" /> National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers (RMT): September 2005 Archives

« August 2005 | Main | October 2005 »

September 28, 2005

Unions are winning greater equality at work

People employed in workplaces with trade union presence are likely to have a better work/life balance and face less discrimination at work than individuals in non-unionised workplaces.

The Equality Audit 2005 shows union success in, for example, negotiating agreements giving employees a greater flexibility regarding the number of hours they work, and improved maternity and paternity pay and leave. Unions are also working with employers to toughen up workplace procedures tackling racism, sexism, ageism and

September 27, 2005

Unions launch attack against First Group's rail record

The Independent: 27 September 2005
Barrie Clement, Labour Editor

One of Britain's biggest transport companies is not fit to be awarded an important rail franchise because it has "serious problems with services, reliability and employment standards'', according to a report compiled for British and American union leaders.

The document - part of a multimillion-pound campaign aimed at recruiting more members and driving up wages and benefits - will emerge today, just as First Group submits its final bid for the "Greater Western" franchise based at London Paddington.

The "dossier" argues that the company has failed rail and bus users in the UK and exploited workers in the US.

First Group, led by Moir Lockhead, the chief executive, defended its record yesterday and argued that the campaign - involving the Transport and General Workers' union (T&G) in Britain and the Service Employees International Union and the Teamsters union in the US - is largely funded by the Americans.

A spokesman for First said the US unions were engaged in a "naked recruitment campaign'' at the company's US school bus subsidiary and were anxious to affect opinion in the company's country of origin.

However, the report emerges at a sensitive time for First, which is competing with National Express and Stagecoach for a rail franchise which includes Thames Valley commuter services, local networks in the West Country and intercity lines between London, Wales and the West. The document will be handed to MPs at the Labour Party conference in Brighton.

The report says the company, already operating the Thames and Express routes, has been responsible for a decline in performance, increasing customer complaints and "arrogant'' rises in fares.

The union leaders argued that the problems have been serious enough to prompt widescale protest, with MPs being compelled to raise questions in Parliament.

It also says that the company has been carpeted by traffic commissioners across Britain for maintenance and service failures in its bus operations.

In the US, management is accused of "aggressively opposing'' all efforts by employees to form unions, prompting complaints from government regulators over possible violations to American labour laws.

A spokesman for First said the US unions had informed First they were spending $15m (�8m) in an attempt to "undermine'' the company and that they were "disappointed'' that the T&G had got involved.

The company argued that its rail operation throughout Britain has seen enhanced punctuality and reliability. It said there had been "huge strides'' made in the record of First Great Western, which ran the intercity services, and that thousands of extra seats had been laid on in the Thames Valley services.

One of Britain's biggest transport companies is not fit to be awarded an important rail franchise because it has "serious problems with services, reliability and employment standards'', according to a report compiled for British and American union leaders.

The document - part of a multimillion-pound campaign aimed at recruiting more members and driving up wages and benefits - will emerge today, just as First Group submits its final bid for the "Greater Western" franchise based at London Paddington.

The "dossier" argues that the company has failed rail and bus users in the UK and exploited workers in the US.

First Group, led by Moir Lockhead, the chief executive, defended its record yesterday and argued that the campaign - involving the Transport and General Workers' union (T&G) in Britain and the Service Employees International Union and the Teamsters union in the US - is largely funded by the Americans.

A spokesman for First said the US unions were engaged in a "naked recruitment campaign'' at the company's US school bus subsidiary and were anxious to affect opinion in the company's country of origin.

However, the report emerges at a sensitive time for First, which is competing with National Express and Stagecoach for a rail franchise which includes Thames Valley commuter services, local networks in the West Country and intercity lines between London, Wales and the West. The document will be handed to MPs at the Labour Party conference in Brighton.
The report says the company, already operating the Thames and Express routes, has been responsible for a decline in performance, increasing customer complaints and "arrogant'' rises in fares.

The union leaders argued that the problems have been serious enough to prompt widescale protest, with MPs being compelled to raise questions in Parliament.

It also says that the company has been carpeted by traffic commissioners across Britain for maintenance and service failures in its bus operations.

In the US, management is accused of "aggressively opposing'' all efforts by employees to form unions, prompting complaints from government regulators over possible violations to American labour laws.

A spokesman for First said the US unions had informed First they were spending $15m (�8m) in an attempt to "undermine'' the company and that they were "disappointed'' that the T&G had got involved.

The company argued that its rail operation throughout Britain has seen enhanced punctuality and reliability. It said there had been "huge strides'' made in the record of First Great Western, which ran the intercity services, and that thousands of extra seats had been laid on in the Thames Valley services.

Statement on Gate Gourmet settlement

TGWU: 27 Sep 2005

Following intensive talks throughout recent days an agreement has now been reached between the T&G and Gate Gourmet London Limited with assistance from the TUC to resolve the long running dispute. The agreement has to be ratified by the members of the union and the company's board of directors.

Details of the agreement will only be released on Wednesday, late afternoon, after they have been fully reported to all concerned on both sides.

Both the company and the union are pleased that a way forward has been found, and if the agreement is ratified both sides have committed to working together to rebuild trust and confidence after all the difficulties of recent weeks.

Ends

September 24, 2005

RMT Pay round up, Sept' 2005

RMT September round up of pay information from around the country.

Circular No. NP/382/05/AG
15th September 2005

TO: ALL BRANCHES, REGIONAL COUNCILS & REGIONAL ORGANISERS

RMT PAY BULLETIN- SEPTEMBER 2005

August 2005 retail prices index rate: 2.8%
This is down from 2.9% for July. Figures for September are available on 18th October 2005.

July 2005 average earnings: 4.3%
This is up from the (revised) 3.8% for June. Figures for August are available on 19th October 2005.

The average earnings index measures changes in gross earnings per person, based on survey returns from around 8,500 employers. It includes basic pay, overtime, shift payments, bonuses and profit-related pay.

Full-time Average Weekly Earnings by Occupation
Labour Research has recently published an analysis of average full-time weekly earnings based upon the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings 2004 (up-rated).

Occupation/Sector Weekly Wage
All workers �528.60
All male �583.00
All female �439.90
Managers �791.70
Professionals �703.40
Associate Professionals* �563.80
Admin & Secretarial �363.50
Skilled/craft �445.10
Services** �303.20
Sales �305.10
Operatives �399.70
Other manual jobs*** �321.80

* Associate professionals includes technicians, nurses, police, firefighters, media/PR workers, train drivers, legal and finance workers and sales reps
** Services means personal service occupations such as care workers, travel assistants, hairdressers, caretakers
*** Other manual jobs includes farm workers, labourers, dockers, postal workers, porters, waiters and cleaners


Recent non-RMT settlements:

Company /Sector Award Effective From
Sainsbury�s 4% March 05
VT Shipbuilding 2-year deal
Yr 1 3.75% delivering a skilled rate of �18,499
Yr 2 RPI + 0.75%
April 05

April 06
Panasonic 3.75% April 05
Capita Call Centre 3.5% October 04
Tesco 3.1% and lowest paid staff received 5% delivering a minimum rate of �5.84 per hour
Selfridges 3% April 05
Xerox UK 3% October 04

Recent RMT settlements:

Company Award Effective From
London Transport
Cubic Transportation 3% April 05
Road Transport
Exel Logistics (Boots Contract) Chester 3%
Reduction in working week to 48 hours
Progress towards salaried status
Introduction of 13 additional rest days
Commitment to further reduce number of days worked in the next 12 months
Incorporation of Saturdays and Associated Leave arrangements into new contracts with an increased availability of Saturdays off
6 hours min turn length, 12 hours max
Rotation of Drivers between runs to comply with the Working Time Regulations
Introduction of time + � for Rest Day Working
Payment of time + � for Rest Days banked since 1st April 2005; up to 5 days at 150% April 05
Infrastructure
Global Crossing 3.7% on basic rates and London & Associated Allowances April 05
Train Operators
Arriva Trains Wales (all grades excluding Guards) 3.5%
Harmonisation talks for Station staff continue
Rostering discussions for Fleet staff continue April 05
First Great Western 4% or �650, whichever is greater May 05
GNER 3 year deal
Yr 1 4.2%
Yr 2 RPI + 1% or 3.4%
Yr 3 RPI + 1% or 3.5%

London Allowances and Chef�s NVQ-related allowance to be increased in line with the pay award

Two additional 1st Class boxes will be granted to all employees (excluding Drivers) from 2005

JWG on all non-pay terms and conditions to include harmonisation of sick pay arrangements. To be completed by June 2007

Pay Agreement made simultaneously to Enabling Agreement on Cost-Efficiencies and Employee Benefit Sharing
March 05
March 06
April 07
Merseyrail (Drivers) 4-year deal worth 17.5%:
6%
Salary of �31,000
Salary of �32,000
Salary of �33,000
January 05
January 06
January 07
January 08
Virgin Trains 3.6% or �600, whichever is greater
Dynamic allowances also increased by 3.6%
Preparation to introduce a childcare voucher scheme from 6th April 2006
Active staff and their dependents who do not already qualify for 1st Class Leisure travel will now be eligible for this benefit. Company to advise the start date as soon as possible
April 05

Excess in the Transport Industry
Information recently published by Labour Research has revealed that Wincanton Director Paul Bateman, received an astonishing 45% pay increase in the year ending March 2005, taking his earnings to �677,000.

Elsewhere, James Wilde received an incredible �675,000 �golden handshake� after lasting just two months as Chief Executive of parcel delivery and cleaning services conglomerate, Rentokill Initial.

This information will certainly be included in the RMT pay submissions for the relevant companies.

Increase in the National Minimum Wage
Although the members resolved at this year�s RMT AGM that the National Minimum Wage (NMW) should be set at �6 per hour for all workers regardless of age, colleagues should be aware that the NMW is set to increase from �4.85 per hour to �5.05 per hour from October 2005 and the Low Pay Commission has further recommended that the rate should increase to �5.35 in October 2006.

The Youth rate for those aged between 18 and 21 will increase to �4.25 in October 2005 and �4.45 in October 2006. The �3 per hour rate for those aged 16 or 17 will not be increased in October 2005.

Yours sincerely,


Bob Crow
General Secretary

September 22, 2005

FGW Drivers have voted YES to Industrial Action Ballot

FGW Drivers have today(Wed) voted to take Industrial Action over the company's failure to discuss productivity issues.

First Great Western Drivers from ASLEF and RMT have voted to take Industrial Action over productivity issues relating to 2005 Pay.

A series of 24 Hour Strikes have been planned for 3rd, 11th, and 19th October. The strikes will take place from 0001 to 0001 on the appropriate days. FGW have stated that they hope to resolve the issue amicably but have so far failed to agree to the demands. The main demand is to introduce 104 Rest Days a year.

September 21, 2005

Building a New Railway

Tibet - The railway across the roof of the world.

They said it was impossible to build a railway to Tibet. There were 5,000m-high mountains to climb, 12km-wide valleys to bridge, hundreds of kilometres of ice and slush that could never support tracks and trains. How could anyone tunnel through rock at -30C, or lay rails when the least exertion sends you reaching for the oxygen bottle? But that's the sort of challenge today's China relishes. Next month, three years ahead of schedule, more than 1,000km of fresh track will link the garrison town of Golmud in China's 'wild west' and the Tibetan capital of Lhasa, strengthening the regime's grip on this troublesome corner of the empire and confirming its status as a technological superpower. Jonathan Watts travelled the route to create a snapshot of a nation on the move.

The new track follows the highway built by our soldiers in the 1950s. The terrain is so harsh that three of them died for every kilometre of road. You have to admire their spirit. But now, we've built the railway without the loss of a single life. Isn't China great?"
Wang, a stout and ruddy power factory worker from Hunan, is in the bunk two below mine. He is as keen to demonstrate the conviviality of China as he is to wax lyrical about the country's strength. As well as cracking open a bottle of beer and sharing his food, he offers a packet of Dongfanghong cigarettes - "I smoke these because it was Mao's favourite brand" - and travel advice: "Actually, there isn't much in Qinghai. It's full of police and soldiers, but we have very good public order."

Wang is one of about 60 passengers squeezed into a "hard sleeper" carriage as our overnight train rattles towards the sunset, passing a half-formed rainbow, the world's largest saltwater lake, hillsides quilted with yellow rape seed and the occasional white Tibetan yurt.

With a couple of hours left until lights out, my fellow travellers are looking for ways to kill time and forget the cramped and smoky conditions. Some play cards, others sing with their children, a curious few chat with a Tibetan monk. And when that entertainment runs out, several attempt to talk to me.

They are engagingly friendly. A family from Xining pours a pot of instant noodles and offers sightseeing tips. Two young sightseers from Hong Kong share their herbal remedies for altitude sickness and talk enviously about the mainland.

"There is an amazing can-do spirit in China these days," says Susan Hong, a maths teacher. "We used to have a bit of that in Hong Kong. But now we are so conservative compared to the mainland. Anything seems possible in China these days. It's very exciting."

As I get ready to turn in, Wang qualifies the level of his friendliness. "I am happy to share food and drink with you. We are friends with all countries now. Except Japan. If you were Japanese I would not share my food with you. And I would not let you sleep in the bunk above me."

Perhaps it is the lack of oxygen here at 3,000m above sea level or the frequent patrols by ticket inspectors, but I have trouble getting to sleep. Instead, my mind races across the day's contrasting impressions: the warmth of my fellow passengers, the sometimes scary nationalism of Wang, the can-do spirit.

China is a nation on the move. But should its economic growth be cause for alarm? Other nations have risen fast - Britain during the industrial revolution, the US at the turn of the century, and Japan during and after the 1960s. However, it took Britain 100 years to rise; 60 for the US and 30 for Japan. It seems China will be transformed in just a couple of decades. And it is not just the speed of change that is turning heads, but the scale.

China has the world's biggest population: 1.3 billion. Now those billions are travelling, earning and consuming more than ever before, and pessimists fear the world will be overrun by an eastern horde. Others, however, view China as the nation most capable of extending the limits of human civilisation in centuries to come. This is where development is progressing fastest. This is where the biggest risks are taken, where the impossible seems possible.

The railway to Tibet is one of the greatest symbols of that spirit. Since it was built in 1984, the route from Xining, the provincial capital of Qinghai Province, to Golmud, the garrison town in China's wild west, has been the train to nowhere. No one, it was believed, could build a line any further across the Qinghai plateau, certainly not one all the way to Tibet. It was too bleak, too cold, too high, too oxygen-starved. Even the best Swiss tunnelling engineers concluded that it was impossible to bore through the rock and ice of the Kunlun mountain range.

If that were not enough, even the flats were filled with perils. A metre or so below the surface was a thick layer of permafrost; above this, a layer of ice that melts and refreezes with the seasons and the rising and setting of the sun. How could anyone build a track on that? And how could a regular service be run in an area plagued by sandstorms in the summer and blizzards in the winter?

As the great train traveller Paul Theroux wrote in Riding the Red Rooster, these challenges are why the former Himalayan kingdom of Tibet - on the other side of the plateau - has remained unspoilt and so un-Chinese for so long. "The Kunlun Range is a guarantee that the railway will never get to Lhasa. That is probably a good thing. I thought I liked railways until I saw Tibet, and then I realised that I liked wilderness much more."

But that guarantee no longer applies. Next month - three years ahead of schedule - Chinese engineers will lay the final section of track on a line stretching to Lhasa, across the roof of the world. Test runs will begin on the new line next July and commercial services are scheduled to begin within two years.

Lhasa (3,650m above sea level)

The Tibetan capital is the obvious starting point if you want to understand what the railway will mean - for the Chinese and for the Tibetans. Just as in the US 100 years ago, the tracks are at the heart of a plan to consolidate central control over a wild west. The settlers are from China's Han ethnic majority rather than Europeans, and the natives are Tibetans rather than Cherokee, but Beijing's policy is just as much about the imposition of the dominant culture as it is about economic development.

Two years ago I joined a government-organised tour of this ancient city in the clouds, the home of Tibetan Buddhism. Lhasa was already starting to look like any other town in China, with broad roads, huge white-tiled buildings and multi-coloured street lamps in the shape of palm trees. It was a garish clash of two cultures - the modern materialism of China and the medieval spiritualism of Tibet. The railway, then two years into construction, looked certain to intensify this clash.

Tibetans seemed divided. For independence activists, the railway would open the biggest channel yet for the influx of soldiers, traders and other sources of materialist Han pollution. Tenzin Metok Sither, a spokeswoman for the Free Tibet Campaign, said it would add to the already tense political situation. "This is a highly strategic project that seeks to tighten Beijing's control over Tibet and will serve to further marginalise Tibetans economically and culturally."

Others, however, grudgingly acknowledge the good that the trains might bring. I was surprised to find a living Buddha make one of the strongest arguments in favour of the railway. "We've been too backward, too isolated for too long," said the lama, who asked that his name not be used. "The rest of the world is in the 21st century. We are still in the middle ages." A more predictable advocate was the governor of the Tibetan Autonomous Region, Jampa Pahtsok. "It is unimaginable to have a high growth rate without a railroad."

Among the four or five unscheduled meetings I had with Tibetans, most were looking forward to the economic benefits the line is expected to bring: 2.5m tonnes of cargo and 1m tourists and business people. However, monks and worshippers expressed their worries that the environment and traditional spiritualism of the Tibetan minority were under threat.

The issues of two years ago are very much the issues of today. With the first train services now less than two years away, Tibet's exiled spiritual leader is increasingly worried about its impact.

"Some kind of cultural genocide is taking place," the Dalai Lama said earlier this month. "In general, a railway link is very useful in order to develop, but not when politically motivated to bring about demographic change."

The Tibetan dilemma is increasingly shared by other countries as the world tries to come to terms with China's rise. Everyone wants Beijing's money and goods; no one wants its ideas.

Economically, China's expansion is a storming success, with 9% growth for each of the past 25 years, lifting hundreds of millions of peasants out of poverty, making a fortune for foreign manufacturers who exploit low-cost labour, pushing down supermarket prices across the globe, and boosting trade with other developing nations.

Environmentally and spiritually, however, it is a disaster. China's rivers are drying up, its cities are choked with pollution, the rural health-care system has collapsed and the cities are seeing record levels of suicide and stress. China is showing all the symptoms of modernity - only on a bigger scale and at a faster rate than the world has ever seen.

Xining (2,275m)

This summer, when I renewed my relationship with the railway across the roof of the world, my first stop was Xining, the first Chinese provincial capital that will be linked to Lhasa when the railway opens. This city is a garrison for the tens of thousands of troops and police needed to maintain order around this often troubled edge of the Chinese empire. Since the communists came to power in 1949, it has also served as a black hole, where the government buries its political and military secrets.

Xining is the headquarters for the network of penal camps spread throughout the province, where millions of criminals, dissidents and political opponents of the leadership have been "re-educated through labour". The Qinghai plateau's remoteness has also made the town an ideal development and testing ground for the military. Among the few tourist sights is a memorial to the factory that made China's first nuclear bomb.

For soldiers, Xining is a hardship posting. It sits in a bleak valley 2km above sea level, an altitude at which the brain and body start to struggle. On several occasions, Chinese troops based here have been sent to put down unrest in Tibet or to skirmish with Indian troops over the disputed area of Sikkim. But this is a time of unprecedented peace and development. Twenty years ago, there were almost no hotels or restaurants. Now there are dozens catering to an increasing number of business travellers, visiting officials and foreign tourists en route to Lhasa. While the main beneficiaries among the 270,000 population seem to be Han officials and businessmen, extra income is trickling down to Hui and Sala muslim restaurants selling lamb kebabs and mianpian noodles, and to the peddlers of Tibetan trinkets and medicine.

One of the beneficiaries of the boom is Buddhism. This was evident from the mix of materialism, spiritualism and political cheek at the Ta'er Si, one of the great Tibetan monasteries. Set in rolling green hills just south of Xining and famed as the home of living buddhas since the 16th century, it is attracting an ever-growing number of Han tourists. Their chatter and mobile phones disturb monks as they chant tantric scriptures ("During the peak season, there are almost as many tour guides as monks," complained one acolyte), but, as with the railway, the linking of materialism and spiritualism is not a one-way track.

Outside the monastery, the streets are filled with Buddhist wholesale shops (often run by Muslims) who offer bulk sales of robes, incense sticks, prayer wheels and beads. The customers are not tourists but monks, stocking up on paraphernalia to establish more monasteries. "This is a boom time for Buddhism in China," says Glen Mullin, the author of several books on the Dalai Lama. "Many of the monasteries that were shut down and destroyed during the cultural revolution are being rebuilt, along with new ones."

The thrice-daily service west from Xining to Golmud is as close to the roof of the world as a passenger can get on China's rail network. But when the new Qinghai-Tibet railway opens, this 800km-long line will be the penultimate leg on the 48-hour journey from Beijing to Lhasa.

Luxury trains are being built for the new track. They feature pressurised carriages to minimise the risk of altitude sickness and tinted windows to protect from strong ultra-violet rays. Canada's Bombardier has won the US$280m contract to build 361 cars, some of which will have deluxe sleeping compartments with individual showers, glass-walled sides to provide panoramic views, entertainment centres and gourmet dining areas, and toilets with sewage and waste-treatment systems. The cars will be pulled by diesel engines capable of maintaining an average speed of 100 kph, even at above 4,000m, when the thinness of the air can cut power by almost half.

The new train will be a world away from the crowded, smelly, smoke-filled carriage we boarded at Xining. The passengers were on narrow beds that climbed in three-tiers almost all the way to the ceiling. There was no dining car, only trolleys selling instant noodles that could be served from giant steel flasks provided for each set of six beds.

Golmud (2,800m)

We arrive in Golmud just after dawn. My Lonely Planet guidebook warns of a "forlorn outpost in the oblivion end of China". But that book was published five years ago. Today, development seems to be everywhere. Many of the roads and buildings look new, and there is a plethora of cranes and construction sites. The newest addition to this city of 200,000 people is a giant two-storey TV screen blaring out advertisements for cosmetics and electrical goods, such as would be seen in Tokyo, Seoul or Shanghai. The city has become more hospitable, too. There are four-star hotels that accept foreigners, along with neon-lit streets of restaurants, pink-lit "massage parlours" and gaudy karaoke bars.

With a few hours to kill, we visit the closest thing the city has to a museum. It is the former home of General Mu Shengzhong, who oversaw the construction of the Golmud-to-Lhasa road in the early 1950s to consolidate China's control over Tibet. When we arrive at the house, it is locked and all we can see through a window is a huge bust of General Mu in two otherwise empty rooms.

More profitably, we spend time with Zha Xi, a burly Tibetan from the Wild Yak Brigade. This rag-tag patrol of two dozen men was formed to fight off poachers threatening endangered species. Having at least temporarily won the battle against the poachers, they are now turning their focus to the development of eco-tourism on the Qinghai Plateau.

Over a bowl of noodles, Zha admits to mixed feelings about the rate of change in the area. "Overall, I think it is a good thing because this area is poor and isolated so people need more economic development. But it is bad for the environment. The railway is being built through the habitat of the Tibetan antelope. They are very timid animals and they have been scared off by the construction work."

Xidatan service station (4,350m)

It is no longer possible to ride the train. We are now ahead of the operational tracks. Engines are ferrying equipment up and down the route and we have to be content with a jeep ride along General Mu's bumpy highway. It is soon evident why so many people died during the construction of the road.

Soon after leaving Golmud, we hit the start of the Kunlun range. The craggy slopes on either side are so steep and barren that it is like driving through an alien planet. This is where engineers started blasting and building the first of the seven tunnels and 286 bridges on the 1,110km-long stretch of new line. At its maximum altitude in the Tanggula pass, the track runs 5,072m above sea level - higher than Europe's greatest peak, Mont Blanc, and more than 200m higher than the Peruvian railway in the Andes, which was previously the world's most elevated track. The longest tunnel - at Yangbajin - stretches 3.3km. The longest bridge spans 11.7km over the Qingsui river.

Such awesome statistics are the scripture of China's materialism, evidence of the powerful gospel of scientific development. So is the speed at which the track has been laid, three years ahead of the original seven-year schedule. For the disciples of the economic miracle, this is further proof of how China is overtaking the US to become the country of bigger, higher, faster.

This ambition is apparent across the country, where Chinese engineers are building the world's biggest dam, the longest bridge and the tallest building. Two years ago, China joined the US and Russia as the only countries to put a man in space. Another will go up next month, and in 2007, the country plans to launch its first moon probe. But the railway across the top of the world is arguably the greatest example of the achievements and risks of this can-do spirit.

After driving for four hours, we stop to talk to some of the pioneers who have conquered the terrain at Xidatan, the first servicing station on the new line. Just completed, the small, brilliant-white building waits forlornly for passengers in the midst of a vast dirty grey plain of dust and stones. The nearest habitation is an exhaust-filled, rubbish-strewn strip of a dozen restaurants and a few petrol pumps. Perhaps the station's function is strategic - the plain is also home to an encampment of hundreds of green PLA tents, trucks and artillery pieces.

