" /> National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers (RMT): December 2006 Archives

« November 2006 | Main | January 2007 »

December 31, 2006

Union calls for end to Tube PPP

BBC News: 31 December 2006

A rail workers' union has called for the "disastrous" Tube public private partnership (PPP) to be scrapped - four years after the deal was made.
tube_platform.jpg
Metronet and Tube Lines took on the contracts in 2002

The Rail Maritime and Transport Union (RMT) said Metronet and Tube Lines, the firms responsible for maintaining the network, had "spectacularly failed".

A government spokesman said that by 2017 PPP will have delivered £16bn of investment for the Tube.

Transport for London (TfL) said it had done all it could to make PPP work.


"It is imperative that the government continues to support and finance the renewal of the Underground" - TfL spokesperson

A spokesman for the government said that during the course of the contracts almost 250 stations would be refurbished, more than 300 new trains would be brought into service and 80% of the track would be updated.

"We have also provided the Mayor of London with the transport funding needed for the Olympics," he said.

But the RMT said warnings that PPP would turn out to be an "expensive failure" had come true.

It said Metronet and Tube Lines had been given £3.3bn of public money and made £300m in profits "but by anyone's standards... they have failed to deliver".

'Vital improvements'

RMT general secretary Bob Crow said the move had resulted in "deterioration in service, missed targets, infrastructure failure, engineering overruns, an alarming increase in safety problems and a massive increase in costs."

Mr Crow added that the government must "bring the necessary legislation forward to end the PPP and return the Tube's infrastructure to London Underground".

A TfL spokesperson said: "TfL's position on the PPP is clear. It is not the system we would have chosen to finance and manage the renewal of the Tube. But once the government transferred the Underground to TfL under PPP, we have done all we can to make it work.

"What is vital is that the major capacity improvements - the line upgrades - due from 2009 onwards, are delivered by Metronet and Tube Lines on time and on budget.

"It is imperative that the government continues to support and finance the renewal of the Underground."

Metronet did not wish to comment.

See also:

Union call to end Tube PPP deal

Press Association: December 31, 2006

The country's biggest rail workers' union has called for the "disastrous" public private partnership (PPP) to be scrapped, on the fourth anniversary of the controversial scheme to finance improvements on the London Underground.

The Rail Maritime and Transport union said warnings that the PPP would turn out to be an "expensive failure" had come true.

Metronet and Tubelines, the two groups in charge of maintaining and upgrading the Tube, have been given £3.3 billion of public money and made £300 million in profits, said the union.

"By anyone's standards they have spectacularly failed to deliver," said RMT general secretary Bob Crow.

"The privatisation and fragmentation of Tube maintenance have resulted in deterioration in service, missed targets, infrastructure failure, engineering overruns, an alarming increase in safety problems and a massive increase in costs.

"By contrast, the national rail network has brought maintenance back in-house and is already reaping the benefits in increased efficiency and better safety.

"Time is rapidly running out, and if we are to have a world-class Tube network in time for the Olympics it is no longer an option for the Government to allow the PPP to rumble on towards disaster.

"Today is the day for New Year's resolutions, and one of the Government's must be to bring the necessary legislation forward to end the PPP and return the Tube's infrastructure to London Underground."

The Department of Transport said: "By 2017 the PPP will have delivered £16 billion of investment in maintenance and modernisation of the Tube.

"During the course of the contracts, almost 250 stations will be refurbished, more than 300 new trains will be in service and some 80% of the track will be replaced or refurbished, with all lines receiving modern signal and control systems. In all, the capacity of the network will increase by 25%, including a 45% increase in Jubilee Line capacity by the time of the Olympic Games."

'Shun domestic flights,' Branson urges Britons

The Observer: December 31, 2006
Denis Campbell

Sir Richard Branson is urging British citizens to stop taking domestic flights to help reduce the damage aviation does to the environment. The Virgin boss, a recent high-profile convert to the dangers of global warming, risks his call being dismissed as self-serving because he runs two train franchises.

'People should think twice before flying domestically,' the owner of the Virgin Cross Country and Virgin West Coast networks told the Friends of the Earth magazine Earthmatters. 'Domestic air travel is twice as damaging as international air travel and yet there is a clean alternative - the train.'

Branson cited the London to Manchester route as an example of unnecessary domestic air travel, and claimed 40 per cent of people formerly flying that route - served by Virgin rail services - have begun taking the train.

British Airways said it did not have data that distinguished rail emissions from those of flights. 'There is no data available to us that makes comparisons between rail and air travel in the domestic market,' said a spokeswoman. BA added that it was the only airline to have joined the government's trial emissions trading scheme, and says it had reduced emissions by 18 per cent compared with benchmark levels.

Branson, who has pledged to spend £1.6bn over 10 years on developing 'green' fuels, also suggested that ministers should force the aviation industry to become greener by limiting the amount of carbon dioxide generated by each airport.

Rail joy for passengers

The Hexham Courant: 29/12/2006
By JOSEPH TULIP

RAIL users in Tynedale are in line for a major boost in the new year, with plans to increase train services at some of the district’s stations.

From May, all passenger trains from Newcastle to Carlisle will stop at Prudhoe – almost doubling the daily service in the town, with a train due every half hour.

The Tyne Valley Community Rail Partnership hopes to convince Northern Rail to follow up its plans for Prudhoe by increasing the number of stops at Haydon Bridge and Bardon Mill.

It is a complete turn-around for the line, which has been plagued by closure rumours for decades.

Leading rail campaigner Malcolm Chainey, who is a member of the rail partnership, is convinced that a much improved service will be in place when the new timetable for the Tyne Valley line begins in May.

The rail partnership, made a series of recommendations to the train operators after an 18 month study which started in 2005. The study found there was a strong case for all trains stopping at Prudhoe.

Mr Chainey said: “Northern Rail has picked up on that and on the summer timetable, we are told, that all trains will be stopping at Prudhoe.”

The changes will be noticed mainly during daylight hours. Most trains already stop at Prudhoe during early morning and evening rush hours, but the new timetable will introduce stops every half hour in-between, instead of the hourly stops currently in place.

Mr Chainey hopes that more service improvements will be implemented at other stations in the district.

He added: “We feel Haydon Bridge station is big enough to justify an hourly service.

“Other stations, at Bardon Mill, Brampton and Wetheral, have four hour gaps at times, which means that they don’t serve a very useful purpose.”

During the £20,000 study, consultants carried out a number of surveys in which they quizzed rail users on the recommendations.

They found Wylam had a “significant case” for improved services, but concluded that no more stops were required at Stocksfield, Riding Mill and Corbridge.

Mr Chainey added: “If the changes at Prudhoe are a success, it makes a case for more stops at the other stations stronger. We hope that the passengers will roll up.”

A Northern Rail spokesman said: “There has been a recommendation that all Newcastle to Carlisle services stop at Prudhoe.

“However, we are in the planning and agreement process, and cannot confirm that this is going to happen in May.”

If improved services are implemented at Prudhoe, it will be a double boost for public transport in the town.

Northumberland County Council is setting up a £400,000 bus and rail interchange to link the railway station with bus routes which take in the town centre.

A former factory site immediately south-east of the station has been earmarked as a base for the interchange, which will include a bus stop, a turning area, car parking space and a pedestrian access way to the station.

County councillor for Prudhoe, Tony Reid, said: “It is hoped that the interchange will be finished by the spring, which would tie in nicely with the timetable changes.

“I am naturally pleased that train services at Prudhoe station look set to be improved. There is a demand, there’s no doubt about that, and this encourages people to use public transport.

“Prudhoe is growing, and is it important to have a good service to Newcastle, and to the west.”

See also:

Bus and rail link go-ahead

The Newcastle Journal: Dec 28 2006

Life for commuters in a Northumberland town will soon be made easier thanks to a £400,000 bus and rail interchange.

Work on the new interchange in Prudhoe is due to start early in the New Year after Northumberland County Council finally completed the purchase of the land. It is hoped work will be complete by spring.

The scheme aims to integrate the bus and train services in line with Government planning guidelines.

The Bus Meets Train Project Partnership, which is behind the scheme, was formed as a result of the successful award of Department for Transport Rural Bus Challenge Grant Funding Bid in 2003.

The steep hill dividing the town of Prudhoe from its railway station is currently a barrier to local people accessing rail.

The project partners have worked with transport users in the town, where the population has continued to grow over the years.

The new interchange will allow space for buses to stop every 15 minutes to pick up passengers.

There will also be 27 car parking spaces, two of which will be for disabled drivers, and four taxi bays.

It will also include a ramp and stair access to the station platform.

John Smith, the county council's executive member for highways and operations, said: "The interchange will provide residents, commuters and visitors with enhanced public transport facilities and opportunities for more flexible travel arrangements."

The Prudhoe partners include local county councillors, Tynedale District Council, Prudhoe Town Council, Prudhoe Community Partnership, Tyne Valley Rail Users Group, Northern Rail, the Arriva North East and Tyne Blue Line Bus Operators and Tynedale Community Rail Partnership.

The mayor of Prudhoe, Eileen Burt, said: "The town council has been working on this scheme for some years, so I'm delighted it is now set to go ahead."

December 30, 2006

Central Trains conductors to strike again from midnight tonight

RMT: December 30 2006

SOME 550 Central Trains conductors will begin two back-to-back 24-hour strikes at a minute after midnight tonight after the company shunned all attempts to bring the dispute back around the talks table.

The RMT conductors are in dispute over the imposition of centralised rostering and two-tier Sunday payments over Christmas and New Year.

The first strike, on Christmas Eve, went ahead after the company turned down flat an offer to call off the stoppages if Central withdrew its imposed rostering system and agreed to talks around a seven-point peace plan.

"Christmas Eve's strike was 100 per cent solid after our members voted by more than six to one for action," RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

"Central Trains have shown absolutely no interest in settling this dispute and they will now face solid strike action on New Year's Eve and Year's Day as well.

"The conductors involved in this dispute are safety-critical staff, and any trains run by Central Trains tomorrow and on New Year's Day will be operated with the use of inadequately trained managers or hastily brought in non-union staff, and that raises serious safety concerns.

"We held out an olive branch to Central Trains before Christmas but they chose simply to ignore it, which raises the fear that public money is once more being used to back a rail employer against its employees in an industrial dispute.

"If taxpayers' cash is being handed to Central Trains to indemnify them against losses and penalties arising from a dispute the company has engineered itself, that is a disgrace - but it would explain why they have walked away from talks without any pretence of trying to solve the problems.

"Central should understand that if they are to settle this dispute they must ultimately thrash out the issues involved around the talks table," Bob Crow said.

ends

Notes to editors: RMT conductors at Central voted by 231 to 37, a margin of more than six to one, to strike over the imposition of centralised rostering, and by 177 to 68 to take action over the company's attempt to give conductors a worse Christmas-working deal than other staff.

Strike to hit New Year trains

Press Association: December 30, 2006
great_malvern_station.jpg
Thousands of rail passengers face travel chaos over the New Year because of a strike by hundreds of senior conductors which will cripple services.

The Rail Maritime and Transport union said it expected solid support from 550 of its members on Central Trains for the 48-hour walkout on New Year's Eve and New Year's Day, following a 24-hour stoppage on Christmas Eve.

The company, which usually runs more than 1,000 services a day, said it will run as many trains as it can despite the strike, but the union predicted that few if any services will operate.

The dispute is about extra pay for working over the festive season, as well as the introduction of a new rostering system.

The union accused Central Trains of rejecting a peace plan which it said would have allowed services to run normally.

The company said it reached a deal with national union negotiators but this was turned down by local RMT officials.

Central said senior conductors would have earned about £600 each if they had worked on the three strike days, equivalent to a week-and-a-half's normal wages, adding that it had offered a number of concessions on the introduction of the rostering system.

All services were cancelled on Christmas Eve, but Central's Operations Director Andy Thomas said: "We are going to run as many train services as we can in the East and West Midlands on New Year's Eve and New Year's Day."

Trains most likely to run are local services into Birmingham's Snow Hill station and between Redditch, Birmingham and Lichfield.

See also:

Rail strikes bring commuter misery

Ledbury Reporter: 29th December 2006
By Tarik Al Rasheed

great_malvern_station.jpg
A poster at Great Malvern Station informs passengers of the planned industrial action.

FESTIVE travel plans are being hit hard by strikes across the Central Trains network, leaving scores of residents and visitors in Malvern stranded or struggling to find alternative arrangements.

No Central services ran from the town's railway stations on Christmas Eve, after the operator cancelled more than 400 trains due to industrial action over pay by senior conductors.

Passengers are facing more misery, with further strikes planned for New Year's Eve and New Year's Day, after negotiations with the RMT union proved unsuccessful.

Retired Freda Georgeson, 61, came from Sheffield to spend Christmas at the Abbey Hotel. She made it to Birmingham, where she was stranded and had to wait more than two hours for a bus to Malvern.

Mrs Georgeson said she received little help from railway staff and that the seven-hour journey left her very tired on Christmas Day.

"It has not spoilt my Christmas but it's not been the holiday it should have been because of this," she said. "I can't believe that they would do that to the public. I will never use the trains at Christmas again."

Andrew Pullen, 26, had problems getting from Worcester to Ledbury to spend Christmas with his family.
“I can’t believe that they would do that to the public. I will never use the trains at Christmas again.”
Freda Georgeson

"I had no idea they were striking and I had to ring round my family to see if someone could give me a lift," he said. "I had all my presents with me and I don't drive There's not a chance I will use the trains at new year."

A much-reduced service could still run at new year if enough staff volunteer to work, but 23-year-old student Mark Holland, who is travelling to Malvern from Inverness, is taking no chances.

Mr Holland can get to Birmingham, but is not sure if he can complete his journey because Central has not confirmed which trains are running.

"One of my friends is going to drive to Birmingham to pick me up just in case I can't get to Malvern. It's a real pain, they want to be celebrating not driving," he said.

Central's managing director Steve Banaghan said they had done everything possible to reach an agreement and avoid the strikes.

He said: "Without senior conductors we can't run a train service, so this means passengers will be paying the price at one of the busiest times of the year for travel."

People are advised to check before setting off on journeys by calling National Rail Enquiries on 08457 484950.

Three die removing suicide victim from rail line

icWales: Dec 29 2006

A passenger train struck and killed two policemen and an undertaker today as they were removing the body of an apparent suicide victim from railway tracks in western Austria, state television reported.

Public broadcaster ORF said the accident happened shortly after 10.00am (0900GMT) near the town of Lochau am Bodensee, just over the border from Germany in Austria’s westernmost province of Vorarlberg.

The station quoted police officials as saying the three were killed instantly when an intercity train hit them as they were investigating and preparing to take away the remains of a man who appeared to have thrown himself in front of an earlier train.

The intercity train was travelling from the German city of Munich to Zurich, in eastern Switzerland.

Deutsche Bahn not ready for privatisation

Deutsche Welle: 25.12.2006

German Investor Group: 'Railway Not Ready for Stock Market Listing'
DB_ice_train.jpg
Deutsche Bahn isn't ready for the big flotation, critics say

A leading German investor representative group has roundly criticized Berlin's plans for selling off the nation's railway company, saying Deutsche Bahn AG was not ready for a stock market listing.

Europe's biggest railways firm, state-owned Deutsche Bahn AG, is due to make its debut on the stock exchange by 2009, the country's last big privatization.

But Jürgen Kurz, a spokesman for the German investor protection group (DSW) said Deutsche Bahn's efforts at restructuring were coming a little too late and that the process was "not really in hand."

Kurz told the dpa news agency in an interview published Monday that it was rare that a company's stock market listing should be delayed as this one has.

Company managers have unpleasant memories of the autumn of 2004, when the government and supervisory board broke off preparations for an IPO.

Bad plan?

After 12 years of reorganization at Deutsche Bahn, the country's last big state-owned company, it is clear to the partners in Germany's governing coalition that the time had come for a partial sell-off. The sticking point, though, is whether the privatised company should own the rail network, including tracks and stations.

DB_hartmut_mehdorn.jpg
Deutsche Bahn chief Hartmut Mehdorn

Kurz also said that Deutsche Bahn's planned stock-market debut had been hurt by the privatization model selected by Chancellor Angela Merkel's ruling coalition government. Under legislation which is to be presented to parliament in March, the federal government is to take over the rail tracks and the railway stations.

The government's plan, which was set out in November, calls on Deutsche Bahn to manage the tracks for a minimum of 10 years and to issue financial reports each year.

But, said Kurz: "It however, clearly diminishes the value of the Bahn." As a result, he said, the proceeds from the Bahn's stock exchange listing will be correspondingly smaller.

From the point of view of future investors, Kurz said, it would make more sense to list the company as a total unit on the stock exchange, as was the case with the German post office, Deutsche Post AG, and the nation's giant telephone company, Deutsche Telekom AG, both of which have been listed on the stock market.

Moreover, Kurz said the tough price competition with airlines would check growth in Deutsche Bahn's domestic German market. On the other hand, he said growth outside Germany would require a major investment.

In addition, Deutsche Bahn chief Hartmut Mehdorn has so far not set out where the company's growth was likely to come from, Kurz said.

Train firm 'One' creates 120 new jobs

Eastern Daily Press: 30 December 2006
MARK NICHOLLS

Rail operator One has announced it is to recruit 120 extra staff in a bid to raise standards in the service it offers.

The roles are right across the business and include new drivers, ticket office, platform and cleaning staff, as well as customer service centre and on-train roles.

The company says it is aiming to improve the quality and consistency of service across its network over the next 12 months as it looks to build on recent improvements in punctuality - with around 87pc of trains arriving on time.

The company is also improving security for passengers and staff by fitting CCTV cameras on many of its trains.

Managing director Dominic Booth said: "This investment in more than 120 additional employees across the One network, in all aspects of service delivery experienced by our customers, illustrates our clear focus on making train travel a more convenient, comfortable and enjoyable experience.

"By directly addressing those areas which we know have the greatest impact on travellers' journeys and which customers highlight as important to them in their feedback through research and correspondence, we hope passengers will see a visible improvement in service standards.

"The introduction of these new recruits should help improve reliability, enhance customer assistance and information provision, raise cleaning standards, make ticket purchase quicker and simpler, deliver faster, higher quality responses to correspondence and complaints, offer better on-train catering and provide greater security for passengers on their journeys."

The train operator says that:

* An extra 24 drivers will be introduced on the Metro and West Anglia routes, which have the greatest density of service and are the busiest lines on the One network.

* Sixty extra revenue protection inspectors will be employed to provide greater assistance for passengers, improve security, reduce fare evasion and "ticket-less travel" and provide better revenue collection.

* At ticket offices a further 10 vacancies will be filled to help reduce or eliminate queuing.

* A further 13 cleaners will be employed, helping to preserve, maintain and improve the condition of the carriages to raise cleaning standards.

* At London Liverpool Street the number of platform staff will be increased by nine to offer extra customer assistance and information, whilst at the Customer Service Centre in Norwich, eight new employees will help improve the speed and quality of response for advance ticket bookings by phone and customer correspondence/complaints.

* On the Norwich to London mainline intercity services extra at-seat catering in both First Class and standard accommodation will be launched from January 2 ,with an additional nine on-board stewards and stewardesses.

Lawyers win delay over fatal rail crash sentence

East London Advertiser: 29 December 2006
ladbroke_grove_crash.jpg
Ladbroke Grove disaster
THE sentencing of Network Rail by a court for the 1999 Ladbroke Grove rail disaster has been put back till February after the company's lawyers asked for a further adjournment.

The rail company faces an unlimited fine after admitting health and safety breaches over the horrific crash which killed 31 passengers.

Among those killed was 44-year-old Roger Brown, a computer software engineer from the Isle of Dogs who was on his way to work at IMP, a telecommunications products firm in Slough.

The company had been due to enter a charge last month, setting out its precise level of responsibility.

But defence lawyers asked for further time to analyse crucial material.

More than 400 people were injured in October, 1999, when a Thames train collided with a Great Western express after shooting a red light near Paddington station.

Both drivers were killed in the collision, with 24 dead from the Thames train and seven from the Great Western express.

The Thames train driver, Michael Hodder, 31, had not been warned of the signal 109, known as one of the worst blackspots in the country, which was mentioned in a rail safety report only months before the tragedy.

Network Rail admitted breaches in health and public safety regulations in the period leading up to the crash.

The sentencing hearing of Network Rail last month was adjourned to February 2 and is expected to last two days.

Thames Trains had already been fined £2 million in 2004 after admitting safety failures.

Copper Thieves Knock Out Rail Services In Germany

Playfuls: December 29th 2006
by News Staff

Copper thieves disrupted railway services in the west of Germany on Friday, knocking out a signals station and forcing bullet trains to divert to other main-line tracks in the Cologne area.

Along with many other countries, Germany has been hit by an upsurge in metal thefts since 2004. Wiring is often stolen and sold as copper scrap.

The thieves absconded after vainly trying to hack off a main signal cable early Friday, but the damage had been done, leaving electricians with the all-day job of reconnecting and testing 120 strands of the cable.

Railways spokesman Udo Kampschulte said about 200 services were disrupted in and near Cologne, with some suburban services severely delayed.

December 29, 2006

Complaints soar after rail franchise takeover

Herts Advertiser: 28 December 2006
EDITORIAL

COMPLAINTS from passengers have spiralled since First Capital Connect took over the rail service between Bedford and Brighton in April.

In the last quarter that former franchise holder Thameslink operated the service - January to March 2006 - there were 33 complaints per 100,000 passenger journeys.

In the first quarter after FCC took over - April to June - the level of complaints went up to 88 per 100,000 passenger journeys.

But after FCC introduced new restrictions on the use of cheap day return tickets during the evening peak, the number of complaints almost tripled to 254 per 100,000 passenger journeys.

The figures are revealed in the latest National Rail Trends published by the Office of Rail Regulation.

Association of Public Transport Users spokesperson Adrian Jackson-Robins, who lives in Harpenden and commutes to London, said: "The restrictions might have made commercial sense for the company but it was a public relations disaster that motivated a vociferous body of people to complain."

He added: "There have been a series of disastrous days on the line which have also generated a large number of complaints, but in fairness to FCC most of these problems have not been of their making. They have been down to Network Rail."

Disappointed

FCC's train punctuality reached almost 89 per cent compared to 84 per cent for Thameslink in its last quarter.

An FCC spokesperson said: "We are disappointed that the number of complaints has increased. We take all complaints and customer feedback very seriously and since taking over the franchise in April, we have invested heavily in our communications with customers.

"We work hard to continually improve our service. We have made a number of improvements this year, but we do recognise there is more to do.

December 28, 2006

First Great Western's InterCity service the worst in UK with more than one in four trains late

Western Mail: Dec 22 2006
Rhodri Clark

DELAYS to First Great Western trains between South Wales and London have increased, bucking the trend for improvement among Britain's rail providers.

With more than one in four trains running late, FGW's InterCity service is the worst in Britain for delays, according to figures from the Office of Rail Regulation.

The figures come less than a fortnight before FGW raises the standard open return fare from Cardiff to London by five times the rate of inflation, to £144.

But there is good news for many Welsh passengers, with a big year-on-year improvement in punctuality on Arriva Trains Wales.

ATW's performance improved by 6%, the biggest improvement in Britain, between the second quarter of 2005-06 and the same period this year.

At the same time FGW saw the biggest drop in performance, down 4.6%.

The ORR's figures show that only 72.7% of FGW's high-speed services were on time in July, August and September.

FGW said the figure reflected "extreme summer conditions". Britain experienced heatwaves in July, although August was much cooler.

A FGW spokesman said, "Summer 2006 saw record-breaking temperatures. These unprecedented conditions affected the railway as well as causing problems to all forms of transport, such as melted roads.

"The heat resulted in a number of rail infrastructure and technical problems, which included buckled rails amongst the technical issues."

FGW was spending £200m on service improvements including more reliable engines for the 30-year-old high speed trains.

Network Rail was also investing in the region's rail infrastructure, he added.

Across Britain train performance improved, from 87% to 88.5%.

Virgin West Coast services, including Holyhead-London trains, improved by 3.1% to 86% but Virgin CrossCountry, which links Cardiff and Bristol Parkway to York and Newcastle, declined by 2.1% to 80.9%. Arriva Trains Wales improved from 79.6% to 85.6%.

ATW commercial director Mike Bagshaw said, "The 6% increase in the number of our trains arriving on time compared with the same period last year is encouraging news. We remain focused on driving up standards higher in 2007.

"We will continue to pay close attention to services on the Cambrian Line in Mid Wales, where inherent problems with the route mean that passengers have not seen the same improved service punctuality as elsewhere on our network.

"The Welsh Assembly Government is considering possible investment to upgrade infrastructure on this line and we welcome moves to identify robust solutions to current limitations caused by the single-line track."

'High-speed rail routes a priority'

Press Association: December 28, 2006

Options for more high-speed rail routes in the UK - seen by some transport experts as a low priority - are to be pursued by the Conservatives, it has been announced.

They said they would press ahead with feasibility work on three major rail project options, including rail links using 300mph Maglev magnetic levitation technology.

The Tory options also include the construction of a high-speed rail network in the UK similar to that in France, where ultra-fast TGV trains run.

The third plan they are keen to promote is the development of a new dedicated freight route to link ports, the Channel Tunnel and major business centres.

The Institution of Civil Engineers recently said that using Maglev trains in the UK would be inappropriate and irresponsible.

In September this year, a Maglev train travelling at 125mph crashed in Germany killing more than 20 people.

Sir Rod Eddington, former British Airways chief executive, said in his report on transport requirements delivered earlier this month that a new north-south high-speed rail link was a low priority.

The Conservatives said that the options on which detailed feasibility work will be carried include the construction of a conventional high-speed rail network using TGV-type trains running on traditional rails. This would probably initially involve extending the existing Channel Tunnel Rail Link northwards. Typical trains of this kind run at around 180 miles per hour.

It also includes the construction of ultra-high speed inter-city rail links using Maglev technology and the development of a new dedicated freight route, possibly using derelict or under-used rail corridors.

The work will focus in particular on costs, commercial potential, the impact of the developments and their ability to lure traffic off the roads.

See also:

Tories to plan for 300mph trains

BBC News: 28 December 2006
maglev_shanghai.jpg
The Maglev train is operating in China
The Conservatives are to look at the possibility of introducing 300mph magnetic levitation trains to the UK.

The party said it would also study whether high-speed rail links like those in France were feasible.

Shadow transport secretary Chris Grayling said it was important to develop new technology to "help our battle against global warming".

He also said a dedicated freight route between ports, the Channel Tunnel and business centres would be examined.

Crash

The Tories said it was discussing options with other groups, including the high speed rail panel of the Institution of Civil Engineers to provide an independent assessment of the options.

Last month the Institution of Civil Engineers said that spending public money on introducing Maglev magnetic levitation trains in the UK would be "inappropriate and irresponsible" as it was "not yet a mature technology".

In September, one of the trains, travelling at 125mph, crashed in Germany, killing 23 people.

And Sir Rod Eddington, a former British Airways chief executive, said in his report on transport requirements this month that a new north-south high-speed rail link was a low priority.

The Conservative Party said it would look into constructing:

# A conventional high-speed rail network using TGV-type trains (like those in France) running on traditional rails. This would probably initially involve extending the existing Channel Tunnel Rail Link northwards

# An ultra-high speed inter-city rail links using Maglev technology

# The development of a new dedicated freight route, possibly using derelict or under-used rail corridors

'Big headache'

Mr Grayling said: "Transport is one of Britain's big headaches.

"In the immediate future, we have to start making a difference to Britain's congestion problems quickly.

"So our focus in government would initially be on 'quick wins' - projects that can start to change things in a relatively short period of time.

"We believe that the right mix of smaller projects, for example longer trains, improvements to individual bottlenecks on the roads, making improvements to transport interchanges, represents the best way to start making a difference quickly."

He added: "Any of the three options we are looking at would be expensive, and would probably need to be developed in phases in the way our motorway network was.

"But we would not be doing our job properly if we were not looking at the longer term as well as short- term challenges."