The station's current residents, however, are railway engineers who are looking forward to leaving. With the work almost complete, they are in good spirits, but they have faced treacherous conditions over the past four years. When Zhao Jianjun arrived from his native Shaanxi province, he needed oxygen to breathe. Working mainly on viaducts, he helped to push the work forward at the rate of a kilometre of track a day. But for five months every winter, work became impossible in temperatures that fell to -30C. Even in the warmer seasons, there were often snowfalls or hailstorms.

According to the Xinhua news agency and my patriotic friend Wang, no one has died of altitude sickness, but Zhao says the work has claimed several lives. It is something we hear on several occasions, though no one knows how many of the 38,000 workers on the project have perished from accidents or illness.

Kunlun Pass (4,776m)

From Xidatan, the railway climbs steadily towards Kunlun Pass. This is one of the great doorways to the top of the world. It is also the northern shore of a vast sea of permafrost that stretches more than 600km across the plateau towards Tibet and the Himalayas, prompting some to describe this area as the third pole of the world.

This barrier of ice and rock had been considered impassable, but China's scientists believe they have overcome the challenge. Their big technological breakthrough has been to insulate the track from the top level of ice, which thaws every summer day and freezes by night. On a normal line this would buckle the rails, collapse bridges and cave in tunnels. But for the new railway, engineers have pumped cooling agents into the ground so that the earth around the most vulnerable tunnels and pillars remains frozen and stable. It is not cheap. Largely because so much of the line has been built on viaducts rather than the semi-frozen surface, the budget for the railway is 26.2bn yuan (�1.8bn).

But even this ingenious and expensive solution may not be enough to protect the track from the worst hazard affecting the plateau: global warming. If current trends continue, Chinese climatologists forecast a 3.4C rise over the next half century, which would lead to a shrinking of the ice by more than 30%.

At the pass, we meet two Hui-minority railway construction workers who tell us the project is still bedevilled by the difficulty of securing firm foundations. "We have had to rebuild some of the stations because of permafrost damage," say the labourers. "The construction bureau is now discussing how to solve the problem."

If true, this would challenge official boasts that the most important technical challenge of the railway has been overcome. I was unable to confirm what damage had occurred. But there is more evidence that the railway's engineers are struggling to keep pace with the environmental damage wrought by global warming.

Temperatures in Qinghai Plateau are rising twice as quickly as in the rest of China. Luo Yong, deputy director of the National Climate Centre, estimates that the volume of ice on either side of the Qinghai-Tibet Highway has retreated by 12% since the 1960s. "By 2050, the safe operation of the Qinghai-Tibet railway will be affected if temperatures keep rising steadily as observed over the past decades," Luo warned at a recent symposium.

To get a sense of the environmental changes, we take our 4x4 vehicle off the road to see one of the biggest glaciers on the route - the wall of ice wedged between two peaks near Dongdatan. It is a hard drive across broken rock and rivers, then a short climb to the foot of the glacier. The bright sun has me sweating. But this is nothing compared with the deep rivulets that the heat has cut into the ice. As we draw closer, each crease in the ice proves to be a torrent of gushing water that has been locked solid for hundreds - possibly thousands - of years. The glacier is retreating.

There were signs of landslides too, both on the slopes and back on the road, where subsidence caused by melting foundations had brought down bridges and cracked and potted several stretches of the road. Global warming was not the only cause. Near Kunlun Pass is a monument marking the huge earthquake that struck the area four years ago. It measured 8.1 on the Richter scale - ripping a 7km crack through the earth. This railway is going to be even harder to maintain than it has been to build.

Wudaoliang (4,500m)

The climb to the glacier is beginning to take its toll. I should have known better. Throughout the journey, the effects of the altitude had become increasingly apparent. On day one, as soon we stepped off the plane in Xining, crisp packets burst and a bottle of suntan lotion splurged its contents into my bag. A few hours later, I could feel a faint muzziness behind the temples. The next day in Golmud, 700m higher, my pen started leaking over my notes. Even at Xidatan, I quickly ran out of breath even after a slow walk.

But with the help of medicine - western Diamox and Chinese Hongjingtian - I convince myself I have mastered the elements, so I rush up the last 100m to the foot of the glacier. At more than 5,000m - where the air contains less than half of the oxygen at sea level - I realise it is a stupid thing to do. I am soon paying the price. Back in the car, my head starts pounding, then the nausea sets it. Two hours later in Wudaoliang, I am throwing up by the side of the road. I recover only after squeezing a bag of oxygen through a tube into my nostrils. Adding insult to injury, just as I am retching, several elderly Chinese tourists trundle by serenely on bicycles en route from Golmud to Lhasa. Slow and steady, they show the alpine terrain the respect it is due.

But the fragile environment is also suffering. The further we progress alongside the track, the more obvious is the damage.

The roof of the world is leaking. Overgrazing has stripped off its thin grassy cover and global warming has burned through its liquid insulation. Between the rail and the road are puddles and pools of melted permafrost. On either side, herds of cows and sheep munch on blotchy patches of grassland and man-made barriers attempt to keep the encroaching sand dunes at bay.

Settlement and modernisation have brought the problem of non-degradable rubbish. Behind each cluster of buildings on the route - such as the small village-garrison of Wudaoliang - is a stinking pile of rotting bags, empty tins, plastic bottles and petrol cans. When I ask our driver how the refuse is disposed of, he laughs. "We leave that job to the wind and the rain and the dogs." Half of this region belongs to China's largest nature reserve.

This is the dark and dirty side of China's development. Pan Yue, the deputy minister of the environment, says the Qinghai Plateau and the western region of China are so ecologically stressed that they can no longer support their current populations. Because there is not enough space for them all to be resettled quickly, he estimates that the country will soon have more than 150 million environmental refugees.

The problems are evident throughout the country. When the railway is finished, travellers on the train from Beijing to Lhasa will pass through some of the most polluted cities and over-exploited farmlands in the world. Acid rain now falls on a third of the Chinese landmass. According to the World Bank, 16 of the planet's 20 worst polluted cities are in China.

Tuotuohe (4,200m)

Just downstream from that glacier, and far across an endlessly bleak plain, is our destination: the station at Tuotuohe, the biggest town between Golmud and the Tibetan border. It is the ultimate frontier community: a narrow strip of grubby buildings populated by a few hundred railway workers, soldiers, truck drivers and the providers of the services they seek - garages, restaurants, open-air pool tables, rough beds and a brothel. An endless stream of lorries roars through on the road that General Mu built.

We stay overnight in a grimy truckers' lodge. Over dinner at the Chengdu First Class Restaurant, I am too tired to even chat. We have reached the place where China's can-do spirit pushes people and the environment to the limit.

Just across the river, migrant labourers are rushing to finish the construction of a railway station. They are doing their part to achieve China's engineering miracle, but there is no pride, only relief. "I'm too tired to feel glad," says a welder from Xining who lives in a tent on the building site. "I have been here four months and I'm still not used to the altitude."

This is the end of the line for me. Ahead is another vast barren plain then the towering peaks of the Tanggula range, which mark the border with Tibet. The railway stretches forward, but I have seen its destination. It is time to head home.

On the way back, the clouds - seemingly close enough to touch - break in a fury, and the storm makes the stony, blotchy plains darker, damper and bleaker. The landscape looks as exhausted as the workers.

As the rain lashed down, I wondered who was to blame for the environmental disaster of the Qinghai Plateau. Certainly not only China. Global warming is a legacy of two centuries of industrial development in Europe, the US and Japan. But in doing the same thing on a bigger scale and at a faster speed, China has the capacity to make things much worse, much more quickly.

If railway tracks can spread the tools of modern technology and education to Tibet, the lifestyles of some of the poorest people in the world could be dramatically improved. If ideas are allowed to flow freely in both directions along the track, the meeting of Chinese materialism and Tibetan spiritualism could fill a gap at both ends of the line. And if, as some suggest, the tracks are extended further south to the border with Nepal and then on through the Himalayas to India, it could transform relations between the world's two most populous and fastest-growing economies.

Present trends, however, suggest a much bleaker future. Fifty years ago, when Qinghai Plateau was part of Tibet, it was a scantly populated wilderness. Now, under Beijing's control, it has become a land conquered and settled by Han engineers, miners, soldiers, police and prisoners. There are few grimmer examples of what Chinese-style development can mean for ethnic minorities and the environment.

In the 19th century, Britain and Europe taught the world how to produce. In the 20th, the US taught us how to consume. If China is to lead the world in the 21st century, it must teach us how to sustain.

September 15, 2005

Working Time Directive from April 2006 for Offshore Workers

Employment Relations Minister Gerry Sutcliffe's statement that he is minded to change the law to clarify that off shore workers are covered by the Working Time Directive, means that tough negotiations at TUC level and pressure from individual unions including RMT, has at last paid off. Offshore workers will be covered by the WTD from April 2006.

TUC: 14 September 2005

Following Employment Relations Minister Gerry Sutcliffe's statement today saying that he is minded to change the law to clarify that off shore workers are covered by the Working Time Directive, Brendan Barber TUC General Secretary said:

'The TUC and its affiliated unions covering offshore workers - Amicus, GMB, NUMAST, RMT and the T&G - welcome the Minister taking action on this issue.

'We have always believed that offshore workers are covered by these regulations. We were very disappointed that the employers have used the law to try to stop workers getting their rights under the Working Time Directive. This change would help provide real protection for offshore workers. All we've ever asked for is that they should have the same holiday rights as everybody else'.

TUC elects new President

TUC: 15 September 2005

Gloria Mills, a senior official with public services union, UNISON, is to be the next TUC President and is the first black woman ever to be elected to the position, the TUC announced today (Thursday).

Gloria was elected at a meeting of the TUC's General Council on the last day of the 137th Congress in Brighton and takes over from Jeannie Drake, Deputy General Secretary of the Communication Workers Union.

Gloria Mills has been active in the trade union movement for over two decades. She made history in 1994 when she became the first black woman to be elected to the TUC's General Council.

Gloria's involvement with trade unions began in 1978 when she signed up to print union, NATSOPA, whilst she was working in legal publishing. It was not long before Gloria was elected as mother of the chapel.

Gloria then went to work for another print union, SOGAT (Society of Graphical and Allied Trades). Then in 1985 she moved into the public sector when she started with NUPE (National Union of Public Employees) as a regional officer, later working as a senior national officer for the union.

In 1993, when the three public sector unions merged to form UNISON, Gloria was made the new union's director of equal opportunities. Over the past 12 years, she has been responsible for a range of union campaigns on equal pay, childcare, women, employment, race and human rights issues.

Gloria's pioneering work on equal rights and race issues has helped shape the agendas, structure and culture of the trade union movement. She has worked hard to move equality from the margins to the mainstream of the trade union movement and make it a priority on the political agenda across Europe.

Gloria Mills joined the TUC executive committee in 2000, is chair of its race committee and is a member of the TUC women's committee. She is a CRE Commissioner and a member of the editorial advisory board of Equal Opportunities Review.

Gloria Mills said: 'During my year as TUC President I would like to concentrate on trying to help make British workplaces and our towns and cities more inclusive places to work and live.

'Everyone leaving school should have the same opportunity to succeed, but unfortunately many children from ethnic backgrounds are disadvantaged because their parents are poor, and because they face discrimination in many areas of our society. I intend to promote strategies that will help to develop more cohesive communities and redress the cycles of discrimination, disadvantage and deprivation in these communities.

'Unions are doing all they can to tackle prejudice and make work a fairer place for everyone, and through learning at work schemes, unions are giving many people a second chance. I look forward to a very interesting and challenging year.'

Gloria was awarded the MBE in 1999 for services to trade unions and the CBE earlier this year. She is 47 and lives in south London. She's an avid cricket fan and supports Arsenal.

September 13, 2005

Rail arson attacks may be linked

British Transport Police are investigating whether arson attacks on track signalling equipment in the Birmingham area are linked to similar incidents at the nearby locations last year.

BRITISH Transport Police are investigating whether arson attacks on track signalling equipment in the Birmingham area are linked to similar incidents at the nearby locations last year.

Signal cables were set on fire at Water Orton, Warwickshire — on the Birmingham-Derby main line — on Friday night. Around 350 trains were disrupted and 40 cancelled.

The previous day, arsonists targeted cables at Garretts Green in Birmingham, on the main line to Coventry and London. A lock on a signal cabinet was smashed and equipment set alight. More than 700 trains were hit and 90 cancelled, including services between Birmingham and London.
The culprit is thought to be a disgruntled rail worker or former employee.

A 30-strong team of detectives — set up 12 months ago in a vain bid to catch the attacker — is being recalled. And Network Rail has reinstated a £25,000 reward to catch the saboteur.
British Transport Police believe the attacks are connected.

Officers are looking into possible links with trackside vandalism near Kingsbury and Coleshill in summer 2004, which disrupted more than 1,000 trains.

Simon Lewis of British Transport Police told BBC News in the Midlands that the train operating companies and Network Rail estimate that the attacks have cost £10 million in damage, lost business and compensation.

"Network Rail has to pay compensation to the train operating companies if the infrastructure is damaged and trains are delayed," he said.

End the great railways rip-off says RMT, as new study exposes profiteering

RMT: 13 September 2005

BRITAIN'S BIGGEST rail union today called for an end to the "great railway rip-off" as a new study reveals that train operators' record profits are siphoned from public subsidy, a perpetual squeeze on rail workers' pay and above-inflation fare rises.

The report, from the Catalyst think tank, reveals that train-operating companies' combined income has risen by 26 per cent since privatisation and that fares have risen by 24 per cent - well ahead of inflation.

The analysis of the TOCs' accounts by Manchester Business School Professor Jean Shaoul shows that profits have been boosted by record levels of subsidy - £1.8 billion in 2003-04 - as well as by cuts in staffing levels and a pay squeeze.

"This report shows that taxpayers, fare-payers and railway workers are being mugged by profiteering privateers whose sole aim is to maximise profits and payouts to shareholders," RMT general secretary Bob Crow said at the TUC Congress in Brighton

"Massive amounts of public money are going into the industry, but the private sector is leeching it out again as profits and handing their parent companies and shareholders massive dividends while services are still worse than in British Rail days.

"Today we heard a speech from Gordon Brown as prime minister in waiting. If he is serious about improving public services and delivering value for money he should announce his intention to stop the re-privatisation of South Eastern Trains and bring all the train operating companies back into the public sector.

"In public hands SET is delivering a better service for £1 million month less subsidy. That is a public-sector success story and should be the blueprint for bringing all the TOCs back in-house," Bob Crow said.

ends


Notes to editors: The Performance of the Privatised Train Operators, a study by Professor Jean Shaoul published today by Catalyst, will be launched at a fringe meeting after today's TUC Congress business (17:30) in the Skyline Restaurant at the Brighton Centre. Speakers will include Tony Benn, RMT general secretary Bob Crow, Aslef's Keith Norman, TSSA's Gerry Docherty and TUC deputy general secretary Francs O'Grady and Michael Meacher MP.

The report shows that, despite claims that subsidies were transitional and would be phased out after the privatisation of British Rail was complete, train operating companies remain wholly reliant upon government pay-outs which are expected to increase in the years ahead.

The combined total income of train operating companies, including both fare revenues and public subsidies, rose by 26 per cent from 1997 to 2003, from £4.8b to £5.8b.

Passenger fares rose by some 24 per cent over this period, faster than the rate of inflation. Although a "cap" was intended to keep fare rises below inflation, this only applies to some ticket types. Companies have compensated by pushing up the price of other journeys.

Labour costs have been cut by reducing staffing levels and allowing wages to fall behind average earnings. This is likely to have been a key factor explaining the poor performance record of the private operators, since British Rail's workforce was already the most productive of any rail service in Europe.

Subsidies allowed companies to pay dividends of £160m to their parent companies in 2003, an exceptional post-tax return on equity of 174 per cent.

Since privatisation at least £890m has been taken out of the industry in dividends paid to parent companies. Without public subsidies, the train operators would have made a loss every single year.
Professor Shaoul also warns that the new Railways Act, the government's latest attempt to bring rail spending under control, will simply "presage closures and fare hikes" unless the costly fragmentation and profiteering resulting from privatisation is addressed directly.

In September 2004 an overwhelming majority of constituency and union delegates at the Labour Party's annual conference voted to adopt a policy committing Labour to "resolving the fragmented structure of the industry by introducing an integrated, accountable and publicly owned railway", but this decision has yet to be reflected in government policy. The government is currently considering bids for the South Eastern franchise, which has been run in the public sector since Connex was removed in 2003 and has achieved notable performance improvements and cost savings in that period.

Jean Shaoul is Professor of Public Accountability in the Division of Accounting and Finance at Manchester Business School. She has authored numerous reports on the privatisation and regulation of public infrastructure industries as well as on NHS finances, the Private Finance Initiative, international regulatory reform, public expenditure and
corporate accountability.

Catalyst is an independent think tank of the left committed to promoting "practical policies for the redistribution of wealth, power and opportunity".

For more information please contact the Catalyst office on 020 7733 2111 or visit www.catalystforum.org.uk.

Mobilise the movement for a Trade Union Freedom Act, says RMT

RMT: 11 September 2005

EIGHT YEARS of new Labour government have failed to bring Britain's labour laws back in line with international law and the movement has no choice but to start fighting seriously for trade union freedom, RMT general secretary Bob Crow said on the eve of the TUC Congress.

"Working people in Britain have to jump through legal hoops to take industrial action at all, are barred from taking solidarity action, and remain prey to employers seeking damages from unions that dare to stand up to them.

"Bosses like Chubb are free to fly in scabs from Hungary and lock out security guards who are taking lawful strike action against poverty pay, but if our members at Eurostar took sympathy action we would be hauled into court faster than you could say "seize their assets"

"Asking politely has got us nowhere, and the time has come to mobilise the trade union movement to demand a Trade Union Freedom Act to enshrine basic trade-union rights into the law.

"Basics like the right to strike and take solidarity action, the right to be accompanied by a trade union rep, the removal of restrictive balloting and industrial-action notice procedures, and the establishment of sectoral forums to establish minimum terms and conditions.

"The Trade Union Freedom Bill gives us an opportunity to deal a massive blow to Europe's most repressive labour laws and start hauling Britain back into line with international law.

Bury the EU Constitution

"Congress this week also has the opportunity to help dig a deep grave for the European Union Constitution - but we need to make sure that the body is in the coffin.

"Despite the decisive French and Dutch referendums the unelected Brussels bureaucrats are busy cherry-picking the parts of the constitution they intend to impose on us anyway.

"Whatever views people hold about the EU itself, the increasingly neo-liberal, privatising, militarising and anti-democratic plans coming out of Brussels have to be defeated.

"We must bury the Directive on Services, because it will turn public services into cash-cows for the privateers and will institutionalise the abuse of imported labour to drive down pay and conditions.

"RMT members already know what social dumping means. We have evidence of ferry crews employed in UK waters on well under half of the minimum wage, and we are fighting alongside our European maritime union colleagues to end it.

"No-one in Scotland has voted for the privatisation of Caledonian MacBrayne's lifeline ferry services, yet despite a vote against it in the Scottish parliament, Brussels is now telling the Scottish Executive that tendering of must go ahead. That is not democracy.

"We are now on the third package of measures aimed at fragmenting and privatising Europe's national railway networks on the very model that in Britain created the conditions for the Hatfield disaster and has drained more than £8 billion of public money from the industry.

"Our CalMac members have already demonstrated that they will not be walked over, and our members at South Eastern Trains are facing a battle to defend their jobs, pensions and conditions in the face of re-privatisation.

"We will continue resist these attacks industrially, but the trade-union movement this week also has the opportunity to throw its political weight behind a campaign to roll back the neo-liberal nightmare and defend our national democratic rights.

Corporate manslaughter

"The need for an effective corporate manslaughter law has never been clearer.

"Nearly five years after the Hatfield tragedy we are supposed to accept that while safety rules were broken, nobody was to blame.

"It was privatisation that created the conditions for Hatfield yet the government is pressing ahead with its plan to re-privatise of South Eastern Trains.

"We need a law that holds to account bosses who are responsible for avoidable deaths. And we need the privateers off our railways, for good."

TUC ready to challenge ministers

BBC News: 12 September 2005

The TUC conference has begun in Brighton with leaders issuing warnings over pensions and what they see as restrictive trade union laws. Mr Barber wants compulsory pension contributions from employers.

TUC general secretary Brendan Barber urged ministers to make bosses face up to Britain's growing pensions crisis.

Leaders also want laws that prevented strikes in solidarity with sacked Gate Gourmet workers at Heathrow reformed.

Several key general secretaries are urging Tony Blair to quit in the next year to allow an orderly handover.

But Unison's boss Dave Prentis and T&G deputy general secretary Jack Dromey warned that Chancellor Gordon Brown must not expect to be crowned next Labour leader.

Mr Dromey, who is married to Constitutional Affairs Minister Harriet Harman, said: "There will be no coronation of a prime minister in waiting."

'Totally discredited'

Mr Prentis said the timing of Mr Blair's departure from Number 10 was a matter for the prime minister.

He added that whoever took over must be given time to settle into the job.

That was a message echoed by Amicus general secretary Derek Simpson who said the important thing was not so much the change of leader but a change in direction.

RMT boss Bob Crow, whose union is not affiliated to Labour, said Mr Blair was "totally discredited" but added he doubted the chancellor would be the "saviour of working men and women".

Mr Brown, seen as the frontrunner to replace Mr Blair when he stands down, will speak at the TUC later this week.

Compulsory contributions

Adair Turner, who heads the government's Pensions Commission, is also due to speak in Brighton.

There is widespread concern over the falling levels of people's pension provisions.

Unions have also been resisting calls to increase the retirement age for public sector workers.

TUC general secretary Brendan Barber wants the introduction of compulsory contributions from both employers and employees.

TUC calls for 'sympathy' strike rights

Guardian Unlimited: September 12, 2005
Matthew Tempest, political correspondent, in Brighton

The TUC today called for the legalisation of secondary "sympathy" strikes, in the wake of the Gate Gourmet affair.

Union leaders meeting in Brighton for the first day of their annual conference voted unanimously to push for new rights for solidarity action, outlawed under the Conservative government of Margaret Thatcher.

The RMT leader Bob Crow told delegates a trade union freedom bill should be the minimum demand "for any new and upcoming leader" of the Labour party.

A delegation of sacked workers from Gate Gourmet received a standing ovation as they arrived in the Brighton Centre conference hall, after earlier holding a demonstration outside as delegates arrived.
An emergency resolution supporting the 667 redundant workers was also passed without dissent.

The motion for a trade union freedom bill, proposed by the Gate Gourmet workers' TGWU union, and seconded by the RMT, would also see protection for workers starting from their first day at work and cut the amount of notice required for a strike ballot.

Exactly how any legislation would be worded to specify what constitutes secondary action by workers employed by the same firm is still to be decided.

More of a hurdle is that no cabinet minister has shown in public any sign of endorsing the call, despite the TUC's careful weekend pronouncements that it would not automatically be backing the chancellor, Gordon Brown, in any leadership battle.

The emergency motion also called for "lawful supportive action". TGWU leader Tony Woodley called Gate Gourmet "the unacceptable face of capitalism". He said the company had sacked "by megaphone" employees who had "worked their socks off".

Around 40 Gate Gourmet workers were in the audience to hear the opening morning's debate.

Kam Olakh said: "The support and welcome from the TUC members was brilliant. I've never seen anything like it."

Sarjit Sandha said: "It's time the government rolled back the legislation that Margaret Thatcher brought in that attacks the union movement."

Reports this morning said that nearly 700 Gate Gourmet workers had asked to leave the firm and take enhanced redundancy money - worth between �6,000 and �12,000 each.

The TUC chair, Brendan Barber, will address the conference this afternoon, with the highly controversial subject of a "mega-merger" of Amicus, the GMB and the TGWU still to be discussed.

Other issues on the agenda are public service pensions and the revelation today that the government was considering at least part-privatisation of job centres.

Mr Brown will address the conference tomorrow morning, whilst the prime minister, Tony Blair, is having a private dinner with union leaders later in the week, although not giving a speech.

In her address opening the congress, the TUC president, Jeannie Drake, told ministers that now was not the time to be held back by a "poverty of ambition".

She told delegates that a new agenda was needed for the workplace, adding: "That means action across the board, from stronger working time protections to better rights for temporary and agency workers and tough measures to combat the gender pay gap.

"We must aspire to get people from a job into a good job. We must move from high employment to high quality employment."

Ms Drake said the UK remained one of the most unequal societies in the world, with just 2% of the population owning one-third of all the wealth.

Ms Drake complained that low pay was still common for many women workers.

She said: "There is a lethal cocktail of gender-based job segregation and sex discrimination in our workplaces."

New bill to 'free' labour movement

Politics.co.uk: 13 Sep 2005

Activists launch trade union freedom bill at TUC conference
A trade union freedom bill to increase workers' powers of collective bargaining was launched at the TUC conference at Brighton last night.

Activists warn the legislation, which they hope to put before parliament next year, is the only way to reverse the decline in the number of people who come under their protection.

Only 35 per cent of workers were last year covered by a collective agreement, compared to 87 per cent in 1979 - the lowest level in Europe and a reduction that has left unions feeling increasingly powerless.

"This could be an historic congress for the UK trade union movement - where we adopt a policy committing the movement to work for and fight for our own emancipation and rights as trade unions," said Barry Campfield, the T&G delegate who put the motion to congress.

The two main tenets of the bill are the right to take secondary, or 'solidarity', action in support of workers on strike; and abolishing the red tape surrounding a strike ballot, which unionists argue allows employers to stop industrial action by brandishing the small print.

As well as bringing the UK into line with other European countries, supporters argue the proposed legislation will also help reverse the decline in union membership by proving to workers that the organisations can make a difference.

"If we cannot sort this out, it is a message about our future," said John McDonell, the MP who will be driving the law through parliament.

Not only was improving the power of collective bargaining good for union members, he insisted, but it was also necessary to reverse the worsening inequalities in Britain.

Efforts to effect change through taxation and benefits had failed because at the heart of the problem was the fact that people "no longer have the strength to negotiate themselves decent working conditions".

Congress has voted to stage a national demonstration to raise awareness of the new bill, but Bob Crow, general secretary of the RMT, warned that a concerted campaign of education about union rights was also needed across the whole country.

Activists must go into workplaces to explain what the trade union legislation meant, he said, and to point out that "all anti-trade union legislation [is based on] putting hurdles in front of workers fighting back".

The Labour government must also be told that they had to take action on removing the constraints on the trade union movement, he said. These included the requirement to give seven days notice for a ballot and then to hold the strike within four weeks of then.

Speaking earlier in the day, Mr Crow asked why Labour MPs who voted against nine lots of anti-trade union legislation passed by the Thatcher government had failed to do this again while in power.

"You can't just expect our chequebooks every four years and expect nothing in return," he warned the government.

September 11, 2005

Railway tech supervisors threaten to take warpath

NT Bureau: Chennai, Sept 10:

'We have no other option but to go on a strike if the government remains silent on setting up Sixth Pay Commission', M Shanmugam, president (central) of Indian Railways Technical Supervisors' association, has said.

At a press meet here, Shanmugam charged Union Finance Minister P Chidambaram with refusing to set up the Sixth Pay Commission.

'Our salary has not been revised for the past 20 years and the Finance Minister has not showed empathy to our 'reasonable' demands', he said.

He further said the government was recruiting only two employees in the place of three. 'The Railway Minister keeps announcing new trains in new routes regularly, but without sufficient workforce, how can we manage?' wonders Shanmugam.

Munuswamy, all-India vice-president of the association, said the technical supervisors were the 'veins' of the railways and the government should consider their demands.

Other office-bearers of the association were also present at the press meet.

September 10, 2005

TUC Conference 2005: Searchlight Anti-Fascist Fringe Meeting

GMB: Target BNP Campaign

We urge all TUC delegates to attend the Searchlight Anti-fascist fringe meeting
on Wednesday 14th September 2005, 12.30pm -2.00pm
at The Old Ship Hotel, 31-38 Kings Road, Brighton BN1 1NR.
Download flier here:
GMB_TargetBNP.pdf (324k file)

The GMB is campaigning to defeat the BNP. Wherever BNP fascists are standing in forthcoming elections, for councils or parliamentary seats, activists from this union will challenge them.

We will expose the truth.

The BNP is a racist party, a party built on nothing but violence and intolerance, threatening Britain's most vulnerable communities. We will explain to voters, face to face, why a vote for the BNP is a vote for hatred.

BNP and other fascist organisation membership is incompatible with trade union membership.Therefore the GMB through Target BNP calls for:

* Legislation to delay trade union membership of those who are members or active supporters of fascist organisations.

* A co-ordinated national & regional campaign against the BNP and other fascist organisations.

* Support for positive policies on the development of social housing, the introduction of contract compliance and the development of local health care plans. These are some examples of tackling urban blight and would help regenerate our workplaces and communities.

* To mainstream anti-fascist,anti-racist political activity throughout the trade union and Labour movement and into our workplaces and communities.

For more information about the campaign, email us at stopthebnp@gmb.org.uk or call Mick Rix on 020 8971 4279

London transport firm sees growth stalled by bombs

The Guardian: September 10, 2005
Heather Tomlinson

One of London's largest transport companies said yesterday it had seen growth in bus and train services in the capital and the south-east until the terrorist attacks in July but that revenue would be adversely affected by the bombings.

Go-Ahead reported its full-year results yesterday, with turnover and profits up 5%, mainly due to growth in its bus business. The company operates more than 2,500 buses and runs ground-handling services for 18 airports.

It praised its staff for their handling of the chaos that followed the attacks. It said bus and rail services in London and the south-east had shown growth in the year to July 2. "Looking ahead for the new financial year the recent London terrorist attacks will clearly have a negative impact on revenue, though the effect is partially mitigated by existing revenue and profit share arrangements with the franchising authority," it added.

It said the attacks "underlined" the need for its approach to CCTV and extra security.

The firm said it was "disappointed" to have failed to win bids for the Thameslink and Great Western train franchises this year. It is still bidding for the integrated Kent franchise.

Overall the company reported turnover rising 5% to �1.3bn and underlying profits, excluding exceptional items, up 5% to �96m.

The company's bus division grew by 8% due to price rises rather than increases in the number of passengers carried. However, increases in labour and fuel costs led to a slight dip in profits. "With a continuing rise in the oil price, margins will continue to be under pressure going forward," the company said in a statement.

Its trains division showed a dip in turnover due to the loss of the Thames Trains franchise in 2004, although underlying revenue was up.

Its aviation services division reported turnover up 5%. Its airports car parking division was the strongest performer, with revenue up 22% due to an increase in prices and in the number of parking spaces. It said it is trying to turn around its ground-handling businesses at airports.

Its Meteor Parking business had a "successful year", the company reported.

Go-Ahead overcomes soaring fuel costs

Financial Times: September 10 2005
By Sharlene Goff

Go-Ahead Group, the bus and rail operator, overcame a steep rise in fuel costslast year to report growthin sales and underlyingprofit.

But the group warned yesterday that profit margins at its bus division were coming under pressure, while the July terrorist attacks on London had deterred passengers from using its Thameslink train services.

Rail service cuts a 'kick in the teeth' for Tynedale

The Hexham Courant: September 9th 2005

By JOSEPH TULIP
CUTS to rail services in the Tyne Valley would throw the working day into chaos and leave many people struggling to make appointments on time.

That's the view of train users and community figures, who have joined together in calling for the future of all services between Hexham and Haltwhistle to be retained.

A leaked document prepared for the Strategic Rail Authority is understood to contains proposals to cut some of the services on the Tyne Valley line between Newcastle and Carlisle.

The Courant spoke to commuters about the possible cuts on Wednesday, and they expressed concerns that buses would be a slower, less reliable, more expensive and an unrealistic alternative.

Melanie Gorman (37) of Shepherds Terrace, Haltwhistle said: "It would be a shame if we lost any services because rural communities are becoming cut off. With high petrol prices, the last thing we want to lose is our trains.

"We are limited even now - not every train stops in Haltwhistle as it is."

Using a bus would not give passengers the freedom they currently enjoy on the train, says Haltwhistle's Susan Wilkinson (45) of Greenpark Crescent.

"I would not like to get the bus," she said. "It is more expensive and I don't like it. A lot of people like to get on with some work or do some reading on the train, and it is more relaxing. We would miss out on that."

One resident, Sylvia Costelloe (63) of Coanwood, says she would not get to Newcastle in time if she took a bus.

Gilsland's Hilary Rackstraw said the 7.45am train from Haltwhistle to Newcastle is economically sound, and losing it would result in increased traffic and parking problems.

Aboard that train was Rail Maritime and Transport Union northern rep Craig Johnston, who believes that the services will not be cut.

'From what I understand, it is highly unlikely," he said.

"But this service is essential to the local community.

"We will be fighting to prevent any reductions in services or station closures."

County councillor for Haydon and Hadrian Coun. Colin Horncastle says any cuts would be "another kick in the teeth for rural people - It would be exactly the opposite of what everyone in higher authority is wanting - to take traffic off the roads," he said.

And county councillor for Haltwhistle Lawrence Thompson called not only for retention, but for improvement.

He said: "As far as the rural west is concerned we suffer from different types of deprivation, from employment to access to services.

"The removal of transport services really increases these problems and my feeling is we should improve services let alone maintain them.

"This is a threat to the vibrancy of rural areas."

Note --

see also; Fears over rail link; Cuts to North-East Rail Services Opposed; Transport boss fears move to cut rail services; RMT ridicules "cut trains to cope with growth" plan; Objections raised about rail cuts; Save the Night Riviera sleeper train; Whitehall plans cuts in local rail services.

French/Belgian/Luxembourg/Swiss alliance for European rail freight deregulation

Railway Gazette: September 2005

Sibelit enters rail freight arena
PLANS to launch an international joint venture to improve the competitiveness of rail freight in the Antwerp - Basel - Milan corridor were unveiled by four European national railways in August.

Fret SNCF, B-Cargo, CFL and SBB Cargo agreed in Paris on August 8 that forming a new company would be the best way to improve the quality and performance of freight services linking the nodes at Antwerpen, Muizen, Bettembourg, Metz and Basel-Muttenz. Sibelit is currently expected to become operational during 2006.

Based in Luxembourg, Sibelit will be responsible for managing cross-border flows and optimising the use of resources belonging to its parent companies. Sibelit will not have its own operating licence, but will co-ordinate the use of existing access rights, locomotives and train crews from SNCB, SNCF and CFL.

SBB Cargo confirmed on August 17 that it was debating whether to become a partner in the venture, although it did not expect Swiss resources to be used north of Basel.

As well as the initial corridors, Sibelit is expected to study the potential for using the Betuwe Route and Iron Rhine corridors to compete with Railion when European rail freight is deregulated further.

New Zealand Rail Workers Vote in MECA

Rail And Maritime Transport Union: 8 September 2005

A successful ratification vote by almost 2000 rail workers employed by Toll NZ Consolidated Limited and Connex Auckland heralds the return of a national rail industry multi party collective agreement or MECA to the rail industry. The MECA was lost to rail workers following an Employment Court decision in July 2004.

Rail and Maritime Transport Union General Secretary Wayne Butson said "I am delighted to see the rail MECA restored to add strength, unity and protection to our core rail members as part of a good overall settlement."

"The MECA is for a term of 3 years and sees a general wages increase of 12% during the term with sectors with significant recruitment and retention issues gaining an additional 5%. The term gives the employers stability in terms of costs and industrial harmony and enables them to focus on developing their businesses," said Wayne Butson.

He went on to say, "The MECA delivers significant gains in workplace delegates rights which recognises the legitimacy of the role of Union delegates, provides reasonable paid time, communication access and protection provisions and expands coverage of the agreement."

Wayne Butson also said that "The fact that we were able to obtain a good settlement in a reasonably short negotiation timeframe also signals that our relationship with Toll is on the improve and demonstrates the growing understanding of the role and worth of Good Faith bargaining by employers under the Employment Relations Act.

Wayne Butson noted "It would be a terrible tragedy for NZ if we saw a National Led Government elected and the ERA was repealed and we returned to the failed adversarial based Employment Contracts Act industrial relations environment which was also outlaw multi party collective agreements".

ENDS

Internet access on the move for travellers

CM Engineering News Online: 10 September 2005

Because business travellers want to use the same state-of-the-art communication options they can access in their offices and at home, Siemens has developed solutions to meet this demand by offering technologies that make it possible to surf the Internet while sitting in a train or have a cellphone conversation aboard an airliner.

The company has made it possible to enjoy a stable broadband Internet connection aboard a high-speed train through satellite by integrating the broadband network in the passenger railcar and creating an entire management system, including user identification and billing.

In a train travelling at 300 km/h, a data transfer rate of four megabits a second for Website downloads was achieved, which is more than 30 times faster than an ISDN connection with 128 kilobits a second.

The Belgian-French rail company Thalys will be testing the wireless Internet connection for three months in one of the company's high-speed trains. After the project's successful completion, Thalys is planning to equip all of its trains on the Brussels-Paris route with the fast Internet access.

Air travellers too can expect to be talking on their cellphones and surfing the Net in the future, provided their devices are equipped with WLAN, Bluetooth or GSM. The German Aerospace Centre (DLR), Siemens and Airbus have joined forces to build a mobile communications system that combines these different data transfer technologies and contacts base stations on the ground by means of satellites.

An antenna extending along the entire length of the plane's ceiling will ensure mobile communications by phone, PDA or PC for passengers in every seat. WLAN will make it possible for the travellers to access Websites and e-mail accounts, and GSM will ensure they can use their phones. Plans call for this exciting new world of communications to become reality in Airbus planes beginning in 2006, and a first airborne test has already been successfully conducted.

September 09, 2005

Engineers left wooden sleeper on railway track

icBerkshire: Sep 8 2005
Exclusive By Steve Still

A HEAVY wooden sleeper which was struck by a First Great Western express carrying more than 150 passengers near Goring was left on the track by bungling engineers.

Network Rail investigators are still unravelling the chain of events which led to the sleeper being forgotten by the maintenance crew on Tuesday, August 9, but vandalism has been ruled out.

The London-bound train was travelling at 100mph at around 6am when it hit the 200lb wooden sleeper lying across the track, catapulting it into the air.

Disaster was narrowly averted by the the quick-thinking of the driver who spotted the obstruction and slowed the train before the impact.

The driver, who has been praised by Network Rail, then got out and averted the danger of a second collision by clearing the sleeper from the downline where it landed.

Accident investigators launched a probe and quizzed a six-man maintenance crew who were working in the area the previous night.

Network Rail spokeswoman Laura Dobson said: "The investigation is on-going. But it has been discovered that it was not left there as an act of vandalism, it would have been as a result of the overnight engineering work on the track.

"Obviously there would have been one person on site responsible for saying that the area was safe and they have been suspended. They will be retrained and brought back. They are not a Network Rail employee but a contractor.

"Safety at Network Rail is the priority and there will be recommendations which come out of the investigation which will be put in place to ensure this does not happen again."

Fears over rail link

The Hexham Courant: September 9th 2005
By HELEN COMPSON

A PROPOSAL to downgrade the Tyne Valley rail service has been met with outrage.

Passengers, together with businesses and councillors, are united in their determination to prevent cuts to the service deemed vital to rural Tynedale's economic health and wellbeing.

The proposal is to create a high-speed link between Newcastle and Carlisle by cutting out stops at the less well used stations.

The proposal is contained in a leaked document prepared for the Strategic Rail Authority, so nobody knows as yet just how far it goes.

But the revelation has triggered a debate about whether it could signal the closure of some of Tynedale's smaller stations.

It seems that the stations west of Hexham - Haydon Bridge, Bardon Mill and Haltwhistle - are among those under consideration.

It is recommended that the service in that area be replaced by shuttle buses.

Currently being wound up by the Government, in its dying days the Strategic Rail Authority has bequeathed the final draft of its North East Regional Planning Assessment to the Department of Transport.

The document has yet to be published officially.

With little money in the pot for capital investment, rail bosses are looking instead at improving efficiency by streamlining services.

Inevitably the focus is on the under-used routes that tend to be in rural areas.

But the move would fly in the face of all that Tynedale's user groups have been trying to achieve.

With commuting on the rise due to a swathe of local job losses and the increasing importance of tourism to the area, West Tynedale in particular needs more trains, not less, they say.

Tyne Valley Rail Users Group chairman Malcolm Chainey said: "We would be massively upset if these proposals were to go through.

"They are the complete opposite of what we have been trying to achieve.

"We have been trying to get a better service for our rural stations, which sometimes have big gaps of up to four hours between trains.

"If the Government wants fewer people to get in their cars, it won't do it this way.

"As it is, the Highways Agency says it doesn't want to do anymore to the A69 which feeds traffic and congestion on to the A1 western bypass."

He added that the local Community Rail Partnership, Nexus and the county council had commissioned a survey aimed at improving the service at rural stations.

Northumberland County Council said it would oppose any plans to cut rail services.

Council leader Coun. Bill Brooks said he would fight cuts in key business and tourism centres, particularly when they posed a threat to rural communities.

"We hope these remain a far-fetched suggestion and not a genuine proposal," he said.

"The council is particularly worried about plans for fewer stops at stations in the Tyne Valley.

"It is also concerned about whether the council will be expected to fund replacement buses to rural communities currently served by train.

"We will be watching developments very closely and liaising with the Department for Transport to try to ensure that residents get the best bus and rail services possible."

Network Rail, which would implement any proposals agreed, has issued a statement.

"Northumberland County Council can be reassured that work on the strategy document looking at the future of services in the area has only just begun," the statement said.

"Network Rail inherited many review documents from the Strategic Rail Authority; these will form just a tiny part of a massive six to nine month review process.

"This process involves detailed consultation with all stakeholders before recommendations are put forward to the Department for Transport."

Service for rail victim

Burnley News: 09 September 2005

A MEMORIAL service is to be held later this month to mark the first anniversary of the death of Burnley rail worker Mr David Pennington.

As family, friends and work colleagues gather in Radcliffe to mark the tragic date, questions still remain unanswered as to how the devoted family man and his colleague, Mr Martin Oates, were killed on the track in Staffordshire.

Contractor VCG, the firm for which Mr Pennington (46) was a manager when he died on September 28th, has organised the service at Bridge Methodist Church, in Milltown Street, at 2-30 p.m. on Friday, September 30th, for the two men. It will be followed by a reception.

The tragic worker, described by his family as "a dad in a million", was killed when he was hit by a rail maintenance vehicle as he got off an engineering train in Cannock after carrying out routine track renewal work.

"All this waiting is just making things worse," said Mr Pennington's parents, Joe and Joyce, who live in Rossendale Road. "We just don't know which way all this will go."

They told how it had taken transport police and health and safety experts six months to gather all the evidence needed from the trackside and barristers were now working on the case, although it could be two years before there was an outcome to their investigations and possible prosecution.

Mr Pennington, who travelled all over the country with his work, was a regular at the Gretna Green Hotel, in Coal Clough Lane, was a keen Clarets fan and enjoyed playing football with his brothers, Colin and Graham. He lived in Cog Lane. A family man, he was married to Carol for 19 years and had five children, Stephen, Louise, Carrie, Ashley and Leon, as well as three young grandchildren.

RMT members start rolling strike action at Chubb Security, Eurostar

RMT European Passenger Services Branch (EPS): September 9, 2005

RMT has called a further series of rolling strikes by security guards employed on Chubb Security's Eurostar contract as part of the union's campaign against low rates of pay, as demanded by the strikers at a mass meeting on Friday 26 August.

Chubb_picket280805_1.1 (33k image)
RMT members picket Chubb Security's Eurostar terminal at Waterloo on Saturday 27 August

Our Chubb members held two 3.5 hour strikes at Eurostar terminals at Ashford and Waterloo International stations on Friday 26th and Saturday 27th August.

Chubb_picket_280805_2.1 (35k image)
RMT strikers at mass picket outside Waterloo International Terminal

The strikes were rock solid with all of our members walking off the job at both sites at the appointed times.

Chubb_picket280805_3.1 (34k image)
RMT picket lines were well supported and enthusiastic

The picket lines were fully supported by all striking members and supporters. Our members were replaced by scabs lodged in hotels and bussed in by Chubb and for the strikes.

Chubb_picket280805_4.1 (34k image)
RMT strikers are determined to win decent rates of pay

A mass meeting was held on Friday at Waterloo and the strikers expressed their determination to win a better pay deal for the stressful high intensity work that they perform screening passengers and baggage for the Eurostar service.

The meeting agreed to call on the RMT Council of Executives to announce a programme of rolling strikes to intensify pressure on Chubb and Eurostar to fund a new pay deal.

-- Notes --

Security guards at Waterloo International terminal will strike from 08:30 to 10:30 and 17:45 to 19:45 on, Friday September 9 and on Saturday September 10, and from 06:45 to 08:45 and 18:15 to 20:15 on Sunday September 11.

Their colleagues at Ashford International will strike from 05:30 to 08:00 and 16:30 to 18:00 on Friday and Saturday, and from 08:00 to 10:30 and 16:30 to 18:00 on Sunday.

At North Pole International action will be between 20:00 and 24:000 on all three days.

Further strike action has been announced for the weekend of September 16-18 as follows:

Waterloo International: Friday September 16, 08:30 to 10:30 and 17:45 to 19:45; Saturday September 17, 08:30 to 10:30 and 17:15 to 19:15; Sunday September 18, 06:45 to 08:45 and 18:15 to 20:15

Ashford International:� Friday September 16: �05:30 to 08:00 and 16:30 to 18:00; Saturday September 17, 05:30 to 08:00, and 16:30 to 18:00; Sunday September 18, 08:00 to 10:30 and 16:30 to 18:00

North Pole International: from 20:00 to 24:00 on September 16, 17 and 18.

A railroad marvel conquers China's terrain

International Herald Tribune: September 9, 2005
By Howard W. French

GOLMUD, China: By the time the great railroad reaches this town from the east, it has already traversed more than half of China, past the high desert of Qinghai, around one of the world's great salt lakes, through the arid fastness of Gansu, and then over and around mountain ranges arrayed like endless sets of waves all the way to Beijing.

But the biggest challenges lie in another direction altogether, when the line heads south from here for an 1,100-kilometer, or 685-mile, run to Lhasa, the capital of Tibet, over what is often called the roof of the world.

For long stretches the railway, which is fast nearing completion, will operate at altitudes higher than many small planes can fly, huffing and puffing far above the fragrant mists that roll down the Himalayan slopes. Indeed, the train, whose engines will need turbochargers to get enough oxygen into them to run, will often soar above the clouds.

One day soon, perhaps as early as next year, with its special pressurized cars, this marvel will make its maiden voyage on its final southward route, chugging across permanently frozen terrain and making stops along the way at stations like Tangula Shankou, which at 5,070 meters, or 16,640 feet, will be the world's highest. For those bored by the scenery, or perhaps just dizzy, there will be other diversions: First-class accommodations include health spas and fancy restaurants.

When China's central government embarked on the $3.1 billion project in 2001, it set aside $240 million of that sum, or 8 percent of the total, for environmental protection. When objections arose about plans to build a station within the Gulu Wetlands, in Tibet, a pristine breeding ground for black-neck cranes and yellow ducks, 8 hectares, or 20 acres, of man-made wetlands were created around the perimeter of the original preserve to make up for land lost to bridges.

Yang Xin, a prominent environmentalist in Qinghai Province, called the project one of "the most caring" he had ever seen. "We proposed detailed measures on protecting migrating Tibetan antelopes in the morning, and to our surprise we got the government's answer back that very afternoon, less than 3 hours, later," Yang said.

One might expect a country that is pulling off one of the world's great engineering feats to be eager to show off its handiwork. If so, no one has told the Railway Ministry, which for a full year refused to answer a reporter's queries by telephone and fax to visit the new line and witness its construction. From the evidence, no one told the local police in Golmud, either.

Normally eager taxi drivers in this pokey frontier town, not far removed from the dusty backdrops of American westerns, except for its 9,100-foot altitude, must not have been told, either. They quickly waved off a foreigner, saying they would be arrested if they took him down the highway south that shades the new railway line. The local police, too, were apparently left out of the loop.

"I'm sorry, but there's nothing I can do to help you," said a supervisor at the city's Public Security Bureau, when an outsider asked for a pass so he could drive into the Kunlun mountains, toward Tibet. Another officer hinted darkly that the foreigner was breaking the law just by being in Golmud.

What could explain such reticence to show off this marvel of railway building, except to tightly controlled groups of outsiders? The events of the week in Lhasa, where Beijing had been celebrating the 40th anniversary of what it calls the Tibetan Autonomous Region, offered one clue. China's state-controlled press hailed the event with editorials that said things like "Tibetans bask in the joy of a bright tomorrow."

A Foreign Ministry spokesman praised what he called Tibet's "democratic reforms," saying that in the past, the people of the province had labored under a "dark serf system." Comments by the man leading the celebrations seemed by themselves sufficient contradiction, however, of the province's autonomy. Jia Qinglin, the third-ranked figure in the Communist Party, hailed China's army for having crushed an uprising in Tibet in 1959 and rioting in 1989 by Tibetans who wish for independence, or at least religious and political freedoms for the province, which was seized by China in 1951.

Many have since all but given up on dreams of independence, including the Dalai Lama, the Tibetan spiritual leader, who lives in exile in India. But they still hope for a modicum of genuine autonomy, something many believe the new railroad will make it even more difficult to attain.

By some estimates, the new train will carry as many as 900,000 people into the province each year, with the newcomers overwhelmingly consisting of members of China's Han majority, many of whom will opt to stay. The yawning gap between rich and poor seen almost everywhere in China is perhaps greatest in Tibet, where almost all of the rich are Han settlers. The poor and powerless, meanwhile, are almost exclusively Tibetan.