See also:

Tories back high-speed rail lines

Politics.co.uk: 28 Dec 2006
maglev-train-shanghai.jpg
MagLev trains are among the projects being considered by the Tories
The Conservatives are backing detailed studies into three major potential rail projects, including the Maglev 'levitating' train and a high-speed north-south rail line.

Shadow transport secretary Chris Grayling said that although he accepted the need for short-term projects, such as cutting congestion on certain roads, Britain's long-term transport needs may require some new major infrastructure projects.

The party has commissioned feasibility work into three schemes, the first of which would be the construction of a French TGV-style high-speed rail network running from London to Scotland, carrying trains travelling at about 180 miles per hour.

Another option could be the MagLev trains, where carriages float on a magnetic field above the tracks and are propelled by changing the field's charge. In August, shadow chancellor George Osborne went to Japan to see the results of a three-year trial there.

A third study will also look into the development of a new dedicated freight route, possibly using derelict or under-used existing rail corridors, to link ports, the Channel Tunnel and Britain's major business centres.

A recent government-commissioned report on Britain's future transport needs was unenthusiastic about the benefits of high-speed rail links, and said the government would be better to invest in small-scale improvements.

Rod Eddington's year-long study concluded: "New high-speed rail networks in the UK would not significantly change the level of economic connectivity between most parts of the UK, given existing aviation and rail links."

The report acknowledged that such networks could ease congestion between cities and in London, with "real and substantial" benefits, but warned: "Crucially though, these goals could be achieved by other solutions, and perhaps at much lower cost."

Today Mr Grayling said the Tories supported quick-fix measures to deal with Britain's congestion problems, including putting in longer trains, improving bottlenecks on individual roads and making improvements to transport interchanges.

However, he warned: "Beyond that we will need to bring forward longer term projects to tackle the capacity constraints that are hindering both economic development and the kind of modal shift that will be needed to help our battle against global warming."

He said: "Any of the three options we are looking at would be expensive, and would probably need to be developed in phases in the way our motorway network was.

"But we would not be doing our job properly if we were not looking at the longer term as well as short-term challenges."

Railway employees’ union fight for common man’s cause

Hindustan Times: December 27
Gorakhpur, HT Correspondent

IT was perhaps the first instance in India of its kind when the employees union of any department hit the street to draw the attention of government over the grievances and hardship faced by the common people.

North Eastern Railway Mazoor Union (NERMU) took out a procession, burnt the symbolic effigy of shooting prices of essential commodities, staged demonstration at district magistrate office and handed over a six-point memorandum to the district officials on Wednesday.

Members of NERMU shouted slogans against failure of Union government for its failure to check the unemployment, corruption and black marketing. The procession converted into a demonstration at district magistrate office.

Expression his views on this occasion, national general secretary of NERMU KL Gupta expressed solidatory of the employees and working class with the grievances of the common people and demanded DM to take initiative to check the black marketing and rising up prices of essential commodities.

Later, they handed over a six-point memorandum to the district officials and expressed their concern over the pathetic condition of electricity, roads and fresh water supply in various colonies of the city.

They demanded to deploy forces on the outlets under public distribution system to bring transparency in distribution of kerosene oil and food grains.

The employees’ leaders invited the attention of district administration over choked pipelines in various localities and expressed their displeasure that street light points remain on in day time, while at night they used to be off and expressed hope that administration would take necessary steps to resolve these problems.

December 26, 2006

Strike action hits rail services

BBC News 25 December 2006

Thousands of train passengers have had to find alternative ways of travelling across central England due to a 24-hour strike on Christmas Eve.

The action, which was taken by conductors on Central Trains, meant all services were cancelled.

But the company said it hoped to provide a reduced service on two other days of industrial action - New Year's Eve and New Year's Day.

The RMT union said the dispute was over holiday pay and working arrangements.

About 400 trains were cancelled as 580 senior conductors went on strike, Central Trains said.


You just can't go along as an employer and impose rosters
Bob Crow,
RMT general secretary

Two thousand trains will be affected over the three days of planned strikes. The areas most affected have been the East and West Midlands, although a number of Central Trains' services also run from Manchester to Norwich and Cleethorpes to Cardiff.

Earlier in the week, talks to try to stop the industrial action broke down when the RMT rejected an increased pay offer.

The company said it could not offer any more than the £236 it had already put forward to work on Christmas Eve or New Year's Eve.

Conductors said they were striking over the "imposition of centralised rostering and Christmas and New Year pay arrangements".

Managers 'staffing service'

Central Trains' spokeswoman Rachel Webster said the company had tried hard to stave off industrial action.

"On New Year's Eve and New Year's Day we are looking at how many services we may be able to run," she said.

"It depends on how many senior conductors want to work. We've had indications that some have been asking if they can come to work.

"Predominantly managers, who were conductors, will be staffing the service."

She added that details of the service on those two days would be published on 27 or 28 December.

RMT general secretary Bob Crow has apologised to passengers for the disruption caused, but said the action was being taken not just because of Christmas payments but over the implementation of rosters.

"The reality is that the money's not satisfactory to our members, and you just can't go along as an employer and impose rosters," he said.

Midland Mainline has operated a normal Sunday service on Christmas Eve after staff accepted a pay offer and called off planned strikes on the same three days.

Network Rail Track Renewals Strategy

RMT Circular No. IR0293/06: December 22 2006

Dear Colleague,
Network Rail has announced that they intend to reduce the number of renewals contractors from the current six to four.

From January 2007, they plan to assess all six contractors for a period of six months, at the end of which they will decide which two contracts will be terminated.

Union policy is that renewals work should be bought in house, and we have constantly put this to Network Rail in discussions. We are extremely disappointed they have not taken this opportunity to bring the contracts in house - a move that we believe would have provicdc better protection of the job security and terms & conditions of our members. We have however had discussions with Network Rail regarding their strategy and will meet with the contractors in the New Year.

The crucial issue for us is the protection of our members' jobs and their terms & conditions. We have asked Network Rail if TUPE will apply to this exercise, (TUPE, or Transfer of Undertakings, providing protection of terms & conditions when contracts transfer). Network Rail has informed us that they anticipate that TUPE will apply. We believe that TUPE does apply. Whilst this does go further than they have gone in the past, we will be looking for clear cut assurances from both Network Rail and the contractors.

The matter has been considered by the unions' Executive Committee who have instructed me to arrange a meeting of all Renewals representatives at Unity House. The meeting will take place at 14.00 hours on Tuesday 16th January 2007. I am requesting the release of all renewals reps from their respective companies. I have invited Peter Bennett, Human Resources Director for Network Rail to attend, and he has accepted the invitation.

In addition to this, the union has repeatedly raised the issue of Network Rail's use of Heavy Maintenance Gangs, which in some areas are doing what we consider to be renewals work. To date, Network Rail have provided no clear statement on this, but their new strategy does have implications for this work. We have again demanded a clear cut statement from Network Rail on Heavy Maintenance work, and on what they consider to constitute renewals work.

I would emphasis that no decision regarding which contracts will be terminated has yet been made. That decision will not be taken until June, at which point a period of notice will have to be given to the contractors affected. Rest assured that we are talking to all parties and the forthcoming meetings will give us the opportunity to address our members' concerns.

Yours sincerely

Bob Crow
General Secretary

December 21, 2006

Persecution of Iranian trade unionist must stop, says ITF

International Transport Workers' Federation: 20 December 2006

The ITF has demanded that the continued persecution of an Iranian trade unionist be brought to an end and that fundamental trade union rights be respected.
mansour osanloo.jpg
Mansour Osanloo: released yesterday

The remarks were made in a statement by ITF General Secretary David Cockroft welcoming the release from prison yesterday of Mansour Osanloo, President of the trade union of workers of the Tehran and Suburbs Bus Company. He had been re-arrested on 19 November, not long after having been set free from an eight-month period of detention, following a long campaign of intimidation by Iranian police and state security agents.

In the statement Cockroft, said: “We welcome the release of Mansour Osanloo, and the thoughts of ourselves and trade unionists around the world are with him today.”

He continued: “Progress has been made but more needs to be done. The persecution of this man has to stop. Fundamental trade union rights have to be respected in Iran and we await similar good news on Mansour Osanloo’s colleagues, some of whom have been sacked, all of whom have been denied the right to be represented by the union of their choice.”

“It took worldwide protests to secure this release, and we can all feel proud to have been part of those, but it shouldn’t need to be that way. The government of Iran has to face up to its responsibilities unprompted.”

The ITF and the International Trade Union Confederation have led an international campaign against trade union repression in Iran and the imprisonment of Osanloo. This has involved protest letters to the Irananian government, demonstrations outside embassies and a formal complaint to the International Labour Organization.

December 20, 2006

2007: 'year of trade-union freedom', says RMT on centenary of 1906 Trade Disputes Act

RMT: December 20 2006

2007 MUST be the year in which trade unions begin to win their freedom from more than a quarter century of anti-union laws, Britain’s largest specialist transport union says today.

Exactly a century after parliament ruled that 'An action against a trade union…shall not be entertained in any court,' RMT has renewed its call for the restoration of the trade-union rights envisaged by the framers of the 1906 Trade Disputes Act.

"A century ago today even Tories accepted that the courts were no place to drag trade unionists involved in an industrial dispute," RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

"But today's employers have been handed so many legal traps that any union standing up for its members' rights and jobs is hauled in and out of court like a yo-yo.

"At the turn of the last century our forebears were sued by the Taff Vale Railway Company and fined £23,000 in damages simply for exercising their right to strike.

"It was the massive upsurge of protest and political organisation that followed the vicious Taff Vale judgement that forced parliament to accept that unions should have legal immunity from employers seeking damages from workers in dispute with them.

"The Trade Disputes Act is still theoretically there, but after nine lots of Tory anti-union laws chipped away at it there are now countless ways that employers can drag unions into court for daring to stand up for workers' rights.

"Today we need to build massive backing for the TUC's campaign for a Trade Union Freedom Bill, to help right the wrongs of the last 25 years and level the playing field.

"Sadly, the Blair government seems more interested in doing a state-funding deal with the Tories that would end the Labour-union link and keep union rule-books under legal seige, and is even egging the European Court of Justice to rule that there is no such thing as the right to strike.

"Nonetheless, most Labour back-benchers have signed up to the idea of a bill that would enshrine basic trade union rights into law, and publication of the bill by John McDonnell early next year should be the trigger for a mighty campaign behind it," Bob Crow said.

ends

Notes to editors:The Trade Union Freedom Bill would establish as law basic trade union rights, including the right to strike and take solidarity action, better protection for striking workers, fairer balloting and industrial-action notice procedures, restricting the use of injunctions by employers, and preventing the use of replacement labour during strikes.

EDM 532 Trade Union Freedom Bill campaign

Tabled by John McDonnell and signed by 30 others to date

That this House recognises that free and independent trade unions are a force for good in UK society around the world and are vital to democracy; welcomes the positive role modern unions play in providing protection for working people and winning fairness at work; notes the 1906 Trades Disputes Act granted unions the legal freedom to take industrial action; regrets that successive anti-union legislation has meant that trade union rights are now weaker than those introduced by the 1906 Trades Disputes Act; therefore welcomes and supports the TUC campaign for a Trade Union Freedom Bill whose principles include better protection for workers, such as those sacked by Gate Gourmet in 2005, the simplification of ballot procedures and to allow limited supportive action, following a ballot, in specific circumstances; and therefore urges the Government to bring forward legislation to address these proposals.

Teamsters' Union: Proposed US Rail Security Rules Ignore Employees' Safety Role

PR Newswire: Dec. 20

WASHINGTON -- Proposed rules by the Transportation Security Administration ignore necessary employee training and protections against employer retaliation.

The Teamsters Union is still reviewing the rules, issued Friday, but so far has determined that the proposals are inadequate.

"The White House has failed again to recognize that the true eyes and ears of the rail system are its employees," said Jim Hoffa, Teamsters General President. "Our members are working on the rails night and day. They know about the security lapses on the rails, yet the railroads refuse to provide quality training for them in preparation for emergencies."

The proposed rules highlight the dangerous cargo transported by freight rail, but there is nothing in them that would compel a rail corporation to provide effective emergency situation training for employees. The thousands of miles of tracks throughout the country are wide open for a terrorist attack or act of sabotage. The security of the public and rail employees is at risk.

"We call on the Bush administration and its TSA to mandate emergency situation training for the thousands of rail employees on the job every day," said John Murphy, Director of the Teamsters Rail Conference. "And we call on them to create adequate employee protections so that those employees reporting safety and security breakdowns will not face retaliation."

MPs anger at rail 'travel chaos'

BBC News: 20 December 2006

MPs in Berkshire and Oxfordshire have called for action to be taken over what they describe as "travel chaos" since a train firm introduced a new timetable.
fgw_class180.jpg
The company said it was making the "best use" of its resources

Martin Salter, Rob Wilson and Ed Vaizey have described some First Great Western (FGW) services to London as unreliable and overcrowded.

They called on FGW and the Department for Transport to take "urgent action".

The company said on some lines extra trains and seats had been added but a small-scale review was under way.


"We are aware of the local issues and are monitoring the situation closely" - Richard Rowland, FGW

Mr Salter, MP for Reading West, said: "First Great Western have made an already mediocre service even worse with their ill thought out and half-baked timetable changes."

Conservative MPs Rob Wilson, Reading East, and Ed Vaizey, Wantage, also condemned "the chaos caused by the new timetable".

"We are asking the Department for Transport to take urgent steps to introduce greater capacity to relieve overcrowded commuter trains," said Mr Wilson.

But Richard Rowland, FGW's regional manager, defended the changes.

He said: "The new timetable represents the best use of our resources to benefit the maximum number of people.

"We are aware of the local issues and are monitoring the situation closely."

See also:

FIRST GREAT WESTERN TIMETABLE CHANGES

Early Day Motion 526: 18.12.2006 5 signatures Vaizey, Edward Wilson, Robert Benyon, Richard May, Theresa Salter, Martin "That this House notes the travel chaos caused by the new timetable introduced by First Great Western on 10th December 2006; condemns the resulting overcrowding caused by the reduction in services and the use of the smaller capacity Adelante trains instead of the usual high speed trains; further notes that this reduction in service comes at a time when fare rises have again risen far above the rate of inflation; and calls upon First Great Western and the Department for Transport to take urgent steps to reintroduce sufficient capacity as soon as possible into the network to enable as many commuters as possible to travel safely on regular, reliable services."

Bring track renewals back in-house, says RMT

RMT: 20 December 2006

NETWORK RAIL'S track renewals contracts should be brought back in-house, Britain's biggest rail union said today as the company said it would be reducing the number of main contractors working on capital contracts next year.

"Network Rail are missing a golden opportunity to bring all their renewals contracts back in-house, and we will continue to campaign for that sensible goal," RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

"Simply re-shuffling some of the existing cards will still leave four privateers raking it in at the public's expense and subcontracting work to a dangerous muddle of subbies, agencies and one-man-and-a-dog outfits.

"Network Rail could make far greater efficiency savings and help re-establish a world-class safety culture by bringing all renewals contracts back under a single roof, as they already have with track maintenance.

"Our immediate concern will be to ensure that transfer of undertakings rules apply, and that there is no threat to our members' jobs, pay and conditions," Bob Crow said.

Network Rail set to cull contractors

Times Online: December 20, 2006
Joe Bolger

Network Rail, the railway infrastructure operator, is set to kick-start a six-month review of the companies it employs to renew its tracks.


The state-backed company said that it would reduce the number of contractors used from six to four as part of a plan to shave £150 million in costs over three years.

AmeySECO, Balfour Beatty Rail, Carillion Rail, First Engineering, Grant Rail Group and Jarvis face a six-month period of scrutiny in which the rail group will monitor the contractors' work and decide which two companies to drop.

The four contractors which remain will each be awarded contracts worth between £100 million and £120 million each.

The contractors will be evaluated across a broad range of criteria, including safety records, business behaviour, unit costs, ability to finish work on time and the volume of work completed.

The best four contractors will be retained and the relationships with the two other will be terminated.

Peter Henderson, the director of projects and engineering at Network Rail, said that the move would improve the planning of renewal work.

"These changes will enable earlier definition and planning of the work further into the future," he said. "We are keen to create an environment that enables both Network Rail and our contractors to plan work with confidence."

He said that retaining four companies would ensure an element of competition that would help to drive efficiencies.

The move is part of a broader push by Network Rail to cut waste. Last year Mr Henderson pushed through a programme to reduce the number of contract staff employed by the company.

He found that the company was employing 1,000 contract workers who, typically, were earning £200 a day — some were earning as much as £500 a day — for routine track renewal work.

Three years ago the company, the successor to Railtrack, launched a programme to eliminate 2,000 middle and senior management jobs, equivalent to 15 per cent of its management workforce, as part of a cost-saving drive.

That announcement was followed in October 2003 by Network Rail's announcement that it would take all track maintenance work in-house.

See also:

Network Rail will reduce contractors and save £150m

Guardian Unlimited: December 20, 2006
Dan Milmo, transport correspondent

Network Rail, the government-backed operator of the British railway system, reduced its dependence on the state purse yesterday by saving £150m in a squeeze on contractors.

The company, which receives about £2bn a year in direct government subsidy, will cut the number of private companies it uses for track repairs from six to four.

Network Rail has been ordered to reduce costs by a third and has cut operating costs by £1.1bn over the past two and a half years, which included moving its maintenance work in-house.

Article continues
The company is spending £22.5bn on maintaining the rail network from 2004 to 2009 and has been told by the Office of Rail Regulation to reduce costs to prepare for the next five-year funding period, when Network Rail is asking for £21bn.

Although today's move helps keep down the bill for running the railways, Network Rail wants an extra £8bn from the government for one-off schemes such as an overhaul of the Thameslink route.

The scale of government funding and criticism of the franchise system has led to renewed scrutiny of the rail industry. Some critics argue that running the rail system is now more expensive and inefficient than it was under government ownership and costs are not curbed enough.

Gerry Doherty, general secretary of the TSSA union, said Network Rail should have taken all track renewal in-house. He said: "This is a missed opportunity for Network Rail. This means private contractors will profit when costs should have been driven down for the benefit of the travelling public. Network Rail has simply forgotten the lesson it learnt from its success with maintenance work. They are just tinkering at the edges by cutting the number of main contractors."

A Network Rail spokesman said the company considered making all track renewal in-house but decided that using contractors was less expensive than going it alone. He said: "Doing nothing was not an option because the pace of the savings was not quick enough and that is why we have reduced the number of contractors.

"We strongly believe that the quickest and most inexpensive way of delivering these savings is to restructure the contracting arrangements rather than bringing the work in-house."

Network Rail recently reported a pre-tax profit of £747m for the six months to September 30, against a pre-tax loss of £108m for the same period last year. The company, whose £18bn debt is secured by the government, recorded a profit due to a rise in government funding, which increased revenues from £1.9bn to £2.9bn.

Network Rail receives about £2bn a year in track-access charges, which are paid by train franchises such as First Great Western and Virgin Cross Country but are also subsidised by the government.

See also:

Network Rail to drop two contractors from its renewals framework

Contract Journal: 20 December 2006

Network Rail (NR) is to streamline its renewals contractors from six firms to four within the next six months, it has been announced today (Wednesday).

The announcement was made as part of the rail operator’s drive to deliver £150m of cost savings over the next three years.

The decision will send shockwaves across the industry and follows the decision in October 2003 to bring all its maintenance operations in-house to improve efficiencies on the rail network.

The contractors currently on NR’s five-year agreements for track and signal renewals are: First Engineering; Jarvis; Grant Rail; Carillion; AmeySECO; and Balfour Beatty.

A decision on who will be chopped from the list has yet to be made with an announcement expected to be made in mid 2007.

NR said a six-month review would begin in the New Year which will measure performance across a number of key areas. These include: safety records, volumes achieved, finishing jobs on time, unit costs and business behaviours.

“Using these measures, the top four performers from the present six suppliers will be selected to continue under the framework of existing contracts,” said NR.

However, Carillion may be feeling the pressure following the decision. In August it was barred by NR from bidding for any new rail work due to questions over safety procedures. It has yet to be given the green light to resume its bidding.

Peter Henderson, director of projects & engineering, said: “Progress has been made in delivering efficiencies in track renewals and these new arrangements will accelerate progress towards delivering our targets.

“These changes will enable earlier definition and planning of the work further into the future. We are keen to create an environment that enables both Network Rail and our contractors to plan work with confidence, and that promotes innovation and investment in equipment and people.”

See also:

Network Rail to Cut Contractors

Railway People: December 20th 2006

The number of track renewals contractors is to be reduced from six to four, Network Rail has announced. It’s part of a plan to streamline processes and deliver cost savings of around £150 million over three years. By focussing on four suppliers, Network Rail believes it can accelerate the rate of efficiency improvement. Over the past two years, 12% efficiency savings have been achieved.

Says Peter Henderson, Director of Projects & Engineering, ‘Progress has been made in delivering efficiencies in track renewals and these new arrangements will accelerate progress towards delivering our targets. These changes will enable earlier definition and planning of the work further into the future. We are keen to create an environment that enables both Network Rail and our contractors to plan work with confidence, and that promotes innovation and investment in equipment and people. Starting in the New Year, we will begin a six-month review of our contractors, measuring their performance across a number of key areas. These include: safety records, volumes achieved, finishing jobs on time, unit costs and business behaviours. Using these measures, the top four performers from the present six suppliers will be selected to continue under the framework of existing contracts.’

A decision to select the four successful contractors will be made in mid 2007.

High-output methods, already a key part of delivery of plain-line renewals accounting for some 15% of track renewals, will increase significantly over the next three years. In addition Network Rail is investing in an innovative programme to deliver switch and crossings using a modular approach that is expected to dramatically increase productivity, efficiency and reduce the time needed to install key track components. A contract is expected to be let in the New Year.

This approach is one part of the improvements Network Rail is making in its end-to-end track renewals processes. The company will also be working to raise the quality of the planning process for renewals work, reducing the numbers of late cancellations and making sure each job is completed in the most efficient and cost effective way.

Peter Henderson concluded, ‘We are confident that retaining a reduced number of track renewals contractors is the best way forward for renewals activity. As well as the core renewals work awarded under the existing contracts the opportunities to win elements of competitively awarded work remains, which will drive further efficiencies by offering growth in turnover for the highest performers.’

Network Rail’s decision follows a six-month review of the way it undertakes track renewals. It has concluded that although track renewal volumes remain constant, with the increased use of high output methods, the current supply market will become too large for future needs.

Network Rail’s current renewals contractors (in alphabetical order) are:
• Amey SECO (JV)
• Balfour Beatty Rail
• Carillion Rail
• Jarvis PLC
• First Engineering Ltd
• Grant Rail Group Ltd

Central trains refuses talks offer and turns strike into lockout

RMT: December 20 2006

CENTRAL TRAINS bosses today refused an offer by RMT to suspend Christmas and New Year strike action by 550 senior conductors to hold talks over the imposition of centralised rostering and arrangements for Christmas and New Year’s payments, and decided instead to close the railway.

RMT's offer to suspend strike action to hold talks on a seven-point peace plan was turned down flat today by the company, which has instead said it will run no services and lock out all staff on Chistmas Eve and New Year's Eve.

"Our talks team offered to suspend the three days of strike action if the company would commit itself to hammering out a peace plan on the issues we are in dispute over, but Central Trains have chosen instead to close the railway on Christmas Eve and New Year's Eve," RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

"Central Trains is clearly not interested in reaching a deal over the two disputes involved and has chosen instead to lock out its entire staff.

"Our members have genuine grievances that need to be addressed, but it is the company that has turned down the opportunity to put in place a plan that would have allowed services to run.

"We have made it clear that we remain available for talks to resolve both disputes, and that remains the case, and we can only hope that the company re-considers its position," Bob Crow said.

ends

Notes to editors: RMT conductors at Central voted by 231 to 37, a margin of more than six to one, to strike over the imposition of centralised rostering, and by 177 to 68 to take action over the company's attempt to give conductors a worse Christmas-working deal than other staff.

Sickness reporting - Virgin West Coast

RMT Circular No. IR. 289/06: December 20 2006

Procedures for staff unable to take duty due to illness (sickness reporting) - Virgin West Coast

Further to my circular dated 14 December 2006, I have received correspondence from FirstCare, an absence reporting service offered by Health and Absence limited, which sets out various assurances in relation to the service to be provided on behalf of Virgin West Country as follows:

(i) Only qualified registered nurses will discuss medical matters with covered employees when they call to discuss their absence;

(ii) FirstCare will only call absent employees when the employee chooses to receive the call, or if the absence has gone past its estimated return to work and the employee has not made contact with FirstCare to update them;

(iii) When the employee chooses to receive a call during their absence from work, the primary purpose is to provide medical advice and support and is made by the qualified nurses employed at FirstCare to ensure that the employee has access to all the services they need to speed up their recovery to good health;

(iv) No medical information will be disclosed to Virgin West Coast without specific consent from the employee concerned. The only exception to this is where there is a safety critical exception; and

(v) FirstCare staff will not use language which may be perceived as threatening and no policy to the contrary exists.

In the light of these clarifications and assurances, I have caused the following circulars: Virgin West Coast - Ballot for Industrial Action, RMT November 21st 2006 and Don't Phone FirstCare RMT Circular IR 277/06 12th December 2006 to be removed from the relevant RMT websites and their contents are not to be repeated.

As you know, the Union remains in dispute with Virgin West Coast over the introduction of the new sickness absence monitoring policy.

I am delighted to report that members have voted massively in favour of taking Industrial Action short of a strike. 294 voted YES in favour of taking Industrial Action with only 24 voting against. There were no spoiled papers.

The General Grades Committee has decided to use the ballot result and have called for Industrial Action to commence as the law permits.

Virgin West Coast members who are booking office, on train catering and station staff grades are therefore instructed not to comply with the imposed procedure with effect from 00.01 hoours on Friday 15th December 2006 until further notice. This is continuous Industrial Action.

In the event the members need to call in sick, they have been advised to phone whoever it was they would have normally contacted prior to the new procedure being imposed. Whatever the case they must ensure that their Line Manager or appropriate person with authority is informed. They have been further informed that in the event of anybody giving them any grief, to inform them that they are taking official Industrial Action.

Please bring this to the attention of any members of your Branch employed by Virgin West Coast. I congratulate our members for their magnificent response and I have informed the Company that RMT remains available for talks.

Yours sincerely,

Bob Crow
General Secretary

December 19, 2006

Train crush criticised

Western Mail: Dec 19 2006
Rhodri Clark

THE former boss of British Rail in Wales said last night he was dismayed by the way passengers are being treated since First Great Western axed the 5.18pm Cardiff to Swansea train on December 11.

John Davies, transport consultant, counted roughly 230 people boarding last night's 5.21pm Cardiff to Maesteg train, with seats for about 138. It was the first train home for most Bridgend commuters, and left 19 minutes late. The next train, also late, to Swansea, was so overcrowded Arriva added an extra two coaches.

"As an ex-professional railwayman, I'm concerned to see such wanton disregard of passengers' needs," he said.

Rail firm may sell

Hartlepool Mail: 19 December 2006

A RAIL company planning to run direct trains from Hartlepool to London could be bought out before it runs its first service.

Grand Central Railways fought off a legal challenge from GNER to win the right to operate three trains a day between Sunderland, Hartlepool and London King's Cross, beginning in May.

But York-based Grand Central has since attracted interest from rival companies, with UK freight rail operator EWS and Danish State Railways both linked to a possible takeover.

However, Grand Central bosses today said nothing would stand in the company's way of launching the direct London rail service.

Sean English, Grand Central operations director, today told the Mail: "There has been interest in this business for some time now."

But he added that any speculation over a takeover would not impact on Grand Central's plans to launch its Hartlepool to London service in May.

See also:

Rivals may buy rail firm in East Coast victory

Yorkshire Post: 18 December 2006
William Green, Political Correspondent

A FIRM that won the right to run new East Coast rail services after a bitter battle with existing operator GNER may be bought by rival companies, the Yorkshire Post has learned.

York-based Grand Central Railways won a court victory over GNER in July to operate trains between Sunderland, Yorkshire and London after a long battle between the two companies.