Tibetans say the completion of a highway to the province from here a few years ago has dramatically increased Han migration into their homeland, with consequences both for the environment and for Tibetan language and culture. The train, they worry, will bring even more Han, and make the deployment of Chinese troops there all the easier.

"The Han population is rising, and the Tibetan language, our mother language, is losing its position among our people," said a Tibetan teacher who fled to India in January after being arrested several times for his views. "The road-building jobs and the construction jobs are not open to Tibetans, and young Tibetan girls are turning to prostitution."

If the Chinese wish to help Tibet, said the man, who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals against his family back home, "they should stop the immigration and give the opportunities to local people so they can improve their lives, and we can protect our culture."

Deadly record of 'engineering firm run by accountants'

Daily Telegraph Online: 07/09/2005
By David Millward, Transport Correspondent

At its simplest the Hatfield disaster was the result of a catastrophic combination of circumstances that ended in a London to Leeds express train hurtling off the track at 115mph as a rail beneath it shattered.

For more than six months an Old Bailey jury heard arguments about whether the accident was the fault of two companies and five rail engineers or whether it was what some argued was a "systemic failure" resulting from the complexity of the way in which the railway industry was privatised by John Major's government.

Whatever the causes, the crash resulted in four deaths and more than 100 injuries. It almost brought the entire network to a halt as trains were slowed to a crawl while rail lines were inspected and faults remedied.

There were disasters when the rail industry was in public hands. But the record of Railtrack, a privatised infrastructure company that owned the track, was undeniably a poor one.

There was the Southall crash of September 1997, in which seven people died. Then, just over two years later, 31 people died when two trains collided at Ladbroke Grove, two miles outside Paddington station. Next came Hatfield and finally seven lives were lost when a train was derailed at Potters Bar in May 2002. Railtrack accepted civil responsibility for Ladbroke Grove and Hatfield.

A variety of explanations have been offered for Railtrack's poor record.

The maintenance regime was based on the load carried by the network in the mid-1990s. Some within the industry say that Railtrack was unable to cope with the increase in demand, which ultimately led to a horrific backlog of repair work.

But many critics laid the blame at Railtrack's door. Unions and others in the industry say the problem was that Railtrack was run by accountants rather than engineers.

Before privatisation, British Rail owned and maintained the track. Under the new structure Railtrack owned the line but the task of maintenance was handed to leading engineering firms such as Jarvis and - in the case of Hatfield - Balfour Beatty. The contractors also inherited the staff with the expertise to carry out the work. However, cost and commercial demands had a higher profile than before.

To add to the industry's difficulties, track maintenance and renewal was separated. But in practical terms the distinction between the two became blurred. Eight months after the disaster Tom Winsor, who was the Rail Regulator at the time of Hatfield, said many of the problems were caused by the way in which the industry was privatised by the Conservatives.

Mr Winsor, whose duty was to police the running of the network, was withering in his condemnation of the rushed nature of the Railtrack sell-off in a speech he gave to the Institution of Electrical Engineers in June 2001.

Corners were cut, he said. Railtrack was a company that "squandered its skills base whilst neglecting the condition of its physical assets".

"Engineers were discarded and before long an essential skills base had been significantly diminished."

Railtrack did not have an accurate idea of what it owned or what condition its assets were in. "Too much of the essential knowledge was missing, misunderstood or locked up in the heads of people who had left the industry.

"For a company whose very existence is wholly dependent on the condition, capacity and capability of its assets, this was a recipe for serious trouble. And that's exactly what happened."

Worry about the state of the track across the network was hardly a secret. In 1999 a report in the Railway Safety Statistics Bulletin showed an alarming increase in the number of broken rails; Railtrack had forecast 600 in 1998-99, the number of breakages was 937.

During the Old Bailey case Richard Lissack, QC, the prosecuting counsel, said the rail that caused the derailment had been identified 21 months before the disaster as suffering from a phenomenon known as "gauge corner cracking" - a form of metal fatigue commonly found where the track curves.

Attempts were made to replace it and on one occasion a new piece of track was delivered, but it arrived on equipment that could not work underneath overhead power lines - which run the length of the East Coast main line.

According to Mr Lissack, Balfour Beatty's maintenance of the track had been totally inadequate for months - a fact that it and Railtrack were fully aware of.

Throughout the trial the defence teams argued that the disaster was an unusual combination of circumstances that were beyond the control of either the companies or their senior executives who found themselves in the dock.

Had trains been slowed down over all the suspect areas of track, the derailment might not have happened. But evidence given in the trial suggests that this would have been politically unacceptable.

Arriva may have a pitch at SWT

London Evening Standard: 8 September 2005

LONDON'S biggest bus operator, Arriva, is to have a tilt at taking over South West Trains.

In the current round of refranchising on London's railways, Arriva has failed to make the shortlist for any of the licences to run an enlarged Greater Western franchise out of Paddington, the Thameslink services or the new Integrated Kent franchise which used to be known as Connex South East.

Earnings growth has stalled after Arriva lost the highly subsidised Northern Trains franchise last year, and chief executive Bob Davies is hungry to replace that income.

'You will see us having a go at some of the other franchises coming up, and I'll think you'll see us having a go for South West Trains. It's a good business to be in,' he said.

South West Trains is run by Stagecoach, and with huge amounts of subsidies coming from the Department for Transport, it is earning the company tens of millions of pounds a year in profit.

Arriva today reported half-year pre-tax profits of £50,3m, marginally down on the previous year. Its bus businesses round the country saw operating profits rise just 3% after 10% growth in passenger volumes in the capital was offset by soaring fuel costs.

The loss of Northern Trains profits was made up by booming, 44% profit growth on mainland Europe where the company is building up a portfolio of train and bus operations in seven countries.

The interim dividend is going up by 5% to 5.07p.

Drivers rail at trainspotters' last journey

The Times: September 09, 2005
By Simon de Bruxelles

IT IS the last thing an avid trainspotter would want when he reaches the end of the line.

Services on a Somerset steam railway are being disrupted because drivers are having to clear piles of cremated remains off the track.

The owners of the West Somerset Railway are appealing to bereaved relatives not to deposit their loved ones' remains on the line. At least eight mounds of ash, most accompanied by flowers, have been found on the track since the start of the summer.

They are believed to be the mortal remains of steam enthusiasts whose last wish was to be laid to rest within earshot of a locomotive.

Mark Smith, the managing director of the West Somerset steam railway, said: "I have seen piles of ashes. They are quite large and are often accompanied by flowers.

"It puts our drivers in a difficult position because they worry that they may run somebody over while they are on the tracks and workers don't want to touch the cremated bodies because it's a health hazard."

The picturesque 20-mile steam route runs 32 journeys a day carrying hundreds of passengers between Minehead and Bishop's Lydeard in Somerset. But drivers are having to stop in case the dear departed's relatives are still in the area.

Mr Smith said: "The last thing we want is another dead body because they were trying to carry out the last wishes of a steam enthusiast. It must stop."

He added that steam enthus- iasts can instead request that their remains are shovelled into the engine's firebox and puffed out of the funnel. "We receive many requests to place ashes in the engine. We are happy to oblige as long as it is organised and done with reverence."

Chris Richardson, 63, a steam train enthusiast, said that the incidents showed the lengths that people will go to in order to be near trains, even after death. He has been a trainspotter since the age of 8. "Trainspotting is not just a hobby," he said. "For some people it is their life - and death. It is quite common practice to have your ashes scattered as near to a train as you can. I knew someone who bought a ticket, booked a seat for his urn, and his family had to sit next to it for hours on his favourite route."

Arriva profit dips as Northern rail franchise ends

LONDON (Reuters): Sep 8, 2005
By Michael Smith

Train and bus operator Arriva posted a 2 percent fall in first-half earnings, as expected, on Thursday after strong growth in Europe was offset by the end of a UK train operating franchise.

Arriva the biggest operator of London's double-decker red buses, flagged further acquisitions in Europe and said it was confident about the rest of the year despite high fuel costs. It gave no specific forecast.

"I think we are reasonably well positioned in the second half, we are moving along with confidence," Chief Executive Bob Davies told Reuters. He said mainland Europe would be the focus for growth.

Operating profit for the six months to June 30 was 57.6 million pounds, compared with 58.8 million pounds a year ago.

The result compared with a consensus market forecast of 58.4 million pounds, according to figures provided by the company.

Arriva shares were steady at 572 pence shortly after the market opened at 8:03 a.m.

Arriva increased profits at its UK bus operations despite a 3 million pound rise in fuel costs in the period. Davies said the division's fuel bill would be 14 million pounds higher in 2006.

He also said its main bus operations were not affected by July 7 bombings in London, although its open-top tourist bus business did not perform well in July.

The main dent in Arriva's performance was the end of its Northern rail franchise in December 2004 which almost halved profits at UK rail.

Analysts said the main focus would be on growth in mainland Europe. Arriva has operations in Denmark, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the UK.

"Mainland Europe remains the key strategic differentiator and future growth driver with good progress demonstrated and new opportunities continuing to emerge in Sweden, Germany and Holland," Citigroup told clients in a note.

The continental European market has seen less of its bus and train services privatised than the UK and is worth an estimated 70 billion pounds.

Redundancies - Maersk Off-Shore Supplies

Maersk Off-shore supplies have informed the Union that they have a surplus of 31 ratings and that they will be making redundancies.

Redundancies - Maersk Off-Shore Supplies

It is with regret that I have to announce that Maersk Off-shore supplies have informed the Union that they have a surplus of 31 ratings and that they will be making redundancies, even though the company have said that they will retain a surplus of 10 ratings to cover sickness and annual leave, thus leaving a total of 21.

The redundancies are the result of the fact that a number of supply vessels have been located to Brazil, Africa and other parts of the world. As a requirement, the company are obliged to have local labour on-board these supply vessels.

Surplus ratings have been carried for sometime in the hope that the vessels would return to the UK. Unfortunately, this is not the case at the present time. However, when the vessels do return to the UK, they will be manned by UK ratings.

Following discussions between the Union and the company it has been agreed that redundancies will be achieved on a voluntary basis rather than having to resort to compulsory redundancies and, there is an offer for ratings to transfer to Norfolkline Ferries. This will be on a lower rate of pay, but, service will be continuous and any benefits accrued will be protected. Also, when the vessels return to the UK, those ratings that transferred over to Norfolkline will have the first option to transfer back to the supply vessels, should they wish to.

I trust this keeps you fully informed.

Bob Crow

September 08, 2005

FGW Drivers ballotted for Industrial Action

RMT Drivers with First Great Western are being ballotted for Industrial Action over failed productivity talks.

Drivers at Train Operator First Great Western are to be ballotted for Industrial Action following the company's failure to agree to productivity issues.

The company agreed in 2004 that it would discuss "104 Rest Days a year" for Drivers before 2005 pay talks commenced, but then failed to do so. As a result the Drivers Divisional Council enacted a Fail to Agree after 2005 Pay Talks ended without discussion on the rest day issue. Further talks continued but have so far failed to produce an amicable solution.

Ballot forms are to be sent out on 7th Sept with a closing date of 21st Sept

It is believed that ASLEF are also to ballot its members.

The Union strongly urges its Driver members at FGW to return a YES vote.

DeutscheBahn boss resists EU rail privatisation model

International Railway Journal: September 2005
David Briginshaw, Editor-In-Chief

No Flash In The Pan For DB
HARTMUT Mehdorn, CEO of German Rail (DB), and his management team must be congratulated for getting DB into the black.

Last year's operating profit of Euros 253 million - the first by Germany's national railway since 1945 - was clearly not a flash in the pan, as DB has just announced a profit after interest payments for the first half of this year, and expects to make a profit of Euros 400 million for the full year.

DB's financial performance is even more impressive considering the weak state of the German economy. Aggressive marketing of passenger services, for example by a campaign with supermarket chain Lidl, helped DB to buck a 1% drop in the overall passenger market with a 3% increase in long-distance rail traffic. However, DB still has work to do to get its railfreight division Railion out of the red.

Overall, DB is a much leaner railway than when so-called rail reform took place in 1993. Productivity has jumped from 328,000 passenger/tonne-km per employee in 1993 to 862,000 in 2003. DB is now carrying about 10 billion more tonne-km than it was in 1993, and passenger traffic has increased by about 7 billion passenger-km.

"... the separation of infrastructure from operations, which has been carried out by most of western Europe's national railways at the behest of the European Commission (EC), is bad for railways" - Hartmut Mehdorn, CEO German Rail (DB)


Mehdorn's long-term, but so far frustratingly elusive goal, has been to privatise DB as an integrated railway. But just as DB's financial performance is starting to come good to pave the way for flotation on the stock exchange, the political climate for privatisation has worsened. National elections have been called for September 18, and there is no guarantee that the Social Democrats, led by Mehdorn's close ally Gerhard Schroder, will win.

Mehdorn strongly believes that the separation of infrastructure from operations, which has been carried out by most of western Europe's national railways at the behest of the European Commission (EC), is bad for railways. Mehdorn has often pointed out that the only financially successful railways around the world are fully integrated ones.

He has a point. North America's unified private freight railways are profitable, and are doing particularly well at the moment, but they struggle to fund adequate long-term capital investment programmes. The privatisation of the big three JR railways in Japan has been a financial success. However, the outright privatisation of New Zealand Railways ended in failure, with the government being forced to take back ownership of the infrastructure. The private owner simply could not earn enough to fund the cost of maintaining the track.

But most German politicians have observed what can go wrong much closer to home: namely the spectacular demise of Britain's fully-privatised railway infrastructure company, Railtrack. German politicians have no desire to follow Britain down this path or to end up having to put public money into private companies. Mehdorn may well argue that if Britain had privatised British Rail as a fully-integrated railway things might have turned out differently.

Germany is also coming under increasing pressure from the EC to split DB into separate infrastructure and operating units. The EC is determined to break the monopoly of the traditional national railways in order to have a single market for rail transport.

Mehdorn's argument for privatising DB as a single company is that DB must have access to private capital if it is to continue its modernisation and growth strategy. But DB has had the largest capital investment budget of any railway in Europe and sometimes the world. DB invested Euros 79 billion between 1994 and 2003, and the annual figure peaked at just under Euros 10 billion in 2002. Investment has dropped back sharply during the last year, because of government spending cuts. Nevertheless, the investment has allowed DB to expand its high-speed rail network, upgrade stations and conventional lines, and renew a large part of its train fleet.

If privatisation is still on the cards after the election, a more likely scenario is for Germany to fall into line with the rest of Europe by finally separating the infrastructure from train operations. The infrastructure would remain state owned. This could pave the way for the privatisation of DB's passenger operations either as a whole or just the high-speed services, followed by Railion when it starts to make a profit.

High Court upholds Viking's right to negotiate with foreign unions on reflagged ship

EIRO: 06 Sep 2005

A court ordered in June 2005 that the Finnish Seamen's Union and its international parent organisation, ITF, must respect Viking's right to negotiate with foreign unions on a ship it plans to reflag to Estonia.

According to Viking, the ruling represents a major victory of principle and a precedent for the whole industry while the Seamen's Union deemed it an attack against the European trade union movement.

The Finnish shipping company Viking Line has for several years planned to reflag its m/s Rosella vessel from Finland. The management of the company maintains that the ship which transports passengers between the Finnish port of Helsinki and Tallinn in Estonia cannot compete with its Estonian rivals because its labour costs are two times higher than theirs. By reflagging the ship the company hopes to acquire foreign labour for which a cheaper collective agreement could be applied.

The Finnish Seamen's Union (Suomen Merimies-Unioni, SM-U) which represents the staff on Rosella and has negotiated their current collective agreement which is valid until February 2008 recognises Viking's, and other shipping companies' right to reflag their ships and to hire staff anywhere within the EU. It is, however, firmly of the opinion that the Finnish collective agreement and legislation must continue to be applied at all reflagged vessels. The International Transport Workers' Federation (ITF) supports the position of SM-U in the matter. In November 2003 it indicated this by issuing a circular letter to among its affiliates in the Baltic Sea region urging them to respect the right of SM-U to negotiate over pay and working conditions on m/s Rosella.

In preparation for the reflagging of its ship, Viking sought a ruling from the High Court of Justice in London against SM-U and ITF over the matter. Viking wanted the court to declare first, that the union organisations may not infringe in any way upon its right to negotiate with any third party in the EU over a collective agreement for a reflagged Rosella and, second, that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) must issue a statement revoking the message put forward in its circular. On 16 June the London court gave out its ruling in which it upheld both the demands by Viking on basis of Article 43 of the EC Treaty which grants businesses the freedom to relocate their operations within the EU.

Viking welcomed the court verdict and argued that it represented a major victory of principle and a precedent for the whole shipping industry. SM-U strongly disagreed. It argued that the ruling was an attempt to limit the fundamental freedoms of action of trade unions and as such it was an attack on the whole European trade union movement. The union plans to appeal against the verdict.

'Chubb must negotiate on eve of fresh Eurostar strikes'

RMT: 8 September 2005

Further action announced for weekend of September 16-18.

CHUBB MUST negotiate seriously to tackle low pay, Britain's biggest rail union said on the eve of a weekend of strike action by more than 130 security guards employed on the Eurostar contract.

Security guards at Waterloo International terminal will strike from 08:30 to 10:30 and 17:45 to 19:45 tomorrow, Friday September 9 and on Saturday September 10, and from 06:45 to 08:45 and 18:15 to 20:15 on Sunday September 11.

Their colleagues at Ashford International will strike from 05:30 to 08:00 and 16:30 to 18:00 on Friday and Saturday, and from 08:00 to 10:30 and 16:30 to 18:00 on Sunday.

At North Pole International action will be between 20:00 and 24:000 on all three days.

The RMT executive also agreed today that further strike action would take place over the following weekend, September 16 to 18, as part of a rolling programme of action aimed at winning an acceptable pay deal - see below for details.

"Instead of throwing huge sums of money away in a futile attempt to undermine our action, Chubb should be sitting round the table negotiating with us," RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

"The company would do well to remember that our members voted unanimously to strike against low pay and that our membership has increased substantially since the dispute began.

"Recruiting scabs in Hungary, flying them into the country and rushing them through a four-day training course will only underline fears about Chubb's attitude towards the security services they are supposed to be providing.

"And it will only harden our members' resolve to win a just settlement to this dispute," Bob Crow said

ends

Further strike action has been announced for the weekend of September 16-18 as follows:

Waterloo International: Friday September 16, 08:30 to 10:30 and 17:45 to 19:45; Saturday September 17, 08:30 to 10:30 and 17:15 to 19:15; Sunday September 18, 06:45 to 08:45 and 18:15 to 20:15

Ashford International: Friday September 16: 05:30 to 08:00 and 16:30 to 18:00; Saturday September 17, 05:30 to 08:00, and 16:30 to 18:00; Sunday September 18, 08:00 to 10:30 and 16:30 to 18:00

North Pole International: from 20:00 to 24:00 on September 16, 17 and 18.

Hatfield: arguments for public ownership of rail

The Crash That Stopped Britain - By IAN JACK
Granta Publications (2001):

"No other railway accident in British history - or, I would guess, in any other country's history has led to the degree of public anger, managerial panic, political confusion, blame and counter-blame that came in the wake of the Hatfield crash. In fact, outside wars and nuclear accidents, it is hard to think of any technological failure which has had such lasting and widespread effects."

Ian Jack's short excoriation of the disastrous policy of railway privatisation pursued by both Tory and Labour governments since 1990 was written following the Hatfield train crash in 2000, serialised in the Guardian and published in full by Granta in a pocket-book format handy for rail passengers. Although given his conclusions it may not be available at too many station bookshops.

The train crash at Hatfield on 17 October 2000 killed four people. Railtrack's press leaks initially sought to put the blame on human error (the Driver was held overnight for questioning by police) or vandalism (for which there was no evidence). Within 24 hours the broken rail emerged as the cause of the high-speed derailment. The media have concentrated on the assassin who pulled the trigger. But who assembled the armies of corporate lawyers and city accountants who had "sweated the assets" of the railway industry for the previous ten years? In Jack's words; "if rail and cracks were Gavrilo Princip and his pistol, who was the Kaiser in the case?"

The answer to that question takes up the bulk of this interesting and thorough investigation. During his research into the principles of engineering and metallurgy, the economic history of railways and into the privatisation junkies of the Thatcher/Major and now Blair administrations, Jack demolishes a number of myths that often permeate discussions about rail privatisation.

Myth number one: that capitalist efficiency can deliver 'social goods', such as public transport safely, or at all. Jack quotes Professor Baldry's evidence to the Ladbroke Grove Inquiry on the effect on the railway industry of 'work intensification': "If you are bidding for a contract on what is essentially a labour-intensive process, the only way or one of the major ways you are more likely to win the contract is through offering to do it with reduced labour costs, that is either to do the work with a smaller number of people or in a shorter timeframe."

Second myth: that there was ever such a thing as a 'golden age' of private railways in inter-war Britain. The average return on railway shares between 1850 and 1875 was 3.65% and it fell thereafter. Nationalisation was actively considered during the First World War when the British State intervened in running the railways, but by 1923 had been dropped in favour of grouping the 120 or so private companies into 4 regional monopolies. The LNER paid out no shareholder dividends at all in the years before the Second World War and in 1946 managed only 0.41%. Nationalisation when it eventually came in 1948 was a blessed relief for the shareholders and owners of unprofitable railway companies and a massive disappointment for the workers who had argued for nationalisation under workers' control.

The myth of 'Golden Ageism' grew up after the Second World War as a reaction to the level of public subsidy needed as a consequence of historical investment starvation by the former private owners. It also reflected a nostalgic hankering by reactionary politicians for the days when porters tipped their hats, the working class knew its proper place and the British Empire's writ still ran India.

'Golden Ageism' was the myth that Tory leader, John Major appealed to when he cast around in his 1992 General Election manifesto for a privatisation policy to convince the zealots of Thatcherism that despite his central role in her downfall, he remained the true son and heir of her economic policies. British Rail was to be the bone he threw to the rabid dogs of the Tory party's right wing in a futile attempt to distract them from splitting the party over European monetary union.

Where Jack's analysis falls short is in explaining correctly the real reasons why railways were privatised in Britain and why the private ownership model continues resolutely to be New Labour's. It is now said by politicians and businessmen from John Prescott and Lord MacDonald to Chief Executives of rail companies, that; "if we could do it again, we'd do it differently." But, as Labour's policy for Tube privatisation shows, they have done it again and they did it exactly the same way.

The invention of Network Rail in 2002 as a 'Company Limited by Guarantee' of course constituted a departure by New Labour from the privatisation model bequeathed by the Tories, but only in the sense that the previous model (Railtrack Plc) repeatedly demonstrated it was unable to function without constant and ever-increasing injections of state aid. This is problematic for all sorts of reasons - not the least of which, the deflationary 'Maastricht Convergence Criteria', that require all European Union member states to consistently reduce public spending as a proportion of GDP - and Gordon Brown's 2002 solution has been to refinance Railtrack/Network Rail's debt through private loans from banks underwritten by Treasury 'letters of comfort', rather than through the more costly 1992 option of private-financing through equity from shareholders.

Railtrack's Chief Executive at the time of the Hatfield disaster, Gerald Corbett, interviewed on BBC said; "The railways were ripped apart at privatisation and the structure that was put in place was a structure designed, if we are honest, to maximise proceeds to the Treasury." This is the argument that in its various forms seeks to persuade us that it isn't the policy of rail privatisation as such that is at fault, so much as the 'wrong kind of privatisation'.

Last month the Thatcherite diehards at the Adam Smith Institute published a report reiterating precisely this argument. It is also ironically, a canard that Gordon Brown would have the public believe secures 'the public interest' in the PPP of the London Underground. It isn't true, it is a lie and although it seems churlish to complain given its great strengths, the main failing of 'The Crash That Stopped Britain' is that it fails adequately to nail this final myth.

The assets of British Rail were disposed of way below their market price between 1993 and 1995. State subsidy to the privatised railway industry today is more than double that pre-privatisation. Jack's best shot at explaining why New Labour sustains this arrangement and wants to extend it to the Tube is that it allows "the nationalisation of credit and the privatisation of blame."

What is missing from this admittedly rather neat formulation however, is any acknowledgement of the fact that rail privatisation was explicitly designed by Tory politicians to smash the national collective bargaining power of some of the few remaining trade unions in Britain with significant industrial muscle, the railway unions.

In 1989, the National Union of Railwaymen (NUR)'s 6-days of strikes was the first successful national industrial dispute since the 1985 defeat of the mineworkers, which was considered by some to have permanently cowed the trade unions and put an end to national industrial militancy. The demonisation of the railway unions by the Tory press of that time led James (Lord) Sterling, then owner of P&O and now of GNER the company whose train crashed at Hatfield, to describe Jimmy Knapp (NUR General Secretary) as "a communist!"

No final explanation of the reasons for rail privatisaton in Britain is possible without an understanding of the political fear, which the British State and ruling class has for organised labour. The rail unions do not play a part in Jack's story and the omission makes his investigation incomplete.