The new services are due to begin next May after they were approved by rail regulators, a decision that GNER has claimed was a key factor behind the loss of its East Coast franchise last week amid a financial crisis engulfing its parent company.

But in the latest twist in the long saga it has emerged that Grand Central could be bought by rivals who previously bid for the Government-awarded East Coast rail contract.

The Yorkshire Post understands that Doncaster-based rail freight operator EWS and Danish State Railways are in talks with Grand Central's owner.

Lancashire firm Fraser Eagle is the main shareholder in Grand Central and operates replacement buses for the railways, but declined to comment along with EWS – although an announcement on a possible sale could be made in the New Year.

Sean English, Grand Central's operations director, said: "The situation is that Fraser Eagle is the major shareholder of Grand Central and as far as I am concerned there is no potential of sale."

Grand Central will operate three trains a day on the route with services calling at Sunderland, Hartlepool, Eaglescliffe, Northallerton, Thirsk, York and King's Cross in London.

Rail passenger numbers to rise 50%

Press Association: December 19, 2006

Passenger numbers on some of the country's busiest rail routes could rise by 50% in the next decade, according to new estimates.

Bosses at South West Trains (SWT), which runs commuter and other services across southern England, believe there will be a huge increase in rail travel in the area.

Around 440,000 passengers use SWT services every day, mainly into and out of London's Waterloo station.

The estimate of a 50% rise in passenger numbers is more than double previous industry predictions.

SWT is already increasing capacity on some of its busiest routes, including the London to Portsmouth line, with measures including longer trains.

Off the rails

The Guardian: December 18, 2006
Leader

Winter is the right time for pruning, for lopping old branches off. Outrageously, it looks as though rural branch lines may be among those to be cut.

Almost silently, Britain's transport planners are planning a bonfire of secondary services. In the Department for Transport and the offices of Britain's big private rail operators, plans are being drawn up to hack back the size of Britain's rail network, reducing services and closing lines, especially in rural areas.

Article continues
John Armitt, the outgoing director of Network Rail, told the Observer yesterday that "we accept heavy rail is not always the best solution, particularly in some ... outer parts of the network". His polite language disguised a melancholy shift in government attitudes, in favour of reducing services on some routes. That has become easier with rules removing safeguards that protected lines from closure.

A product of the 2005 Railways Act, the rules nominally help transport planning and efficiency but, in reality, aim to save money from a rail budget bloated by the vast inefficiencies of privatisation. Virgin, whose west coast route was profitable under British Rail, was last week offered £1.4bn by the government to run services until 2012. GNER, which runs the east coast route, is in financial meltdown. None of this is the fault of Britain's local train services, most of which are busier than they were at privatisation. But they will be made the victim of cost-cutting, the easiest to shut, regardless of the consequences for passengers.

This threat was underlined in October by the publication of an extraordinary Department for Transport document, Railways Closures Guidance. It offers a step-by-step explanation of how to shut train lines, its thinking dominated by economics of the crudest and most-short-term sort. "Value for money is a central criterion in determining whether a proposal should go ahead." There is no requirement for anything more than token public consultation or any regular need to consider the environmental consequences. "Domestic air services may ... be a relevant alternative" to trains, it adds, a mockery of green thinking.

With malign ingenuity, rural closures are likely to be presented as environmentally wise, since empty trains pollute more than full cars. But no work has been done to test the implausible claim that passengers will club together to share their journeys, or switch to buses. Past closures suggest road traffic will grow and car-occupancy stay low. Many of Britain's remaining secondary lines boost tourism and employment. They survived Dr Beeching and Margaret Thatcher. It is incredible that a government which claims to put the environment first is even thinking about shutting down railways.

December 17, 2006

Transport 2000 calls on Government to reverse FGW cuts

Transport 2000: 15 December 2006

Government failing passengers with contract for First Great Western says Transport 2000

The Government’s cull of train services in the South West, taking away an astonishing 1,839 rail seats a day in the greater Bristol area, is causing mayhem on the region’s trains. First Great Western’s fleet of 69 local train services has been slashed to 60 and 32 carriages have been removed.

The catalogue of chaos that has ensued after the cuts on 11 December is immense:

· People have fainted on overcrowded trains;

· Passengers, including commuters heading to work, have been turned away because there was no room on the trains at Westbury and Salisbury;

· Ticket inspectors on the trains can’t move through the carriages because of all the bodies in the way – so revenue isn’t being collected;

· Catering and drinks trolleys cannot move through the trains;

· Evening “emergency” rail replacement bus services have been initiated between Bath and Westbury, Bristol and Severn Bridge and Bristol Gloucester, adding upwards of 20 minutes to passenger journeys;

· The Bristol to Penzance service has been cut down to a measly 1-carriage train

Julia Thomas, Public Transport Campaigner at Transport 2000 said: “People are being crammed onto trains like sardines – it’s completely unacceptable. The timetable for the region and length of trains has been set by DFT rail ‘experts’ in London but it is clearly unworkable. First Great Western has their hands tied on this.

“It is unbelievable that just a few weeks ago the Government’s own Eddington report stated how important rail is to the economy, yet here we have huge rail cuts affecting employment opportunities, business trading and development opportunities in the region.”

Transport 2000 is calling for an immediate reverse to the cuts and will be launching their Manifesto for rail growth in the Southwest region on 19th January 2007 in Bristol. The Manifesto has pulled together support for a thriving regional railway from politicians, local government, business leaders, unions and rail user groups. The launch is part of a nationwide campaign run by Transport 2000 called Growing the Railways, which calls on Government to plan for a growing railway in its 30 year rail plan due next year.

Notes to Editor:

1. On 6th December 2006 the Government introduced the new rail timetable for the Southwest, for which First Great Western is the provider.

2. The manifesto for Growing the Railways in the Southwest will be launched at the Government Office for the Southwest, Temple Quay, in Bristol on 19 January 2007 at 10:00 AM. Details of the launch are available at http://www.transport2000.org.uk/diarydates/maintainDiaryDates.asp?DiaryDateID=716

3. Transport 2000 Campaigns represents the key transport interests of around 40 environmental groups, transport organisations and transport unions. It brings together people who seek to reduce the environmental and social effects of transport through encouraging less use of cars, lorries and planes and more use of rail, buses, trams, cycling and walking.

For further information from Transport 2000 please contact:

Julia Thomas, Public Transport Campaigner, 020 7613 7725

Stephen Joseph, Director, 020 7613 7715 or 07939 584790

------------------------------------------------------
Vanessa Bulkacz
Communications Officer (Temporary Cover)

Transport 2000: Putting people and the environment first

The Impact Centre
12-18 Hoxton Street
London N1 6NG

Telephone: 020 7613 0743 Extn:113
Direct Line: 020 7613 7723
Mobile: 07984 773 468
Fax: 020 7613 5280

EU Commission: 'interoperability' isn't working - blame safety regulation

Infrasite: 2006-12-14

Brussels, Belgium - European Commission has proposed new measures to remove regulations it says are hindering the development of railways throughout Europe

The European Commission adopted a series of measures on 13 December 2006 to support revitalisation of the railway sector by removing obstacles to the circulation of trains throughout the European rail network. The measures include a Communication on simplification of certification of railway vehicles, a proposal to recast existing Railway Interoperability Directives and to modify the Regulation establishing a European Railway Agency and the Railway Safety Directive.

Jacques Barrot, vice-president in charge of transport declared: “If railways are to become more competitive, we need to streamline and reduce the amount of rules that railway undertakings have to comply with before they are allowed to use the railway networks in the European Union. The measures the Commission adopted 2006-12-13 will accelerate and simplify these procedures, as well as contribute to significant cost reductions for the sector".

Among the proposed measures is a Communication on the amendment of several legal instruments in order to facilitate the cross-acceptance of railway rolling stock. Locomotives and other vehicles that can operate in one Member State are not necessarily accepted for operation in another Member State under current rules. Sometimes national safety rules are contradictory. In Italy, fire extinguishers on trains must contain CO2 powder and no foam, while Austria requires fire-extinguishers to be filled with foam whereas CO2 is not allowed! Furthermore, railway undertakings wishing to operate international services undergo repeated approval procedures for their rolling stock in each Member State. This often requires the provision of evidence that is not mutually recognised between Member States and can cause delays and costs. Certification may take up to 3 years to complete and is unnecessarily costly due to duplication.

Another initiative aims to streamline the certification process of rolling stocks by introducing cross acceptance of national tests and checks. The current lack of interoperability across the EU obliges, for example, operators to change locomotives and train drives when they cross borders. Although the European Community launched an ambitious common standards programme to overcome these obstacles, the pace of their introduction depends on new investments in the network and rolling stock. The transition towards new standards and the introduction of measures to facilitate cross border operations on the existing network therefore needs to be accelerated.

A Directive on the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system[1] and another dealing with interoperability of the trans-European conventional rail system[2] also need to be amended in order to facilitate cross-acceptance of rolling stock. Both Directives aim to harmonise technical standards in rail transport by requiring the Commission to develop Technical Specifications for Interoperability. However, a single technical specification is sufficient for both conventional and high-speed rail systems, rendering the separation of the two directives unnecessary.

The Railway Safety Directive[3] will be modified by amending the article which defines the conditions under which rolling stock used in one Member State can be allowed to run on the network of another Member State. The mutual recognition of operating in-use rolling stock is proposed: rolling stock that has already been approved for service in one Member State shall not be submitted to the same or an equivalent procedure in another Member State, except for specific, national requirements.

Finally, the Regulation[4] establishing The European Railway Agency has been amended. The Agency will be mandated to develop a reference document with information on all the national rules in the domain of placing in service of railway rolling stock. Equivalent rules used in several Member States will be linked in order to facilitate cross-acceptance of rolling stock. The Agency will also organise the activities of the network of national railway safety authorities in order to reduce the number of national safety rules and to identify equivalent national rules. Finally, the Agency will be asked to elaborate opinions on technical issues at the request of the Member States or the Commission.

[1] Council Directive 96/48/EC of 23 July 1996 on the interoperability of the trans-European high-speed rail system, OJ L 235 of 17 September 1996.

[2] Directive 2001/16/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2001 on the interoperability of the trans-European conventional rail system, OJ L 110 of 20 April 2001.

[3] Directive 2004/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on safety on the Community's railways and amending Council Directive 95/18/EC on the licensing of railway undertakings and Directive 2001/14/EC on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure and safety certification (Railway Safety Directive), OJ L 164 of 30 April 2004.

[4] Regulation (EC) No 881/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 establishing a European railway agency (Agency Regulation), OJ L 164, 30 April 2004

Kenya Railway's houses fall from glory to near ruins

The Standard: December 17, 2006

Quality housing has always been a challenge for State corporations but Kenya Railways Corporation was different. Lillian Aluanga writes on the houses of Kenya Railways that were once the envy of many but slowly went down the drain.

A bare-chested man in khaki shorts heaves as he pushes a wheelbarrow filled with cement, making his way towards a block of partially complete houses.

kenya_railways_flats.jpg
Kenya Railways put up the Muthurwa flats to replace the infamous Landhies houses that had been in place since the early 1950s. These were meant to replace the one-roomed structures that were too small for families.

In the background, a long row of freshly painted houses stand behind neatly trimmed hedges and canopies of trees. Gravel pathways and flower-beds lead up to the houses, each with a huge litter bin outside.

There appears to be a flurry of activity in the compound as excited tenants troop into the pristine structures, laden with furniture, bedding and utensils. They appear eager to settle into their new homes, free of the burden of having to find accommodation in the city.

Elsewhere, a group of men in immaculate pin stripe suits and Stetsons shake hands and smile as they cut a long ribbon tied around a pillar, signalling the opening of a housing estate.


The corporation’s housing estates

These are just a few of the dozens of still scenes stored in stacks of files that line dusty shelves in an office located at the now defunct Kenya Railways headquarters in Nairobi. Though old, the pictures, pasted on manila sheets and stacked in large files, still bear traces of quality camera work.

But these are not just another stack of old pictures taken at a time when digital cameras were just but a mirage. They are pictures that carry a significant part of the defunct corporation’s history. These still black and white images carry precious memories of what was once the pride of Kenya Railways employees: the corporation’s housing estates.

From Nairobi to Kisumu, Mombasa and all the stations nestled along the steely snake’s path — at Sultan Hamud, Voi, Mwatate, Njoro, Nanyuki, Gilgil, Malaba and Eldoret — housing units put up by the then East African Railways and Harbours Corporation, were a difficult thing to miss.

With their picturesque compounds, the freshly painted houses had neat hedges and well tended flowerbeds. They stood out among many and were at one point some of the most sought after living quarters in the country.


Years of mismanagement

kenya_railways_house.jpg
Middle-level workers of Kenya Railways had houses contructed for them in Makongeni Estate during the early ‘1970s and continue to occupy them.

But things have changed.

Years of mismanagement saw operations at the Kenya Railways Corporation chug to a halt, culminating in the take over, last month, by the Rift Valley Railways Company.

What was once the picture of excellence and shining examples of housing projects put up by organisations for their employees crumbled and fell into disrepair following years of neglect. Dozens of others fell into the hands of greedy government officials and were sold at a pittance. Later years they would be resold by their owners for astronomical amounts of money.

But it wasn’t just officials of the corporation and their cronies in Government that were to blame for the woes that befell the corporations’ estates. Tenants, desperate to make a quick buck, sub-let the houses to those that were searching for affordable accommodation. With time, the porches and verandas of railway quarters houses in Muthurwa disappeared and were replaced with iron sheet structures. These extra rooms were referred to as ‘extensions’, which the tenants of the main houses rented out.


Houses grabbed by unscrupulous individuals

The flowerbeds and driveways were not spared as they were swallowed up by kiosks.

Burst sewers, deplorable sanitation and insecurity plagued most of the corporation’s estates situated along Jogoo Road, dashing the dreams of thousands who had grown to love their little havens.

Those that were spared the discomfort of burst sewers and marauding gangs in the upmarket areas of the city were grabbed by unscrupulous individuals and quickly disposed off, leaving families out in the cold.

Decades later, pockets of the corporations’ housing estates remain in various parts of the country, but many are a far cry from their glory years.

There was a time when things were different — a time when those working for the corporation were assured of getting years of quality housing.

In those days, huge tracts of land that today make up Upperhill, Ngara, South B, Industrial Area and parts of Jogoo Road were largely owned by the Kenya Railways Corporation.


Houses allocated along racial lines

In Mombasa, the corporation was said to own almost half of the Industrial area, while in Kisumu, most of the land around lake Victoria was Railways property.

"Kenya Railways was a wealthy employer and owned a lot of land. Land next to the railway belonged to the corporation and no one could dare put up any structure within a specified distance to the tracks," Omondi, a former Kenya Railways employee said.

Omondi, an elderly man in his late 70s, recalls working for the corporation for more than 30 years. This was the period when one’s colour determined which part of the city he would be allowed to live in.

Government policy during the colonial era demanded that estates be mapped out and allocated along racial lines.

It was these guidelines that were used by the then East African Railways and Harbours Corporation to allocate houses to their employees and led Omondi to Muthurwa Estate in the 50s.


Houses categorised into two classes

kenya_railways_estate.jpg
Nyalenda Estate owned by the Kenya Railways is no longer a preserve of the corporation’s employees.
Africans and Asians mainly occupied the Eastlands area in Nairobi while the upmarket areas in Westlands, Lavington, Hurlingham and Kileleshwa were reserved for Europeans.

Houses provided for the corporation’s employees were categorised into two classes. Class 1-3 houses were occupied by senior staff, while Classes 4-6 type of houses were for junior employees.

Usually, Class 1-3 houses were larger in size and even had spacious compounds compared to those in the second category, which ranged anywhere from the ‘Landies’ (long block of small housing units with communal bathrooms and toilets) to two bed-room flats.

"You could never find an African living in Parklands or Ngara or an Asian or European living in Muthurwa. The situation only changed after we got our independence and Africans and Asians moved into areas that were previously for Europeans," Omondi says.


It was convenience for corporation to build houses

Muthurwa traces its origins to 1937. At the time it was put up to house African employees and was known as the Nairobi Native Location.

With its closeness to the city centre and the railway tracks, Muthurwa was considered ideal for the African workers.

Building houses for its employees to save on topping up their salary with house allowance wasn’t the only reason that drove Kenya Railways to put up houses for its workers. Convenience also played a key role.

"The company wanted its workers, especially those who could be summoned to work at any time, to live closer to the office and railway line," Omondi said.

For instance signal operators, drivers, and ‘gang men’ (staff who worked on the railway line) lived in Muthurwa and the not too far, Land Mawe and Makongeni estates. All the three estates were located just a few kilometres from the city centre and were occupied by Africans.

Europeans, who were mainly in top-level management of the corporation, occupied spacious homes in the Kileleshwa, Hurlingham, Upperhill and Parklands. Ngara and Pangani were, according to Government policy, reserved for Asians and it is here that the corporation’s employees of Asian descent were housed.


Railway Club was meant for European employees

Omondi recalled a time when the site on which Pangani Girls School stands was once occupied by Kenya Railways staff quarters.

Not too far from the houses, Asian and Goan employees could relax with their families and while their time away at the exclusive Asian and Goan clubs in the area.

The present day Railway Club along Nairobi’s Haile Selaisse Avenue was meant for the European employees, given that their homes were located in what was then Nairobi South area.

The area had cosy homes that had tiled roofs, wooden floors, a lounge, three bedrooms, dining room, and kitchen.

Today, this area is known as South B. An employee’s cadre and grade largely determined where he would live and which category of houses he would get.

Given the nature of their work, station-masters often did not live too far from their places of work. Their houses, in those days, were simple but comfortable as exemplified by the one time timber and sisal roofing structures that dotted the Kiu Station along the Nairobi-Mombasa route.


Employees had to apply for houses

Elsewhere at the Gilgil Station, senior Asian staffers were housed in what were referred to as ‘Artisan Quarters’. They mainly were painters and mechanics. The houses were put up in 1949, 12 years after those of Kiu. Present day Kisulisuli Estate in Nakuru traces its formative years to 1918 when it was referred to as the ‘Lake Native Location’, while the corporation’s Landie type houses in Kisumu trace their origin to 1915.

Getting a house, especially for those employees stationed in big towns such as Nairobi, Kisumu and Mombasa, was not easy, given that one had to make an application and wait for a response from the housing department of the corporation.

The application would then be considered on the basis of one’s service to the corporation and grade. Those sent to work in smaller towns dotting the railway line, however, had an easier time given that they weren’t too many housing alternatives.

"The smaller stations were slightly different from those located in larger towns. Since the corporation did not want the employees to live too far from the station, it made sure that they all got accommodated there," Omondi said.


Cleanliness was taken seriously

Houses in Kisumu and Mombasa, according to the elderly man, were more spacious.

"Maybe they gave them larger houses and compounds because those places are very hot," he said.

Even though housing was free, employees were required to pay their own water and electricity bills.

Cleanliness within the staff quarters was taken seriously. There was staff to clean communal bathrooms and toilets in the lower income housing projects.

To minimise disease outbreaks, all drains and houses were frequently sprayed and a superintendent was at hand to check that this was done.

Houses were painted and repairs of broken window panes and doors made as soon as the occupant filed a report with the maintenance department. Mugging and robbery were almost unheard of within railway quarters given the stringent security checks and screening of all visitors to the compounds housing the corporation’s employees.

Omondi recalled a time when things were so good that the corporation put up cottages in Mombasa, where employees could take their families on vacation.

"There was a time when the houses were only for Europeans and Asians but in later years African employees were also allowed to use them," he said.

Rest houses were also a common feature in ‘out stations’ where employees who were seconded to the smaller stations could be housed for several days.

Alstom Aims for Rail-Speed Record With Upgraded TGV

Bloomberg: December 15, 2006
By Fabienne Lissak and Brian McGee
tgv1.jpg
Alstom SA's TGV train will attempt to set a new rail-speed record of 550 kilometers an hour (342 mph) in coming months using upgraded technology and a faster, straighter line in eastern France.

Alstom and state rail operator Societe Nationale des Chemins de Fer, or SNCF, will seek to extend the TGV's existing record of 515.3 kph on a newly built stretch of track, Philippe Mellier, head of Alstom's transport unit, said in an interview.

"All the elements are in place and we're ready for the challenge,'' Mellier said. "The line is ready and we have the technology.'' The bid, to be made in February or March, will be announced Monday by French Transport Minister Dominique Perben.

Alstom, the world's second-biggest train maker, has been building the TGV, or Train a Grande Vitesse, for 25 years and set the existing record in 1990. Merrier said that the upgraded train may even reach 570 kph with the help of technology developed for the company's new AGV regional train fleet.

Alstom, which also builds power stations, recorded its first annual profit since 2001 in the 12 months through March after railway operators and utilities placed orders to refurbish older equipment and install new gear.

Next year's record attempt will feature a five-carriage TGV set assembled at Alstom's plant in La Rochelle. The train will draw on 24,000 horsepower from two motorized cars and run on track built by rail-network owner Reseau Ferre de France.

The company has about 450 TGV trains in service in France and overseas markets including Spain and South Korea. The train also runs on the Thalys network operating between France and Belgium, Holland and Germany and is used in modified form for the Eurostar between London, Paris and Brussels.

Shares of Alstom rose 1.8 percent to 98.65 euros today. The stock has surged 103 percent this year, giving a market value of 13.6 billion euros ($18 billion).

See also:

France hopes to set world speed record of 342mph with new TGV

Independent Online: 19 December 2006
By John Lichfield in Paris

The French railways will attempt to raise the world speed record for a conventional train to at least 342mph in the new year - smashing their own 16-year-old record.

Tests with a new generation high-speed train, or train à grande vitesse (TGV), will attempt to push the speed record for steel wheels on steel rails to at least 550kph (342 mph) and possibly 570kph (354mph).

The tests will try out a new line to the east, from Paris to Metz, which is due to open to the public at a maximum speed of 320kph (200mph) in June. The record attempt will also make a strong statement that France is ready to take on competition from Japan and Germany in the multibillion-pound market for high-speed trains.

The record for conventional trains is 515.3kph (320mph), which was set by the French railways, SNCF, in 1990. Monorail or magnetic levitation trains have reached higher speeds on experimental tracks. The tests will form part of a "programme of French high-speed excellence" launched yesterday by the Transport Minister, Dominique Perben. A new, more powerful type of double-decker TGV - to be unveiled in the next couple of days by Alstom, the French transport engineering company - will make runs east of Paris from February.

Philippe Mellier, the president of Alstom's transport division, said yesterday that a shortened train of two power cars and two carriages would attempt to reach 570kph. M. Mellier denied reports that SNCF and Alstom would try to smash the 600kph barrier. The tests will nonetheless take rail travel almost up to commercial aircraft speeds. In the medium term, SNCF hopes to upgrade all its high-speed lines to 320kph, possibly 360kph (224mph), for ordinary service trains.

The top speed of service trains on Britain's railways is 140mph on the east coast main line and 125mph on the west coast. The exception is the French-style, purpose-built, high-speed line from the Channel tunnel, which is due to open its second stage to St Pancras in London next year, with a top speed of 300kph (186mph).

M. Perben said that the programme of rail excellence would also explore improvements to track and signalling, and study any environmental effects of service trains with even higher speeds. The aim was to "define railways of the future and allow France to keep its world leadership in high-speed trains".

Alstom and SNCF are competing with Siemens of Germany and Kawasaki-Mitsubishi of Japan to supply high-speed trains to China, South Korea, Spain and Argentina. France has won orders for Spain and South Korea but the first Chinese orders have gone to Siemens.

The domestic high-speed trains to Kent, which will share the Channel tunnel rail link with Eurostar from next year, will be supplied by Japan, but will be operated by Keolis, a subsidiary of SNCF.

See also:

Direct TGV Connections for 37 Million Europeans

Skyscrapercity: December 17th, 2006

tgv_est_train_routes.jpg

Some people speak of 550kph, some other hope 600kph. But rail fans in France all hope that the targeted speed is 600kph. Alstom and SNCF said that 550kph will be enough but we all think that will try to make better just like in 1990!

Serving around forty destinations, from Strasbourg to Bordeaux, Rennes or Lille; from Paris to Luxembourg, Metz, Nancy, Frankfurt or Zurich, in 2007 the TGV EST EUROPEEN will offer a new proximity to 37 million French and European customers.

Paris and some twenty cities of Eastern France will be directly connected via TGV and on most of the destinations the customers will enjoy a journey shorter by at least a third of the actual duration.

Paris will only be 2h20 away from Strasbourg, 1h30 away from Nancy or Metz, 45 minutes away from Reims. And with the good network of regional and local transport (TER, Bus, Tramway), inhabitants of these regions will benefit from the arrival of the TGV.

TGV EST EUROPEEN will also connect Paris directly with about 10 destinations in Germany, Switzerland and Luxembourg.

Besides the connections between Paris and Eastern France, TGV EST EUROPEEN will offer new opportunities of travel with direct TGV connections via Strasbourg and 3 new Stations between Eastern France on one hand and Ile-de-France, Northern, Western and South-Western France on the other hand.

3 New Stations will be built on the outskirts of 3 cities. Champagne-Ardennes TGV station will be situated 5 km from Reims, Lorraine TGV station between Metz and Nancy and Meuse TGV station about thirty km from Verdun and Bar-le-Duc. These modern and comfortable New Stations will be easily accessible by individual and public transport.

The new TGV Est Network : Paris- Strasbourg

Breaking news!!

Paris - France's high-speed TGV train - already the fastest in the world - is to try to break its own record by hitting speeds above 540km per hour, its constructors said on Monday.

One of the prides of French engineering, the superfast train a grande vitesse (TGV) set the current world rail record of 515.3km per hour, in test conditions, in 1990.

The new speed trial will be carried out in early April on the brand new TGV line connecting Paris to the eastern city of Strasbourg, which is set to open in June 2007.

According to the French engineering giant Alstom, which builds the TGV, the train is hoped to hit speeds of 550-570km per hour.

Currently, average travelling speeds for the TGV are around 300km per hour, but trains on the latest-generation Paris-Strasbourg line are to run slightly faster at 320km per hour.

The tests will nonetheless take rail travel almost up to commercial aircraft speeds. In the medium term, SNCF hopes to upgrade all its high-speed lines to 320kph, possibly 360kph (224mph), for ordinary service trains.

The record attempt will also make a strong statement that France is ready to take on competition from Japan and Germany in the multibillion-pound market for high-speed trains.

So if it's currently around 300km/hr, and they've been testing it at 500km/hr.... are they ever going to raise the speed? I know the Strasbourg route will be at 320km/hr.

But anything higher is deemed unsafe or the tracks aren't suitable? Is France going to try and raise the speeds on the other routes? Or is there no need to?

360km/h would be very cool and a nice round number - 100 metres per second

Yes the Strasbourg route is planned for 320kph (so is the a part of the line between Lyon and Marseille since 2001).

Tests have been successfully made a few months ago to upgrade the speed at 360kph on all the high speed lines in few years (instead of 300 and 320kph). We already know that all the future lines after the new eastern one will be build for 360kph.

How does that compare to the other high-speed lines in the world? Is France going to be at the top?

Japan railways also plan to upgrade their speed up to 360kph in a few years. Spain will open quickly a new Madrid-Barcelona line with a section at 350kph.

I think German ICE, Japanese Shinkansen and French TGV are all fantastic trains, all have their advantages. ICE for its luxury 1st class and comfort, TGV and Shinkansen for their fiability (no fatalities on high speed lines since their launch). Shinkansen wins for its punctuality, TGV for its low prices (actually you can run from Paris to Marseille - 800km - in 3 hours for 19€!) - but also Japan's trains come out on top for energy efficiency,

Take a taxi in the country, says rail boss

The Observer: December 17, 2006
Juliette Jowit, transport editor

Network Rail's outgoing chief says rural buses and cabs can be greener than empty trains

Rural train services should be replaced by buses and taxis and the money saved invested in busy commuter and inter-city routes, the head of Britain's railway system has urged.