In a telling chapter entitled Workers, Jack quotes Permanent Way workers interviewed over three years earlier, about their safety concerns as they witnessed the unravelling of rail privatisation. As he points out, the interviews were anonymous; "speaking to the press - whistleblowing - is now usually a breach of contract."

The infamous 'gagging clause' introduced into railworkers' contracts of employment after the NUR strike in 1989, has been the most effective method of preventing workers' safety concerns being acted upon. In case after case railworkers have been pressurised into silence through the reminder of their contractual duty of confidentiality to the private owners who weigh their lives and the lives of rail passengers as of lesser importance than the drive for productivity and profit, or victimised and sacked like a succession of union representatives in the rail industry.

Jack's conclusion is therefore not entirely satisfying. Politicians and their advisers, he argues - the 'Kaisers' of rail privatisation - are the guilty men. However, his devastating indictment of the personal responsibility borne by such individuals, ultimately is not a sufficient strategy to resolve the political and social crises that privatisation strategies have led to. The failed prosecutions for corporate manslaughter at Southall, Ladbroke Grove and Hatfield confirm not only the failure of the prosecution cases, but a wider failure to hold company directors and corporations to account.

Justice for the relatives of the victims of Hatfield demands an effective corporate manslaughter law to ensure that bosses responsible for avoidable deaths are held to account. However to do so successfully also requires a reassertion of socialist values of public ownership and the need to reverse remorceless drives by Tory and Labour governments over a 20 year period at privatising public services.

Thatcher was brought down by her own colleagues' internecine feuding over European Monetary Union, but her government's authority had already been shown to be waning by a mass, working class refusal to pay Poll Tax. Blair's administration like Thatcher's, has tried and failed - the ludicrously inflated housing market excepted - to convince British society that there is popular model for the private ownership of everything. PPP on the Tube, PFI in schools and hospitals and a default position of privatisation of public services from meat inspection to Air Traffic Control remains New Labour's weakest link. With the scheduled ratification by the European Parliament in October 2005 of the European Commission's 'Directive on Services' this battle is about to be rejoined in earnest. The book that describes how to organise to defeat the new neo-liberal economic order still remains to be written.

Alex Gordon
September 8, 2005

'If only...' isn't good enough

The Guardian: September 8, 2005
Ian Jack

To find the real guilty men of the Hatfield train crash, look to those who privatised the railways.

During my research for a piece I wrote about the Hatfield crash (it became a small book: The Crash That Stopped Britain), I wondered, naturally, about the guilty-men question. On October 17 2000, four passengers died and dozens were injured because a faulty rail hadn't been replaced: instead, it crumbled under the friction of the 12.10 from King's Cross to Leeds and threw the train from the tracks.

Many, many people knew the rail to be faulty. They knew at Railtrack and they knew at Railtrack's maintenance contractor, Balfour Beatty. Negligence had to be to blame. But negligence by whom? In the crazy architecture of management and ownership devised for the privatised railway by the Treasury and its consultants, could negligence ever be ascribed to individuals?

Four months after the crash, people in the railway industry doubted that any individual, certainly any senior figure, would go down. Early in the next year I spoke to a senior railway safety inspector about the possibility of manslaughter charges. He said you would need to find a piece of official paper with words on it such as, "Do not repair this track, we can't afford it, yours sincerely, The Fat Controller", before such charges would stick.

In July, he was proved right. The judge threw them out. Now five individuals have also been found innocent of lesser charges, mere breaches of the safety regulations. In Tuesday's judgment at the Old Bailey, only those abstractions known as companies - Balfour Beatty and the now ghostly Railtrack - were found guilty of breaches of the Health and Safety At Work legislation.

A large organisation, as you'll know if you work in one, is a hard thing to imagine - other than in the things it makes, runs or sells, the buildings it occupies - and the people it employs. It is easier, for example, to think of Captain Smith of the Titanic than of the entity known as the White Star Line (though we may think of that company's chairman, Bruce Ismay, taking flight in an early lifeboat and living a lonely and pitiable life thereafter; who knows that Hatfield won't produce similar human guilt?).

And so the relatives of the dead feel cheated and angry. Understandably so - organisations comprise individuals, and if I were one of the bereaved I would also like to see one of those individuals punished for their lethal ignorance or carelessness. But where in the search for the guilty does one stop? I would suggest somewhere earlier and higher than Railtrack and Balfour Beatty.

Some accidents are easier to explain than others. The most famous, as well as one of the most explicable in British railway history, happened on May 22 1915, at Quintinshill near the Scottish border on what is now known as the West Coast Main Line. Two humble railwaymen were entirely to blame. Signalman Tinsley had an informal, against-regulations arrangement with his colleague, Signalman Meakin, that would allow him to start work 10 minutes after his signing-on time of 6am. Some faking of the logbook was required, but nothing in the practice seemed dangerous. On the morning of May 22, however, the line at Quintinshill was unusually busy while Tinsley was preoccupied with his copying in the log. Meakin had parked a local train on the wrong line so that it could wait for a night express from the south to overtake it. There it lay forgotten as Tinsley set his signals to accept a troop train from the north. The troop train hit the local, then the express ploughed into the wreckage of both. A total of 227 people died.

Tinsley and Meakin went to jail for culpable homicide, but both were pardoned within a year. They had suffered nervous breakdowns.

After Hatfield I often thought of Tinsley and Meakin and how hard their lives ever after must have been - a waking nightmare of "if onlys". In the book I wrote that "a nervous breakdown or two would be just" among the politicians, civil servants and lawyers who produced a privatised railway system that was fragmented, stripped-down, rivalrous, bonus-driven, overly cost- conscious, confused and ignorant.

That view of railway privatisation is now widely accepted, and the system has been remedied to some extent. But I don't see any reason to revise that opinion of Hatfield, unpleasantly vengeful though it is. With railway privatisation, as with Iraq, a British government stubbornly flew in the face of public and informed opinion as though it were maddened by vanity and self-belief. It's there, as with Iraq, that you must find the guilty men. If, as the Hatfield court heard, the faults were "systemic", which human brains devised the system?

SRA doubtful about open access on East Coast

RailManager: 31 August 2005

A handover document prepared by the SRA for the guidance of the Department for Transport has revealed official doubts about the benefits of more open access services on the East Coast Main Line.

The document, which was prepared recently by the SRA's MD of Strategic Planning Jim Steer, and which has been posted on the ORR website, also concedes that there is no contractual commitment to the GNER 'Leeds Horseshoe', involving the electrification of 24km of line from Hambleton Junction to Leeds, and allowing a half hourly service between there and London.

Although GNER started a new franchise on 1 May with the promise of more frequent services, the document admits that these will depend on ORR approval.

In reality, a fierce contest for ECML paths is under way, with GNER competing with Grand Central and to a lesser extent Hull Trains, for scarce capacity.

The ambitions of aspirational open access operator Grand Central are given little encouragement in this behind-the-scenes brief:
"Against the advantage of better services to destinations such as Hartlepool and Halifax, the SRA has to consider the effect on revenues - In practice, the level of 'abstraction' of revenue is often significant. Open access services are seldom viable unless they stop at stations already served by franchisees. Moreover, since open access operators face lower track access charges, they are typically able to offer lower fares."

"The ORR in previous findings has looked for a balance between revenue generation and revenue abstraction as an indicator of where public interest lies. So far as it goes this is a reasonable test, but the balance needs to be struck having regard to whole industry costs."

"The SRA believes that it would be appropriate for ORR to consider again whether, on efficiency rounds and to ensure a 'level playing field', there is a case for reviewing the arrangements on access charge allocations, there is an efficiency case for applying the same track access charges to competing operators."

The decision on the future use of paths on the ECML will rest with the Office of Rail Regulation, not the Department of Transport, but the ORR's evaluation of the competing claims has been in progress throughout this year, with no hint of an announcement yet.

Grand Central has continued to claim strong local support for its plans, but the SRA says it believes the main traffic flows from Sunderland and Bradford are regional, not London-directed.

The possibility of revenue abstraction has been raised previously too. It was given as one reason for refusing GC's original application to run services between Newcastle and Manchester: in that case, the official intention was to protect the income of franchiseholding TransPennine Express.

The document also reaffirms the SRA view that a major upgrade of the ECML is now irrelevant:
"there is no longer a case for a large-scale upgrade of the route. Better use can be made of the existing infrastructure as a result of recent small-scale improvements, and much more can be achieved with targeted investment."

For the longer term there are wider choices to be made. These 'wider choices' appear to involve the downgrading of the ECML to 'classic' status:
"If demand continues to grow, there will be very little scope left for further cost-effective capacity increases. Solutions such as High Speed Line options thus need be considered, and, given the lead times involved, without any delay."

"Open access services are seldom viable unless they stop at stations already served by franchisees."

What the SRA said:
Under the new franchise contract, GNER will pay £1.3bn over the life of the franchise and will deliver specific and demonstrable commitments. The benefits for passengers will [include]:
New half hourly London-Leeds services throughout the day;
A commitment to develop a newly electrified stretch of track south of Leeds, providing greater Leeds to London capacity;
A contractual commitment to restore operational performance to better than pre-Hatfield levels"

- SRA Press Release 22 March 2005

but, in fact:
It is proposed to explore the development of the 'Horseshoe' concept for the fifth off-peak long distance train. This would entail running 1 tph in each direction in a loop from London to London via Wakefield, Leeds, and Hambleton; and a new 'parkway station'. The SRA believes that, for this project to be viable, it will be necessary to re-examine arrangements for both long distance and regional trains and to ensure that widespread benefits are derived. At present the proposal is at concept stage. There is no contractual commitment in the franchise to implement this proposal.
- Brief to DfT, June 2005

Cuts to North-East Rail Services Opposed

Railnews: 06 Sep 2005

PLANS by the former Strategic Rail Authority to discontinue passenger train services in North-East England are facing mounting opposition.

The proposals - revealed by The Journal newspaper in Newcastle-upon-Tyne last month - include discontinuing services from Newcastle to Morpeth and Chathill and ending round-trip journeys between Sunderland and Newcastle.

The SRA also proposed halving the number of trains from Birmingham and the South-West to Newcastle and has opposed a new "open access" direct service proposed between London, Teesside and Sunderland, said The Journal.

The newspaper now reports that Northumberland County Council leader Bill Brooks is hoping to mobilise cross-party opposition in the authority to the plans, which will be decided on by Network Rail.

And passengers in the county have added their voice to the protests against the SRA's document, reports The Journal.

Coun Brooks said: "Although some of these [SRA] suggestions make good sense, there are others which could seriously threaten rural communities.

"We hope these remain a far fetched suggestion and not a genuine proposal.

"The county council has recently worked hard to improve links. We worked with Virgin trains to get the CrossCountry service to Leeds, the Midlands and South-West England to stop at Morpeth.

"Excellent transport links with other parts of the UK, especially to London, have important strategic economic benefits for Northumberland."

Ken Allott, chairman of the South-East Northumberland Rail User Group, said: "Once people are forced into their cars to start their journey, they often do not use rail for longer journeys. The surviving rail services will lose passengers too.

"The brief of the SRA was strategic planning, not short-term fixes to route congestion and money shortages, but short-term solutions are all this report offers."

September 07, 2005

CSX Faces Rail Delays Due to Northwest Mechanic Strike

Ohio News Now: September 6, 2005
Tom Bosco

(Walbridge, OH) --- One union official says trains could be backed up from St. Louis to New York City, all because of some striking Northwest Airline Mechanics in Northwest Ohio.

As NBC24 first reported Tuesday, striking Northwest Airlines employees set up a picket line at an Ohio rail yard yesterday to bring attention to their labor dispute.

Striking workers say picketing at the C-S-X Transportation rail yard in Toledo is legal under the Railway Labor Act that governs labor relations with airlines.

Members of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen who operate the rail yard refused to cross the picket line, stopping train cars from departing the yard.

Bob Rose of the airline mechanic's union local in Detroit says the picket line at the rail yard was an attempt to disrupt Detroit-bound C-S-X freight.

A union official estimates the yard is 95-percent shut down, although C-S-X won't confirm that. C-S-X says rail cars that pass through Walbridge carry grain, coal and general merchandise. The rail line won't estimate when or if consumers will be affected.

C-S-X plans to ask a court for a temporary restraining order Wednesday.

Why does TUC applaud this latest pension wheeze?

Financial Times: September 5 2005
Letter From Mr Hugh Lowe.

Sir, There was an interesting juxtaposition of pension items in your edition of September 1.

First was a letter from Peter Vicary Smith of Which? where he berates, with abundant justification, the private pensions industry as "the most dysfunctional consumer market [with] A litany of mis-selling and other scandals ...". Then on page 3 there was an article reporting a proposal from the Engineering Employers Federation, applauded by Brendan Barber of the Trades Union Congress, proposing compulsory, instead of voluntary, contributions to private company pensions and the insertion of the Inland Revenue between the employers and the managers of the pension funds, whose faults are so roundly condemned in Mr Vicary Smith's letter.

Why should this eliminate the frauds, which Mr Vicary Smith (and the late Sheila McKechnie before him) have exposed so ably? Why should compulsion end scandals? What cost/benefit improvements would it bring to the pensions of ordinary retired workers? Will it eliminate the inbuilt tax avoidance that favours the better off? Why go in for privatised pensions at all when pay-as-you-go state pensions are shown to be far cheaper to run and more equitably distributed?

Mr Barber certainly needs to ask these questions too. What induces the TUC to turn primarily to a financial elite that have run the private pensions industry gravy train at so much profit to themselves for so long? Surely this is a significant cause of Britain having, according to the Turner Commission, "one of the least generous pension systems in the developed world".

Why not prioritise increasing PAYG National Insurance pensions instead?

Hugh Lowe,
Press Officer,
Greater London Pensioners Association,
London W3 9JF

TUC explodes pension compulsion myths

TUC: 6 September 2005

The TUC has stepped up its campaign for compulsory employer and employee contributions to pensions with an attack on the 'top ten myths' about compulsion.

In a briefing published today (Wednesday) in the week before its annual Congress, the TUC says that a voluntary system can only be cheaper to the extent that it fails to close the pensions gap. A voluntary system has inevitable costs, whether from new tax breaks, subsidies, publicity campaigns or other ways of persuading people to make savings. These will come on top of the actual cost of pensions contributions. Therefore only a voluntary system that fails will be cheaper than a compulsory system.

The briefing (below) also deals with myths that have been peddled about the Australian pensions system, which phased in compulsory contributions as the TUC are urging in the UK.

TUC General Secretary Brendan Barber said, 'Everyone knows there's a growing pensions crisis. People at work today are not saving enough. All the voluntary approaches to shift the responsibility from government and employers onto individuals have failed. A generation of young employees have no idea how much poorer they will be in retirement than their parents.

'The argument for phasing in compulsory pension contributions by both employers and employees is strong - as the Turner Commission recognised. Yet a strong campaign has been mounted against it by some employers and opposition politicians. This briefing shows their arguments are wrong.

'The only way a voluntary system is cheaper than a compulsory system is if it fails to get people saving.'

Mick McAteer of Which!, fellow members of the Peoples Pensions Coalition that earlier in the year called for an extension of compulsion, said: ' It is important to explode the myths about compulsion. Which? Believes it is the most cost-effective, responsible and fairest method of ensuring the UK creates a sustainable pension system. Critically, it is the fairest for future generations of consumers who have no say on how pensions policy is formulated today. '

The top ten myths about pensions compulsion

The depth of the pensions crisis is well known. As the Turner Commission has reported, people are not saving enough to ensure a decent income in retirement. Part of the problem is the retreat of employers from providing decent pensions. Employers have replaced good schemes with far less generous schemes, but the numbers in employment who do not have access to any kind of occupational pension has grown.

The TUC has argued that the only way to halt the employer retreat is a phased introduction of compulsory contributions from both employers and employees, as happened in Australia. An extension of compulsion was a key demand made in the People's Pension Coalition statement backed by the TUC, Which?, Help the Aged and Age Concern. (See http://www.tuc.org.uk/pensions/tuc-10046-f0.cfm )

The call has been controversial and opposed by some employer organisations and politicians. But many of the criticisms have been based on myths. This briefing tackles the top ten myths.

Myth one - Compulsion would be more expensive than voluntarism and would cost the exchequer lost revenue or cost jobs.

The truth: compulsion is the most efficient way of ensuring that people save enough for retirement. Voluntarism is only cheaper to the extent that it fails to get people saving. If a voluntary system succeeded in persuading people to save as much as compulsion would deliver it would be more expensive. The costs of encouraging people to save, whether through incentives, tax breaks or publicity campaigns would have to be paid for on top of increased pension contributions.

Myth two - The public is against compulsion.

The truth: research carried out by Which? in September 2004 found a clear majority of those in work or seeking work in favour of compulsion: 73 per cent agreed it should be compulsory for all employers to contribute to a pension scheme, with 71 per cent agreeing all employees should contribute. A 2004 survey of 1,001 British working people carried out by Chase de Vere found 85% supported compulsory pension saving, with almost 75% still supporting compulsion if they had to contribute.

Myth three - compulsion would displace existing savings rather than create new savings.

The truth: all major studies of the Australian compulsory superannuation system have concluded that it has created much new saving. In last year's Reserve Bank of Australia report it was estimated that over 60 per cent of the additional money in the superannuation system since the introduction of compulsion was new savings. Other studies put the figure at over 80 per cent.

It is actually more likely that incentives - such as new tax breaks - would result in displacement of savings, as the Sandler report concluded.

Myth four - net savings fell in Australia because of compulsory superannuation, and compulsion started a recession in Australia.

The truth: there is no factual evidence to support either of these. The Reserve Bank of Australia report suggests that actually the introduction of compulsory savings has increased the savings rate by up to 2 per cent a year.

Since 1990 Australia has had sustained economic growth and the stockmarket has outperformed other major indices in the region and globally.

Myth five - auto-enrolment is preferable to compulsion.

The truth: auto-enrolment could boost savings, and the TUC has always supported it. But it only works where there is an occupational pension in which employees can be enrolled. A big part of the pensions crisis is the decline in the number of workers covered by decent occupational schemes. Auto-enrolment would not provide a single new scheme - and if it increased the pension costs of good employers it might make it easier for bad employers to take advantage of the lack of a level playing field and undercut them.

In any case auto-enrolment is a form of compulsion. There is a logical inconsistency in supporting auto-enrolment but opposing compulsion in principle.

Myth six - if a minimum contribution rate is set, employers and employees will just contribute the minimum.

The truth: perversely this is true, but it's not a reason to oppose pensions compulsion. The minimum contribution rate at present is zero, and that's precisely what huge numbers of employers and employees contribute to pensions today. A higher minimum than zero can only increase savings.

Of course the minimum contribution needs to be eventually set at a level that will provide a worthwhile retirement income, but a compulsory system is likely to encourage increased voluntary savings as well, as employees will have an easy way to make additional contributions.

Myth seven - Compulsion hits low earners as they would be forced to save cash they can't afford.

The truth: Not necessarily - as it depends how the compulsion system works. The TUC's plan uses a strengthened state second pension working as the bedrock of a compulsory system. This ensures that the low paid are treated fairly - only pay over and above a threshold would face deductions towards a state second pension. The very low paid would therefore pay nothing, and would instead receive credits towards their pension. Those earning slightly more than the threshold would pay a small proportion of their earnings. Compulsory contributions to occupational or private pension provision would only be appropriate higher up the income scale.

But it is certain that a voluntary system does not suit the low paid. Private pensions suppliers are not interested in this market, and small savings in private pensions are swallowed up by charges.

Research carried out by Watson Wyatt for Which? suggests that in the US voluntarism penalises minority ethnic groups for example. Moreover, if government wanted to help lower income groups it could use the cost savings from compulsion to boost savings of lower income groups.

Myth eight - Compulsion is not practical politics

The truth: A survey by Virgin Money in 2002 found that 60 per cent of MPs supported compulsory pension contributions. With public and MP support, all it will take is political will and a willingness to stand up to vested interests.

Myth nine - Employers don't support compulsion.

The truth: In its recent report 'Rethinking Pensions' the Engineering Employers Federation explicitly supported mandatory pension contributions from both employer and employee. The EEF has also found rising support for compulsion amongst its members, in part to enable them to compete on a level playing field with those firms who currently do not pay anything towards employee pensions.

Myth ten - Compulsion would introduce new state interference in how people used their after-tax income.

The truth: There is nothing new about compulsion in the UK pensions system. At present people are compelled to contribute additional National Insurance contributions if they do not contribute part of their income to an opted out pension scheme. Some people who take this line also back auto-enrolment, which surely raises the same principles

The state compels citizens to spend money in many ways - such as compulsory insurance for car drivers. There is nothing philosophically different about pensions savings.

NOTES TO EDITORS:

- Pensions Commissioner Adair Turner will speak to TUC Congress in Brighton at 9.30am next Wednesday (14th September), followed by the pensions debate. To apply for media credentials, now subject to a �50 charge, call 020 7467 1242 before Friday 12 September or register at the credentials office at the Brighton Centre from 9am Sunday morning.

Hatfield Cover-up

The Daily Mirror: 7 September 2005
By Clinton Manning and Adrian Shaw

As five Network Rail bosses walk free over this terrible crash, we reveal how the firm GAGGED the Mirror as we were about to EXPOSE an astonishing 354 track defects.

A SECRET catalogue of rail faults can be revealed today after five Network Rail executives were cleared of blame for the Hatfield rail crash.

Three years after the disaster there were still repeated failures to fix 354 potentially lethal hazards in the same region, according to a shocking report.

Hatfield_train_wreck (11k image)
TRAIN OF DISASTER: The wrecked Hatfield train in which four victims died

The dossier was so sensitive Network Rail, which admitted it was a "very nasty story", won a High Court injunction gagging us from revealing its contents during the seven-month Hatfield trial.

We can now disclose that badly damaged rail lines in Network Rail's London North Eastern region were still in use up to 20 months after they should have been replaced.

Shameful neglect included cracked rails, dodgy welding and misaligned track. Many of the faults were on lines carrying trains at up to 120mph. Unions said ignoring the faults was a "major gamble".

The 2000 Hatfield disaster which left four people dead and more than 100 injured was caused by a lethal crack in the line identified 21 months earlier. But yesterday an Old Bailey jury cleared the executives of breaking health and safety laws. They were earlier acquitted of manslaughter.

The verdict shocked grieving relatives and unions. James Melvin, brother-in-law of victim Steve Arthur said outside court: "This beggars belief. I wouldn't say they got away with murder but they certainly got away with manslaughter."

RMT chief Bob Crow asked: "How can safety rules be broken and no one is responsible?

"When there's money to be made there's no shortage of executives ready to pocket fat bonuses. But when there's responsibility to be taken for something going horribly wrong there's a deafening chorus of 'Not me, guv'."

The faults exposed in the dossier were officially classified "2C defects". This means they are serious enough to require track to be immediately strengthened with clamps and replaced within 13 weeks.
But some stretches were still being used almost 20 months after they should have been fixed.

In many cases Network Rail failed to impose 20mph speed restrictions, according to the report handed to us by a source in February.

On the first four pages alone of the 30-page dossier 30 sites were named where work to replace track was more than 100 days late.

A crack 30mm long and 14mm deep was first picked up on a 90mph stretch of line at Ketton, Leics, in April 2003. It was due to be replaced by July 1, 2003. The report said the work was 591 days overdue. It had not been tested since April 8, 2004.

Cracked track at Clay Mills, near Derby - where trains travel at 120mph - was 465 days past the deadline for replacement.

The fault was first discovered in August 2003. It should have been replaced by November 4 that year but was still in place in February this year. Our source said: "These are serious faults. But people travelled over them every day at up to 120mph. Did they want another crash?" Mr Crow said: "Repeatedly ignoring these standards amounted to a major gamble."

The shambles cost the man in charge his job. Derby infrastructure maintenance manager Steve Slater is still employed by the company but no longer in a "safety critical role". When the Mirror contacted Network Rail about the faults a press officer emailed bosses "URGENT - very nasty story". He warned: "The Mirror is looking to go big with this tomorrow and depending on the news agenda it may make the front page."

Network Rail immediately started the legal moves which stopped us printing details of the scandal until now.

James Melvin said: "The public have been denied vital information. This whole sorry story is a tale of neglect and failure of duty."

Network Rail said last night all the faults had now been fixed and tighter systems put in place to prevent backlogs building up.

The Hatfield train derailed at 115mph in a "disaster waiting to happen". The damaged track was one of about 200 serious defects overdue for repair on a 43-mile stretch of the East Coast Mainline leading out of King's Cross.

Before the court yesterday were Anthony Walker, 46, a regional director of sub- contractors Balfour Beatty; Nicholas Jeffries, a Balfour Beatty civil engineer; Alistair Cook, 50 and Sean Fugill, both 50 and both asset managers for Railtrack, and Keith Lea, a Railtrack track engineer.

Despite a catalogue of safety lapses they were cleared by a jury which deliberated over four days, and shook hands at the verdict. As they left court, all five expressed sympathy for those who had died or been injured while protesting their innocence.

Balfour Beatty had admitted the safety charge. It was earlier cleared of manslaughter. Sentence was adjourned until next month.

In comments which can only be reported now judge Mr Justice Mackay said the level of proof needed for conviction for manslaughter was so high it could not be shown the men were guilty of gross negligence.

He said: "This case continues to underline the pressing need for the long delayed reform of the law in this area of unlawful killing. Some will seem lucky to have escaped prosecution."

Last year the family of victim Mr Arthur, 46, of Pease Pottage, West Sussex, were awarded �1million damages by Railtrack which admitted liability, Mr Arthur's mother Audrey, 78, said yesterday: "Greed and negligence killed those who died."

Susan Monkhouse, from Leeds - whose husband Peter, 50, died - said: "Hatfield should never have happened. But it's awful, there'll always be another crash."

Miscalculation of risk brought tragedy

Financial Times: September 7 2005
By Robert Wright

The deaths in the Hatfield crash resulted from a gross miscalculation of the risks arising from a well-known engineering problem.

The track on the curve at Hatfield, which was used by hundreds of express trains every week, had begun to crack on the inside - or gauge corner - of the outside rail.

The problem, known as gauge corner cracking, is common where high-speed trains are forced against the track as they enter a curve.

Many of the trains round the curve at Hatfield at the same 115mph maximum speed as the doomed train. The problem can be addressed by grinding the rail to shave off the cracked area, as long as the cracks have not grown too serious. The track will eventually need to be replaced.

The crash might have been avoided if the problem had been managed effectively.

The court heard that the track at Hatfield had been identified for replacement 21 months before the accident. The work was scheduled for March 2000, but because of a miscommunication the necessary rail did not arrive.

When the rail did arrive in April 2000, Railtrack failed to schedule the necessary track possessions - agreed periods when the track is handed over to the contractor for maintenance work and trains cannot run. The court heard that the replacement rail was lying by the track when the crash happened.

Even without the rail's replacement, the crash could still have been avoided. Balfour Beatty, maintenance contractor for the area concerned, used ultrasonic testing equipment to monitor the development of the cracks.

But when the machine said the results were unreadable, little further action was taken.

A book on Hatfield, The Crash That Stopped Britain, by Ian Jack says results can be unreadable either because the ultrasonic testing machine is not working properly, or because the cracks are so severe that the machine fails to work.

Balfour Beatty assumed that the machine was merely faulty. The result was probably unreadable because the cracks had grown too severe.

The court heard that Railtrack and Balfour Beatty had failed to adhere to established procedures for times when ultrasonic test results came back unreadable.

The procedures called for emergency track replacement or imposition of a speed restriction.

Instead, the only action taken was to use a railgrinder on the rail in September - by when the cracks might have been so severe that the treatment made them worse.

The result was that the track shattered into 300 pieces under the pressure of the 12.10 train from King's Cross to Leeds.

The accident's longer-term effect has been to changethe maintenance philosophy of Network Rail, which took over the running of the rail network from Railtrack two years after the crash.

It seeks to keep track conditions continuously monitored and to replace track just before there is a problem.

Hatfield relatives angry over managers' acquittal

The Times: September 07, 2005
By Ben Webster, Transport Correspondent

THE families of the victims of the Hatfield train crash condemned the weakness of the law on corporate manslaughter yesterday after five rail managers were acquitted at the Old Bailey.

Network Rail, which inherited the liabilities of Railtrack, was convicted of breaking safety rules before the crash.

Four people died and 102 were injured when a rail shattered under a King's Cross to Leeds train travelling round a curve at 115mph on October 17, 2000. The rail had been identified as faulty 21 months earlier but had been left unrepaired.

Railtrack failed to impose a speed restriction on the line despite several reports warning that the rail was deteriorating. When the deadline was missed for repairing 200 track defects, Railtrack simply allowed a new deadline to be set.

The prosecution had alleged that the derailment occurred because of a cavalier approach to safety by Railtrack, its contractor Balfour Beatty and five managers working for the two companies. The defence argued that it was unfair to make the managers scapegoats.

Jonathan Goldberg, QC, defending one of the men, told the court that they worked in an underfunded industry that had been neglected by successive governments for more than 40 years.

Balfour Beatty and the five men had originally faced manslaughter charges but these were thrown out by the judge, Mr Justice Mackay, halfway through the trial. Charges of manslaughter against Railtrack and three executives, including Gerald Corbett, the former chief executive, were dropped before the trial began. Balfour Beatty admitted breaching safety rules after being cleared of corporate manslaughter.

The case again highlighted the difficulty of securing convictions of companies for corporate manslaughter under current legislation.

The Government has proposed reforming the law to make it easier to prosecute companies for manslaughter by removing the need to prove that a senior individual was responsible. The draft Bill is due to be scrutinised by Parliament in the autumn.

John Pickering, the lawyer for the victims' families, said some of them felt betrayed. "They feel rather let down by the prosecution process and the fact that there haven't been successful prosecutions other than on basic health and safety charges against two companies," he said. "The law as it currently stands is unsatisfactory and proves ineffective in establishing responsibility at a senior level."

Mr Pickering said that Labour had been dragging its feet since promising to reform the corporate manslaughter law in 1997. "I am hugely sceptical about the speed with which this process is moving."

Mr Justice Mackay, in dismissing the manslaughter charges last month, said: "This case continues to underline a long and pressing need for the long-delayed reform of the law in this area of unlawful killing."

Bob Crow, the general secretary of the Rail, Maritime and Transport union, said: "Now more than ever before we need an effective corporate manslaughter law to ensure that bosses responsible for avoidable deaths are held to account."

The five managers acquitted yesterday were Anthony Walker, 48, Balfour Beatty Rail Maintenance Limited's regional director, and Nicholas Jeffries, 50, a civil engineer for the same firm; Alistair Cook, 52, and Sean Fugill, 52, both managers for Railtrack North Easter, and Keith Lea, 55, a Railtrack LNE track engineer.

Mr Goldberg told the jury: "These five men worked in an under-funded, under-invested railway industry, which had been neglected by governments of all parties for over 40 years and which had recently undergone a botched and unworkable privatisation.

"It is a sad reflection on political correctness and the blame culture of modern-day Britain that five men at modest job levels are blamed for Hatfield while the concerned and grieving relatives and the press and public are fed the line that the buck stops with them."

The four men who died in the crash were Steve Arthur, 46, from Pease Pottage, West Sussex; Peter Monkhouse, 50, of Headingley, Leeds; Leslie Gray, 43, of Tuxford, Nottingham; and Robert James Alcorn, 37, of Auckland, New Zealand.

Network Rail and Balfour Beatty will be sentenced on October 3 for the health and safety offences.

Ian McAllister, the Network Rail chairman, apologised in a statement to the victims and said that the company, which replaced Railtrack in 2002, took all maintenance back in-house last year.

CASES DISMISSED

KEITH LEA, 55, was track engineer of the London North East Zone of Railtrack and oversaw work carried out by maintenance contractors. Having spent more than 35 years in the industry, he is still regional track maintenance engineer for Network Rail, ensuring that correct track standards are met by maintenance teams.

SEAN FUGILL, 51, at the time of the crash was the area asset manager of Railtrack's London North East Zone. He has spent 26 years working on the railways and is now transition manager for Network Rail and is part of a team working on the transfer of maintenance back to the company for the Reading area.

ALISTAIR COOK was the asset manager for the London North East Zone of Railtrack from King's Cross to the Scottish border on the East Coast mainline. Mr Cook, 52, oversaw track and signals maintenance, and reported directly to Nicholas Pollard. He is now head of maintenance improvement at Network Rail's headquarters.

NICHOLAS JEFFRIES, 53, was employed by Balfour Beatty and was responsible for overseeing all engineering work and for advising his line management on engineering matters.

He left his £50,000-a-year job with Balfour after the incident but still works in the industry.

ANTHONY WALKER was working with Balfour Beatty as its regional director in charge of the contract to maintain the East Coast main line.

Mr Walker, 48, had worked on the railways for several years before joining the comany in 1996. He left his £50,000-a-year job before to the crash.

Senegal: Transrail workers' strike

Sud Quotidien: 06 septembre 2005
M BADJI - (Translated AG)

Meeting fixed for the 14th
Click here to see a pop-up of the {{popup dakarbamako.gif dakarbamako 462x258}}dakarbamako railway
On the second day of the Transrail workers' strike, the Managing Director's office paid the demonstrators' expenses: it was ransacked by workers "vigorously denouncing Transrail's Master-slave relationship towards the workforce."

The strikers are demanding immediate negotiations with the General Manager who promptly travelled from Mali to acquaint himself with the facts of the situation. They refused any form of mediation by an outside body, or any kind of delay whatsoever. The meeting eventually took place in the Conference Centre. After three hours of debates surging back and forth, the two parties were able to come to a verbal agreement.

dakarbamako (91k image)
The 1250km-long Dakar-Bamako railway completed in 1924 was sold in 2003 to the Franco-Canadian joint venture 'Canac-Getma' with massive redundancies (637 Malian railwaymen out of 1400 and almost half the 1374 Senegalese railwaymen).

In fact, the management and the strikers' delegates agreed on some of the points of the strikers' platform of demands. The Directors' spokesman, Francois Lemieux is committed to respect Senegalese Health and Safety legislation standards in future and to undergo inspection by the Regional Labour Inspector. This will take place after the workers have met with the Regional Governor, who will personally make a tour of the railway workshops to witness the working conditions so deplored by the workers.

However additionally, the question was discussed of reinstating the attendance bonus, to a value of (CFA) 150,000 francs which the workers are demanding from the board of directors. This matter will be discussed at the next meeting, which is to be held on the 13th. A recall mass meeting is being organised for the following day September 14th, at which time the workers will assess the decisions of the Board of Directors and decide what action to take.

The strikers are not particularly satisfied with the turn of events since the predecessor of the General Manager had already made similar promises. Nevertheless, they are returning to their workshops and offices awaiting the next meeting with only one watchword: "in discipline and with the unity to win".

Railwaymen salary protest

Cybernoon.com: September 06, 2005

Mumbai_dharna (27k image)
Mumbai -- Added responsibilities come with cut in pay and leads to dharna [dharna - Hindi for a hunger strike at a debtor's door to obtain justice, such as payment of debt].

The Central and Western Railways' cup of grief has run over. Still struggling to come to terms with the losses they incurred due to 26/7's deluge, both the city's railways now find they have to deal with a staff strike. Actually, the strike has been called because of the railways' decision to cut salaries of employees.

In protest, the National Railway Mazdoor Union (NRMU) held a 'dharna' inside the Central Railway Headquarters at CST yesterday. The ten-hour-long protest saw family members of the railway employees, including their wives and kids, joining in. Red banners with slogans like 'NRMU Zindabad' covered the building."

P. R. Menon, NRMU general secretary, said that the protest was to support various demands which were unattended for years. "During the floods we were also affected, but no relief was sent to us. We were given advance salaries. Even that was withdrawn before it reached us. We placed our grievances before our general manager, but nothing happened. Now we will go to Delhi with our protest. The railway budget increases but our salary decreases. What kind of justice is this?"

What kind of justice is this?
Employees represented by the NRMU are from different sections of the railways, including motormen, countermen and also technical and non-technical staff. Shankarprasad Ghirgole, a motorman, said that the salary cut would affect his family badly. "The railways always challenge our work. We are underpaid. Now with this salary cut, I will face a tough time with my children's education."

Shrikant Berothe, a guard on the Mumbai-Pune route, said that such protests are just a response to biased decisions by the railways. "I have been in service for the last four years. Now as per the new report, the salaries have been reduced and the responsibilities have been increased. This is injustice towards the employees."

N.P. Yadav, a locomotive inspector on the northern long-distance line, said, "This protest is a reaction to the new report brought out by the railways, in which the allowances of employees has been reduced. In fact, employees are also given added responsibilities with low income. This is the first time the railways is witnessing a downward trend in the salaries. This protest is just to inform the officials that the new report is not accepted by their employees."

Sunil Jain, Chief PRO (Central Railway), said, "This is not a zonal level issue, but affecting India in whole. The union is cooperative and they will place the report in the national committee. We have a lesser role to play as the decisions will be made by the national level authorities."

AFL-CIO Chief Criticizes Storm Response

Associated Press: Sep 5, 2005
By JEREMIAH MARQUEZ, Writer

LOS ANGELES - AFL-CIO President John Sweeney derided the Bush administration's handling of Hurricane Katrina at a Labor Day rally Monday, saying the government's slow response was a sign of hostility to workers.

Speaking to more than 1,000 cheering teachers, firefighters and nurses at a Los Angeles intersection, Sweeney argued that cuts in government services and taxes had sapped the administration's ability to react to the crisis.

"We really need look no further than the ravaged cities of the Gulf Coast ... to see what can happen when government is underfunded, unprepared and unresponsive," Sweeney said.

Amid public complaints over the pace of relief, President Bush on Monday visited Southern states and vowed a huge effort for hurricane victims. White House officials have said the time for blame will come later and that the federal government had difficulty getting information from local authorities.

In an interview after the event, Sweeney noted that many victims along the Gulf Coast were poor and working class.

"This administration has been very callous," he said. "And the slow reaction to the (hurricane) ... is an indication of their shortsightedness and lack of focus on workers and their families."

The Labor Day rally comes as organized labor struggles with membership declines and division.

In July, three of the AFL-CIO's biggest unions — the Teamsters, Service Employees International Union and the United Food and Commercial Workers — left the federation. Critics complained the labor group, made up of more than 50 unions, was spending too much money on political campaigns and not enough on organizing unions.

Sweeney said he was in talks with disaffiliated union leaders.

September 06, 2005

New Labour to re-privatise South Eastern Trains

New labour to re-privatise railways again on South Eastern Trains - RMT to Ballot for Industrial action.

RMT to ballot over South Eastern Trains jobs and conditions

MEMBERS OF Britain's biggest rail union at South Eastern Trains are to be balloted for strike action after the company failed to provide assurances that jobs, pensions and working conditions will not be adversely affected by the re-privatisation of the franchise.

Preparations to re-privatise the Integrated Kent Franchise have continued despite the huge improvements made since it was brought back into public ownership and overwhelming support for it to remain in public hands.

"We asked South Eastern Trains to insert clauses into our members' contracts ensuring that there would be no compulsory redundancies or worsening of pensions or conditions, and that existing promotion and transfer arrangements would remain in place," RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

"We made it quite clear to SET that failure to agree to do so by the end of August would result in a dispute existing between us, and the RMT executive has now set in motion a ballot for strike action among our more than 1,350 members.

"The last time the franchise was handed to the private sector staffing levels were pared to the bone, our conditions came under attack and staff morale hit rock bottom, while services deteriorated alarmingly and public confidence evaporated

"After Connex was thrown off the franchise and it came home to the public sector much progress was made in restoring staffing levels, improving services and punctuality, boosting staff morale and stopping the massive haemorrhage of public money.

"But in the run-up to re-privatisation the company is already trying to throw the whole process back into reverse by reducing station-staff numbers.

"Our members' fears are founded on a bellyful of experience of privateers seeking to maximise profits by cutting staff, undermining decent pension schemes and squeezing pay and working conditions while pocketing massive subsidies.

"Like most rail users, we would far rather SET remained in the public sector, but if the government insists on going ahead with this ideologically driven re-privatisation we have every right to demand that our members' jobs, pensions and working conditions are protected," Bob Crow said.

ends

Note to editors/...

Note to editors: Early Day Motion 395, tabled in the House of Commons by Clive Efford and signed by 32 MPs, expresses deep concern that the government intends to re-privatise SET and calls on the government to allow the company to make a public-sector bid to run the franchise.

Bhangra Benefit Night

London Gate Gourmet Sacked Workers Support Group & Workers Beer Company

Gate_Gourmet_women1 (35k image)
8pm to 11.00pm
Sunday 11th September 2006

Southall Community Centre (opposite Sunrise Radio)
Bridge Road, Southall, Middlx (nearest station is Southall British Rail)

Dancers, DJ’s, Licensed Bar, Asian Snacks & Speakers
Suggested solidarity entrance £5.00

Organised by the

Sacked Gate Gourmet T&G Shop Stewards Committee


London Gate Gourmet Sacked Workers Support Group & Workers Beer Company

8pm to 11.00pm

Sunday 11th September 2006

Southall Community Centre (opposite Sunrise Radio)
Bridge Road, Southall, Middlx (nearest station is Southall British Rail)

Contact 07861-675 385 www.sackedbygategourmet.org.uk
Bring friends & family ~ Bring solidarity ~ Bring workmates

Hatfield trial underlines need for effective corporate manslaughter law

RMT: 6 September 2005

THE DEBACLE of the Hatfield trial underlines the need for an effective corporate manslaughter law and an end to private-sector involvement in the railways, Britain's biggest rail union says today.

"How can it be that safety rules were broken yet no-one was responsible?" RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

"When there's money to be made there's no shortage of executives ready and willing to pocket fat bonuses, but when there's some responsibility to be taken for something going horribly wrong there's a deafening chorus of "not me, guv".

"Now more than ever before we need an effective corporate manslaughter law to ensure that bosses responsible for avoidable deaths are held to account. The law as it stands makes that next to impossible.

"We also need to get the privateers off our railways once and for all.

'Privatisation and the fragmentation of the railways effectively dismantled British Rail's safety culture, blurred lines of responsibility and communication and created the conditions that led to the tragedy at Hatfield.

"The safety of our industry has been subordinated to privateers' greed for too long and it's time the whole lot was brought back in-house," Bob Crow said.

Cars skip track in Fort Saskatchewan

United Transportation Union (UTU): September 3, 2005

Three empty CN cars left the track in a rail yard near Fort Saskatchewan - the company's fifth rail accident in Alberta in a month.

Around 5 p.m. yesterday three cars derailed and landed upright, as they were being moved in the Scotford Yard near Fort Saskatchewan, 42 km east of Edmonton, said CN spokesman Jim Feeny. There were no injuries and nothing was spilled.

Feeny said the derailment was being investigated.

Since Aug 3., when a CN train derailed along Lake Wabamun about 65 km west of Edmonton, spilling oil into the lake and along the shore, there have been four CN train derailments in Alberta, as well as a fatal train-truck collision near Fort Saskatchewan.

There have also been four derailments in British Columbia in the past month.

Feeny acknowledged there has been a series of high-profile derailments over the past several weeks in Western Canada, but insists that be put in context of the company's safety record compared to other railroads in North America.

"What you see is that CN has a safety record that is favourable compared to the rest of the railroad industry in North America," he said.

The unions representing CN workers have been calling for a federal inquiry into staff cutbacks and safety concerns.

Network Rail guilty over Hatfield

BBC News: 6 September 2005

Network Rail has been found guilty of breaching health and safety legislation in the run up to the Hatfield crash. The Old Bailey trial got under way in January this year.

But three Railtrack managers, and two former employees of Balfour Beatty, the firm which maintained the line, were cleared at the Old Bailey.

Four people were killed and 102 were injured when a Kings Cross to Leeds train left the tracks at high speed on 17 October 2000.

Prosecutors said the crash resulted from a "cavalier approach" to safety.

Sentence will be passed in October.

The jury was told the 115mph crash took place when the train was derailed by a cracked section of the track.

The prosecution said a backlog of essential work had been allowed to accumulate, and claimed the rail had been identified for repair 21 months earlier.

"These five men worked in an under-funded, under-invested railway industry, which had been neglected by governments of all parties" - Jonathan Goldberg QC


Network Rail, formerly Railtrack, which owned the East Coast Mainline at the time of the derailment, pleaded not guilty.

The Railtrack executives - Alistair Cook, 52, Sean Fugill, 52, and Keith Lea, 55 - and the executives from Balfour Beatty - Anthony Walker, 48, and Nicholas Jeffries, 50, also denied the charges.

Balfour Beatty, which had the contract to maintain the track at the time of the accident, admitted a charge under the Health and Safety Act.

But the company said it did not accept all the facts of the case the prosecution had outlined against it.

During the trial, Balfour Beatty and the five rail executives were formally cleared by the judge, Mr Justice Mackay, of manslaughter.

Defence lawyers had told the court the executives were being used as scapegoats.

"These five men worked in an under-funded, under-invested railway industry, which had been neglected by governments of all parties for over 40 years and which had recently undergone a botched and unworkable privatisation," said Jonathan Goldberg QC for Mr Jeffries.

Trial renews manslaughter debate

BBC News: 6 September 2005

The Hatfield train crash forced the government to overhaul its rail policy. The resulting court case could now force a re-think of corporate responsibility in the UK. The Hatfield crash ultimately forced Railtrack out of business.

The comments of an Old Bailey judge at a key moment in the trial of five rail bosses are set to put pressure on the government, which has been promising a corporate killing law since 1997.

Four people died and more than 100 were injured when the London King's Cross to Leeds express train hit a cracked rail and came off the tracks on 17 October 2000.

In September 2005, after an eight-month trial, Network Rail was found guilty of breaching safety guidelines.

Five executives - two from the engineering firm that maintained the track, Balfour Beatty, and three from track owner Railtrack - were cleared of all charges.

Balfour Beatty had already admitted health and safety breaches.

Initially, the five individuals had faced manslaughter charges while Balfour Beatty was accused of corporate manslaughter.

But at the midpoint of the trial, Mr Justice Mackay ordered all manslaughter charges against the individuals, and against the company, to be dropped.

Unprecendented

At the time, the judge told the jury he was not permitted to give his reasons for dropping the charges, telling them simply: "I must ask you to accept my ruling."

"If the companies do well, they get massive rewards, so if something goes wrong, they should be held responsible" - Bob Crow, RMT union


But what had happened in court on the previous day was unprecedented. The judge had directly addressed families of the victims, and weighed into a controversial political debate.

While the jurors were out of court, he said: "I appreciate that these decisions on the manslaughter counts will be a cause of concern, disappointment and perhaps distress to the relatives of those who died in this tragic crash.

"I have tried to explain why it is I am obliged by the existing law in my judgment to make these rulings.

"This case continues to underline the pressing need for the long-delayed reform of the law in this area of unlawful killing."

Error of judgement

Balfour Beatty was charged with manslaughter under the Health and Safety at Work Act, 1974. Under the Act, a company can only be convicted of corporate manslaughter if a senior individual in that company is guilty of "gross negligence manslaughter".

"We are looking for parliamentary time to introduce the legislation" - Home Office


In the Hatfield case, as Judge Mackay put it, the conduct of the individuals was "at its highest, a bad error of judgement" and nowhere near gross negligence. Therefore, the case against the individuals had to be dropped.

With no individuals accused of manslaughter, the company could not be guilty of manslaughter.

Campaigners for a change to the law believe there should be a corporate killing law entirely separate from the laws covering individuals.

Bob Crow, boss of the RMT union which represents many rail workers, is among those calling for a change.

"Without a doubt" Network Rail/Railtrack, which was in overall control of the rail infrastructure, and Balfour Beatty should have faced criminal charges, he said.

"If the companies do well, they get massive rewards, so if something goes wrong, they should be held responsible," he said.

Manifesto pledges

Several other trade unions, relatives of victims and the Institute of Directors have all given their support for such a law.

The Labour Party has promised a corporate killing law in each of its last three election manifestoes. In March, the government published a draft bill for consultation. But there is still no law.

A Home Office spokeswoman said: "It is a very complicated area of the law and we have consulted widely with both industry and the legal profession to make sure we get it right.

"The consultation is now closed and we are looking for parliamentary time to introduce the legislation."

The fallout from the Hatfield case may just help to find a gap in the parliamentary diary.

How Hatfield changed the railways

BBC News: 6 September 2005

On 17 October 2000, the 1210 London to Leeds express train hit a cracked rail at Hatfield, Herts, while it was travelling at 117mph. Stephen Byers branded Railtrack a failure in the wake of the crash.

The rail shattered and the train came off the tracks, killing four people and injuring more than 100 others.

The train split into two, with the buffet car sustaining the worst of the damage, survivors saying the roof ripped open "like a can of sardines".

The whole incident took just 17 seconds to unfold.

Out-of-court settlements

Railtrack, the company in charge of rail infrastructure, admitted liability for the tragedy and paid damages to the families of the four men who died.

The widow of executive jet pilot Stephen Arthur, 46, of West Sussex, received £1m in damages at the High Court in June 2004.


FATAL CRASHES

* 10 May 2002: Potters Bar
Seven people killed as faulty points cause a derailment
* 17 October 2000: Hatfield
Four die as train derails on cracked track
* 5 October 1999: Paddington
Thirty-one people die as two trains collide after a driver goes through a red signal
* 19 September 1997: Southall
Seven die when a London-Swansea service crashes into an empty freight train


New Zealander Robert Alcorn, 37 - also a pilot, Peter Monkhouse, 50, an advertising executive of Leeds, and solicitor Leslie Gray, 43, of Nottingham also died in the crash.

Their families were awarded damages earlier in out-of-court settlements.

In the months immediately following the Hatfield crash, speed restrictions were enforced across the country as thousands of miles of track was checked for faults.