John Armitt, chief executive of Network Rail, said that running mostly empty trains was a waste of money and environmentally unfriendly. Instead, he wants to pump more money into overcrowded routes around and between major cities. Top of his list of priorities is an ambitious £3.5bn plan to treble services on the Thameslink London commuter franchise, which is now run by First Capital Connect.

Armitt, who announced his retirement last week and who will leave in the summer, said Network Rail should have nine out of 10 trains running on time next year. But he warned that it might not be worth spending huge sums improving performance much more.

He was speaking two weeks after the government-sponsored Eddington report on transport recommended more investment in roads and warned that railways were very expensive. It has since been established that three-quarters of the 186 projects former British Airways chief executive Sir Rod Eddington considered which showed the benefits outweighed the costs involved were road schemes. Just 14 were rail improvements, the rest involved trams, buses, walking and cycling proposals.

'We accept heavy rail is not always the best solution, particularly in some of the outer parts of the network,' said Armitt. 'At the end of the day a bus or a train may not be the most cost-effective or environmentally effective solution.' In 'outer parts' of the rail network, cars 'with three or four people', small buses or taxis 'might be a better solution', he added.

Traditionally, trains have been defended on environmental grounds, but Armitt said those which ran mostly empty caused more pollution than if the journeys were made by other means. Two years ago the Railway Forum, an industry lobby group, warned that rail was losing its environmental advantage because trains were getting heavier and cars were becoming lighter and more efficient.

At about the same time the government's Strategic Rail Authority identified the 60 least-used lines in Britain. They included picturesque routes such as Brockenhurst to Lymington in the New Forest, Exmouth to Barnstaple in Devon, and Oxenholme to Windermere in the Lake District.

Several, however, were close to big urban areas, such as the one from Watford Junction to St Albans, and Chester to Manchester Piccadilly. 'Running empty boxes around is not very environmentally friendly or cost-effective,' said Armitt. In return for cutting government spending on under-used lines and services, Network Rail is asking for £8bn to spend on enhancements from 2009 to 2014.

About £3.5bn of that would be for the Thameslink commuter service. The rest would go on projects costing up to £300m, the cost of redeveloping Birmingham New Street Station. Another scheme previously backed by Network Rail was a new high-speed line from London to the North, but this was rejected by the Eddington report.

Since Armitt took up his job in December 2001, just two months after Network Rail's predecessor, Railtrack, was placed in administration, performance has improved significantly and costs have fallen by more than £1bn a year.

Armitt admitted they had benefited from a big increase in government subsidy. Other important improvements were taking direct control of maintenance and working more closely with train operating companies, he said. 'We have probably focused on the priorities correctly, but [now] it would be nice to put more priority on station conditions and passengers' experience.'

Armittwill be replaced by his deputy, Iain Coucher.

RUNNING ON EMPTY

Some of Britain's least used rail routes:

South West Exmouth-Barnstaple

South East Ryde-Shanklin Brockenhurst-Lymington

Wales Cardiff-Maesteg Machynlleth-Pwllheli

West Midlands Paddington-Hereford

East Midlands Nottingham-Worksop

East Anglia Marks Tey-Sudbury

North West Oxenholme-Windermere

North East Saltburn-Bishop Auckland

Source: Strategic Rail Authority

See also:

Driving causes less damage per head than under-used rail routes

Scotland on Sunday: 17 Dec 2006
MURDO MACLEOD POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT (mmacleod@scotlandonsunday.com)

THEY clog the roads, drawing glares from other drivers and guzzling fuel as if there was no tomorrow. But they can still be better for the environment than some train services.

Transport Secretary Douglas Alexander has warned train operators that some routes have so few passengers on them, it would generate less greenhouse gas to give the travellers 4x4 vehicles and allow them to drive to their destinations instead.

Scotland on Sunday has identified a number of routes which attract so few travellers that the environment would breathe easier if the passengers took to 4x4s instead, and one route where it would cause less environmental damage if small hatchbacks were allowed to take the strain.

Alexander said: "Here is an uncomfortable statistic. If 10 or fewer people travel in a Sprinter, it would be less environmentally damaging to give them each a Land Rover Freelander and tell them to drive.

"Be clear - that is not code for rail closures. Far from it. We want to see the railways grow. And in order to do so, we need to encourage better use on all parts of our railway."

A Department for Transport (DfT) spokesman said Alexander was trying to persuade the rail industry to continue working at getting emissions down and attracting more passengers rather than advising travellers to give up on public transport.

The spokesman said: "The car industry has worked hard on getting emissions down, and on less used lines it cannot always be assumed that the train is the most environmentally friendly option. The industry must do more to make sure that it does attract more passengers to less-used services, such as lifeline rural lines."

This newspaper identified seven routes, four in Scotland, where the typical user would do the environment less harm by driving a 4x4.

According to the most up-to-date statistics obtained from the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR), the service from Drumgelloch in North Lanarkshire to Glasgow attracts 65,451 passengers for its 12,716 departures a year, making an average of just 5.1 travellers per train.

That means it is less environmentally friendly than giving all the passengers a Land Rover Freelander each and advising them to drive north-west to Scotland's biggest city.

According to official DfT figures, the Class 156 train which travels between the two points emits 204 grams of carbon dioxide per kilometre per passenger, compared with 194 g/km for a Land Rover Freelander TD4 GS, meaning that for the train to beat the car for greenness it must carry 10.5 passengers.

The commuter service from Paisley Canal Street to Glasgow, carries an average of 7.8 passengers per journey, according to the ORR, while the service from Whifflet in North Lanarkshire carries a typical 8.75 per trip.

In the north of Scotland, the Wick to Inverness service has an average of just 10.3 passengers per train.

South of the Border, services carrying fewer than 10 passengers per train include the Gunnislake to Plymouth line, with 4.4 passengers per train, the service between Blaenau Ffestiniog and Llandudno Junction at 6.9 travellers per journey, and the Falmouth Docks to Truro service which carries just 4.4 people per trip.

The environment could breathe more easily still if the passengers from any of these stations decided to share a car, even a gas-guzzling 4x4.

While the majority of train services in Scotland are still better for the environment than all the passengers driving off-road vehicles, some travellers might help the environment by opting for a small car rather than a train.

In the West Highlands, while the 18.5 passengers who get on each train from Kyle of Lochalsh to Inverness mean it is greener than giving each one a 4x4, the service is still emitting 110.3 grams of CO2 per passenger. This means it would be more environmentally friendly to give each passenger a small car to drive there themselves - a Citroen C1 or a Toyota Aygo generates 109g/km of the gas.

Alexander's warning and the figures were hailed by motorists. Motoring pundit and 4x4 driver Eric Dymock said: "I have some sympathy for once with Douglas Alexander. I have to say that I am still dubious about parts of the green agenda, but these figures suggest that 4x4 owners are being unfairly vilified."

A spokeswoman for the AA said: "If you live in a rural area, like much of Scotland, it can be a matter of the car or nothing. Carbon emissions from cars have been coming down in recent years, but motorists still pay an awful lot of tax."

But environmentalists attacked the remarks. Mark Ballard MSP, the Scottish Green Party speaker on transport, said: "The point is the emissions savings from the rail service as a whole when compared with car use. You cannot isolate one journey - so what exactly is Alexander's point?

"He needs to be a lot smarter with what he says. The issue at stake is the need to make rail more attractive so that more people leave their cars at home - to suggest otherwise is ludicrous."
Getting the balance right

While cars have become greener because of tough new rules, trains can only rival their on-road counterparts for greenness by packing in the passengers.

VEHICLE: Class 156 Sprinter Train

ENGINE: 14-litre six-cylinder Cummins engine

WEIGHT: 38.6 tonnes

MAXIMUM SPEED: 75mph

FUEL ECONOMY: 6mpg

CO2 EMISSIONS per passenger (train carrying 10): 204g/km

VEHICLE: Land Rover Freelander TD4 GS

ENGINE: 2,179cc four-cylinder turbodiesel

WEIGHT: 2.5 tonnes

MAXIMUM SPEED: 112mph

FUEL ECONOMY: 38mpg

CO2 EMISSIONS per passenger (vehicle carrying one): 194g/km

Rail commuters switch to buses

Oxford Mail: 16th December 2006
By Andrew Ffrench

Oxford commuters angered by train timetable changes are switching to the coach to get into London.

Changes brought in by First Great Western on Monday prompted a furious reaction from regular rail passengers. City MPs Andrew Smith and Evan Harris have been inundated with calls from commuters urging them to intervene.

Dr Harris, Liberal Democrat MP for Oxford West and Abingdon, said: "I have received a large number of emails on this and I have written to First Great Western to ask for an urgent meeting."

He will raise the matter with Douglas Alexander, Secretary of State for Transport, on Tuesday.

First Great Western outraged passengers when it withdrew the 6.45am and 7.25am services from Oxford to Paddington. There are now trains at 6.38am and 7.05am, but they start from Moreton-in-Marsh and Great Malvern and are packed by the time they reach Oxford.

Hundreds of passengers have signed a petition demanding the reinstatement of the 7.25 service, which got them to London in time to be at work by 9am. Passengers sick of being forced to stand are switching to the coach.

Ann Black, of Howard Street, Oxford, said: "The 7.25 was usually on time and passengers could find a seat because it started in Oxford. In future, I shall travel by bus, which costs £10 per trip instead of £40 and will allow me to sit down. More importantly, unlike First Great Western, the bus companies actually seem to welcome customers."

Both bus companies running London services said they had noticed an increase in trade during the past week - but it was too early to say if the rail changes were the cause.

Oxford Bus Company general manager Louisa Weeks said: "We have detected an increase in passengers on the Espress service to London but it's too early to say whether or not this is as result of the new train timetable. However we'd be more than happy to welcome new travellers aboard."

Chris Child, a spokesman for Stagecoach in Oxford, added: "At the moment it is too early to say whether the new railway timetable has caused people to switch. However, we don't think it will take long to attract disgruntled train users."

Investment banker Simon Eaton, 43, from North Oxford, lobbied the city's MPs and contacted First Great Western to complain about the changes. He said: "Before, the trains were crowded but not overcrowded and now they are packed.

"First Great Western is blaming the Department of Transport for the timetable changes but they are passing the buck."

Passengers stranded on platform

ThisisWiltshire: 15th December 2006

A REDUCTION of train carriages has been blamed for dozens of passengers being left stranded on a railway platform on Saturday.

Crowds were left in the cold on Trowbridge Station after packed trains could not cram in any more passengers to Bath and Bristol.

Trowbridge town councillor Graham Hedley, who abandoned his planned trip to Bath, said he was astonished to find the trains only had two coaches instead of three.

"There were 70-100 people on the platform. Some people said they would use their cars while others just said they'd try again another day," he said.

"Then the train manager announced no more tickets would be sold at Trowbridge. I've never heard of a ticket office shutting its doors for selling tickets."

Roger Newman, from the West Wiltshire Rail Users Group, said shorter trains had become more common over the last year but said it was the Government which was to blame rather than train company First Great Western.

"We are very disappointed by the Government who in their specifications told whoever won the franchise they could only have a reduced number of train sets," he said.

"The excess, we believe, have been sent to Yorkshire to ease overcrowding, but here in Trowbridge we have a situation where a coach load of passengers are left on the platform. It's a ridiculous situation."

He is calling on passengers to lobby their MPs to urge the Government to provide more coaches.

A spokesman for First Great Western said the company would monitor the number of passengers over the next few weeks.

Comment by jeff osborn: Fri 15 Dec 06

Please see below a letter that I official wrote to the Rail Company:

Tuesday, 11 December 2006

Andrew Griffiths
First Great Western
Regional Manager Central (Severn & Solent)
Bristol Temple Meads Station
Bristol BS1 6QF

Dear Andrew

First Great Western December 2006 Timetable Changes – Chaos at Trowbridge Station

It is with great concern that I write to you with news of negative impacts caused by the implementation of the December 2006 timetable and rolling stock changes on the Greater Western Franchise area. In particular, I convey the anger and frustration of local people and locally elected Members in relation to the disorder experienced at Trowbridge Railway Station on the morning of Saturday 9 December 2006.

In September 2006 you kindly wrote to me, providing the District Council with re-assurances that First Great Western understood Trowbridge’s growing importance within the sub-region. You also correctly noted that “Trowbridge is easily the busiest station between Bath and Southampton”. Consequently, it is surprising that the services travelling north through Trowbridge, to Bath, Bristol and Cardiff, were permitted to degenerate into such disarray. We understand that reductions in rolling stock provision associated with the timetable changes – namely, the reduction from three to two carriage trains played a role.

The District Council understands that northbound trains arrived full throughout the morning and that the numerous waiting passengers were not permitted to board. It is understood that public address announcements advised expectant passengers not to bother waiting for further services as these would also be full. The District Council has been informed that, perversely, the Trowbridge Station ticket office spent most of Saturday 9 December 2006 issuing ticket refunds rather than selling tickets.

Whilst we appreciate that the current demand is seasonal there is, nevertheless, a direct correlation between overflowing passenger numbers and reduced rolling stock. Based on the reports made to the District Council, members of the local community have made the connection between reduced rolling stock provision and their ability to use the rail network. It is understood that most of those waiting to use northbound services resorted to using their private motor cars to get to their final destination. This is possibly the most worrying outcome from last weekend’s farcical events.

The District Council intends to closely monitor the implementation of the new franchise timetable. Given the continued importance of Trowbridge and the large level of growth currently being planned for the area (upto 2026), it is vital that the town’s public transport network is appropriately enhanced and developed. Incidents such as this do not inspire public confidence in either the public transport provider, or those responsible for the franchise specification. Whilst infrastructure improvements to the station are welcomed these need to be supported by reliable services. The current situation is not good enough.

I have forwarded copies of this letter to South West Regional Assembly and the Government Office for the South West. A further copy has been sent to the Department of Transport as further evidence of the flawed franchise specification – particularly, in terms of the ill-advised reductions in service provision.

Yours sincerely

Councillor Osborn
Cabinet Portfolio holder for Planning & Development
West Wiltshire District Council

Cc:
Glenda Lamont (First Great Western)
Andrew Knock (Department of Transport)
Government Office for South West
South West Regional Assembly
Wiltshire County Council

December 16, 2006

Protests lead to rail u-turn

South Wales Argus: 15th December 2006

CAMPAIGNERS fighting to save train services at the Severn Tunnel junction are claiming a victory for people power after rail bosses reversed their decision.

Angry commuters fought First Great Western's plans to cut services from the station near Caldicot.

The company recently made a U-turn and reinstated morning stops at the station.

On Monday 70 campaigners from Save The Severn Tunnel Station met at the station to protest the cuts, and last night the company said it will now restore the evening service.

The 4.54pm and 5.54pm services from Bristol had faced the ace.

Angry commuters said they faced crowded trains and less options as a result.

Last night campaigner David Flint was celebrating victory.

The 59-year-old marketing man from Caldicot, who uses the service to communte daily to Bristol, said: "There is jubilation and almost disbelief. I have never done anything like this in my life before - fought a big corporation and won. It shows people power and democracy do work."

First Great Western said it had reviewed its plans for the timetable after a "strong response" from passengers to the changes.

Regional manager Andrew Griffiths said: "I am very pleased to report that we have now had the green light to provide stops at Severn Tunnel Junction in the 1422 and 1522 Portsmouth to Cardiff services, as from Monday 18 December. "Thanks are due to Network Rail for making this possible."

The stops are at 5.15pm and 6.14pm, on the 4.55pm and 5.44pm departures from Bristol Temple Meads respectively.

Mr Griffiths added: "This restores the choice of four peak-time services in each directions for commuters using Severn Tunnel Junction station."

Welsh commuters celebrate return of Bristol rush-hour trains

Western Mail: Dec 16 2006
Rhodri Clark

WELSH commuters were celebrating a victory over the Government last night, after learning their train service to Severn Tunnel Junction station is to be restored.

On Monday First Great Western changed its timetables and left commuters with only one train home from Bristol per hour in the evening rush hour.

The reduced service had been specified by the UK Government in FGW's new franchise. But after a week of serious overcrowding - when buses were laid on to help bear the burden - FGW said last night it would restore the full evening service from Bristol to Severn Tunnel Junction.

David Flint, a Monmouthshire commuter who campaigned against the cuts, said, "We're absolutely delighted. It's not all First Great Western. I'm afraid the Department for Transport, the Labour Government and other persons have got a lot to answer for.

"The Welsh Assembly have been hiding a bit behind FGW as well. In many ways, FGW has just been the whipping boy."

Andrew Griffiths of FGW said, "I am pleased to offer these services for the commuters of the Caldicot and Magor area. It has been made possible by working closely with Network Rail, which owns the track and infrastructure. These are extra stops on routes our trains are already travelling."

From Monday, the 2.22pm and 3.22pm Portsmouth to Cardiff services will serve Severn Tunnel Junction, stopping there at 5.15pm and 6.14pm.

Before December 10 those services had provided convenient trains home for commuters from Bristol.

Train Derailment

The Times: December 16, 2006
Leading Article

The plight of GNER highlights far wider failings in franchising

The crash on Britain’s fastest railway could clearly be seen coming. The Great North Eastern Railway, operating trains over the high-speed East Coast Main Line from London to Edinburgh, is to be deprived of its franchise only a year after winning a ten-year extension. But almost from the moment it was given the green signal by the Office of Rail Regulation, GNER ran into difficulties. It had overcommitted, offering to pay a franchise premium to the Government of £1.3 billion over the decade — a huge sum that could be raised only if revenue grew by about 10 per cent a year. That always looked overoptimistic; after the July 2005 bombings in London it was unachievable. Passenger numbers were hard hit. Earnings stalled. At the same time, power costs rose sharply and Network Rail compensation payments for post-Hatfield disruption declined. Meanwhile, Sea Containers, GNER’s parent company, sought protection from bankruptcy.

GNER’s troubles were not entirely of its own making. The Government, encouraged perhaps by the success of Hull Trains, which runs services to that city in competition with GNER on most of the route, agreed to allow a new service to Sunderland. This would cut further into GNER’s market. GNER sued but lost. The Government allowed the ruling to stand. A crash was all but inevitable.

Douglas Alexander, the Transport Secretary, had refused to alter the terms of the crippling franchise. He has now backtracked. Public money will not be available to bail out GNER directly — nor, under the clear terms of the franchise system, should it be. Although Britain’s private train companies are subject to regulation of fares, routes and service provision, they are not guaranteed against commercial failure. But by relieving the company of its future premium payments and cancelling the penalty clause for defaulting, is it not doing exactly this? The example will be watched closely by other franchises forced to pay large sums to the Treasury.

Passengers will nevertheless be bemused. GNER was one of the most popular and successful rail operators, which brought back something of the style, elegance and pride of the prenationalisation age. Why should it find it impossible, when passenger numbers are reaching record levels, to make enough money to survive? More importantly, why should each of the 17 million passengers a year pay the Treasury £6 out of every ticket to subsidise loss-making rural lines in Wales? The GNER premium will not even be used to re-engineer the worn-out overhead catenary, which was installed on the cheap by British Rail and needs substantial modification.

The Government seems unclear on what it should now do. It has given GNER 18 months to continue operating and says it will look at its performance. Whatever happens, however, Treasury revenue from the line will fall short by millions of pounds — a sum that the taxpayer must find. And when the franchise is put out to tender, will GNER be allowed to bid again? The announcement by Mr Alexander, the Transport Secretary, has focused attention on the wholly unsatisfactory way that franchises are awarded. The railways, integral to social and economic planning, cannot be treated like an order for the office fax paper. They are still essentially in public hands, operated under a franchise system. GNER has shown that the Government, overwhelmed with an illogical and burdensome regulatory framework, has still not understood how to make the trains run on time.

See also:

Rail company pulls out of service to the North East

The Times: December 16, 2006
Ben Webster, Transport Correspondent

# Withdraws from £1.3bn contract
# Doubts raised on other franchises

The Government’s plans for investing in Britain’s railways are in disarray after the company operating the most profitable route surrendered the contract yesterday.

gner_flying_scotsman.jpg
The route of the Flying Scotsman

GNER had signed the contract only 18 months ago, under which it had agreed to pay the Government £1.3 billion over ten years to run trains between London and Edinburgh.

Ministers were relying on the money to prop up loss-making services elsewhere, and to pay for improvements, such as longer trains and platforms, on overcrowded routes.

The failure of the contract also raises doubts about the viability of other franchises, such as South West Trains and First Great Western, where the operators have each promised to pay more than £1 billion over the next decade.

Passenger Focus, the rail passenger watchdog, said that the Government was partly to blame because it had accepted an unrealistic bid from GNER — said to be £300 million higher than any other company was willing to pay.

Anthony Smith, the watchdog’s chief executive, said: “This shows that driving a very hard bargain with train companies may not always be in the best interests of passengers. It will do nothing to calm concerns about the premiums which have been promised by some of the other companies.”

Tom Winsor, the former Rail Regulator, said: “The failure of GNER’s contract has cost the taxpayer hundreds of millions of pounds. Competition for franchises has ecome so vigorous that companies are sometimes tempted to put in optimistic bids — and it can go wrong.”

GNER will continue to run trains on the route for up to 18 months while the Department for Transport seeks another operator. The company will be allowed to keep an undisclosed proportion of any cost savings it makes, and any revenue it receives above a certain target.

The company attributed the failure of the contract to the downturn in tourism after last year’s bombings in London, a rise in electricity prices and the emergence of a small rival company on the same route.

The transport department refused to say how much it expected to lose from the contract’s failure and would not reveal the details of its temporary agreement with GNER.

A senior rail industry source said that bidders would offer several hundred million pounds less than GNER agreed to pay last year. First Group, the biggest train company, said that it planned to submit a bid.

Gerry Doherty, general secretary of the TSSA, the white collar rail union, said that the failure of the contract showed the current rail franchising system was fundamentally flawed. “Instead of this lottery, this franchise should be handed over to Network Rail to run it for the benefit of the passenger.”

December 15, 2006

Friends Of Suburban Bristol Rail need your help!

FOSBR: 15th Dec 06

Friends of Suburban Bristol Rail's "Half Hour Train Campaign" aims to get Bristol City Council to put approximately £450,000 in their 2006/7 budget to subsidise a half-hourly rail service from Temple Meads to Avonmouth. Here are some ways you can help
severn beach line.jpg

The Council currently plans to spend just over half of what other cities are spending on public transport, and this small amount includes nothing for local rail. Getting a half hourly service on the Severn Beach line is a good starting point for improving the local rail network as a whole.)

We have produced hundreds of yellow postcards for people to fill in and send to the Council's budget consultation, to say they support the campaign. The deadline for the consultation is 15 January.

1) We need people to fill in and distribute yellow postcards (and explanatory campaign leaflets). If you can do this, please ring FOSBR on 0117 942 8637 and ask for however many postcards/leaflets you want.

2) Come with us to lobby the Cabinet to include our demand in their budget 5.30 - 6.30pm, Thursday 11th January
Council House, College Green

It would be great if you could also:
- Write to your councillor to ask them to support the campaign. So far only one councillor (Rosalie Walker) has given her support. Let's put pressure on the others!

- Write to your MP to ask them to support the campaign. Kerry McCarthy has given her support, but the others haven't responded.

This year, FOSBR are getting organised...and we think the Council's getting nervous...we might actually win this!

Together we can do it!

Stranded commuters vent fury at timetable changes

Bath Chronicle: 14 December 2006
c.foster@bathchron

Timetable changes are causing chaos for rail commuters travelling in and out of Bath.

Furious scenes have erupted with passengers left stranded at Oldfield Park and other stations, unable to board packed carriages.

The problems have arisen over the past week since the introduction of a new timetable for services between London and Bath and across Wiltshire and Somerset.

Extra staff were called to Oldfield Park station yesterday and commuters were held back from boarding the 7.31am Cardiff-bound service for the third time in as many days.

People had arrived extra early after 40 passengers were left behind or greatly delayed on Monday morning.

Titus Jennings, of Englishcombe Lane, who uses the service every day to travel to Bristol, said: "Monday was absolute hell. We were like sardines. We literally spent the entire journey timing when to breathe in and out. It's not just the fact people we were late for work; it's a safety issue.

"They are stopping the high speed trains at Oldfield Park and Keynsham but you aren't notified until you get here. I pay £25.10 for a weekly return. That works out at roughly £10 an hour for a service. If I pay someone £10 an hour for a job I expect it to be done properly."

Another passenger John Dunn said the situation was ridiculous and the worst he had seen in 18 years of using the trains.

"People will be forced to use their cars because public transport is simply not adequate," he said.

"Words have certainly been exchanged all week but the staff are agreeing with us and handing out complaints forms."

Passengers travelling to Bath from Montpelier on the Severn Beach Line have also been affected as have commuters from Frome and Trowbridge.

A Trowbridge to Bath service on Saturday is said to have left around 100 people stranded at the station because it was already full.

Trowbridge town councillor Graham Hedley, who tried to board the train in the county town, said: "The vast majority of the people on the platform were left behind feeling very angry and very cold."

Cllr Hedley had his ticket refunded by staff at the station who had given up issuing new tickets because of the volume of people already waiting to board trains.

"May I suggest that this reduction in carriages and services will not only lead to overcrowding but will also, at first, lead to many people being left behind on a regular basis," he said.

"This will, fairly quickly, lead to a great many people leaving the rail transport system and getting back into their cars - an interesting green policy."

First Great Western regional manager Andrew Griffiths put the issues down to "technical teething problems" and said he hoped they would be resolved as soon as possible.

"We are very concerned that people have been left behind and understand that Oldfield Park station is one of the worst affected," he said.

"For the first few days of the new timetable we have been monitoring the problems that have arisen.

"However, we only have a finite number of trains for the morning services so it's a case of robbing Peter to pay Paul.

"I would like to assure passengers that we are looking into the problems and are trying to make sure that all services run as efficiently as possible.

"We have provided a bus service for Keynsham passengers travelling to Bristol but of course to do this at Oldfield Park would be more difficult," he said.

However, David Redgewell, of the south west branch of campaign group Transport 2000, said the Department of Transport had a lot to answer for.

He has urged MP Don Foster to take up the case and appeal for more rolling stock and funds to improve transport services across the region.

He said: "We need to go directly to the top. These people need to get real. They are running a fantasy service.

"Bath is a World Heritage Site and we deserve the type of service every other European economy has.

"Oldfield Park is crucial to the Western Riverside Development.

"There are, of course, a lot of concerns about the trains becoming like cattle wagons."

Yorkshire rail commuters on attempts to ease overcrowding

BBC Look North: 13 Dec 2006

Last week Northern Rail added an extra 800 peak time seats, many on the Harrogate line. Alan Whitehouse reports for BBC Look North on commuters' verdict on trains here. [RealPlayer required].

Striking Eurostar cleaners carol singing - Waterloo Station, Monday December 18, 10am

RMT ADVANCE NOTICE: December 15, 2006

Striking RMT cleaners working for OCS on its Eurostar contract will be singing their own Christmas carols at the entrance of Waterloo Station between 10am and 11am on Monday December 18 against poverty pay.

The cleaners are taking 24-hour strike action after the scrooge contractor failed to budge from its miserly 20p-an-hour offer.

“This is meant to be the season of goodwill, but at OCS the top-dog gets a £13,000 rise, yet the people out there doing the dirty work are offered a 20p insult,” RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

“OCS, which has an annual turnover of £600 million, claims to be a company based on “traditional family values” and “respect, honesty and integrity” yet has so far refused to even discuss ending poverty pay.

“As Christmas approaches Eurostar should think very hard about the message they are sending out by tolerating such behaviour from contractors who wouldn’t be out of place in a Dickens novel.

“As for OCS, a company that spends money sponsoring a cricket stand at the Oval while paying its staff poverty wages has truly got its priorities wrong,” Bob Crow said.


Note for editors: the last verse of the cleaners’ Christmas carol is below

On the Twelfth day of Christmas my boss should give to me
An annual pay increase, A shorter working week, A decent pension scheme, Twenty eight days leave, Full employment rights, Free travel pass, Proper safety wear, Respect and equality, Fair sick-pay scheme, Clean changing rooms, Unsocial hours pay and at least seven pounds and five p.


ends

For further information contact Brian Denny on 020 7529 8824

GNER stripped of rail franchise

Daily Telegraph: 15/12/2006
By Harry Wallop

The Department for Transport has stripped GNER of its valuable East Coast Mainline franchise, worth £1.3bn.
gner_kx.jpg
The Government is taking over GNER's East Coast franchise

The calamities that have befallen its parent company Sea Containers have finally caught up with GNER, which has struggled to pay its franchise payments to the Government.