Railtrack was left with a £733m bill for the repairs and compensation to train-operating companies.

The firm could not pay and was put into administration in October 2001.

Stephen Byers, transport secretary at the time, then announced Railtrack would be replaced with a not-for-profit organisation - effectively putting the railways back under public sector control.

Mr Byers called for a "fresh start" and labelled Railtrack a failure.

The Hatfield disaster was one of four fatal crashes in five years blamed on poor track maintenance or driver error.

Senegal: Strike by Transrail workers

Sud Quotidien: 5 September 2005
Mariama BADJI (Translated AG)

Big day of discontent
There is sharp tension in Senegalese railways amongst Transrail workers who deserted railway workshops and other offices yesterday from mid-morning onwards. They headed for the administration headquarters building where they gave a militant demonstration to white Executives before holding a mass meeting.

These are determined workers raising their red arm-bands and shouting out their dissatisfaction. Through their spokespersons they denounced their working conditions, which are not far off slavery and bad rates of pay. They believe that in respect of management, share-holdings and investments nothing is being done for the workers. None of their technical proposals have been carried out. The staff shout out their frustration and their demands loud and clear, which Transrail is failing to address.

They maintain that the State is largely responsible for breaking agreements by those that took over after privatisation, which was carried out to the great detriment of the workers. An agreement was negotiated in December 2004, however up until now nothing whatsoever has been done for the staff, according to Pierre Ndoye, a trade unionist from Fedrail, which supports the workers' movement and the demands of the strikers for a decent recognition of the material and moral interests of the employees. He believes that they can put forward alternative solutions to all of the problems, which Transrail currently faces.

In any event, despite the intervention of the regional governor Zacaria Diaw who met them before asking them to go back to their workshops, the protesters are sticking to their campaign. They maintain they will not return to the workshops tomorrow and will again force the Canadians out of the administration headquarters building. About 700 railworkers are still awaiting a 100,000 franc one-off payment and the installation of a wage structure, which has already been agreed by the administration.

Another concern of the workers is the closure of the staff canteen while their colleagues from Mali continue to receive a subsidy to support theirs. In short, the workforce denounce all of the abuses they face. The director of human resources Ndaraw Fall who we challenged refused point blank to be quizzed over the situation but claims that "no notice [of the workers' action was given, a merely spontaneous movement took place".

Transport boss fears move to cut rail services

Glasgow Evening Times: September 5, 2005

TRANSPORT bosses fear Network Rail will try to cut services in Scotland in a bid to massage poor train performance figures.

SPT chairman Alistair Watson has warned rail bosses are closing stations and axing services in England rather than investing in improvements.

Now he has written to Scotland's Transport Minister Tavish Scott asking for a guarantee no services north of the border will be cut in such a way.

Train services in Scotland are currently being looked at in a Route Utilisation Strategy which aims to improve reliability for passengers.

But Mr Watson says in the West Midlands a similar review by the Strategic Rail Authority has meant poorly performing services being axed to boost the percentage of reliable services.

In some of the English cases, bus services are to be used in place of the axed rail services. Stations between Stoke and Stafford are to close and services between Wolverhampton and Walsall end.

Mr Watson fears Network Rail could be follow suit in Scotland. He said: "This is simply cooking the books. The logic is that the best way to avoid having trains cancelled is to avoid having any trains.

"If there is a problem with reliability the sensible course of action is to address the root causes, not axe the service.

"Over the past year we have seen great strides made by First ScotRail to improve performance.

"Unfortunately this hasn't been matched by Network Rail in Scotland which is now the worst performing Network Rail sector in Britain."

SPT is currently involved in a number of projects aimed at improving services in the west of Scotland and Mr Watson said he wants Network Rail to improve on a "poor record on infrastructure improvements".

Network Rail Director (Scotland) Ron McAulay said: "Mr Watson's statement is both misleading and incorrect.

"The Route Utilisation Strategy will assess Scotland's rail industry and identify the needs of passengers and the network's potential to fulfil those needs. As each strategy is unique to its area, it is impossible to compare Scotland's with the West Midlands'."

Japan's deadliest train accident in four decades blamed on speeding

AFX News Limited: 09.06.2005

TOKYO (AFX) - A government panel said speeding by a driver who was 80 seconds late caused Japan's deadliest train accident in four decades, which killed 107 people and injured 555.

In the April 25 accident, a seven-car commuter train jumped the tracks and smashed into an apartment tower during the morning rush hour in Amagasaki, part of an industrial belt lying between the western cities of Osaka and Kobe.

The committee investigating the accident said the train derailed when it travelled around a curve at more than 110 kph, despite the speed limit there of 70 kph.

The panel proposed to Transport Minister Kazuo Kitagawa a set of corrective measures such as detailed recordings of train movements and installation of more accurate speedometers.

The train's driver was among those killed in the crash.

The media and labor unions have said the driver must have been under intense pressure as rail operators here strictly enforce punctuality, publicly punishing drivers who run even seconds late.

The interim report confirmed that the driver overran a station by about 70 meters before the accident, putting him 80 seconds behind schedule.

Takami applied the brakes after the train negotiated the curve, but it was too late.

The panel did not address why the driver drove recklessly.

'As the driver is dead, there is no record on his state of mind,' Junzo Sato, who chairs the committee, told a news conference. 'I presume it will be difficult to determine what relationship there was between the train's operation and the speed.'

He said it might take two years from the time of the crash to make a final report.

RZD Hits Brakes on Siemens Train Deal

Moscow Times: September 6, 2005
By Lyuba Pronina, Staff Writer

Russian Railways is postponing the signing of a 1.5 billion-euro contract with Siemens on a joint high-speed rail project, presenting the German engineering giant with its second major setback in Russia this year.

Both Russian Railways, or RZD, and Siemens confirmed on Monday that plans blessed by President Vladimir Putin and German Chancellor Gerhard Schroder earlier this year were being reviewed.

The news comes after Russia's anti-monopoly watchdog nixed Siemens' bid for a controlling stake in turbine giant Siloviye Mashiny, or Power Machines, in April -- and only days before Putin is scheduled to visit Schroder in Germany.

"I had to suspend the project of high-speed trains between Moscow and St. Petersburg the way it was conceived. We expect to realize the project without multi-billion loans," Vladimir Yakunin, RZD's new president, said in an interview with Itogi magazine published Monday.

RZD has said in the past that it was in talks with the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development for a $500 million loan to help cover the project.

Under a preliminary agreement signed during Putin's visit to the Hannover Trade Fair in April, Siemens was set to develop and deliver 60 high-speed trains. The first trains were planned to begin darting between Moscow and St. Petersburg in 2008.

The actual contract between the two sides was to be signed in June, but the deal was delayed when Yakunin replaced Gennady Fadeyev as the head of RZD that month.

A Sept. 1 deadline for Siemens to submit a preliminary design for the new train has also been pushed back.

"We are negotiating a new deadline for the draft design," said an RZD spokeswoman who requested anonymity because of the sensitivity of the discussions.

The spokeswoman said that RZD's technical requirements and cost expectations proved too stringent.

"We do not rule out that the train will turn out to be too expensive," she said.

"In that case, we would talk about how to make the project cheaper, and maybe buy fewer trains."

Nikita Kukushkin, a Siemens spokesman in Moscow, confirmed the delays.

"The agreement is being reviewed without our participation," he said. "We would like to have seen the contract signed in June and not just sit and wait for a change in the weather."

For Siemens, the delays are the second setback in less than a year.

"From the image point of view, it does not make us look good. We are trying to convince a world-famous company that we are interested in foreign investments, but our actions don't match our words," said Igor Nikolayev, head of strategic analysis at FBK consultancy, which counts RZD among its clients.

Nevertheless, the review of the plans is not a surprise, said Nikolayev, as RZD has to face more pressing issues, such as the deterioration of its existing rolling stock.

Tunnel fire victim laid to rest

BBC News: 2 September 2005

One of the two railwaymen who died when fire broke out on a maintenance train on the Channel Tunnel Rail Link was laid to rest on Friday afternoon. Mr Lynch's colleagues described him as "a hero".

Engine driver Douglas Lynch, 50, from Folkestone, lost his fight for life on 20 August - four days after the fire.

The blaze started a mile inside a tunnel under the River Thames between Swanscombe, Kent, and Thurrock, Essex.

Mr Lynch's family invited all those who knew him to a service at St Saviour's Church in his home town.

His wife Denise and sons Michael and Stephen said they had wanted everyone who knew or worked with him to attend the ceremony.

90% burns

The fire on 16 August was on a train carrying cables used in the construction of a new line linking Gravesend to London St Pancras.

It is believed that Mr Lynch stayed with the train to prevent a major incident for which his colleagues have called him "a hero".

His wife described him as "the most safety conscious man you could meet".

Mr Lynch suffered 90% burns to his body and was taken to Darent Valley Hospital, Dartford, before being transferred to the burns unit at Broomfield Hospital, but passed away four days later.

A railway shunter died at the scene.

More than 50 firefighters fought to put out the blaze.

An investigation into the cause has been launched.

Tracking down the history of railway women

Yorkshire Post: 02 September 2005
Brian Dooks

WOMEN have worked on the railways since at least 1832, but when the first female guard to be employed by British Rail did some research she found they were barely mentioned in the history books. Now they have a book of their own thanks to Helen Wojtczak, who yesterday launched Railwaywomen at the National Railway Museum in York, where much of her research was carried out.

WOJTCZAK_book_sign_2005_1 (26k image)
Helena signs copies of her new book, 'Railwaywomen'.

Ms Wojtczak, of Hastings, who became a guard at Wimbledon in 1978, and worked on the railways for 20 years until she had to retire after suffering an accident on duty, has been researching Railwaywomen since 1998.

She said: "I was very interested in the history of the railway workers who came before me, but when I started to read about them, I was very disappointed that there were no women mentioned."

The omission started Ms Wojtczak on a research trail which include the Public Records Office in Kew and the Scottish Records Office in Edinburgh, but also included the National Union of Railwaymen headquarters at Coventry.

She said: "I read through 100 years of union newspapers to find what I wanted. I could see when I started. Now I wear spectacles. I used all my annual leave up every year, just to do this."

Among the personal details she discovered was that a woman called Argyll was station master at Merry Leas in Leicestershire in 1832. "It is not a dry book. I think it is very readable. I have dug out as much detail as I could find."

The book includes 90 pages of photographs from the national collection which have never been published previously. Ms Wojtczak has published the book herself. "Self-publishing among the working classes is very rare - doing so in hardback, with a serious work of social history, is almost unprecedented."

Supporting her at the launch were Ann Henderson, who used to drive Class 37 diesel locomotives on the West Highland line; Laura Biddulph, a train manager at Manchester, whose aunt, Edith Addison, a porter, received a bravery award from the Great Central Railway for saving the life of a passenger who fell between a train and the platform in 1916; Nicky Brann, a former guard and driver who is now a railway manager; and Ellen Bryan, a signalwomen with 28 years service.

Prof Colin Divall, of the Institute of Railway Studies, said Railwaywomen had been meticulously researched. He described it as "an unbiased, academically excellent and very entertaining".

Ms Wojtczak, whose book costs £25 or £10 for a CDROM e-book at the National Railway Museum and other outlets, is a guest on Women's Hour on BBC Radio 4 on Thursday.

HSE gamekeeper turned poacher's best friend

The Health & Safety Executive (HSE) has published an 'Informal consultation' entitled "Management of railway contractors - Developing an intervention strategy".

As HSE notes: "Recommendations relating to the better management of contractors in the rail industry were included in Part 2 of Lord Cullen's report into the crash at Ladbroke Grove.

"In May 2002 the HSC published a report on "The use of contractors in the maintenance of the mainline railway infrastructure" which described the background to the industry's use of contractors for maintenance and steps taken by both the industry and HSE, through its enforcement activity, to improve contractor health and safety management. A commitment to develop a management of contractors strategy was given in the HSC's "Strategy for Improving the Health and Safety on the Railways 2002-2005".

"Management of contractors in the rail industry was given fresh prominence by the implementation of arrangements within London Underground to contractorise all their infrastructure maintenance, and the HSC Interim report into the Potters Bar train derailment which endorsed Lord Cullen's recommendations on contractors. Subsequently Network Rail decided to take infrastructure back in house."

HSE has already commissioned W S Atkins to develop proposals for the strategy. W S Atkins is ahem,.. a major railway contractor. W S Atkins describes itself as: "the largest UK-based international railway consultancy. We provide a unique combined capability in infrastructure and train... We design, test and commission signalling and telecommunications systems... We provide civil engineering for rail infrastructure projects - from embankments and cuttings, through tunnels and bridges, to track designs and stations."

So no potential conflict of interest there then, just major railways contractor W S Atkins Rail being given lots of lovely HSE dosh for this railcontractors[1].pdf (395k file) .

In December 2004 the TUC and RMT campaigned for amendments to the Railways Bill to halt the transfer of HSE's rail-safety functions to the Office of Rail Regulation - removing the threat to subordinate safety to commercial considerations identified by Lord Cullen after the Ladbroke Grove rail crash.

So, the 'Health & Safety Executive Rail Delivery Programme - Management of Contractors Project: Proposals for the Essential Elements of a HSE Strategy for Management of Contractors (MoC)', is now being commissioned and delivered by one of the major firms to profit from the fragmentation and privatisation of railways in Britain.

As HSE's press release makes clear: "The W S Atkinsreport does not go as far as finalising a strategy but makes a number of recommendations based on an analysis of the position current at autumn 2004. The analysis and opinions in the report are those of W S Atkins and not HSE."

The period in question saw what the Railway Safety and Standards Board (RSSB) reported as a: "sustained and dramatic rise in fatalities and major injuries to trackworkers and a fifth successive year of increases in assaults on rail staff, which rose by 6% in 2004, to 3,847 incidents."

Yet, HSE commissioned Atkins Rail: "to develop proposals for a HSE Management of Contractors Strategy (MoC) Framework Strategy. The purpose of such a strategy is to enable the HSE to deploy its resources as effectively as possible so as to minimise the safety risk associated with the use of contractors in the rail industry in Great Britain (GB).

"The development of the proposals for a strategy commenced in August 2004 and was first issued to the HSE in November 2004. This version of the report has been prepared for wider circulation and publication.

"The Report sets out the findings from the research and investigations of: current legislation and regulations covering the rail industry; current arrangements for the management of contractors in the rail and other high risk industries; accident and incident reports and data; generic risk factors.

"The Report describes proposed measures whereby the HSE can use its influence to enhance the management of contractors in the rail industry, with the objective of improving safety. The Report outlines how these measures could be implemented."

While Parliament debated the Railways Bill, while the TUC and rail unions lobbied for HSE to retain authority over railway safety over and above the competition regulator - Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) - to avoid conflicts of interest, HSE were busy commissioning a report from one of the main beneficiaries of rail privatisation. You'd almost think it was corrupt...

September 05, 2005

Safety professionals demand corporate killing law

It isn't often we agree with the conclusions of so-called 'Safety professionals' - more often found explaining to union safety reps why expenditure on that vital piece of safety equipment, or an additional member of safety critical staff isn't justified by cost/benefit analysis. However, this press release Construction_survey_05.doc (102k file) for a new survey of 68 health and safety professionals in the construction industry, calls for stronger enforcement by HSE, greater director culpability and stronger corporate killing legislation. One submission bitterly declared: "directors sometimes feel that they employ H & S professionals like me to protect them from the law." Yup, that's about right.

Principle People - Health & Safety
Press Information: 24st August 2005

Conflicting Interests Undermine Safety

The relationship between health and safety and site management has often been uneasy, and a survey by the health and safety consultancy Principal People suggests that things have not improved. Returned with the survey were calls from health and safety professionals for stronger enforcement by HSE, greater director culpability and stronger corporate killing legislation. One submission bitterly declared that "directors sometimes feel that they employ H & S professionals like me to protect them from the law."

Principal People questioned 68 health and safety professionals with current or recent experience in the construction industry and found many areas of concern. There was dissatisfaction about the lack of authority given to health and safety, the conflicting agendas of management and about the pressure from clients for swift completions. More than half of the health and safety professionals often found themselves in conflict with site management, and almost everyone agreed that more could be done to make construction safer.

Almost half the respondents considered that they were not given the authority and resources necessary for the job, and a quarter were concerned that their employer did not offer adequate health and safety training. PPE regulations were not strictly enforced on site according to 31 per cent of those surveyed, and 93 per cent believed that safety would be compromised in the absence of full time health and safety staff.

While many commented that greater management accountability and liability and a stronger health and safety focus would be effective in reducing accidents, 72 per cent agreed that sometimes accidents happen which are nobody's fault, and for which it would be inappropriate to apportion blame.

When asked what changes would offer the greatest benefits to construction safety, answers ranged from greater corporate liability for accidents, compulsory safety management training for site managers and better policing by the HSE. There was also considerable cynicism directed at senior management.

One respondent wrote: "A safe working environment needs to come from the heart of the company to succeed - directors sometimes feel that they employ health and safety professionals like myself to protect them from the law."

Construction is unquestionably the UK's most dangerous industry, and 2,800 people have died in the last 25 years from injuries received at work. Many causes of death were from falls through roofs and rooflights or from ladders and other work places. Other major causes were accidents involving excavators, lift trucks, dumpers and other site vehicles and by collapsing structures.

Alistair Attwood, of the Principal People Construction Desk commented: "Construction has always been a tough environment for health and safety, and we look for strong personalities with good advocacy skills. Quite often we get construction workers moving across into health and safety, because they have witnessed an accident and want to make a difference."


Ends

Mike Birch
MBA Communications
Charwell House
Wilsom Road,
Alton,
Hants GU34 2PP
t: 01420 540 255 f: 01420 544 098
mbacomms@ukonline.co.uk

Campsite to protect and strengthen public railway service

SUD-Rail - Federation of Railworkers' Unions invites you to participate in a ...

Struggle Campsite: To protect and to strengthen public railway service.
Dugny, September 16 and 17 2005.

for background information click here, for full details see below, or contact James Croy 0207 529 8822.

The Campsite will be 9 Km from Dugny, at Villers-sur-Meuse.

2 days program :

Friday september 16 :

Reception of the participants, train from Paris Est at 15.49, to Chalons en Champagne at 17.11. Then we will get a bus to reach the campsite. Installation of the tents.

19.30: Struggle meal organized in collaboration with the Confederation Paysanne with local bio products.

21.30: festive and musical evening with the participation of 3-4 music groups.

Saturday september 17 :

For those who didn't get Friday departure, Train is leaving Paris Est at 8.02, arrival time Chalons en champagne at 9.30 where there will be bus to the campsite.

10.30 - 12.30 : in same time, three debates :

Rail privatisation, a European and international game: with representatives of several trade-union organizations RMT (United Kingdom), ORSA (Italy), CGSP (Belgium), Bahn von unten (Germany), CGT (Spain), plus an intervention of Africa ATTAC-group in connection with the Struggle led in Mali, and SUD-rail.

The criminalisation of the social movement: with Confederation Paysanne/mowing volunteers, SUD PTT/repression Begles, Coordination Lyceenne, UL CGT Longwy/judgment Kamel de Daewo, SUD Nettoyage/Mayant Fati of ARCADE.

Defense of Services publics and resistance: Union Syndical SOLIDAIRES, a local or regional collective in favour of Public service, ..

12.30 - 13.00 : barbecue, sandwich,..

Around 13.00 , we're leaving for action (car and bus)

About one km where the action will take place, we will begin demonstration.

Then we will have symbolic and media action ...

17.30 : meeting with SUD-rail/SOLIDAIRES and nationals organisations.

19.00 : meal.

20.00 : bus to Chalons en Champagne. Train Departure time at Chalons at 21.20, arrival time at 22.54 in Paris Est.

Campsite will be operative till Sunday morning with bus from campsite on Sunday Chalons at 11.40, arrival at Paris Est at 13H03.

Remember you will need your sleeping bag and flags (we provide to foreign organisations tents, just tell us as soon as possible how many you will be ...)
Toilets and showers will be available.

Everybody to DUGNY on SEPTEMBER 16 and 17 2005 !

SUD-Rail: Federation des syndicats de travailleurs de rail -
17, boulevard de la Liberation 93200 Saint-Denis - Tel. 01 42 43 35 75 - Fax. 01 42 43 36 67 federation-sudraill@wanadoo.fr - http://www.sudrail.org

Train unions call strike ballot over privatisation

Independent Online Edition: 05 September 2005
By Barrie Clement, Transport Editor

Passengers on one of Britain's busiest commuter networks face severe disruption after union leaders called a ballot on strike action to defend employees' terms and conditions.

Bob Crow, general secretary of the RMT union, is demanding assurances that jobs, pensions and benefits will not be adversely affected when the state-run South Eastern Trains (SET) is re-privatised early next year.

Mr Crow expressed concern that new private-sector management aimed to cut costs by shedding employees and undermining the terms of those who were left. He had failed to win the guarantees he sought.

Representatives of the RMT are confident that the 1,350 members concerned will back industrial action, causing major operational problems. The ballot is due to begin in about a week and the first stoppage could be scheduled for October.

Mr Crow has led opposition to the re-privatisation of the franchise, saying the service, which covers Kent and parts of Sussex, has improved "beyond recognition" since the French operator Connex was stripped of the franchise.

The RMT leader said there was overwhelming support for the franchise to remain in public hands. "The last time the franchise was handed to the private sector, staffing levels were pared to the bone, our conditions came under attack, staff morale hit rock bottom, while services deteriorated alarmingly and public confidence evaporated.''

Mr Crow said in the run-up to the re-privatisation of the operation the company was already trying to cut the number of station staff. "Our members' fears are founded on a bellyful of experience of privateers seeking to maximise profits by cutting staff, undermining decent pension schemes and squeezing pay and working conditions while pocketing massive subsidies."

A spokeswoman for the Department for Transport said the issue was a matter for management at SET.

An official at SET said the ballot had been called in advance of a meeting due to take place between management and union representatives this monthto discuss Mr Crow's demands.

Management intends to send out a letter to all employees today putting the company's arguments.
Passengers on one of Britain's busiest commuter networks face severe disruption after union leaders called a ballot on strike action to defend employees' terms and conditions.

Bob Crow, general secretary of the RMT union, is demanding assurances that jobs, pensions and benefits will not be adversely affected when the state-run South Eastern Trains (SET) is re-privatised early next year.

Mr Crow expressed concern that new private-sector management aimed to cut costs by shedding employees and undermining the terms of those who were left. He had failed to win the guarantees he sought.

Representatives of the RMT are confident that the 1,350 members concerned will back industrial action, causing major operational problems. The ballot is due to begin in about a week and the first stoppage could be scheduled for October.

Mr Crow has led opposition to the re-privatisation of the franchise, saying the service, which covers Kent and parts of Sussex, has improved "beyond recognition" since the French operator Connex was stripped of the franchise.

The RMT leader said there was overwhelming support for the franchise to remain in public hands. "The last time the franchise was handed to the private sector, staffing levels were pared to the bone, our conditions came under attack, staff morale hit rock bottom, while services deteriorated alarmingly and public confidence evaporated.''

Mr Crow said in the run-up to the re-privatisation of the operation the company was already trying to cut the number of station staff. "Our members' fears are founded on a bellyful of experience of privateers seeking to maximise profits by cutting staff, undermining decent pension schemes and squeezing pay and working conditions while pocketing massive subsidies."

A spokeswoman for the Department for Transport said the issue was a matter for management at SET.

An official at SET said the ballot had been called in advance of a meeting due to take place between management and union representatives this monthto discuss Mr Crow's demands.

Management intends to send out a letter to all employees today putting the company's arguments.

RMT to ballot over South Eastern Trains jobs and conditions

RMT: 5 September 2005

MEMBERS OF Britain's biggest rail union at South Eastern Trains are to be balloted for strike action after the company failed to provide assurances that jobs, pensions and working conditions will not be adversely affected by the re-privatisation of the franchise.

Preparations to re-privatise the Integrated Kent Franchise have continued despite the huge improvements made since it was brought back into public ownership and overwhelming support for it to remain in public hands.

"We asked South Eastern Trains to insert clauses into our members' contracts ensuring that there would be no compulsory redundancies or worsening of pensions or conditions, and that existing promotion and transfer arrangements would remain in place," RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

"We made it quite clear to SET that failure to agree to do so by the end of August would result in a dispute existing between us, and the RMT executive has now set in motion a ballot for strike action among our more than 1,350 members.

"The last time the franchise was handed to the private sector staffing levels were pared to the bone, our conditions came under attack and staff morale hit rock bottom, while services deteriorated alarmingly and public confidence evaporated

"After Connex was thrown off the franchise and it came home to the public sector much progress was made in restoring staffing levels, improving services and punctuality, boosting staff morale and stopping the massive haemorrhage of public money.

"But in the run-up to re-privatisation the company is already trying to throw the whole process back into reverse by reducing station-staff numbers.

"Our members' fears are founded on a bellyful of experience of privateers seeking to maximise profits by cutting staff, undermining decent pension schemes and squeezing pay and working conditions while pocketing massive subsidies.