The DfT this morning announced it is inviting expressions of interest to run the line, often seen as the flagship route in the UK. It runs from London to Edinburgh via York.

The Government is immediately taking over the franchise, which will save GNER £100m in franchise payments. GNER will help manage the line, however, over the next 18 months to ensure a smooth hand over.

Transport Secretary Douglas Alexander said: "The Government made it clear that rail operators that fall into financial difficulty should expect to surrender the franchise and not receive financial support. To do otherwise could set the precedent that we are willing to bail out operators at extra cost to the taxpayer.
advertisement

"This agreement protects the interests of both passengers and taxpayers. It will ensure services operate as normal until a private sector franchise operator can be put in place."

GNER chairman Bob Mackenzie, who is also Sea Containers chief executive, said: "We would have preferred a renegotiation of the current contract, but that was not available. The management agreement is therefore a sensible solution for all parties."

He explained that the company had been crippled by the July 7 bombings, which led to sharp fall in passenger numbers, and the increase in electricity prices.

Today's move by the Government follows a similar stripping of a franchise in 2003 when Connex South Eastern was taken over by the now-defunct Strategic Rail Authority, much of whose powers have now passed to the DfT.

The South Eastern franchise was eventually absorbed into a new, privately-run Kent Integrated Franchise.

The GNER position contrasts sharply with that of Virgin Rail which earlier this week was able to announce a new franchise deal with the Government for the West Coast Main Line which includes subsidies.

There are now bound to be questions asked about the fairness of the franchise system with some train operators getting Government money and others asked to pay large premiums.

See also:

GNER loses East Coast franchise

Times Online: December 15, 2006
Rebecca O'Connor

The Government is inviting bids from train operators to take over the East Coast Main Line between London and Edinburgh, after confirming that it was relieving GNER of the franchise.

The struggling GNER will continue to manage passenger services along the route, famed for the Flying Scotsman locomotive, until the takeover is completed within 12 to 18 months.

GNER is believed to be straining to sustain its cash reserves at the legal limit to fund the franchise, having acknowledged that its original bid for the deal was "bullish".

The train operator's US parent company, Sea Containers Ltd, filed for reorganisation under US bankruptcy law in October after missing the deadline for a $115 million (£59 million) bond payment.

Bob Mackenzie, chief executive of Sea Containers and chariman of GNER, said:
"GNER has a new management team in place which is now delivering revenue growth in line with the original bid.While we are not in breach of the current franchise agreement, GNER will not be able to meet the significant increase in franchise premium obligations due from May 2007."

Rail unions criticised the Government for bringing the franchise system into disarray and exposing rail workers to the threat of job losses.

Bob Crow, general secretary for The Rail, Maritime and Transport Union, said: "The Government must tell GNER today that its plans to cut jobs across the franchise will not be allowed. GNER’s operations should be brought back in-house. Sea Containers’ disastrous tenure has destabilised a key part of Britain’s railways and sends a signal to other privateers that if you get into financial difficulties you too will be bailed with public money. The franchising process is now in complete disarray and there should be an immediate moratorium on the whole process."

The Government has recently been criticised by passenger groups for increasing the cost of running rail franchises, forcing companies to increase fares.

From next month a standard open return ticket from London to Edinburgh with GNER will rise by 5.5 per cent to £232.

Douglas Alexander, the Secretary of State for Transport, said: "The Government made it clear that rail operators that fall into financial difficulty should expect to surrender the franchise and not receive financial support.

"To do otherwise could set the precedent that we are willing to bail out operators at extra cost to the taxpayer."

The key financial rewards and risks of the franchise agreement will pass to the Government until the new operator is installed, with GNER earning a performance-based incentive.

GNER operates more than 100 services along the main line and carries almost 17 million passengers a year. Last month, it was voted Britain's best rail operator, with passenger satisfaction ratings of 90 per cent.

Under the East Coast Main Line franchise arrangement, the new operator would have to introduce efficiency-improving measures, such as passenger smart cards.

See also:

Rail firm stripped of franchise

Press Association: December 15, 2006

The operator of a main London to Scotland rail route has been stripped of its franchise after its parent company ran into financial difficulties.

The Department for Transport said it was inviting expressions of interest to operate the East Coast Mainline route which has been run by GNER since the late 1990s.

A new franchisee is expected to be in place in 12-18 months time and until then GNER will operate the franchise on behalf of the DfT under a no-fee management agreement deal.

GNER's parent company Bermuda-based Sea Containers has filed for bankruptcy protection in the US and has been suspended from the New York Stock Exchange.

Its financial problems were worsened by the fact that under the terms of its franchise, GNER had to pay back £1.3 billion to the Treasury over 10 years.

Transport Secretary Douglas Alexander said: "The Government made it clear that rail operators that fall into financial difficulty should expect to surrender the franchise and not receive financial support. To do otherwise could set the precedent that we are willing to bail out operators at extra cost to the taxpayer.

"This agreement protects the interests of both passengers and taxpayers. It will ensure services operate as normal until a private sector franchise operator can be put in place."

GNER chairman Bob Mackenzie, who is also Sea Containers chief executive, said: "While we are not in breach of the current franchise agreement, GNER will not be able to meet the significant increase in franchise premium obligations due from May 2007. We would have preferred a renegotiation of the current contract, but that was not available. The management agreement is therefore a sensible solution for all parties.

GNER has faced competition on the line with rail regulators - to some people's surprise - allowing the Grand Central company to start services from the north of England to London.

GNER operates 124 weekday train services along the East Coast Main Line, linking London King's Cross, the East Midlands, Yorkshire and Humberside, North East England and Scotland, carrying almost 17 million passengers a year.

Train services and rail improvements will continue as nomal.

Bring GNER franchise back in house to safeguard jobs and services, says RMT

RMT: December 15 2006

THE GNER franchise should be brought back in-house immediately to safeguard jobs and rail services, Britain’s biggest rail union says today.

"Priority number one must be for the government to tell GNER today that its plans to cut jobs across the franchise will not be allowed to proceed," RMT general secretary Bob Crow said.

"Sea Containers have defaulted on what was always an absurd franchise agreement and GNER's operations should taken back in-house to harnesss the revenue for the benefit of the whole industry.

"Sea Containers' disastrous tenure had destabilised a key part of Britain's railway network, and it makes no sense to continue handing them guaranteed, risk-free profits on a management-fee contract.

"Allowing Sea Containers to stay in charge for even one more day sends the signal to other privateers that if they get into financial difficulties they too will be bailed out with public money.

"The franchicing policy is now clearly in complete disarray and there should be an immediate moratorium on the process.

"Refranchising GNER would cost millions for the paperwork alone, and we would only end up with yet another privateer being handed a licence to drain public money out of the railway industry," Bob Crow said.

Virgin Trains gets £1.4bn subsidy

Guardian Unlimited: December 13, 2006
Dan Milmo, transport correspondent
virgin_wc.jpg
Virgin Trains has reversed the industry trend of paying billion pound windfalls to the government by securing a £1.4bn subsidy for its west coast franchise.


The government has agreed to subsidise Virgin after the charges it pays for using the London-to-Glasgow line more than doubled.

Over the course of the five-year franchise to March 2012, Virgin will receive £1.36bn in state funding that will be passed on to Network Rail, the quasi-public body that inherited the running of the British rail network.

Under the majority of large train franchises, train operators pay the government premium payments for using the rail network, typically over the course of a 10-year contract.

The four largest train franchises paid the state around £500m last year.

The rising premium payments have caused alarm among industry executives.

GNER is attempting to renegotiate the terms of its deal after admitting that it cannot meet the £1.3bn payments pledge in its contract.

Stagecoach and First have also raised alarm by signing £1bn contracts over the past year, although they claim to be happy with the terms.

A Virgin Trains spokesman said no company could run trains on the London-to-Glasgow route without a subsidy, because Network Rail has spent £8.6bn of taxpayers' money on upgrading the west coast mainline and needs to recoup its investment.

"The cost of turning this line into one fit for the 21st century has been huge. We clearly have to repay the cost of it to the government, but it would not be viable for a sole commercial operator to cover the cost with income of around £500m per year," he said.

Virgin said it would not cover the increased access charges with significant fare hikes.

The spokesman added that the train operator expected to generate the extra revenue through a rise in passengers: from 20 million currently to 34 million by 2012.

"This only works if we can get passenger numbers up by 70%. If we price people off the trains we will not hit those revenue targets. We will need to have sensible pricing," he said.

Virgin is also in talks with the Department for Transport over adding two extra cars to its 53 high-speed tilting Pendolino trains, which would provide a further 10m seats, although the DfT is understood to be sceptical about the need for the extra capacity.

Virgin is planning to increase the number of journeys by 50% from 2008 onwards, through longer trains and more frequent services.

The company had been operating the route on a yearly contract after its original franchise deal - which envisaged a massive increase in services - collapsed following delays in the west coast upgrade and the financial turmoil caused by the 2000 Hatfield crash.

Rail minister Tom Harris said: "Now the [west coast upgrade] project is on track it makes sense to reinstate the franchise agreement.

"Many passengers are already benefiting from the increase in services, improved reliability and faster journeys.

"But this provides the opportunity to put even more services in the December 2008 timetable within the contract, and strike a better value deal for the taxpayer."

See also:

Branson to get £1.4bn subsidy on West Coast line

Independent Online: 14 December 2006
By Barrie Clement, Transport Editor

Sir Richard Branson's Virgin Rail is to receive £1.4bn of taxpayers' money in return for operating services on the West Coast Main Line between London and Glasgow.

The massive public subsidy over the next five years stands in stark contrast to the £1.3bn which Great North Eastern Railways is struggling to pay the Exchequer for being re-awarded the franchise to run trains between London and Edinburgh.

Under a plan drawn up at the time of privatisation in 1996, Sir Richard's rail interests, which include the sprawling CrossCountry franchise, should have been making contributions to the Treasury, rather than the other way round. Virgin has received well more than £1.5bn from the state since 2002-03 in subsidy and in compensation because of Railtrack's failure to upgrade the west coast line.

Managers at Virgin Rail, which is 51 per cent owned by Virgin Group and 49 per cent by Stagecoach, pointed out that the company would take the "revenue risk" associated with a franchise, but they will also have the opportunity to attract more customers.

Virgin hopes to increase the number of passenger journeys from 20 million a year at the moment to more than 30 million by the end of the franchise period.

The agreement replaces a "cost-plus" management contract with the Government dating from 2002 when the project to refurbish the west coast line fell apart under the now defunct Railtrack and Virgin was unable to fulfil its obligations under its franchise deal.

Gerry Doherty, general secretary of the rail union TSSA, said: "Father Christmas has come early for Sir Rich. I am completely baffled why the British taxpayer is playing Santa Claus to one of the country's richest men. I would much rather see fares cut."

A Department for Transport (DfT) spokesperson said the franchise had not been due to return a premium to the Government until Railtrack honoured its contractual arrangements.

A spokesman for Virgin said the subsidy would not cover the £2.2bn in access charges over five years the company will pay to the infrastructure organisation Network Rail as a result of the £8.6bn cost of modernising the route. The access charges amounted to around £450m a year, while current revenue was just £500m, the spokesman said. "We have to pay our staff, pay for the trains and pay for power on top of the access charge," he said.

As part of the new franchise agreement, Virgin and the DfT said there would be major improvements to services after 2008. They would include a 50 per cent increase in frequency in London-Birmingham and London-Manchester services and a 30-minute reduction in London-Glasgow journey times.

Virgin said it was discussing with the DfT the feasibility of adding two extra cars to each of its 53 nine-car, high-speed, tilting Pendolino trains, which would provide a further 10 million seats to meet expected demand.

See also:

Subsidy for Branson is £10 per passenger

The Times: December 14, 2006
Ben Webster

Sir Richard Branson is to receive £1.3 billion of public money to run Virgin Trains until 2012 — £10 per passenger — contradicting promises that he would pay the Government to operate the franchise.

Virgin, which is raising fares by double the rate of inflation next month, will become the most highly subsidised intercity train company.

Under the deal, signed by the Government yesterday, Virgin will receive up to £300 million a year to operate trains on the West Coast Main Line between London Euston, Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool and Glasgow.

Under Sir Richard’s contract signed a decade ago, he agreed to pay the Government £1.1 billion for the right to run the franchise until 2012. That was suspended four years ago when Railtrack was abolished. Since then Virgin has received £590 million in extra subsidy.

There is a £3 billion difference between what Sir Richard agreed originally to pay over 15 years and what he will end up receiving, three times the annual subsidy British Rail received for the entire network.

Virgin said the subsidy was needed to pay higher track access charges imposed by Network Rail. The upgrade of the West Coast Main Line has quadrupled in cost from Railtrack’s original estimate of £2.2 billion.

Virgin also claimed that Network Rail’s failure to upgrade the line to 225km/h (140mph) meant that it would be unable to operate its planned frequent services with shorter journey times. It would therefore attract fewer passengers.

Yesterday’s deal did not include the 106 carriages that Virgin had requested to relieve overcrowding on the line by lengthening each of its Pendolino tilting trains to 11 carriages.

Gerry Doherty, general secretary of the TSSA, the white collar rail union, said: “Father Christmas has arrived early for Sir Richard.”

December 14, 2006

Fury over FGW rail chaos

Maidenhead Advertiser: 14th December 2006
Editorial
fgwlink_train.jpg
FRUSTRATED commuters this week branded Maidenhead's new-look rail services to London ‘Third World'.

Peak-hour trains were late, overcrowded and some were even cancelled. Passengers were left standing on platforms as others tried desperately to squeeze onto the few fast trains left in the timetable.

The impact of the new First Great Western (FGW) schedule, which sees fewer fast trains from Maidenhead and Twyford to London Paddington, was compounded by mechanical failures and delays, which heightened people's frustration.

Commuters described being ‘rammed in like sardines', which people feared would be a hazard in the event of an accident.

Those lucky enough to have seats had passengers crushed between them, according to Neil Symons, 28, of Brunel Road.

The HR manager, a commuter since 1999, said: "It used to be a lottery to get a seat, now it is a lottery to get on a train."

FGW spokesman Lance Cole said: "We had some mechanical issues on Monday morning, it was nothing to do with the timetable."

He added FGW adhered to all statutory safety requirements and there was ‘no evidence to suggest overcrowding increases risk'.

FGW said people's comments on the timetable were taken into account following public consultation earlier this year.

A statement from the train operator said: "As a result of the comments, we were able to make numerous amendments to the timetable. However, regrettably it has not been possible to make every change and some people inevitably will be disappointed."

The company said it would monitor the situation closely and if possible, try to make changes to the timetable in the future.

See also:

Third World experience for rail commuters

Maidenhead Advertiser: 14th December 2006
Letters

Like hundreds of other commuters, I'm appalled at the impact of the new timetable serving Maidenhead.

It has been a Third World experience on many commuter services this week.

Having cut back on fast and semi-fast services, the remaining FGW services have been horrendously overcrowded as well as late.

Anyone travelling on the 0812 from Maidenhead and the 1914 back from Paddington on Monday or the 0750 to Paddington on Tuesday will know what I mean.

The frustration is how powerless we are. Despite the best efforts of yourselves, our MP and passenger groups, things have got worse with little prospect of improvement for 2007.

When I contacted FGW, they referred me to their base franchise commitment (just three fast services during the morning rush hour) and basically told me we should be grateful for anything above that (such as the 0735 service they so ‘generously' agreed to run).

FGW is a monopoly and behaving one like one. You can't imagine a company that genuinely has to earn its customers, such as John Lewis, treating its customers like this, can you?

Chris Barraclough

College Avenue
Maidenhead

Tough luck on the rail commuter

Oxford Mail: 14 December 2006
Editorial

One would think that passengers' interests would come first in running a railway.

Not a bit of it. Many commuters in Oxfordshire have had a raw deal since the new timetables came into force this week.

They complain that trains are being axed and others rescheduled, bringing huge inconvenience.

They have been stitched up by the Government and First Great Western.

Not only will they have to adjust their travelling times, but there is a danger that the fewer fast trains will become heavily overcrowded.

Just what is going on on our railways?

The Government tells us to leave our cars at home and travel by public transport.

But then it conspires with the train companies to make life difficult for those who heed the advice.

No doubt the bus companies will be rubbing their hands with glee. It is much cheaper to travel to and from London by coach and you are guaranteed a seat.

Talk about the Government and the railways shooting themselves in the foot.

Anger over cut to early morning rail service

icBerkshire: Dec 14 2006

PASSENGERS are furious after an early morning service connecting Sandhurst, Crowthorne and Wokingham with Reading was axed.

They have signed a petition urging operator First Great Western to re-think and have won the backing of MPs whose constituents are affected by the cut.

More than 100 regular users of the 5.57am Gatwick-Reading service,which was dropped on Monday this week, have signed the petition organised by Aongus O'Laoire.

Mr O'Laoire, of Beechnut Close, Wokingham, says the two-car train is always busy with passengers joining at many stations between Gatwick and Reading. The service was dropped on Monday, December 10.

Bracknell MP Andrew MacKay and Wokingham MP John Redwood have backed the campaign.

Mr O'Laoire, who works for a London-based telecommunications company and uses the train for a connection at Reading, said there was little notice of the timetable change and on-board announcements never mentioned it.

In a letter to FGW boss Alison Forster, he said: "The loss of this train will be a major inconvenience for those joining before Wokingham and they will have no route to Reading before the 5.57-7.28 Gatwick to Reading train.

"For passengers joining at Wokingham it will also cause considerable difficulty, as they will have to take a train 20 minutes earlier, or a train that arrives at Reading 20 minutes later, thus missing a number of high speed links to Paddington."

Mr MacKay said petition signatories in Crowthorne, Sandhurst and Finchampstead would be inconvenienced.

He added: "I have written to Alison Forster to say she needs to reconsider this decision.

"A lot of people who start work early use the service to get to other stops on the line and quite a lot of people will use the line to connect with services to London."

An FGW spokesman said it was part of a new timetable which had been publicised.

He said: "It should not have come as a surprise to passengers. We consulted local user groups and notified MPs of the new timetable details in February 2006.

"Over the next few weeks we will monitor services very closely and, if it is necessary and possible,we will make further modifications."

He said alternative services run by Virgin were closely timed to the service FGW ran.

New Potters Bar rail crash documentary

BBC What's On: 14 December 2006
potters_bar_train_crash.jpg
A DOCUMENTARY examining the Potters Bar rail crash will be screened on television tonight (Thursday).

Seven people died and 76 were injured when a train derailed and crashed into the station, on May 10, 2002.

Potters Bar: The Truth, due to be screened at 9pm on BBC 1, is billed as a fascinating and thought-provoking film by Jane Sayers.

It follows the British Transport Police and the Health and Safety Executive during the huge inquiry into the cause of the accident.

The programme shows them examining claims of sabotage and reveals their findings have implications for the whole rail industry.

Rail protest increases pressure

Royston Crow: 14 December 2006
EDITORIAL - news@royston-crow.co.uk

COMMUTERS from Ashwell and Morden station increased their protests against a rail company by invading a neighbouring stations car park.
FCC_letchworth_carpark_protest.jpg
Some of the protestors handiwork

The protests stem from First Capital Connect decision to cut their 7.03 fast service to Kings Cross, which came into effect on Monday.

Upping the ante commuters, who have been forced to drive to Letchworth Station to catch their preferred train, filled car park spaces with their own cars leaving commuters from Letchworth nowhere to park.

Protesters apologised but feel that FCC officials have left them with no alternative.

One Ashwell commuter, Tim Giles said: "We sincerely apologise to Letchworth commuters for what we did but First Capital Connect have left us no choice. Many of us need to catch a fast train to London and the only way to do that now is to drive to Letchworth every day."

Commuters placed signs on their car windscreens that read 'We don't want to be here. Help save our fast trains'.

Members of the protest also gave out leaflets explaining why they were there and asked for their support.

Mr Giles added: "At a time when 'green issues' are right at the top of the country's concerns, it's ludicrous that we have to drive away from our local stations and come to Letchworth, causing unnecessary pollution and congestion. We often hear talk of a joined-up transport policy but here's a real example of a very untogether one."

Talking about the start of the new timetable, commuter Chris Hunt told The Crow: "I was on the train on Monday morning and it appears that FCCs attempt to deal with overcrowding from Ashwell and Baldock has backfired in a big way.

"The train was just as overcrowded, with people standing in the isles and entrance doorways. The train was as crowded as ever and it will continue to be so - this is not the solution.

"In addition the mood was particularly poor given that a large number of commuters had to drive to Letchworth in order to catch the train. There was a lot of frustration."

- The protest took place on the first day of the new timetable. The 6.45 from Cambridge, which used to stop at both Ashwell and Morden and Baldock now runs straight through from Royston to Letchworth. More cuts to the fast train service are planned for 2007.

December 13, 2006

Bristol commuters deserve a real public service

Bristol Evening Post: 13 December 2006

The Post's trenchant editorial comment ("Railway woes will continue", Comment, December 9) on the scandal of 20 per cent fewer train seats available to rail users in the Bristol commute-to-work area, makes a number of excellent points.

Rail users are held captive by private sector monopolies that increase the cost of train travel massively above the rate of inflation.

Meanwhile, so-called regulation fails to deliver a good deal for the public on price, quality, cleanliness, reliability or frequency of rail services.

That is why the demand for an end to the fiasco of rail privatisation, which the Post rightly identifies as the root of the problem, will not go away.

However, Bristol's commuters and rail users will ask themselves why it is that commuters in Yorkshire could look forward to an easier ride to work from Monday, when almost 1,700 extra seats were provided on peak-time trains in and out of Leeds, while Bristol commuters experienced a cut of 1,839 train seats per day.

Across the River Severn in south east Wales, steps to open up new commuter rail lines to Ebbw Vale are under way and new services to the Vale of Glamorgan are already in place. Bristol's local rail lines to Portishead and those linking Filton and Bristol Parkway stations with Avonmouth via Henbury remain freight-only, and proposals for a suburban rail service fit for a city of Bristol's size and economic importance remain a pipe dream.

Let's bring railways back to the public sector where they belong. But rail users in Bristol and the West also need accountable structures to manage rail services similar to Passenger Transport Executives that exist in other major British cities where rail is growing. Perhaps then we might get representatives prepared to defend and improve our train services.

Alex Gordon,
South Wales & West Regional Council Secretary,
National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers (RMT).

Timetable means trains 'too full'

BBC News: 13 December 2006

Rail passengers travelling to and from Somerset have complained a new timetable has them packed like sardines into fewer carriages in peak hours.

On Sunday First Great Western began its new times for services between Bristol, Weston-super-Mare and Taunton.

On Monday a man fainted on a packed train near Bath, and on Tuesday people were not being allowed onto the train at Bradford-on-Avon.

A spokesman for FGW admitted some services have been "extremely full".


"I spent the journey standing on one leg as there wasn't anywhere to put the other one" - Communter, Titus Jennings

Theresa Hopkins, a regular commuter from Frome said: "It was worse than crowded and just outside Bath a man just flopped down.

"He was in the middle of a load of people and just fell - it was scary."

Ms Hopkins, an annual ticket holder said she was thinking seriously about buying a car in order to get to work on time.

"It's appalling to reduce the number of seats - just because we're a captive audience they just treat us like cattle," said Ms Hopkins.

Another regular passenger on trains from Oldfield Park to Temple Meads, Titus Jennings, said the trains were always busy during peak hours but since the new timetable had been introduced it was "like the black hole of Calcutta".

Services reviewed

"I spent the journey standing on one leg as there wasn't anywhere to put the other one," he said.

Andrew Griffiths, the regional manager of First Great Western trains apologised and said he would be reviewing the number of carriages on the services affected.

"We can't put on extra (trains) we can only shuffle round what we've got and we have to be careful not to rob Peter to pay Paul," he said.

He added the number of trains should increase soon when those undergoing maintenance were back in action.

Commuters in blockade at rail station car park

Cambridge Evening News: 13 December 2006

ANGRY commuters campaigning against the loss of a fast train service blocked up spaces at a station car park.

Rail commuters have gone to extreme lengths to stop First Capital Connect from axing the 7.03am service from Ashwell and Morden to London King's Cross from December 11.

Adults have already stripped off and posed for the cameras with just customised newspapers to cover their modesty.

Even their children have been campaigning to save the service.

But, on Monday - the first day of the new timetable, the Ashwell and Morden Rail User Group's protest reached a new level, with campaigners blocking Letchworth station's car park with their vehicles.

Protesters placed huge signs in their car windscreens saying: "We don't want to be here. Help save our fast trains."

Risking the wrath of Letchworth train users by leaving them with nowhere to park, the protesters apologised but said that First Capital Connect had left them with no alternative.

Tim Giles, one of the Ashwell commuters who took part in the protest, said: "We sincerely apologise to Letchworth commuters, but First Capital Connect have left us no choice. Many of us need to catch a fast train to London and the only way to do that now is to drive to Letchworth every day.

"At a time when 'green issues' are right at the top of the country's concerns, it's ludicrous that we have to drive away from our local stations and come to Letchworth, causing unnecessary pollution and congestion.

"We often hear talk of a joined-up transport policy but here's a real example of a very disjointed one."

First Capital Connect has introduced an eight-carriage train for 500 passengers, which will take 15 minutes longer, and stops at Ashwell and Morden at 6.49am.

Blair's union cap won't fit

The Mirror: 13 December 2006
Kevin Maguire

TRANSFORMING the Labour Party into a pale imitation of the feckless Social Democratic Party would be one of Tony Blair's stupidest mistakes.

The outgoing Prime Minister is charged with plotting to sever Labour's historic links with the trade unions as a central part of his legacy.

His bequest to Britain would be not to change the party he leads but to destroy it, emasculating Labour as a force still concerned about working people.

New Labour reduced to a SDP Mk II, an organisation that came and went in the 1980s, would be the plaything of Middle England and about as radical as a church fete.

Had Blair wandered into a gathering of his own MPs this week, the leader would have encountered a lynch mob accusing him of high treason.

The ugly meeting behind the supposed privacy of the closed doors of a Commons committee room vowed to resist to the bitter end proposals to cap union donations at £50,000.

"What an irony," moaned Dennis Skinner, the Beast of Bolsover, "that trade union money is the only clean money in politics and it's under attack because of loans-for-Lordships."

Eccles MP Ian Stewart vowed to "fight it to the death" while North Durham's Kevan Jones suggested "the lights are on but no one is at home in Downing Street".

Chorley's Lindsay Hoyle demanded "people in the dark cellar of No 10 must be sorted out." And Blaydon's Davey Anderson, a ministerial aide supposed to loyally back the leadership, complained: "Someone at No 10 is doing the Tories' dirty work for them."

The Labour MPs suspect ultra-Blairites in No 10 are encouraging an inquiry into party funding to shackle unions - and permitting the pockets of taxpayers to be picked to finance parties.

Old duffer Sir Hayden Phillips, a retired mandarin handpicked by Blair to investigate funding, favours adopting the Tory idea of a £50,000 ceiling.

Bracketing unions, which collect money from millions of individual workers, with billionaires would be grossly unfair - as well as offensive.

Indeed, political funding expert Professor Keith Ewing warned the proposals represent the biggest attack on Labour since the 1911 Osborne Judgment when a judge banned unions funding the party.

The Premier refused to comment on the crisis yesterday, dodging questions until Phillips delivers his report next year.

Charitable Labour MPs maintain that Blair is struggling to squeeze the funding genie back in the bottle and has little influence over Phillips.

Less charitable Labour MPs -whom my sums put in the majority - accuse the PM of plotting one last malevolent strike against a movement that never loved him.

Either way, the Premier will change politics for ever. But not for the better, unless he is stopped.