"Like most rail users, we would far rather SET remained in the public sector, but if the government insists on going ahead with this ideologically driven re-privatisation we have every right to demand that our members' jobs, pensions and working conditions are protected," Bob Crow said.

ends

Note to editors: Early Day Motion 395, tabled in the House of Commons by Clive Efford and signed by 32 MPs, expresses deep concern that the government intends to re-privatise SET and calls on the government to allow the company to make a public-sector bid to run the franchise.

Rail workers balloted on strikes

BBC News: 5 September 2005

Rail workers at a train company in the South East are to be balloted on strike action in a row over re-privatisation. South Eastern Trains has been running the service since 2003.

Members of the Rail, Maritime and Transport Union (RMT) at South Eastern Trains will vote in the next few weeks on whether to take industrial action.

The company runs trains from Kent and parts of Sussex and Surrey into London. Four bidders are competing to take over the franchise from early next year.

South Eastern Trains said it was disappointed the ballot was being held.

Job cuts feared

The company has run trains in the South East since Connex was stripped of its franchise in 2003.

The RMT has been protesting at plans to re-privatise the franchise, arguing that services have improved since South Eastern has been in charge.

The union fears possible job cuts and has asked for assurances there will be no compulsory redundancies or worsening of pensions and other working conditions.

se_trains_map (7k image)
The franchise area covers Kent and parts of Sussex and London

"We made it quite clear that failure to agree by the end of August would result in a dispute and we have now set in motion a ballot for strike action among our 1,350 members," said RMT general secretary Bob Crowe.

Michael Holden South Eastern's managing director, said a meeting had been set up with the RMT on 20 September to discuss its demands.

"I'm saddened that this unnecessary and extreme step has been taken before we've even had the chance to discuss them," he said.

"It is not possible to agree to reinstate previous British Rail terms and conditions nor can we stop the re-franchising of the South Eastern Trains' network.

"Equally, I cannot make an agreement now as to what the owners of the company may wish to do after the transfer."

September 04, 2005

Fighting fascism

Morning Star: 3 September 2005

STEVE SILVER* explains in The Morning Star why anti-fascist magazine Searchlight opted to pull out of the Unite Against Fascism campaign.

LAST Saturday, Ken Livingstone penned an article in this paper concerning the reasons why Searchlight left Unite Against Fascism.

However, there is nothing to speculate over, for we made our reasons clear over two months ago in a letter to UAF and in the July edition of Searchlight (available online at www.searchlightmagazine.com).

Searchlight left UAF primarily because it was incompatible for us to remain in an organisation that was promoting a fundamentally different strategy to our own.

Our strategy is based around localised campaigning on broader issues than racism - fundamental as racism is. We know from experience that this is the key to turning back the British National Party's electoral advance.

In collaboration with local groups, we produce hundreds of thousands of items of specifically local literature each year.

Racism is just one part of what fascism is about and it cannot be reduced to it. For this reason, we do not believe that the UAF concept of black leadership is appropriate for an anti-fascist organisation.

We believe that the trade unions - the democratic organisations of Britain's working people, black and white - should not merely be participants in coalition politics, but should play the lead role in a broad-based fight against the BNP in the localities in Britain.

It is self-evident that the people who we need to address and win away from the BNP are white. What is needed at this time is localised campaigning to deal with the realities of BNP targeted campaigning. This has won it 21 local councillors, a situation without precedent for a fascist organisation in Britain.

The nature of a coalition means that there will always be internal differences and this was the case with UAF.

We did hang on in there for as long as we could, but the final straw was public accusations by UAF staff that we were pandering to racism by addressing the issue of the "grooming" of young women in Keighley. We think that, if we had not addressed the issue, the BNP would have been given a free hand to use it to garner votes.

The allegations against us about the campaign in Keighley cannot go unanswered. When Searchlight sat down with the organisers of the Bradford and Keighley TUCs to discuss this year's general election campaign for Keighley, a recent scandal involving the grooming of girls for sex hung heavily over the town.

The BNP had won four council seats in 2004 on the back of the subject and it was clear that it intended to focus on the issue again.

The facts are that the police have investigated 65 cases of grooming in Keighley and that the BNP has been able to make much of the fact that 10 Asian men are currently in prison as a result. This is not racist myth, but stubborn fact.

In the past, there had been a general failure by anti-fascists to deal adequately with the issue, largely because it was seen as contentious and divisive. Some people believed that, by raising it, we would be playing into the hands of the BNP.

But that approach was wrong. The BNP had exaggerated the issue and twisted the arguments, but it was a very real issue that angered a lot of decent people in Keighley, not just hard-core racists.

By ignoring it, we not only played into the hands of the BNP but also allowed them to present themselves, quite falsely, as the only party that cared about the children who had been preyed upon.

This year, we were not prepared to make the mistakes of the past. The issue of grooming could not be wished away. It had to be dealt with - voters needed to be told that the BNP had no answers.

We did this by getting the support of Angela Sinfield, the mother of one of the girls, who had led the campaign on behalf of all the mothers. Her campaigning led to two changes in the law.

Grooming is now a specific offence and police can now accept hearsay evidence.

Sinfield became the central focus of our campaign. By speaking out against the BNP and revealing what was actually being done, we took the issue away from it.

Our campaign was successful. BNP leader Nick Griffin won just 9 per cent of the vote - the party was expecting 20 per cent at the outset of the campaign - but, more importantly, the BNP was hammered on the very estates where it had done so well in 2004.

This was a unique local issue, but, up and down the country, anti-fascists are facing their own unique "issues." That is the nature of local politics.

In Barking and Dagenham, it is the lack of housing and the perception that Africans are being given grants to move into the area.

In Burnley, it is about the distribution of council services.

In Stoke-on-Trent, the BNP has tapped into popular mythology about asylum-seekers and, in the former mining communities of south and west Yorkshire, it surrounds the feeling that British industry and the communities that once serviced it are now being overlooked, leaving communities abandoned.

To us, it is clear that, to beat the BNP, anti-fascists need to have a coherent answer for each "issue," whatever it may be.

In Oldham, the credit for the successful campaign there must go to Oldham United Against Racism and the local TUC.

They distributed hundreds of thousands of pieces of their own material, not just in the weeks in the run-up to an election but all year round.

While we have left UAF, we have no intention of engaging in an ongoing row.

We recognise that there are many good activists on the ground who identify with the UAF and we continue to work with these people today.

Ultimately, what will beat the BNP is not one or another national anti-fascist organisation.

The BNP will be defeated by activists on the ground, in our communities, in the council wards that they fight electorally.

That means winning the battle of ideas and, to win, you have to prove yourself relevant to people's lives. In some areas, there are already strong campaigns doing this work.

Dismissing people's concerns because they are about issues that we do not want to discuss is not an option if we are to be successful against the BNP in the May 2006 council elections.

* Steve Silver is editor of Searchlight.

National Express flogs US operations to Connex

National Express Group PLC: 01/09/2005

Completion of the sale of North American public transit operations.

Further to the announcement of 28 July, National Express Group PLC confirms that it has completed the sale of its North American public transit operations to Connex.

Alstom, Siemens Bidders for $5 Billion Saudi Rail Project

Bloomberg: Sept. 4, 2005

Alstom SA, Siemens AG and Mitsubishi Corp. are among companies bidding for a $5 billion Saudi Arabian project to create the first rail link between the Persian Gulf and the Red Sea, a Saudi official said.

The state-run Saudi Railways Organization yesterday got initial offers from eight groups interested in the project that involves building a 1,065-kilometer (665 miles) railroad across the desert-kingdom, the organization's president Khalid Alyahya said in a telephone interview from Dammam today.

"The project will link the three major economic cities in Saudi Arabia for the fist time,'' Alyahya said. The groups of companies that include banks, railway builders and train makers that meet the Saudi's initial criteria will be invited to submit firm bids by the end of the year for the project, he said.

Saudi Arabia, the world's largest-oil exporter, wants to attract foreign investment to develop the country's infrastructure and expand its industrial base to create jobs for its expanding population, set to double to 30 million by 2020.

The kingdom last year hired UBS AG, Europe's biggest bank by assets, and France's state-owned rail operator Societe Nationale des Chemins de Fer, to advise them on the project, known as the Saudi Landbridge.

Build and Operate

The winning group of companies will build and operate the railway, which will carry both passenger and freight traffic, for a period of at least 30 years, according to Alyahya.

The existing Saudi rail network consists of two 500-kilometer (313-mile) lines connecting Riyadh, the capital, with the Persian Gulf seaport of Dammam and the petroleum center at Haradh, according to the state-rail operator's Web site.

At least 850,000 passengers and 850 million tons of freight were carried by the Saudi Railways Organization in 2002, according to the site.

A third railway line is being considered to link the religious centers of Mecca and Medina with the Red Sea port of Jeddah and industrial city of Yanbu, Alyahya said.

The Middle East is the ``fastest growing'' transport market for railway projects in the world, Charles Carlier, Paris-based Alstom Transport's senior vice president for southern Europe, said in a Sept. 21, 2004, interview.

Mitsubishi Corp., Japan's biggest trading company, won a $3.4 billion contract in May to build the first urban commuter metro in the Persian Gulf sheikdom of Dubai.

Gulf Oil Boom

Persian Gulf states including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait, which account for about one fifth of the world's oil supply, are investing billions of dollars to expand their industrial base in an effort to diversify their economies.

Oil revenue among the six Arab monarchies are expected to increase by 25 percent to $250 billion this year, according to London-based Standard Chartered Plc.

Saudi Arabia, the world's largest oil producer, pumped 9.58 million barrels of crude a day in August, according to Bloomberg estimates. That was almost a third of all production by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and more than double the output of the next largest supplier in the group, Iran.

Crude oil for October delivery rose $1.44, or 2.2 percent, to $67.57 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange last week. Prices surged to $70.85 on Aug. 30, the highest intraday price since trading began in 1983. The contract declined $1.90, or 2.7 percent, on Friday.

Hatfield jury considers verdicts

BBC News: 1 September 2005

The jury in the trial of Network Rail and five executives accused of safety breaches over the Hatfield crash has been sent home for the day. The Old Bailey trial got under way in January this year.

It had earlier retired to consider verdicts in the Old Bailey case which prosecutors allege resulted from a "cavalier approach" to standards.

Four people were killed when the Kings Cross to Leeds train left the tracks at high speed on 17 October 2000.

Defence lawyers said the executives were being used as scapegoats.

The trial got under way in January.

Faulty rail

The court heard the 115 mph crash took place when the train was derailed by a cracked section of the track.

The prosecution said a backlog of essential work had been allowed to accumulate, and claimed the rail had been identified for repair 21 months earlier.

Balfour Beatty, which had the contract to maintain the track at the time of the accident, has admitted a charge under the Health and Safety Act. But the firm does not accept all the facts of the case the prosecution has outlined against it.

Railtrack, which owned the East Coast Mainline at the time of the derailment, has pleaded not guilty.

Three Railtrack executives - Alistair Cook, 52, Sean Fugill, 52, and Keith Lea, 55 - and two executives from Balfour Beatty - Anthony Walker, 48, and Nicholas Jeffries, 50, have also denied the charges.

"These five men worked in an under-funded, under-invested railway industry, which had been neglected by governments of all parties for over 40 years and which had recently undergone a botched and unworkable privatisation," said Jonathan Goldberg, QC, for Mr Jeffries.

During the trial, Balfour Beatty and the five rail executives were formally cleared by the judge, Mr Justice Mackay, of manslaughter.

TV drama of train disaster

The Daily Mirror: 3 September 2005

THE Paddington rail crash is to be dramatised in a major new BBC production.

It will tell the story of the disaster and the fight by relatives of the dead to bring Railtrack bosses to court following the accident in 1999.

Robin Kellow is among those whose stories have been recreated for the drama, called Derailed.

The 66-year-old from Torquay, Devon, whose daughter Elaine, 24, died in the disaster, said: "The film shows how all the inherent problems that existed in 1999 are still there."

Senior figures in the now-defunct firm have never been put on trial and plans to introduce corporate manslaughter laws have been put on hold.

Derailed focuses on Elaine as she boards the train at Paddington and also tells the story of Michael Hodder, the driver of the Thames Train, as he sets off from home for the early shift.

Mr Kellow, who hopes Derailed will help his fight for justice and safer railways, added: "I do not see why rail travel should be different from sea and air travel which are both leaders in safety."

Peter Horrocks, outgoing head of BBC Current Affairs, said: "Derailed, like our other fact-based dramas, aims to stimulate debate. We believe that with the Paddington rail disaster there is a story behind the headlines to be told."

Minister for Railways attacks Train Driver elitism

Asian Tribune: 04 September 2005
By Anne Rodrigo

"Engine drivers get a whopping Rs.45,000 per month - not earned even by a minister" - Minister for Railways.
Colombo -- As the island wide railway strike, launched by the engine drivers entered its fourth day on Saturday, Railways Minister Felix Perera vowed not to budge an inch and told the engine drivers that the Department is not their 'monopoly'.

The Locomotive Operating Engineers Union (LOEU) demanded that salary anomalies be corrected and the entry qualification for an engine driver be upgraded to a diploma.

Holding a salary copy of the Chairman of LOEU, L.K. Dissanayake -- citing a thumping Rs. 45,290.28 per month -- the Minister Perera commented that even his salary does not amount to this figure.

He argued that these engine drivers themselves were G.C.E. O/L qualified when they were recruited to the Department and now they are demanding the qualification be raised to a diploma. "Why? Because they want to maintain their monopoly".

"The Railways Department is for the benefit of the public. It is not for the benefit of the engine drivers", Perera told an interview with the "Asian Tribune."

Minister observed that their name "Locomotive Operating Engineering Union" in itself is misleading since they do not fall into the category of the engineers. By a making a diploma which can only be obtained at Moratuwa University, mandatory, I think they are trying project the picture that they too are engineers.

"Even I can drive a train. I did it once in China", he said.

Minister Perera was stripped of his Transport portfolio nearly a month ago by President Chandrika Kumaratunga. Apparently unhappy over the matter, he is also on a collision course with Deputy Minister of Transport, Lasanatha Alagiawanna.

The Deputy Minister announced plans recently, on reviving the once defunct Central Transport Board. But Perera said it was he who did the groundwork and insisted on establishing the CTB, though his deputy is now gloating about it. "Lasantha did not give any support while I was the Transport Minister", he said.

Excepts of the interview with Railways Minister Felix Perera is given below:

Question: Both the government and the LOEU are firm about not giving into each other. Where will all this end?

Felix Perera: Our stand is clear. No matter how much they clamor, these are not demands that we can meet. On the one hand the union is asking that the salary anomalies be rectified. But the chairman of the LOEU is earning more than 45,000 a month. I have got a copy of his salary sheet. I am telling you; even I don't get that much of a salary. They are among the highly paid government sector workers. This is just one union out of 104 unions in the Department. The fleet of trains that we have is only 58. There is a workforce of 17,000 with some 300 engine drivers. So what if others also insist the same. The Railways Department is for the benefit of the people. It is not for the benefit of the engine drivers alone.

Question: The union is also insisting on upgrading the entry qualification to a diploma. What is your opinion on it?

Felix Perera: These very engine drivers who are calling for a diploma to be made mandatory to become an engine driver, are the ones who became engine drivers only with their General Certificate of Education (GCE) Ordinary Level (O/L )examination. They want to maintain their monopoly by insisting on a diploma. In fact I brought down the 5 years training period for the engine drivers to three years. In India, it is only 1 years training.

The very name, "Locomotive Operating Engineering Union" itself is misleading since they do not fall into the category of the engineers. By a making a diploma that can only be obtained from Moratuwa University mandatory, I think they are trying project the picture that they too are engineers. Even I can drive a train. I did it once in China.

Question : The Railways Department is losing a massive Rs. 2800 million, a year. What are your plans to minimize the loss?

Felix Perera: We cannot aim at making profits at the expense of the public. But certainly we can cut down on the loss. At present, we are only transporting 1% of goods such as oil, cement and containers etc. I am hoping to increase it up to 10%. On the other hand, it will reduce the traffic jam on road and add to the income. That apart, we are planning to make hotel reservations available when a booking for a train is done. For that we need to have agents and we are already in the process of employing them. The Department is losing a lot of tax revenue that it is entitled to. The best of the land belong to our Department. Some 1600 acres of Land Island wide is rented out for Rs. 300 million annually. But there are only two workers in charge of collecting money; hence we are not getting the money.

Question: What new plans are in store for improving the railways?

Felix Perera: Colombo-Katunayake express railway track will be completed with funds from China. There are also plans to increase the speed of the track with upgraded trains. The Cabinet approval was granted for another track from Colombo to Matara with a bridge over Nilwala river.

Question: There are an estimated 900 unprotected rail gates around the country and we have a history full of accidents related to such gates with the recent incident of killing a bus load of people in Yaangalmodara. What steps have you taken so far?

Felix Perera: The Department is running at a loss and we do not have funds to put up new gates. So, I got the Cabinet approval last month to sell millions worth of steel, lying idle in the Department and to raise money have new rail gates.

Question: Deputy Minster last week announced plans on reviving the Central Transport Board as a means of breaking the private sector monopoly. Y

Felix Perera:Yes, I think the CTB should be revived. In fact I was the one who did all work relating to it preparing the new Act on CTB. The state accounts for only 22% of the transport need of the people and the private sector account for the rest. This is too much of a disparity.

September 02, 2005

RMT security guards to take more strike action on Chubb�s Eurostar contract

RMT: 2 September 2005

STRIKE ACTION by more than 130 RMT security guards employed by Chubb at Eurostar's Ashford International and Waterloo International stations and North Pole depot is to be stepped up following the company's failure to table an acceptable pay offer.

Security guards at Waterloo International terminal will strike from 08:30 to 10:30 and 17:45 to 19:45 on Friday September 9 and Saturday September 10, and from 06:45 to 08:45 and 18:15 to 20:15 on Sunday September 11.

Their colleagues at Ashford International will strike from 05:30 to 08:00 and 16:30 to 18:00 on Friday September 9 and Saturday September 10, and from 08:00 to 10:30 and 16:30 to 18:00 on Sunday September 11.

At North Pole International RMT security guards will strike between 20:00 and 24:000 on each of the same three days.

"Our members' action last weekend was 100-per cent solid and reflects their desire to win a just pay settlement," RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

"But rather than sit down with us and negotiate, Chubb have chosen to waste huge sums of money on futile attempts to undermine our strike action.

"We understand they have recruited scab security guards in Hungary, put them on a four-day training course, flown them into Britain and put them up in a hostel in Neasden before putting them to work on the Eurostar contract.

"That makes a nonsense of their claim that our action is having no effect, but it also raises serious further concerns about their cavalier attitude to the professional security services they are supposed to be providing.

"It smacks of desperation that a company should go to such extraordinary and expensive lengths to avoid negotiating a settlement with its own workforce, and it is astonishing that Eurostar should go along with it.

"This dispute will ultimately be settled around the negotiating table, and we are ready to talk as soon as Chubb are ready to acknowledge the strength of feeling among their own workforce," Bob Crow said.

Call for compulsion on pensions

BBC News: 1 September 2005

The Engineering Employers Federation (EEF) has called for some pension contributions to be made compulsory for both employers and their staff.

The EEF is the first significant business organisation to demand that compulsion be introduced.

Its plan is outlined in a package of pension reforms submitted to the Pensions Commission.

"We have to face the fact that pensions are going to cost more in the future," said Alan Wood, president of the EEF.

Minimum contributions

The EEF's proposed reforms suggest that employers and individuals should eventually both be compelled to contribute at least 4% of a workers income into a new national scheme of investment funds.

The EEF's plans, costed by the Pensions Policy Institute, also include an enhanced state pension system that would provide at least 21% of national average earnings at the age of 65.

Other business organisation such as the CBI and the British Chambers of Commerce have opposed compulsion. They have argued it would lead to greater costs for employers.

But Alan Wood said: "It's something that has to be faced up to. We do need to start planning now for a better system for the future."

The Pensions Commission will publish its second report, with policy recommendations, by the end of this November.

Amicus to ballot all manual workers at Rolls Royce

Amicus: 2 September 2005

Amicus trade union is preparing to ballot nearly 800 members at the Rolls Royce plant in Bristol as the dispute in support of a sacked Amicus convenor, Jerry Hicks, escalates.

Amicus is preparing to ballot approximately 800 manual workers at Rolls Royce in Bristol for strike action to demand Jerry's reinstatement. This is in addition to 96 engineers in the sites test department where Jerry worked, who began a continuous strike on Tuesday 23 August, in support of the Amicus convenor sacked by the company in July.

The announcement comes on the day of a rally in Bristol in support of Jerry Hicks. Hundreds of union members and Rolls Royce workers from all over the country are expected to attend the rally at 1pm today. Other rallies have already taken place at Bristol and in Derby.

The union says the ballot will be concluded in September and, if voted for, strike action will begin in October. Amicus has also warned that it may also ballot more than 200 Rolls Royce administrative staff at Bristol.

Amicus' National Officer, Ian Waddell, said: "Amicus and our members are determined to do everything we can to achieve Jerry Hick's reinstatement. It's unbelievable that the company seem to be willing to let this dispute grow rather than just do the right thing and give Jerry his job back.

"Rolls Royce released a statement earlier this week saying that workers should be careful not to risk a successful business but it's Rolls Royce that are prepared to risk a damaging strike because of their failed handling of industrial relations."

- Ends -

Please call Catherine Bithell in the Amicus press office on 020 7 420 8909 or 07958 473 224

September 01, 2005

Sri Lanka Railway Strike 2 days old

Asian Tribune: 01 September 2005

Colombo -- "End the strike and talk," Minister - "Talk while the strike is on" - Secretary.

Minister of Railway, Felix Perera has decided not to have any talks while the Railway engine drivers are on strike as the strike entered yesterday the second day

Meanwhile, K A U Konthasinghe, Secretary, Railway Locomotive Engineers Union has said that they were not prepared to have talks after suspending the strike, but if necessary they were ready to discuss while they were on strike.

The railway strike was on for the second day on Wednesday, and commuters encountered immense difficulties.

Yesterday, only 71 trains were operated out of the 300 normal schedule and they were run by retired train drivers.

The lower grade employees of the Railway Department complained that their promotions have been suspended. However the Railway Minister said that the other demand of Supervisory Management Services appointments also cannot be granted.

In the meantime, the Railway Ministry has decided to increase the internal recruitment for the locomotive engine drivers from 30 percent to 50 percent. It was also decided to commence the train Driver Training course at the Ratmalana German Technical College belonging to the Railway Department.

Meanwhile, Government has decided to appoint 9 relief drivers with immediate effect, who have fulfilled the necessary entry requirements to the Technical College.

Government has also decided to pay an emolument of Rs 1,000 per day for train drivers, assistant drivers, head guards and assistant guards and the workforce and thus operating the train services without disruption.

Carillion Rail Restructuring - On Track Machines

RMT Circular No. IR350/05: 25 August 2005
Ref: BR4/14/3

Members reject proposals - further discussion sought
Following negotiations, the union recently received final proposals for new terms & conditions for On Track Machine Operators at Carillion Rail.

It was the firm belief of the RMT negotiators that the proposals offered no fundamental benefit to the membership over their current terms, but in order to gain the views of our members and to force management back to the table, the GGC instructed me to conduct two separate referenda of the membership, one for members on Centrac terms & conditions and one for those on Personal Contracts.

The referenda have now concluded and the results are as follows:

Personal Conditions
Papers Returned - 50
Voting Yes -1
Voting No - 49
Spoilt Papers 0

Ex Centrac
Papers Returned - 25
Voting Yes - 0
Voting No - 25
Spoilt Papers 0


Noting the near unanimous rejection of the company's proposals, the GGC has instructed me to seek further talks with the company in order to secure an improved offer. I have written to Carillion Rail in line with this decision.

Bristol: Postal staff take strike action

BBC News: 29 August 2005

Postal workers in Bristol are holding a third day of official strike action on Tuesday following an unresolved dispute about overtime.

Communication Workers' Union (CWU) members took action on 15 and 26 August after contractual overtime was cut at Easton's Royal Mail depot.

Managers have been brought in to cover during the walk-out.

The Royal Mail said it could not justify the normal scheduled overtime as there was less post over the summer.

The CWU has proposed for the matter to be dealt with through their national headquarters.

The union warned the strike could cause severe disruption to deliveries and collections in the Easton, Fishponds and Lawrence Hill areas of the city.

Somerset: Firefighter strike talks finish

BBC News: 31 August 2005

The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) in Somerset has threatened industrial action over insurance cover for staff attending terrorist incidents. Talks between firefighters and managers to avert strike action have ended.

Somerset chief fire officer Clive Kemp told the meeting on Wednesday there would be "no assistance" for firefighters facing increased premiums.

The FBU said it was "holding open the door for further talks to resolve outstanding issues".

Somerset FBU members have already secured a nine to one ballot victory for industrial action short of a strike.

Somerset FBU representatives will meet on 6 September to plan industrial action.