See also:

Blair supports plan to weaken unions' grip on party, MPs told

The Guardian: December 12, 2006
Will Woodward, chief political correspondent

· Allegation that PM backs overhaul of party funding
· No 10 denies claims over Phillips inquiry findings

Tony Blair is to back a sweeping overhaul of party funding which will curb the influence of the unions over the Labour party, MPs were told last night.

Union members would be required to agree to annual donations to the party through their unions, it was alleged at a private meeting at Westminster. The total donation made by each union would also be subject to a cap, under the proposals from Sir Hayden Phillips, the Whitehall mandarin brought in by the prime minister to make recommendations on the future of party funding after the cash-for-honours affair.

Sir Hayden is consulting on whether to propose a cap of £50,000 a year, as the Tories have proposed, although one source said last night that the limit could go as high as £250,000. Publication of his report, originally scheduled for this month, has been delayed until the new year.

Current rules require unions to ask members every 10 years whether they want to contribute to a political fund. The unions then take money from the political fund and distribute it as they wish. The arrangement enables union leaders to wield considerable financial clout - and political pressure. But MPs believe Sir Hayden will propose "individualisation", where each union member opts in or out of contributing to political parties.

A meeting of the trade union group of Labour MPs heard from Professor Keith Ewing from King's College, London, who is advising the unions on the Phillips inquiry. One source familiar with the meeting said last night: "The MPs went ballistic." Another said: "It will mean the end of the Labour party as we know it."

According to sources, it emerged during the meeting that John McTernan, the prime minister's political secretary, met Sir Hayden last week. It was claimed that he had told him that Tony Blair would support these proposals. Mr McTernan could not be contacted last night.

Downing Street insisted last night that no recommendations have yet been made by the Phillips inquiry. But according to some critical sources inside the Labour party, Sir Hayden is openly touting these plans with Downing Street backing.

A senior government source stressed that Prof Ewing was not on the Phillips inquiry. One warned that it would be "premature" to speculate on the findings when they have not been completed. It may be that the MPs have been misinformed about Sir Hayden's intentions.

Critics believe Tony Blair is intent on seeking a dramatic restructuring of the relationship between Labour and the trade unions, as part of his "legacy". In his first months as Labour leader, Mr Blair stamped his authority on the party by announcing his plan to scrap clause 4 of the Labour party's constitution.

The Labour and Conservative parties ran up record deficits of nearly £30m between them to fight the last general election. Labour's liabilities include the costs of a bank loan secured on its old HQ in Old Queen Street, Westminster.

A huge swathe of Labour MPs and the trade unions are likely to resist any fundamental restructuring of party funding as described. Gordon Brown, the chancellor, has strong links to the trade unions and could veto the plan. But some leftwing Labour MPs believe Mr Blair may calculate that he could get such measures through parliament with Conservative and Liberal Democrat support.

See also:

Funding plans will end bankrolling of Labour by union leaders

The Guardian: December 13, 2006
David Hencke and Will Woodward

· £50,000 donations cap proposed in review draft
· Workers paying party levy to be registered as donors

All 3.5 million workers who opt to pay an annual £3 levy to the Labour party will have to be publicly registered as individual donors under plans sent to the three main parties by Sir Hayden Phillips, chair of the independent party funding review.

The draft proposes a £50,000 cap for all individuals and organisations, which will more or less end the bankrolling of Labour by union leaders. Sir Hayden says his proposals "will be challenging for trade unions, they will require new systems and new management arrangements".

The draft, dated December 4, scraps the plans put forward only last month for a £250,000 cap on trade union donations, and will inhibit the political power of union barons. The change would, however, allow Labour to take money from union members over and above the £50,000 cap. That proposal is being fiercely opposed by the Tories.

There will be an emergency meeting of Labour's national executive committee tomorrow to discuss the plans.

Sir Hayden also recommends a continuous cap on party spending throughout parliament and a ban on anonymous bodies donating to political parties. Such moves would hit the Conservatives; they have long used groups such as the Midlands Industrial Council and the Yorkshire and Humberside Industrial Council as front bodies for donors.

David Cameron, the Tory leader, wants a cap on donations but not on spending. He argues that a cap on spending would give an advantage to incumbent MPs able to use parliamentary expenses to promote themselves in their constituencies outside election time.

Under Sir Hayden's proposals each of the 3.5 million trade unionists paying the party levy will find their name and address passed to the Labour party where they will be registered as an individual donor; every year the party will have to write to them asking if they wish to remain a donor. A similar registration system will exist for constituency Labour parties where unions give £6 for each 100 members, effectively restricting union influence in these parties where the four unions Amicus, GMB, TGWU and Unison, play a big role. Each union member would be able to personally donate up to £50,000 a year to the party.

The proposals provoked alarm at a meeting of the Labour trade union group on Monday night. Yesterday a trade union source said: "These proposals are worse than those put up by Norman Tebbit to force people to check in to support Labour." But senior party sources insist that Tony Blair and senior ministers have no intention of breaking the union link. Hazel Blears, the party chairman, calls it the "red line" she will not cross.

One Labour official insisted Sir Hayden's proposals were not set in stone but merely areas for discussion. But sources close to the inquiry insisted Sir Hayden was determined to push ahead with the plans in his final report next month.

Mr Blair and Mr Cameron discussed the inquiry during a private meeting last month, but sources insisted they had not held full talks on them. At his monthly press conference yesterday Mr Cameron said that consensus was not yet in sight. He is still holding out for the cap on union and company donations to be the same.

Mr Cameron said: "I don't think there's any argument for treating different organisations separately. I'm a reasonable person, I'll listen to arguments, but so far I am not convinced. I think we ask ourselves, what is it the British public want? I think they do want a limit on these big donations. They want us to get away from this feeling that somehow parties can be bought by rich individuals or rich trade unions or rich businesses."

He said any deal should be between the politicians and the public, not him and Mr Blair: "A deal which says look, we will clean up this mess of party funding." In exchange for a modest rise in state funding, Mr Cameron said, parties should agree to a cut in spending in a general election year and a cut in the size of the Commons.

Mandarins model of madcap funding

Rail 554: December 6 2006
Christian Wolmar

The Treasury has never really trusted the railways over money.

There are mandarins with long memories – or at least a sense of history – in Whitehall and they are wont to refer to the excesses of the Modernisation Plan in the mid-1950s which did, indeed, produce some awful white elephants such as the famous redundant Bletchley flyover and vast marshalling yards amid all the useful schemes such as electrification of the West Coast Main Line. Over the years, countless improvement schemes have been shelved or ditched on orders from the Treasury.

And when there is clearly an irrefutable case for investment, then the Treasury comes up with ways to try to control expenditure which, oddly, end up costing more. So it was the Treasury which imposed new structures on the rail industry with the idea of saving billions of taxpayers money which was, supposedly, being wasted on projects by British Rail and London Underground. On the national railway, we have had rail privatisation and the creation of Railtrack, that was intended to bring private sector investment into the railways because government money was never going to be available. On the London Underground, we have had the £30bn Public Private Partnership which offered a new way of upgrading the system through privatising the infrastructure while leaving the operations in public hands.

Both these ideas, it must be stressed, came from very clever people inside the Treasury. The brains behind rail privatisation belonged to Sir Steve Robson, who headed its privatisation unit which pushed heavily for a model that allowed on-rail competition and therefore required separation of track from operations. He also had a hand in the creation of the PPP but that was driven forward by one of Gordon Brown’s special advisers, Shriti Vadera, who ensured that despite enormous pressure from both inside and outside the Labour party, the scheme was eventually brought to fruition.

By coincidence, reports by different watchdogs on these two great experiments were published last month, and make grim reading for anyone who expects that the Treasury is about to release further dollops of cash for the industry to build Crossrail and the north south high speed rail link: The Modernisation of the West Coast Main Line by the National Audit Office and the Annual Metronet Report produced by the PPP Arbiter (who happens to be Chris Bolt, also the chairman of the Office of Rail Regulation).

Superficially, the NAO report appears to be good news. The project has been brought under control thanks to the intervention of the Strategic Rail Authority following the collapse of Railtrack (as an aside, I totally agree with Richard Bowker that the decision to abolish the SRA does not make sense). But when one starts to look at the wider history of the West Coast Main Line modernisation project, the extent of the catastrophic overspend becomes apparent and consequently of the inappropriateness of the model that was foisted on the rail industry. For example, the final cost is now reckoned to be in the order of £8.6bn which thankfully is a lot less than the figure of £14.5bn that was floating around at the time of the Railtrack’s demise. Remember, though, this started out as an upgrade that was to have cost £800m under British Rail or £2.2bn under Railtrack that included a new – and totally untried – moving block in-cab signalling system.

The detail of where some of that money has gone is enlightening. For example, £305m – enough to build quite a few schools – has been spent on compensation to train operators for disruption to their schedules which, of course, is designed to give them a better service in the end, not exactly a case of aligning incentives. Moreover, there is some lack of clarity about the precise nature of the compensation arrangements as there are two different payment systems depending on whether it is a ‘network change’ or not (don’t ask!). Network Rail has recently been taking a more robust approach, reducing claims by 7 per cent on average and 15-17 per cent to some operators. While operators have squealed in private about this, ‘none of [these claims] have required adjudication by the Office of Rail Regulation’. In other words, millions of taxpayers money (for NR is essentially taxpayer funded) were paid out in the past in undeserved compensation to the benefit of the shareholders of these private operators.

The in-house costs by Railtrack and Network Rail on the projects have, so far, been £615m, 8 per cent of the total, which seems inordinately high given that so much has been outsourced. Yet, there is very little way of checking whether that is offering value for money. Another detail which raises eyebrows is the fact that renewal costs are 60 per cent higher and signalling costs 100 per cent higher than elsewhere on the network. While there are some good reasons for this, such as the difficult working environment on the busy track, nevertheless these figures suggest that costs got out of control and have still not being reined in. Not surprisingly, a little noticed part of the report reveals there is still overspending on the West Coast Main Line upgrade. Network Rail will, apparently, spend £300m more than the £3bn allowed by the Regulator, but that will be transferred from NR’s underspend of £390m on its regional renewals programme: so that’s OK then!

Moreover, the cost of the modernisation does not, however, include the staggering sum of £590m which is the extra that the Department for Transport has had to pay Virgin West Coast because of Railtrack’s failure to deliver the promised upgrade on which Virgin’s 1996 franchise bid had been predicated. So taxpayers have ended up paying extra because a deal between two supposedly private companies went wrong. And these payments will continue over the next few years as the Department has found it impossible to buy itself out of the contract which Railtrack signed with Virgin. No wonder Richard Branson (fresh from his brief appearance in Casino Royale –don’t blink or you will miss it) can afford to bid for ITV.

The Arbiter’s report on the PPP is even more painful reading. Here, too, the idea was that by privatising the infrastructure of the Underground, the private sector would deliver the extra investment. The contracts themselves, remember, cost a staggering £500m to draw up but were supposed to be the final word on how to refurbish an ailing asset like the London Underground. In my book on the PPP, Down the Tube, I quote its main architect, Martin Callaghan of London Undergorund, telling a Railway Forum meeting in 2002 that ‘The PPP is a hugely well thought through, imaginative , rational, well-tested response to the challenge given to us by Government, which is to find a value for money and safe way of getting the best out of a billion a year of public expenditure.’ That’s not what the arbiter thinks of it now: his report find that Metronet, which won two out of three contracts, is set to rack up a 10 per cent overspend over the amounts set out in the contract, about £750m for the first 7.5 years of the project. For example, track maintenance is costing twice as much as expected, station refurbishment more than three times.

Now here’s the interesting bit. One would have thought that this would all be the responsibility of the Metronet and its five shareholders, who, largely, consist of its suppliers (Balfour Beatty, Bombardier, Atkins).But no. The numbers in the contract have no real meaning because it is up to the arbiter to decide whether the money has being spent efficiently, irrespective of the prices set out in the contract.

The underlying message of these reports is that the Treasury’s attempts to pass on the cost of investment and the inherent in such projects risk from the public to the private sectors have backfired. Rather than succeeding in reducing the taxpayers’ burden, these new models seem only to increase it, and yet the lessons do not seem to have been drawn from these experiences. Quite the opposite. Gordon Brown recently announced a revival of the Public Finance Initiative scheme that will further increase the risk to taxpayers of fiascos like the Underground PPP.

The Treasury, though, rides above all these considerations. The mistakes, those oh so clever mandarins will argue, are all the fault of the rail industry and not of the models they have imposed on the railways. Their love for complex models mean, too, that tram schemes are prohibitively expensive and the way that projects have been shelved suggests that there is, frankly, no chance of a north south high speed line ever being built. Crossrail may get the go-ahead simply because of pressure from the business world and the recognition that London is the driver of the UK economy, but each of these reports is a further nail in the coffin of a high speed line.

The railways are caught in a vicious circle of rising costs and Treasury antipathy. The Treasury fails to see either their wider importance in the UK economy or their value in stimulating regeneration, and, instead, imposes unworkable models on the industry which ensure that their worst fears are realised. It would, at least, be reassuring if the architects of these scandals paid for their errors. But Sir Steve Robson happily went off to lucrative non executive directorships with Cazenove, Xstrata and the Royal Bank of Scotland and surely does not lose sleep over the fact that one of his great experiments is costing taxpayers £5bn per year and the other could give Londoners a £750m headache. Martin Callaghan, too, went off to the private sector, working for PriceWaterhouseCoopers who were, euh, the main advisers to the PPP. And Gordon Brown is all set for No 10. Meanwhile, as the two reports show, the railways and their passengers are paying the price of being the guinea pigs for madcap schemes.

Swiss Railways boss: EU rail harmonisation 'a big illusion'

Swissinfo: 10. December 2006
Interview, Matthew Allen

Outgoing Swiss Federal Railways boss Benedikt Weibel says Switzerland has the best railway network in the world.

But in an interview with swissinfo 60 year-old Weibel says there are challenges ahead, notably getting the freight division back on track.

"Complete system harmonisation will not happen for 30 years or more. This is nothing but a big illusion for the European Union. ETCS is the poorest project ever led in the European railway landscape. The crazy thing is that there was never a business case for this. It is much easier to work with different systems and to change the locomotives, and we are proving it. You can never change the electrification of different networks because it is too expensive." - Benedikt Weibel


The longest-serving railway chief in Europe, Weibel was named chief executive in 1993. He ends his 28-year association with the railways at the end of the year and will become Switzerland's official delegate to the Euro 2008 football tournament, which Switzerland is co-hosting with neighbouring Austria.

Despite Weibel's achievements, his successor, Andreas Meyer, will have a number of issues to tackle. The railways sank into the red last year, while problems remain with the pension scheme and negotiating new labour contracts.

On top of that, Weibel's recent announcement of further fare increases next year has not gone down well with the public.

swissinfo: How does the Swiss rail network rate in international comparison?

Benedikt Weibel: I think we have the best rail network by far. I know this because I have been head of the International Union of Railways for four years and I know about the networks in other countries.

We have double the density of trains per line kilometre than neighbouring networks and at the same time the best punctuality performance with nearly 96 per cent of Swiss passenger trains arriving within five minutes of schedule.

swissinfo: You have announced another fare increase. Do passengers get value for money?

B.W.: The Italian system is cheaper, but our performance is incomparably better. If we compare with France, Germany and Austria, our prices are not more expensive.

More than two million frequent travellers have half:price cards, so if you travel regularly it is extremely cheap and the price:performance ratio is very good.

I have seen more than ten price increases in my career and the reaction is always the same. I understand that nobody loves it if you increase prices, but I am amazed by the reaction.

swissinfo: The cargo division is being downsized and restructured. Is it possible to get freight back on track?

B.W.: It is a really tough challenge because we have competition from trucks and we have extremely low margins. Switzerland is not a heavily industrialised country and the average distance between destinations is 90 kilometres ? which is good for lorries but nothing for rail.

The north-south business - from Germany to Italy - is completely different. There is tough competition between trains and trucks and between companies. We are very well positioned, but on a European scale we are a niche player.

swissinfo: Switzerland has recently installed European standard signalling (ERTMS/ETCS). Will we soon see a harmonised rail system in Europe?

B.W.: Complete system harmonisation will not happen for 30 years or more. This is nothing but a big illusion for the European Union.

ETCS is the poorest project ever led in the European railway landscape. The crazy thing is that there was never a business case for this.

It is much easier to work with different systems and to change the locomotives, and we are proving it. You can never change the electrification of different networks because it is too expensive.

swissinfo: What challenges does your successor face?

B.W.: Firstly, technology. Our oldest signalling box dates back to 1904 and that must work together with modern boxes. Freight will always be an extremely important issue too because it is so hard to break even.

There is also a daily battle for quality and punctuality. Every day we have more than 100 incidents such as technical failures, rolling stock problems, suicides and cars on the line.

The pension deficit is a dossier that will not be resolved totally, but we have a concept to resolve the problem by unlocking SFr1.5 billion ($1.23 billion) from our real estate.

I have two final goals in my remaining weeks: to get a decision from government for our pension fund proposal and find a solution with unions for collective contracts for workers.

swissinfo: What is your role during the Euro 2008 football tournament?

B.W.: As the delegate of our government, I will coordinate everything outside the stadiums that is not football related. This includes security, transportation, marketing, events and hospitality.

It is a bit like the work I have been doing here. I will work with cities and cantons to bring people together. The task is quite simple - to organise 15 football games perfectly around a huge, marvellous, great party.

Belgium Completes High Speed Rail Link

Railway People: December 12th 2006
belgian_high_speed_link.jpg
Belgium has completed the last and final section of a new high speed rail link that runs from the French border at Lille to Brussels.

The new £7.5 million, 435 metre viaduct outside Brussels Midi station, places the Belgian capital at the heart of a European wide high speed rail network. Infrabel, (Belgium’s Network Rail equivalent) built the new viaduct which carries two dedicated tracks over 22 other railway lines at the entrance to Brussels Midi and separates high-speed TGVs, Thalys and Eurostars from domestic train services.

The gleaming new infrastructure means quicker journey times for London-bound high speed passengers. The launch of Eurostar services from St. Pancras International on High Speed One, Britain’s first high-speed line, on 14 November 2007 will mean that London-Brussels and London-Paris services run on dedicated high-speed lines from capital to capital. Journey times between London and Brussels will be slashed to just 111 minutes.

A delighted Richard Brown, CEO Eurostar, said, “The new viaduct is absolutely key to the further improvement of services between the UK and Belgium, and in the development of Brussels Midi as a European railway hub for onward connections to the Netherlands, Germany and beyond. We congratulate infrastructure provider, Infrabel and the SNCB Group (Belgian Railways) on the investment and the successful delivery of this project.”

RMT welcomes step forward on bus policy

RMT: December 12 2006

TRANSPORT UNION RMT today welcomed the government’s proposals to give local authorities a bigger role in shaping bus provision and called for further steps to return the industry to proper public control.

"This is a positive step which previous Transport Secretaries have shied away from over the last decade," RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

"Giving local authorities a bigger say on timetabling, bus frequency and fares will help make a start towards unravelling the chaos brought about by bus deregulation.

"However, this should be one of a number of steps, which must include action to reverse the long-term decline in bus-workers' pay and worsening of conditions, together with action to cut fares and reverse the decline in bus use.

"We need a national bus strategy to encourage bus use and that does not permit a two-tier system to emerge where local authorities do not prioritise good bus services - social exclusion and climate change do not stop at local authority boundaries.

"The fact that the measure will be brought before parliament alongside planned road-pricing pilots in the draft Road Transport Bill also underlines the importance of ensuring that all road-pricing revenue is ring-fenced for investment in transport.

"Ultimately ministers must take steps to stop the continual drain of public money from the bus industry by the privateers, who last year alone pocketed nearly £275 million in profits between them, despite the continued fall in passenger numbers outside London.

"The only people to benefit from deregulation and privatisation have been the privateers, and they remain a barrier to the bus industry playing its full role in an integrated transport network that encourages people out of cars.

"If the governmenmt wants to see the bus industry play its full economic and environmental role it must take further steps to bring the industry back under public control," Bob Crow said

OCS cleaners on Eurostar contract to strike on December 18

RMT: December 12 2006

MORE THAN 100 RMT cleaners working for OCS on its Eurostar contract will strike on December 18 against poverty pay after the contractor failed to budge from its miserly 20p-an-hour offer.

RMT members voted by a margin of 13 to one to take action in their campaign to win a minimum pay rate that matches the London living wage of at least £7.05 an hour.

"This is meant to be the season of goodwill, but at OCS the top-dog gets a £13,000 rise, yet the people out there doing the dirty work are offered a 20p insult," RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

"They are even expecting the very lowest paid - people on £5.50 an hour - to pay for the few extra coppers they are being offered by giving up £68 in back-pay.

"That may not sound a lot, but when your basic is worth less than the boss's pay rise, having £68 taken from the money you are owed adds insult to injury.

"As Christmas approaches Eurostar should think very hard about the message they are sending out by tolerating such behaviour from contractors who wouldn't be out of place in a Dickens novel.

"Eurostar has a moral obligation to ensure that the people who clean their trains and stations are paid a decent rate for the dirty and often difficult work they do for their passengers.

"As for OCS, a company that spends money sponsoring a cricket stand at the Oval while paying its staff poverty wages has truly got its priorities wrong," Bob Crow said.

December 12, 2006

RMT will resist job cuts at GNER

RMT: December 11 2006

ANY ATTEMPT by GNER to impose redundancies will be resisted, with strike action if necessary, the franchise’s biggest union said today, following reports that the company was set to announce redundancies.

"We urgently need an explanation from GNER about what appears to be a massive betrayal of trust," RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

"What the company has told the media is completely at odds with the gurantees they gave our reps around the talks table last Wednesday.

"It is shameful that the company seems to have chosen to leak plans to cut jobs to the media before it has had the decency to approach its employees' union.

"It is less than a week since our reps agreed with GNER a plan for the introduction of the 35-hour week which was supposed to safeguard every existing job on the franchise.

"GNER gave us written confirmation of projected staffing levels under the 35-hour week deal, which would at least maintain existing staff numbers and would even increase the staff complement in some grades.

"Now it seems that the company has been telling the media that there will be redundancies.

"RMT has already made it clear that we will resist redundancies, with industrial action if necessary.

"Our members are already angry that GNER appears to be framing policy for the short-term benefit of a bankrupt transnational company based three thousand miles way, and they will now be absolutely livid that they appear to have been betrayed," Bob Crow said.

BNP councillor expelled from RMT after threat to Bob Crow

RMT: December 11 2006

FAR RIGHT activist and BNP councillor Rodney Law has been expelled from RMT for conduct inconsistent with membership of the union and for acting in a manner contrary to the interests of the union and its members.

The RMT executive found that in April this year Law acted in a threatening manner towards general secretary Bob Crow while the latter was campaigning against the British National Party in Debden.

A journalist from the London Evening Standard was among several witnesses to the exchange, part of which was reported in the newspaper.

Law was charged with misconduct under RMT's rules and was expelled by the union's executive after twice failing to attend to answer questions as part of the disciplinary process.

December 11, 2006

John McDonnell MP to unveil new RMT banner in Bristol on Monday (December 11)

RMT: December 8 2006

LABOUR LEADERSHIP contender and RMT parliamentary group convenor John McDonnell is to unveil the stunning new South Wales and West of England RMT banner in a ceremony in Bristol on Monday.

The ceremony will take place at 14:00 hours on Monday December 11 at the Great Western Railway Staff Association, Bristol Temple Meads Station, Bristol BS1 6QF

The Hayes and Harlington MP, alongside RMT general secretary Bob Crow, will preside over the formal handing over of the banner by its creator, renowned banner-maker Ed Hall, to the union's South Wales and West of England regional council

A press conference will take place after the unveiling.

Copies of John McDonnell's speech will be available.

Pictures of the banner will be made available to the media after the unveiling

ends

Notes to editors: Ed Hall is one of the country's foremost designers and creators of banners for the labour movement, and has just completed a touring exhibition of his work in Europe.

Ed Hall's stunning design celebrates both the technological achievements of the railway revolution and the enormously important role played by railway trade unionists in the political history of modern Britain.

The front of the banner bears the title of the union and the SW&W Regional Council, and depicts the dramatic, classical-style, western portal of Box Tunnel - the most difficult engineering problem that Isambard Kingdom Brunel had to solve when building the Bristol to London line.

The tunnel is 2,939m (1 mile, 1,452 yards) in length, dead straight and descends a one percent gradient from the east, and at the time of opening it was the longest railway tunnel in the world.

Construction started in 1836, and when the tunnel opened in 1841 it was generally believed that a tunnel through the hill would be so long and deep as to "stifle and deafen" passengers.

Initially some passengers chose to leave the train before the tunnel and rejoin it the other side, having journeyed round by road.

The lives of about ten navvies (railway construction workers) were lost during construction.

When the two ends of the tunnel were joined underground there was found to be less than 5cm (2 inch) error in their alignment.

It is a testament to the skill of the railway navvies, Brunel and his engineers that the Box Tunnel remains a functional element of the London Paddington to Bristol railway line.

Emerging from the tunnel mouth are a 'Castle' class, steam engine of the Great Western Railway, built in GWR's Swindon works and a 'Intercity 125' High Speed Train, built by British Rail Engineering Limited from 1976 and officially the fastest diesel in the world, with an absolute maximum of 148mph and 125mph regular service speed (200 km/h) on the Great Western mainline.

This year marks the 30 birthday of the HST and the current re-engineering programme means that the existing fleet may operate through to 2015 or beyond.

At the foot of the banner is the 'spinning wheel' logo of the RMT surrounded by the union's motto, Unity is Strength in English, and Mewn undeb mae Nerth in Welsh.

On the reverse the artist has recreated the Rhondda historical mural found at Trehafod railway station between Porth and Pontypridd in Rhondda-Cynon-Taff, South Wales. The mural represents the close relations between the South Wales Miners and the Railway workers, depicting the production, extraction and distribution process of the South Wales mining industry from pithead in the Cynon valley via the Taff Vale Railway to Cardiff docks.

Beneath the picture is the slogan: "We Honour the Taff Vale Railway Strikers of 1900" and a quote from the 1906 Trade Disputes Act, which for the first time legalised the right to strike: "An action against a trade union … shall not be entertained in any court."

Update: House of Commons Early Day Motion - FGW Train Service Cuts

Early Day Motion 311: 27:11:06

FIRST GREAT WESTERN TRAIN SERVICE CUTS IN BRISTOL AND WEST OF ENGLAND
* 45 signatures:
check below to see if your MP has signed...

Kerry McCarthy MP (Bristol East - Labour Party),
Mr Jeremy Browne MP (Taunton - Liberal Democrats),
John Penrose MP (Weston-super-Mare - Conservative Party),
Sarah McCarthy-Fry MP (Portsmouth North - Labour Party),
Dr Doug Naysmith MP (Bristol North West - Labour Party),
Roger Berry MP (Kingswood - Labour Party),
Gordon Prentice MP (Pendle - Labour Party),
Bob Spink MP (Castle Point - Conservative Party),
Martin Caton MP (Gower - Labour Party),
Jeremy Corbyn MP (Islington North - Labour Party),
Kelvin Hopkins MP (Luton North - Labour Party),
Lindsay Hoyle MP (Chorley - Labour Party),
John McDonnell MP (Hayes and Harlington - Labour Party),
Gregory Campbell MP (Londonderry East - Democratic Unionist Party),
Ann Cryer MP (Keighley - Labour Party),
David Drew MP (Stroud - Labour Party),
Rudi Vis MP (Finchley and Golders Green - Labour Party),
Robert N Wareing MP (Liverpool West Derby - Labour Party),
Jessica Morden MP (Newport East - Labour Party),
Robert Key MP (Salisbury - Conservative Party),
Derek Conway MP (Old Bexley and Sidcup - Conservative Party),
Sian James MP (Swansea East - Labour Party),
John Leech MP (Manchester Withington - Liberal Democrats),
Dai Davies MP (Blaenau Gwent - INDEPENDENT),
David Simpson MP (Upper Bann - Democratic Unionist Party),
Brian Jenkins MP (Tamworth - Labour Party),
Bill Etherington MP (Sunderland North - Labour Party),
Hywel Francis MP (Aberavon - Labour Party),
Janet Dean MP (Burton - Labour Party),
Janet Anderson MP (Rossendale and Darwen - Labour Party),
Stephen Williams MP (Bristol West - Liberal Democrats),
Don Foster MP (Bath - Liberal Democrats),
Paul Rowen MP (Rochdale - Liberal Democrats),
Julie Morgan MP (Cardiff North - Labour Party),
Liam Fox MP (Woodspring - Conservative Party),
Mark Williams MP (Ceredigion - Liberal Democrats),
John Hemming MP (Birmingham Yardley - Liberal Democrats),
Alan Simpson MP (Nottingham South - Labour Party),
Steve Webb MP (Northavon - Liberal Democrats),
Linda Riordan MP (Halifax - Labour Party),
Eric Illsley MP (Barnsley Central - Labour Party),
AJ Beith MP (Berwick-Upon-Tweed - Liberal Democrats),
Martin Horwood MP (Cheltenham - Liberal Democrats),
Sandra Gidley MP (Romsey - Liberal Democrats),
Andrew Murrison MP (Westbury - Conservative Party)


"That this House notes with concern that from 11th December 2006 users of First Great Western train services in the Bristol and West of England area will suffer the loss of their early morning train service from Cardiff to Bristol, early morning services and late evening services between Bristol and Gloucester, irregular intervals between trains from Bristol to Weston-super-Mare and Taunton, reduced capacity on short platform stations to Weston, such as Worle, loss of connectivity on trains to and from London and extensive reductions in train services to local stations in the Bristol area; further notes that First Great Western plans to reduce the amount of rolling stock used on train services in the Bristol area, including cutting Cardiff-Portsmouth trains from three to two coaches, an overall reduction of 1,839 seats, equating to a 20 per cent. cut in train seat availability, and a reduction in the number of trains from 69 to 57, equating to an 18 per cent. cut in trains; calls on the Government to urge First Great Western urgently to reconsider the reductions in levels of rolling stock on these key services, the consequences for overcrowding and forcing passengers onto the already heavily congested road network, with all the outcomes for increased carbon emissions, pollution and road traffic accidents that these train service cuts will lead to; and further calls on the Government to ensure that capacity and train service frequency in the Bristol and West of England area are maintained and improved."

Reopened Larkhall rail line beats target one year on

Transport Briefing: 11/12/06

The first railway branch line in Scotland to be opened for 25 years was hailed as a resounding success on its first anniversary on Saturday (9 December).

More than 325,000 passenger journeys have been made on the half-hourly Larkhall-Glasgow Central electrified link, according to latest figures from train operator First ScotRail.

The Larkhall-Milngavie section of railway was reopened to passenger services last year. The £35m project included new stations at Larkhall, Merryton and Chatelherault in Lanarkshire and also an extension of the Northern Suburban Line in Glasgow from Maryhill to Anniesland with a new station at Kelvindale.

Transport minister Tavish Scott said: “I am delighted that the first new rail line to be reopened for 25 years has been such a success for Scotland’s rail passengers. 325,000 passenger journeys is well above predicted levels. The figures go to show our commitment to improving access to public transport to all areas of Scotland is really paying off.

"This rail line has already improved access to jobs, education and health services for the local communities involved and brought economic, social and environmental benefits. One year on, this is great news for Scotland."

Cllr Alistair Watson, chair of Strathclyde Partnership for Transport, lead promoter of the Larkhall-Milngavie project, said: "These strong patronage figures for the first year of operation come as no surprise because we always believed the case to re-open the Larkhall branch line was compelling.

"It has been proven time and again, where investment is made to provide quality transport infrastructure, people will use it. The re-opening of the Larkhall branch line is already making a significant contribution to the economic regeneration of Lanarkshire and this progress looks set to continue.

The previous rail link to Larkhall was withdrawn in 1965 on the recommendation of the Beeching Report. In doing so, all passenger trains through the Lanarkshire town were removed at the stations at Blackwood, Coalburn, Lesmahagow, Stonehouse and Strathaven were closed.

December 09, 2006

Railway woes will continue

Bristol Evening Post: December 9, 2006
COMMENT No. 33,698 (not online)

THE protests over the changes to the railway timetable are completely valid.

But sadly it is too little, too late.

For the new timetable, which sees the number of coaches on some trains reduced and the level of service on others curtailed, comes into force in less than 48 hours.

The time for voicing opposition has sadly long gone.

But the changes do illustrate just how the railway companies in this country have got it all their own way.

"... every day the railways provide a reminder of what a complete failure the privatisation of the railways has been."

They have a virtual monopoly in the areas in which they operate.

Take First Great Western. They are the only company running trains between the South West and London. They also operate all of our local rail services.

Train companies benefit from considerable government subsidies and they seem to be allowed to increase fares consistently without any real restraints. As a result we pay through the nose to travel with them and have practically no choice over which company to use.

Added to that we have to put up with frequently crowded trains simply because they do not have sufficient coaches on them.

Yet the Government stands by and does nothing.

Every day our railways fail to deliver a decent service but politicians, who are supposed to represent our interests, do nothing.

And every day the railways provide a reminder of what a complete failure the privatisation of the railways has been.

Nobody surely can pretend otherwise.

Politicians would like us to travel more by public transport and less by car. Given the current state of the railways that is nothing short of absurd and, what's more they know it.

Protest over changes to area's trains

Bristol Evening Post: December 9, 2006

A protest was staged at Bristol's main station to complain over major cuts to rail services in the region.

First Great Western (FGW) is reorganising its timetable, cutting some services, increasing the time between others and also reducing carriages on some trains.

The RMT union says the changes equate to cutting around 2,000 seats on trains a day.

Representatives of the RMT and the TUC were joined by Bristol East MP Kerry McCarthy and passengers at Temple Meads station at around 3.30pm yesterday.

The crowd of around 50 then paraded with banners and placards to the offices of the Government Office of the South West (GOSW) at Temple Quay, where they presented a letter complaining about the cuts and asked it to be passed on to rail minister Tom Harris.

Some protestors were blaming the Government for not investing enough in the railways and said they were "squeezing" providers like FGW into making the cuts.

However, some others said FGW's priorities were at fault for cutting some less profitable services in favour of more lucrative ones.

The timetable changes will come into effect tomorrow.

It is likely they will effect services stopping at stations including Temple Meads, Severn Junction, Keynsham, Oldfield Park, Bedminster, Weston-super-Mare and Yate.

The changes have received so much protest that the train operator has already agreed to reduce the amount of cuts it intends to make.

It is understood the 69 daily services run by FGW in the region were to be reduced to 51, but will now only be reduced to 60.

Last week Mrs McCarthy launched an Early Day Motion in the House of Commons urging the government to invest in the rail network in the Bristol region. It has already been signed by 33 MPs.

On Wednesday, she and Bristol North West MP Doug Naysmith met with Mr Harris to discuss the changes.

Yesterday, Mrs McCarthy was joined in making speeches at the demonstration by the South West TUC's regional secretary Nigel Costley and by RMT assistant general secretary Pat Sikorsky. Mrs McCarthy said: "There is already overcrowding on some trains.

"These changes will mean people will also be left stranded on platforms. First Great Western should not be making these cuts."

Mr Sikorsky said: "This is absolute crazy madness and it has to be stopped.

"The Department of Transport is facing in two directions - on one side it is squeezing rail providers into giving more and more to the treasury and on the other it is saying it wants more people to travel by rail.

"The only way forward we can see is for the Government to bring it back in house and have a nationalised system."

Andrew Griffiths, First Great Western regional manager, said: "The whole programme of local train service is changing with the new timetable so there will be a fair bit of shifting around and people will have to adjust to the new patterns.

"There are some winners and losers - I agree there a slightly fewer local trains, but we have balanced this out with more capacity on High Speed Trains."

The Great Train Seat Robbery

Western Daily Press: December 9, 2006
BY BRIAN PRICE TRANSPORT CORRESPONDENT

Angry campaigners went on the march in protest over cuts to the region's rail services.

They claim a reduced timetable will increase overcrowding and force passengers back on to already congested roads.

unknown.jpg
ANGRY campaigners went on the march in protest over cuts to the region's rail services. They claim a reduced timetable will increase overcrowding and force passengers back on to already congested roads.

A group of about 50 vocal campaigners gathered at Bristol Temple Meads station yesterday before marching to regional government offices at nearby Temple Quay to hand over a letter of protest to transport chiefs. They are furious about plans by Swindon-based train operator First Great Western (FGW) to axe a number of trains, and a number of seats on other trains, when the winter timetable begins on Sunday.

Campaigners claim FGW will be cutting train seats in the greater Bristol area by 1,839 a day from Sunday - a 20 per cent drop - with the number of trains also slashed from 69 to 60 - a 13 per cent decrease.

But FGW regional manager Andrew Griffiths insisted yesterday that the company had made a number of adjustments to services that would see "pretty much the same number of seats" remaining available.

Mr Griffiths said train timetables would change with most seats lost on local commuter trains transferred to High Speed Services.

He said passengers would simply have to "adjust" to the new patterns being introduced.

But furious transport union chiefs insisted the changes were detrimental to the West's long-suffering commuters.

Rail Maritime Union (RMT) spokesman Alex Gordon said: "It's true that some Inter City 125 services, which is what First Great Western calls High Speed Trains, will now be stopping at intermediate stations between Bristol and Weston-super-Mare to counter the local services being withdrawn.

"But these will be very limited and won't run at the times when most people want to travel.

"And what will happen when these so-called High Speed Trains are running late from London?

"We believe they will revert to being 'fast' services and then won't actually stop at the smaller stations, leaving passengers stranded on platforms."

Nigel Costley, South West secretary of the TUC, said: "It's hard to get your head around the fact they are taking out seats and trains at a time when we should be celebrating the extension of railways. It's a real shame.

"It's all about the ownership and control of our railways. We have got to have a publicly owned transport system."

Labour MP for Bristol East, Kerry McCarthy, who tabled an early day motion on the matter in the Commons, said the entire public transport system in the greater Bristol area required an overhaul.

She said: "It's not that people don't want to use trains and buses.

"They're finding the trains are full to the brim at peak times and they're left on the platforms.

"People will return to their cars if that happens and that will only cause more gridlock on the roads."

Yesterday's protest, which was organised by RMT's Bristol Rail branch, was also supported by Transport 2000, Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways, Save Severn Tunnel Junction Train Services, and campaigners who want to see the line to Portishead reopened.

RMT general secretary Bob Crow said: "If the Government wants to meet the climate challenge set out so starkly by the Stern report it must tell First Great Western that these cuts are unacceptable.

"We need to see greater rail capacity, more trains and more seats, and any attempt to cut them should be met with howls of protest." Andrew Griffiths, First Great Western regional manager, said: "There have been some extra trains organised for the morning peak hours and evening peak hours which means we will have pretty much the same number of seats available when the new timetable starts on Sunday as there are now.

"More of those seats will become available on high speed services, rather than on the smaller commuter trains."

See also:

A BRAVE NEW WORLD OF RAIL IS SHRINKING

Western Daily Press: 09 December 2006
Editorial Comment

LOTS of brave and exciting promises were made when First Great Western won the franchise to run train services for the whole of the West Country.

But when the full extent of FGW's plans for the region's rail network finally emerged, people were less than thrilled with what was on offer.

And from this weekend its plans will finally come into effect and the full ramifications will be felt by those who rely on public transport to get to work. The number of trains in and out of the regional capital will fall by an estimated 20 per cent each day.

Trade unions and passenger groups came together yesterday to air their dissatisfaction with the changes to the timetable and deliver a letter of protest. The gesture will probably make very little difference as all the important decisions have already been made by the train company.

But at a time when our roads are becoming ever more clogged and pollution continues to soar it does seem more than a little strange that we are cutting back on rail services.

Rail passengers claim bus service is a nightmare

Bridgwater Mercury: 9 December
By Dan Sales
bridgwater_station.jpg
"NIGHTMARE" journeys are facing commuters using the replacement bus service provided while train track running through Bridgwater undergoes repairs.

The town's line has been closed since November 20 and will remain that way until Friday (December 8) as some 10,000 metres of track are cleaned and replaced by Network Rail.

But users travelling through and to Bridgwater have branded the bus service carrying them as "appalling" after they say drivers repeatedly got lost on their way.

Ruth Williams contacted the Mercury to tell of problems she experienced trying to get to her workplace in the town from Taunton.

"I was amazed that the driver was taking instructions from a colleague moments before leaving the station, but thought nothing of it," she said.

"However, after getting stuck in traffic and the bus being late by 15 minutes, you can imagine my frustration when the bus driver then got lost. In a frantic panic about being so late for work, I got off the bus, along with a second annoyed lady.

"Despite being more environmentally friendly than using my car, I will never get the train to work again. I can only describe my alternative method of getting to work as a complete and utter nightmare."

Student Jo Brook had been visiting friends in Somerset and had wanted to get back to university in Plymouth. The teenager found herself stranded and alone when bus delays meant she missed her connecting train.

"The bus was about 20 minutes late and the driver ended up getting lost twice," she said.

"I ended up being an hour late and missed my connection to Plymouth.

"I think it is absolutely appalling. Everyone wants us to use public transport but it is so rubbish."

First Great Western spokesman Adrian Booth said he had spoken to the man responsible for the replacement service.

"He said early in the schedules there were some timing problems that were dealt with subsequently," he admitted.

"But he did say that he had not had any complaints from customers. Anyone that has had problems should contact us on 08457-000125."

Rail staff to strike over Christmas

Press Association: December 8, 2006

Hundreds of railway workers on Central Trains are to stage a series of strikes over Christmas and the New Year in two separate rows over pay and rosters.

The Rail, Maritime and Transport Union said more than 550 senior conductors at the company, which runs services throughout the Midlands, will walk out for 24 hours on Christmas Eve, New Year's Eve and again on New Year's Day.

The workers voted heavily in favour of industrial action over pay arrangements for working during the festive period and over new rosters which the union said had been imposed without agreement.

General secretary Bob Crow accused the company of trying to "ride roughshod" over the workers by introducing a new rostering system without agreement.

See also:

Conductors to strike at Central Trains over rostering and seasonal pay

RMT: December 8 2006

MORE THAN 550 senior conductors at Central Trains are to strike on Christmas Eve, New Year’s Eve and New Year’s Day in disputes over the imposition of centralised rostering and arrangements for Christmas and New Year payments, Britain’s biggest rail union said today.

RMT conductors at Central voted by 231 to 37, a margin of more than six to one, to strike over the imposition of centralised rostering, and by 177 to 68 to take action over the company's attempt to give conductors a worse Christmas-working deal than other staff.

"Central Trains are attempting to ride roughshod over its workforce by introducing a centralised rostering system without agreement," RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

"This plan will have a massive impact on our members' working lives, because it will become virtually impossible for them to move annual leave, swap shifts or arrange for Sunday and rest-day availability.

"Our members' massive vote for action on this issue should tell the company all they need to know about their plan

"Central should not be surprised that our members have also voted to strike over their attempt to treat conducters less favourably than other staff.

"The company can hardly expect our members to give up their Christmas and New Year if they know they are being treated as second-class employees.

"The solutions to both these disputes lie in the hands of Central Trains, but we have made it clear that unless there is agreement our members will strike for 24 hours from 00:01 on December 24, December 31 and January 1," Bob Crow said.

Economy minister announces rail cutbacks

Caboodle.hu: 2006-12-08

HUNGARY -- Economy Minister János Kóka yesterday unveiled the government's decision to close railway lines, raise ticket prices for MÁV trains and Volán buses, and modify subsidies for students and the physically disabled.

Under the measures, to come into force in February, the government will shut down 14 railway passenger routes, affecting 700km of track, Kóka said.

Plans to close further branch lines are still being considered. In areas where rail transport is shut down, Volán, the state-owned inter-city bus company, will take over, and its timetables will be harmonised with those of MÁV. The government expects to save Ft 4 billion from the closure of lines that had low passenger traffic.

The cabinet has given the approval to cut 1,500 jobs at MÁV's Budapest headquarters, in addition to this year's 1,000 lay-offs, Kóka said. The number of departments and executive staff will also be reduced.

MÁV and Volán ticket prices will be raised in two stages next year, in January and in May. Passengers can expect to pay 16% more when travelling via MÁV, while the new prices set by Volán will be 6% higher from January. Prices are expected to rise in May by 17% at MÁV and 4% at Volán.

The state railway company will not change preferential rates for pensioners, but prices for students will rise due to a cut in subsidies. The state will assume 90% of the costs for passengers with severe physical disabilities and 50% for those with impaired hearing.

See also:

Gov't to drastically reduce financing for public transportation

BBJ.hu: 08 Dec 2006

The government aims to reduce state spending on passenger rail service and other forms of public transportation from a projected Ft170 billion in 2007 by Ft 40 billion by 2010, Minister of Economics and Transportation János Kóka said late on Thursday.

The government expects to reduce state-owned railway company MÁV's operating costs Ft 20 billion, Kóka said. The restructuring of Hungary's main public transport companies as well as the harmonization of MÁV's and state-owned long-distance bus company Volán's timetables is expected to save a further Ft 10 billion.

The introduction of a new tariff system will save Ft 10 billion. Kóka noted that the state subsidizes on average 82% of the cost of rail tickets. This adds up to Ft 17,000 per taxpayer every year, he added. In 2006 and 2007, ticket price subsidies for MÁV will add up to Ft 120 billion. MÁV's costs for passenger services and track upkeep are expected to rise form Ft 53.3 billion in 2006 to Ft 102.9 billion in 2007. The state plans to inject Ft 111.6 billion into MÁV in 2007 and Ft 24.4 billion in 2008.

Operation of Doors by Drivers - SWT

RMT Circular No: IR/0266/06

Dear colleague,
Further to my previous circular on the above matter (IR/0240/06 - 31st October 2006), your union has continued to defend our Guard members' role and responsibilities.

As I stated in that previous circular, the company had issued new instructions for door opening which would have given the driver responsibility for this when the train arrives at the station, with the Guard taking control only at departure.

I have written to the company reaffirming the policy of this union that the Guard should retain full responsibility for the operational control of train doors and I now await their response. When I receive this response, I will of course advise members.

Additionally, your union will initiate a campaign with the co-operation of the Regional Councils, Branches and the wider membership in order to defend the role and responsibility of our Guard members and meetings will be held with our reps in the near future.

I will provide you with further information on this matter in due course.

Yours sincerely

Bob Crow
General Secretary

Changes to Retail Staff - South Eastern

Circular No: IR/0268/06

Dear colleague,
It is with alarm that your union greets the proposals from South Eastern to introduce a re-rostering exercise among retail staff which will result in job cuts, de-staffing of stations and increase unsafe lone-working.

It is only a year since South Eastern Trains was re-privatised and this is their third attempt to cut staffing levels. It is only seven months since the company stepped back from cuts to platform staff and agreed to honour a pledge to keep high-risk gatelines staffed after our members voted overwhelmingly to strike.

The simple fact is that there are already too few staff on stations and trains, and passengers and rail workers alike want to see more uniformed staff, not fewer.

An emergency resolution on this matter was passed by our South East Regional Council and this has now been considered by the General Grades Committee, which has taken the following decision:

"That noting the resolution from the South East Regional Council we instruct the General Secretary to seek an urgent report from the Lead Officer. In the meantime, the General Secretary is further instructed to immediately inform all of our representatives not to discuss this matter with the company without the involvement of our Lead Officer and to arrange a suitable press release highlighting this union's opposition to the proposals and the contents of the resolution.
Regional Councils and Branches to be advised."

I will keep members fully aware of all developments in this matter and would request that all South Eastern reps take heed of the GGC decision and only discuss this matter with management with the involvement of our Lead Officer.

I would be grateful if you could distribute this information to your members and in particular those who work for South Eastern.

Yours sincerely

Bob Crow
General Secretary

December 08, 2006

Bristol to host public protest against massive rail cuts Friday, December 8

RMT: December 5 2006

CAMPAIGNERS AGAINST massive cuts to rail services in Bristol and the west will be on the march on Friday, December 8, to protest against plans which will increase rail overcrowding and force passengers off the rails and onto already congested roads.

From December 11, First Great Western intends to cut train seats in greater Bristol by 1,839 a day - a 20 per cent cut; to slash trains from 69 to 57 - an 18 per cent cut, and to cut and reduce many services - details below.

On Friday, Bristol East MP Kerry McCarthy, Southwest TUC secretary Nigel Costley and RMT assistant general secretary Pat Sikorski will join local trade unionists and rail users in a walk from Bristol Temple Meads station to the government offices at Temple Quay, where they will hand a protest letter to the Transport Department.

The protest, organised by RMT's Bristol Rail branch, is also supported by Transport 2000, Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways and Save Severn Tunnel Junction Train Services

Meet: Brunel Shed car park, Bristol Temple Meads Station from 15:30

Walk: to Department of Transport from 16:15 to 16:30

"Trains in and around Bristol are already full to bursting, and these unnecessary cuts can only force people off trains and into cars, and that will mean more road congestion, more pollution and more accidents," RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

"If the government wants to meet the climate challenge set out so starkly by the Stern report it must tell First Great Western that these cuts are unacceptable.

"Kerry McCarthy has done rail users a service by tabling a House of Commons motion calling for rail capacity and service frequencies in Bristol and the west are maintained and improved (text and signatories to date below)

"We need to see greater rail capacity, more trains and more seats, and any attempt to cut them should be met with howls of protest," Bob Crow said.

ends

Notes for editors: Below are: a summary of the train service cuts affecting Bristol and the surrounding area; text of the Early Day Motion (311) tabled by Kerry McCarthy and signed to date by 28 MPs, and the text of the letter from Bristol East MP Kerry McCarthy, RMT general secretary Bob Crow and Southwest TUC secretary Nigel Costley to Tom Harris MP, the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Transport

Attached to this email is the appendix detailing capacity cuts referred to in the letter.

Train service cuts affecting Bristol and surrounding areas include:

* loss of early morning Cardiff-Bristol service
* two-hour gaps at Oldfield Park, Keynsham and Patchway
* reduced peak period services at Keynsham, Bedminster, Parson Street and Weston Milton
* loss of early services between Bristol, Yate and Gloucester and late evening services at Yate, Cam and Dursley, Gloucester and Patchway;
* irregular intervals between trains from Bristol, Weston-super-Mare and Taunton, plus loss of connectivity on trains to/from London

Early Day Motion 311, tabled by Kerry McCarthy and signed (at December 5) by 33 other MPs.

To check latest list of signatories visit http://edmi.parliament.uk/EDMi/EDMDetails.aspx?EDMID=31928&SESSION=885

FIRST GREAT WESTERN TRAIN SERVICE REDUCTIONS IN BRISTOL AND WEST OF ENGLAND

27.11.2006

McCarthy, Kerry

"That this House notes with concern that from 11th December 2006 users of First Great Western train services in the Bristol and West of England area will suffer the loss of their early morning train service from Cardiff to Bristol, early morning services and late evening services between Bristol and Gloucester, irregular intervals between trains from Bristol to Weston-super-Mare and Taunton, reduced capacity on short platform stations to Weston, such as Worle, loss of connectivity on trains to and from London and extensive reductions in train services to local stations in the Bristol area; further notes that First Great Western plans to reduce the amount of rolling stock used on train services in the Bristol area, including cutting Cardiff-Portsmouth trains from three to two coaches, an overall reduction of 1,839 seats, equating to a 20 per cent. cut in train seat availability, and a reduction in the number of trains from 69 to 57, equating to an 18 per cent. cut in trains; calls on the Government to urge First Great Western urgently to reconsider the reductions in levels of rolling stock on these key services, the consequences for overcrowding and forcing passengers onto the already heavily congested road network, with all the outcomes for increased carbon emissions, pollution and road traffic accidents that these train service cuts will lead to; and further calls on the Government to ensure that capacity and train service frequency in the Bristol and West of England area are maintained and improved."

Text of the letter from RMT general secretary Bob Crow, Bristol East MP Kerry McCarthy and Southwest TUC secretary Nigel Costley to Tom Harris MP, the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Transport

Reference: rail service cuts FGW Dec' 06

BY HAND

Tom Harris M.P.
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Transport
Department for Transport
2 Rivergate
Bristol
BS1 6EH

Dear Minister,

Subject: Planned Cuts to FGW Rail Services in Bristol and the West of England from December 2006

We are writing to you as representatives of rail workers and rail service users in the Bristol and West of England area to express our very grave concerns over impending planned rail service changes from 11 December 2006 that will have a marked effect on the people of Bristol and surrounding areas.

1. December 2006 Timetable

In February 2006 First Great Western (FGW) published a draft of the timetable they proposed to operate from December 2006. This was based on the "Service Level Commitment - SLC2", which formed part of the Franchise Agreement. Following consultation on 17 July 2006 FGW published a revised timetable for December. In the South West most of the suggested amendments had been taken on board, but in the Bristol (West of England Partnership) area, hardly any changes have been made in response to suggestions from local authorities and rail users' bodies. Those changes that FGW did make made the local train situation in our area even worse.

The case for amending the changes planned for December 2006 has not been helped by the wilful and utterly irresponsible abandonment by the Liberal Democrat-run Bristol City Council of any meaningful policy of encouraging improvements to local train services. Having announced in their February 2006 budget the withdrawal of the Council's historic and rather frugal annual budget for promoting rail services in Bristol and subsequently having axed the Council's one remaining rail officer, it may have appeared to some in the Department of Transport (DfT) that local train services were not a priority for the citizens of Bristol. We can assure you that this is an entirely erroneous impression. The people of Bristol including our members and constituents remain deeply attached to their local train services and it is a most inappropriate and retrograde step, in the year in which Bristol is celebrating the 200th anniversary of the birth of our railway pioneer, Isambard Kingdom Brunel, to preside over the dismantling of his wonderful railway.

It is clear that these cuts in services are completely contrary to the Government's stated aim of reducing carbon emissions. Even prior to the Stern Report, the Government has set itself challenging targets to reduce carbon emissions by 20% and 60% by 2010 and 2050 respectively. Carbon emissions from transport currently account for around 25% of all UK carbon emissions, the vast majority of which are produced by road transport. Great Western's proposals go completely against the growing political consensus of encouraging a more environmentally friendly approach to transport.

We remain deeply concerned over the following timetable issues affecting Bristol and the surrounding areas:

· loss of early morning service from Cardiff to Bristol;

· two-hour gaps in the middle of the day at Oldfield Park, Keynsham and Patchway;

· reduced peak period services at Keynsham, Bedminster, Parson Street and Weston Milton;

· loss of early morning services between Bristol, Yate and Gloucester and late evening services at Yate, Cam and Dursley, Gloucester and Patchway;

· irregular intervals between trains between Bristol, Weston-super-Mare and Taunton, plus loss of connectivity on trains to/from London

· irregular intervals between trains between Bristol and Severn Beach

2. Penalty Fares

In mid-September 2006 a poster appeared at stations and briefing handouts were issued to FGW staff with responsibility for revenue collection and protection announcing that FGW intended to implement a penalty fare regime from 1 October 2006. While Penalty fares are a tried and tested method for controlling fare evasion, such schemes need very careful implementation particularly at unstaffed and part-time staffed stations of which there are a large number in this area, where ticket machines will not deal with problems of high peak use. FGW had not carried out statutory consultation on these proposals and therefore was in breach of the Penalty Fare Regulations. The Franchise Agreement required FGW to implement a scheme by 1 October 2006. Proper consultation was not carried out and as a result FGW have been unable to fulfill the conditions of the Franchise Agreement.

3. Reduced Rolling Stock and overcrowding

We are dismayed and extremely concerned to discover that FGW intend to reduce the amount of rolling stock used on local train services in the Bristol area, by cutting the Cardiff-Portsmouth trains from 3 to 2 coaches and by not strengthening any peak period trains. Bristol local trains on all routes consist of 2 coaches throughout the day, but with trains strengthened to 3 or 4 coaches during the peak period (except for the Severn Beach line services). For a detailed breakdown of the reduction in rolling stock availability from December 2006 please refer to the attached Appendix.

Local trains are already stretched to capacity at the peak, with passengers frequently complaining of uncomfortable and alarming levels of overcrowding and rail staff on a number of occasions raising issues of passenger safety. Any further withdrawal of coaches will mean unacceptable levels of overcrowding and passengers left behind at stations.

Under current plans the rolling stock availability for local Bristol trains will reduce from 11 December 2006 with 8 (two coach) units going to Arriva Trains Wales for use on Wales & Borders Franchise services, while 7 (two coach) units will be lost to local Bristol train services going to strengthen train services in Merseyside. The overall reduction of 1,839 seats, equates to a 20% cut in train seat availability. The reduction in the number of trains from 69 to 57 equates to a 18% cut. Clearly this is a significant and serious reduction.

4. Urgent Action required on Rolling Stock - see Appendix

FGW has now agreed to put on extra coaches on certain trains on the Bristol-Westbury route and on the main morning service from Yate-Bristol. The significant problem is on the Bristol-Weston-Taunton and Cardiff-Bristol-Portsmouth routes.

Originally FGW proposed 3 High Speed trains (HST) would be used from Bristol-Weston-Taunton during the evening peak. When the timetable was recast in July, however, this was dropped to 2 HSTs - a loss of 350 seats.

Currently there are 2 trains from Bristol to Weston-Super-Mare and Taunton at 17.15 (2 coaches) and 17.25 (4 coaches). Two separate trains are needed because combining them into one 6-coach train would not fit on certain station platforms. However, from December 2006 only one 2-coach unit will be provided.

We urge you, Minister, to use your powers, through your Department to reconsider as a matter of urgent priority the reductions in levels of rolling stock on all the key services we have listed above. The consequences for passengers of overcrowding and packed trains leaving passengers behind will deter people from travelling by public transport, and force them onto the already heavily-congested road network, with all the outcomes for increased carbon emissions, pollution and road traffic accidents that this means.

On key strategic corridors, rail has an increasingly important role to play in Bristol and surrounding areas. Local rail use has doubled over the past 10 years and continues to grow. We are looking for DfT's support to ensure that sufficient coaches and train services are provided for this desirable and hopefully continuing growth.

It does appear to us that one part of the DfT is pushing FGW to withdraw trains from the Local Transport Plan while another part is pushing forward the agenda for tackling congestion and accessibility by encouraging a modal shift from private to public transport.

We would very much welcome the opportunity to meet with you to discuss all of these issues and to provide you and your officials with more details.

Yours sincerely,

Bob Crow
General Secretary,National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers

Kerry McCarthy M.P.
Bristol East

Nigel Costley
Secretary, South West TUC

Public Pressure over train service cuts tells on FGW

BBC News: 7 December 2006

'Minor win' over rail timetable
FGW_HST_old_livery.jpg
Commuter trains will continue to stop at the Severn Tunnel Junction

Commuters angry at planned cuts in some mainline rail services have welcomed last-minute changes to the timetable aimed at addressing their concerns.

Passengers using the Severn Tunnel Junction in Rogiet, Monmouthshire, were told trains between Newport and Bristol that stop there were being cut.

First Great Western's new changes mean more commuter train stops.

Commuters called it "minor victory," but they said they remained unclear over evening services.

The company said the revised timetable would now include 0654 and 0754 Severn Tunnel Junction stops on its 0630 and 0730 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour train services, which had not been dropped from the original December timetable.


"It just goes to show what you can do standing up and shouting about something" - Simon Marshall, commuter

But campaigners said they were still "unclear" about whether evening stops would be revised.

Andrew Griffiths of First Great Western said the company had reviewed its plans for the timetable after a "strong response" from passengers to the changes.

"In recent weeks, our planning team has been working very hard behind the scenes. Their success in including these stops follow detailed liaison with train operating companies, Network Rail and the Department for Transport," he said.

"It is extremely unusual for changes to be made in 'extra time' so late in the timetable planning process, but the importance of this stop warrants special treatment."

'Crowding in'

Simon Marshall who uses the station to commute from his home in Magor, Monmouthshire to Bristol, was part of an action group set up after the announcement was made that some of the services were to be stopped at Severn Tunnel Junction.

"I think this will be a relief to everyone, people won't now have to worry about crowding in on the 0726 or 0826 trains," he said.

"We are pleased they've reinstated the services but it's a bit of a minor victory for us because we are still unclear about the evening services.

"But it just goes to show what you can do standing up and shouting about something," he added.

He said the action group would continue to monitor any future plans to alter the timetable and also wanted to campaign for better facilities at the station and pressure for more stops at the station.

See also:

First Great Western: 7 December 2006

First Great Western has announced some late changes to its new timetable, which goes live on December 11.

It will include two additional Severn Tunnel Junction stops, and a new service from Bristol Temple Meads to Bath.

Severn Tunnel Junction

First Great Western will now include 0654 and 0754 Severn Tunnel Junction stops on its 0630 and 0730 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour train services, which had not been specified in the December timetable.

Says Andrew Griffiths, First Great Western’s Regional Stakeholder Manager: "I am
delighted we are able to offer these services for the commuters of the Caldicot and
Magor area.

"We conducted an extensive consultation exercise about the new timetable
earlier in the year and received over 9,500 replies. Only a couple of dozen responses
raised any objections to these service not being included.

“However, in subsequent public meetings which followed the announcement of our finalised December timetable, we received a far stronger response from customers who use Severn Tunnel Junction than expected.

“In recent weeks, our planning team has been working very hard behind the scenes. Their success in including these stops follow detailed liaison with train operating companies, Network Rail and the Department for Transport.

"It is extremely unusual for changes to be made in 'extra time' so late in the timetable planning process, but the importance of this stop warrants special treatment.

“It has only been possible because these are extra stops on routes our trains are already travelling, which means no extra staff, rolling stock or impact on performance. The co-operation of our industry colleagues has been a key factor.

“From the outside, railway timetabling may appear simple, but in reality it is a complex jigsaw."

New Bristol to Bath service

Another late change to the new timetable is an additional morning train between Bristol Temple Meads station and Bath Spa. The new 0834 train will stop at Keynsham at 0841, Oldfield Park at 0848 and arrive at Bath Spa at 0850.

Says Andrew Griffiths: “This very late change is only possible because we found a way to make use of what was originally empty rolling stock being moved to the start point of another service. Additional train crew have now been identified, making it possible to carry passengers on board.

Jarvis profits depend on rail infrastructure sector

The Scotsman: 7 Dec 2006
COLIN DONALD BUSINESS CORRESPONDENT

RECOVERING infrastructure company Jarvis has slashed its half-year deficit to £1.5 million and said it expects increased workloads next year as more rail contracts become available.

Jarvis, once Britain's biggest construction and engineering firm, said the figure marked a major improvement from the £59.3m loss in the same period last year.

The group yesterday said the results were in line with its expectations following the sale of loss-making contracts.

"Fundamentally what we are doing is disposing of all our non-performing assets," chief executive Richard Entwhistle added.

The company operates 31 accommodation services contracts, of which it said five are loss-making, and that talks to sell three of them would take several months.

Jarvis has struggled since it was implicated in the Potters Bar rail crash in 2002 in which seven people died.

By 2004 it was engulfed by debts of more than £230m, exacerbated by over-ambitious bids for Private Finance Initiative (PFI) contracts, mainly in accommodation work.

Jarvis responded to the crisis by selling businesses and completing a debt-for-equity restructuring with creditors. It is now focused on rail renewals, plant and accommodation services.

The group's headcount has been reduced to 4,500, with Jarvis looking for a further £10m of annual cost savings by next September. It is closing offices in Doncaster as part of efforts to consolidate more operations at its head office in York.

Chairman Steve Norris said yesterday he was confident of further progress, particularly as there were indications that work available to the rail industry was picking up.

He added: "We are far from restored to full health and we still have challenges to overcome, but continued focus on operational improvement and strategic repositioning now sees us in a position few would have given us credit for only two years ago.

"This is the start of the new Jarvis. I believe there will be more and better to come in the years ahead."

At the operating level, Jarvis made profits of £2.9m in the half year, but this was down from £7.8m a year earlier, reflecting the timing of rail contracts and a further reduction in construction activity.

Following the completion of West Coast main line track renewals, Jarvis said it was now awaiting the award of the second generation contracts.

The company's track renewal teams are also working on the first phase of a major project in the Rugby area, where Jarvis is looking for the second phase to be awarded in the near future.

December 07, 2006

Bob Crow re-elected unopposed as RMT general secretary

RMT: December 7 2006

BOB CROW has been re-elected unopposed to serve a second five-year term as RMT general secretary from February 2007.

Bob received 131 nominations from the union's 225 branches. No other nominations were received.

"I am delighted that one of my final duties as RMT president is to announce that Bob Crow has been re-elected unopposed for another term as general secretary of our great and growing union," RMT president Tony Donaghey said today.

"RMT membership has grown by a third from 56,000 when Bob became general secretary in 2002 to well over than 75,000 today, and the 100,000 benchmark is now well within our sights.

"In all my 46 years' membership I can never remember a time when the union was so united and so focused on the twin tasks of organising to win at the workplace and campaigning vigorously for a publicly owned, publicly funded and accountable integrated transport network.

"The union's finances have been completely turned around and are now on a sound footing, enabling us to put more organisers out in the field, constantly improve the service members receive and even open our own national education centre in Doncaster.

"Bob has had the nerve to stand up without compromise for the rights and interests of RMT members and working people in general, and for that he has been vilified by the right-wing media - but he has kept every promise he made to the members.

"The rule of thumb for a trade unionist is that the more the capitalist press attack you the more sure you can be that you are doing a good job - and there is no doubt that that is why Bob has been returned so decisively for a second term," Tony Donaghey said.

"It is the greatest honour to be able to serve RMT members as their general secretary, and I am grateful that they have given me the honour of serving a second term," Bob Crow said.

"The priorities remain: fight for jobs and better pay and conditions at work and continue building RMT membership, campaign for public transport to be returned to the public sector, and fight for trade-union rights fit for the 21st century," Bob Crow said.

Notes for editors: Bob Crow was first elected as general secretary of RMT on February 13 2002, when he received 12,051 of the 18,560 votes cast for the three candidates - the biggest winning margin in the union's history.

Bob Crow joined London Underground as a 16-year-old track worker in 1978, and joined what was the National Union of Railwaymen on May 6, 1979.

By the early 1980s he was elected as the senior shop steward representing thousands of Tube infrastructure maintenance and renewal workers.

In 1984 he was awarded the National Union of Railwaymen's youth award by the late Jimmy Knapp.

In 1992 he was elected to the national executive of RMT. Two years later he became the youngest person ever to be elected as the union's assistant general secretary.

Born in Wapping, London, in 1961, he was educated at Kingswood High School, Hainault, Redbridge.

Good News: 1,700 more train seats for commuters ... in Yorkshire!

Leeds Today: 06 December 2006

COMMUTERS in Yorkshire can look forward to an easier ride from Monday December 11 when almost 1,700 extra seats will be provided on peak-time trains in and out of Leeds. Unhappily for Bristol commuters, at the same time First Great Western intends to cut train seats in greater Bristol by 1,839 a day - a 20 per cent cut; to slash trains from 69 to 57 - an 18 per cent cut, and to cut and reduce many services.
1700_seats.jpg
What 1700 seats looks like

A new £20m partnership between Metro, Yorkshire Forward and train operator Northern means there will be six extra carriages for travellers usually forced to stand on the busiest services from York and Harrogate via Horsforth and from Halifax and Bradford on the Caldervale Line. Additional seats will also be provided for those on services in and out of Leeds from Huddersfield, Knottingley, Selby and Sheffield.

Tom Riordan, chief executive of Yorkshire Forward, said it was great news for commuters but he hoped it was "only the start" of better transport across the region.

He said: "What we are looking for from the Government next year is much more investment coming into Leeds.

"We need a better deal and this is our way of symbolising what we can do if people let us get on with it."

He said the project should have a "double win" by taking people off the roads – reducing congestion and pollution at the same time.

There will be 246 extra seats available in the morning and 283 extra seats in the evening between Leeds, Bradford and Halifax, on the Caldervale Line.

And there will be 358 additional seats in the morning and evening between Leeds, Horsforth and Harrogate.

The news will come as a relief to many of the 84,000 people that now pass through Leeds railway station every day – around the same number that use Gatwick Airport.

Yorkshire Forward has contributed £8.7m towards the project.

Mr Riordan said: "We are confident that the additional seats will encourage more people to make public transport their first choice when travelling to work."

The £20m covers the lease of the six extra carriages for the rest of Northern's franchise period – six years, nine months.

The rest of the cash will come from Northern's fares increases and an increase in the cost of MetroCard. Platform extensions in North Yorkshire to cope with the longer trains are being funded by North Yorkshire County Council, and delivered by Network Rail.

The improved rail services start on Monday, a day after the new national rail timetable is introduced.
Train timetables can be downloaded at www.wymetro.com and are available from Metro Travel Centres and staffed rail stations.

See also:

Rail expansion will ease local congestion

The Huddersfield Daily Examiner: Dec 6 2006

AN EXTRA 700 seats will be made available to commuters using West Yorkshire's busy rail network, it has been revealed - and it will ease congestion at Huddersfield.

Six extra trains will soon be travelling in and out of Leeds station in a £20 million partnership between transport firm Metro, Northern Rail and regional development agency Yorkshire Forward.

From Monday, peak-time services from York and Harrogate via Horsforth and from Halifax and Bradford on the Caldervale line will be boosted.

Extra carriages will also be added to trains from Huddersfield, Knottingley, Selby and Sheffield.

Metro chairman Clr Stanley King said: "Metro remains committed to putting the passenger first, and by pooling our resources with Yorkshire Forward we have enabled Northern to provide services more suited to the needs of commuters, while still providing extra seats on busy routes during the rest of the day."

Tom Riordan, chief executive of Yorkshire Forward said: "We are confident that the additional seats will encourage more people to make public transport their first choice when travelling to work."

Northern Rail managing director Heidi Mottram said: "We are delighted that the partnership with Metro and Yorkshire Forward has enabled us to provide more capacity for our passengers.

"We hope that this partnership will be the first of many that help us to address the growing demand for local train travel."

North Yorkshire County Council is currently funding work to extend platforms at stations in its area to accommodate the new, longer trains.

More Good News: New rail platform on time for 2008 ... in Milton Keynes

MK News: 6 December 2006
BY ROB GIBSON

Milton Keynes' central railway station will become the region's rail hub according to MP Phyllis Starkey.
west_coast_mainline.jpg
Time is tight: Rail journeys between MK and Manchester will be reduced by five minutes

The MP for South West Milton Keynes met with new rail minister Tom Harris last week and was assured that the new platform will be delivered on time and will guarantee fast rail services between MK and London.

The development will also create faster and more regular services to Manchester and the North. Work on the £115m scheme, funded by the Government and Network Rail will start next year and be completed by late 2008.

Dr Starkey said: “The new timetable, post December 2008, establishes Milton Keynes Central as a regional hub, recognising the importance of Milton Keynes as a city and a business centre.

“Milton Keynes will be in a strong position to benefit from any further enhancements of the West Coast Main Line and ensure fast and frequent services to London and the North to meet the needs of our growing population.”

A report by the National Audit Office last week suggests that passenger growth has exceeded expectations and by 2015-2020 there may be insufficient capacity to sustain current levels of growth.

Mr Harris said: “The long distance services will be much improved, with the provision of four trains an hour throughout the day. Journey times will be improved – Birmingham International in 39 minutes (now 45 minutes) and Manchester in 95 minutes (now over 100 minutes).”

There will be an hourly train between Euston and Crewe via Watford, MK, Northampton and Rugby, to and from Birmingham and to Crewe, Chester and Manchester.

See also:

Milton Keynes work prepares for East West rail link

Transport Briefing: 07/12/06

Work has begun on a £200m upgrade of Milton Keynes station to provide more platforms for inter-city trains, allow the extension of the Bedford-Bletchley branch line route, and provide capacity for passenger services from Oxford and Aylesbury.

The project, part of the West Coast Main Line overhaul, will improve rail links to Milton Keynes, which under government plans for major housing development is expected to grow to 45,000 households by 2021.

Improvements will include a third northbound fast line and platform, which will enable consecutive trains to call at Milton Keynes during peak times, and modifications to an existing platform to allow it to accommodate future services to and from Bedford, which currently terminate at Bletchley. This platform could also be used for trains from Oxford or Aylesbury, should the East West rail link project receive funding. The project will also improve turnback facilities for trains, allowing the new West Midlands franchisee to improve the reliability of London to Northampton services.

Network Rail’s west coast programme director Tom McCarthy said: "The start of work on the site represents an important milestone in the Milton Keynes project. The extensive track and signalling improvements will improve reliability and allow for the future growth of services to the expanding town of Milton Keynes. This is an exciting first step towards delivering improved performance and increased capacity for thousands of passengers."

The early stages of the two-year programme began on Monday (4 December) and involve clearing land between the existing northbound fast line and the A5 road, to provide space for the new northbound tracks. Work is scheduled to be completed by April 2007.

The £200m Milton Keynes project includes funding of £23.6m from the Department for Transport's Community Infrastructure Fund and £8.3m funding from Milton Keynes Council - of which £5m is from the Milton Keynes infrastructure tariff and £3.3m from section 106 contributions to Milton Keynes Council.

In total, the West Coast modernisation is expected to cost £7.6bn and is scheduled for completion in 2009.

Stagecoach Bungs £400 Million to Shareholders as Profits Soar

Bloomberg: Dec. 6
By Kamil Tchorek

Stagecoach Group Plc, a U.K. bus and rail operator, plans to return at least £400 million to shareholders after first-half profit surged following the sale of its London bus business.

Net income rose almost fivefold to £206.4 million in the six months ended Oct. 31 from £43.6 million a year earlier, the company said today in a statement. Revenue increased 15 percent to £752.1 million from £653.3 million.

The company sold its London bus unit to Macquarie Bank Ltd. in August. Perth, Scotland-based Stagecoach in September won a second renewal of its contract to operate the South Western railway, Britain's largest. More than 90 percent of trains arrived on time, Stagecoach said.

"People are moving from the car to the train because of increased punctuality, and that has increased profit a little more than many people expected,'' said Gert Zonneveld, an analyst at Panmure Gordon in London with a "hold'' recommendation on the shares. "If you want to visit your granny for the weekend, you can expect a much more reliable service than three years ago.''

Shares of Stagecoach rose 3 pence, or 2.1 percent, to 146 pence in London. The stock has risen 26 percent this year.

"We are well positioned to create further shareholder value and we are confident in the prospects for the rest of the financial year,'' Chief Executive Officer Brian Souter said in the statement.

South West

The South Western franchise, with 1,635 daily departures on rail lines between London's Waterloo station and suburbs such as Wimbledon as well as cities in southwest England including Portsmouth and Exeter, accounts for about 15 percent of all U.K. rail journeys, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Service on the franchise was rated as satisfactory or good by 83 percent of travelers, a 4 percentage-point gain, in a survey conducted in February and March by Passenger Focus, an organization representing rail passengers.

Stagecoach competes with operators such as FirstGroup Plc and Go-Ahead Group Plc. It has about 28,000 employees and also runs school buses in the U.S.

Rail man says first class is a ‘rip-off’

North West Evening Mail 06/12/2006

A RAIL campaigner has slammed the introduction of first class travel between Barrow and Manchester as a “rip off” as a new fleet of trains pull into Furness for the first time.

TransPennine Express will launch its state-of-the-art fleet of Desiro 185s on to the Furness line from tomorrow, fully furnished with 15 first class seats.

The company spent £250m building the engines to replace the current 175s.

Furness Line Action Group leader, Allan Ball, welcomes the new trains but says the introduction of first class travel will mean the segregation of travellers and a loss of seats for standard class.

He said: “The majority of people travel second class and now we are going to have a three carriage set with a percentage of the seats out of use that will probably lie empty.

“I personally don’t see the need for first class in any train. I know the airlines do it but first and second class is just a barrier.

“If they want to stop over crowding they want to get rid of first class compartments.

“Another five or six years down the line I can see it just being a railway for those that have, and those without will not be travelling.

“They are ripping the public off, there is no doubt about that.

“It is not one particular company, they are all in this together. The government are the overseeing body and they should step in to stop this. And if they don’t, then the railways will implode much in the same way as the bus industry has.”

A first class return ticket to Manchester Airport offering extra legroom, a large reclining seat and complimentary tea and biscuits will set you back £64.20, over double the price of a saver return ticket and nearly £20 more than a standard.

Allan Mallander, a spokesman for TPEX, says there is definitely a market in Furness for those wanting to pay more for a more comfortable journey.

He said: “The trains have been built on the fact that we believe there will be a demand for first class travel from both people travelling on a daily basis and those travelling for leisure and pleasure.

“There is no reason the North West should be peculiar to other parts of Northern England in that people wouldn’t want to travel first class. Just because we haven’t had first class on the trains previously doesn’t mean people wouldn’t want to try it now the opportunity is there.”

The official opening of the fleet is set to take place at Windermere station on December 11. Standard class passengers are being offered a special introductory £3 upgrade price until the beginning of January.

White House steps into rail labor dispute in NY

Reuters: Dec 6, 2006

WASHINGTON - President George W. Bush intervened on Wednesday to prevent any possibility of a near-term strike by workers on the heavily traveled Metro-North commuter rail line serving New York.

Bush appointed a special board to address issues that have prevented 3,400 machinists and other trade workers from reaching a new contract after four years of negotiations with the Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

Federally mediated talks ended a month ago with no resolution or agreement for arbitration, clearing the way for unions to strike. No threat of a walkout has been issued.

Appointment of a presidential emergency board triggers a cooling off period until summer while the panel reviews the dispute and makes recommendations for contract terms. The recommendations are not binding.

Metro-North serves 250,000 passengers per day in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut.

December 06, 2006

Hopes raised that rail line will re-open

The Northern Echo: 6 December 2006

CAMPAIGNERS last night claimed victory in the fight to save a mothballed North-East rail route from the threat of development, raising hopes it could be re-opened.

Network Rail announced it would join a new study to reinstate the 21-mile Leamside line, which links Ferryhill, in County Durham, with Pelaw, near Gateshead.

Following a meeting in London, the body insisted it had no option but to press ahead with removing the remaining track, because it is in such a poor state of repair.

But its pledge to work with Nexus, the Tyne and Wear Passenger Transport Executive, on a feasibility study was seen as removing any fear the land would then be sold.

Dyan Crowther, route director of Network Rail North-East, said: "The Leamside line is saved forever as far as we are concerned. We do not have any intention of closing it. We are committed to join with Nexus and other stakeholders to carry out a feasibility study about re-opening the line and I very much hope it can be positive."

The pledge was welcomed by Fraser Kemp, MP for Houghton and Washington East, who arranged the meeting.

He said: "I am really grateful that Network Rail have made this commitment. The Leamside line has been neglected, but Wearsiders know that is no reason why we should not now look to the future and plan to reopen it to proper traffic."

Durham City MP Roberta Blackman-Woods, said: "I'm really pleased at the outcome of the meeting and I hope we can now reopen the line for passengers."

The Leamside line has been closed to freight services since 1992 and passengers since the mid-1960s. Campaigners insist it should be re-opened to ease congestion on the East Coast Main Line, where some regional services, including the Tyne-Tees link, have been forced off.

Network Rail wants to salvage any remaining assets to benefit other parts of the rail network.

It says the Leamside line would need to be replaced before a service could run on the route.

UK rail regulator to make freight train operators pay for goods-only lines

AFX: 5 December 2006

LONDON - The UK rail regulator said it plans to make freight train operators pay the full cost of railway lines used exclusively by goods trains.

The Office of Rail Regulation (ORR) said it is proposing to levy the new charge for freight-only lines exclusively on freight trains carrying coal for the energy supply industry and spent nuclear fuel, starting from April 2009.

ORR said it is also investigating the scope for trains carrying iron ore to pay the charge and the potential level of such a charge.

The government currently pays the costs of freight-only lines directly to Network Rail.

The regulator said in a statement Tuesday that it is launching a consultation on the introduction of maximum levels for the new freight charge and for the variable usage charge that freight operators pay Network Rail to use the railways.

ORR chief executive Bill Emery said: 'We are also consulting on the possible introduction of a reservation charge, levied on unused capacity reserved by operators.

'This would provide a financial incentive for operators not to hold unnecessary track access rights and incentivise efficient use of the increasingly scarce capacity on the network.'

The proposed maximum cap for charges for energy-related coal is about 19 mln stg per year and about 2 mln per year for spent nuclear fuel.

'There remains significant uncertainty around these costs and the final level of the caps could be lower than these levels,' ORR said in a statement.

Scots seek 150-minute rail link from London to Glasgow

The Guardian: December 6, 2006
Severin Carrell, Scotland correspondent

A new high-speed railway which would cut the journey time between London and Glasgow to 150 minutes could be built within the next decade, Scottish ministers said yesterday.

The high speed line could see services similar to the French TGV and Japanese bullet trains hitting 186mph as a direct competitor to the short haul, environmentally damaging air routes now carrying more than 80% of travellers between London and Scotland.

The proposal by Scotland's transport minister, Tavish Scott, directly contradicts last week's report for the Treasury by Sir Rod Eddington, former British Airways chief executive, on modernising the UK's transport infrastructure.

Mr Scott, a Liberal Democrat member of the Scottish executive coalition with Labour, told the Guardian yesterday Sir Rod "was not ambitious enough" when he explicitly ruled out new high speed rail services.

Sources close to Douglas Alexander, the transport secretary, said Labour had already made a similar manifesto commitment.

The proposal was outlined in the executive's Scottish transport strategy, which unveiled plans to electrify a rail line between Edinburgh and Glasgow, improve rail and bus links across Scotland and with England, and cut emissions.

Opposition MSPs and green groups accused the executive of squandering its best chance of taking radical action. Mr Scott ruled out any Scottish city introducing congestion charging before a UK-wide road-pricing scheme comes into force in 10 years' time.

See also:

High-speed Edinburgh rail link set to be unveiled

Glasgow Evening Times: 04/12/06

A HIGH speed train link between Glasgow and Edinburgh is expected to be announced tomorrow.

The bullet train could cut travel time from Scotland's biggest city to the capital to just 30 minutes.

At present, most trains take nearly an hour.

The move would be welcomed by politicians and businesses in both cities, who have repeatedly said faster links between the cities would attract more companies to locate in both Glasgow and Edinburgh.

Glasgow City Council has previously expressed an interest in improving transport between Scotland's two most prosperous cities.

A spokesman said: "We will look at the report with keen interest."

The high-speed rail connection is believed to be one of the main plans in the Scottish Executive's long-awaited national transport strategy to be unveiled by transport minister Tavish Scott.

The report is also expected to support a new London-Scotland link that will cut travel time from Scotland to London to just two-and-a-half hours.

The link will be served by French-style TGV trains or the high-tech 300mph Maglev trains from Shanghai, which use a magnetic track.

The hope is the faster rail link would persuade the four million passengers who fly between Glasgow and London every year to travel by the more environmentally friendly train instead.

Only one million people made the journey by rail last year.

The new transport strategy is also believed to include plans for a national road pricing scheme, which could see Scots motorists charged up to around £1.30 a mile.

See also:

Transport: The Executive's Strategy

December 06 2006

Rail

A high-speed rail link between Scotland and London has been backed by Tavish Scott, while Whitehall's expert adviser reckons it is too expensive.

The project, costed at around £15bn, is seen by Mr Scott as an opportunity to reduce the number of flights between Scotland and London each day. But Sir Rod Eddington, whose report on Britain's transport future was published last week, argued it should not be a priority.

"I don't think Eddington is being ambitious enough," said Mr Scott. "If we can produce with the UK government a transport link which cuts these journey times and is consistent with our environmental obligations, then it's win-win."

Mr Scott said he wants to "review the affordability" of rail fares, and to reduce the confusion of fare rises being announced at different times through the year.

See also:

RMT welcomes positive aims of Scotland Transport Strategy

RMT: December 5 2006

THE POSITIVE aims in the Scottish National Transport Strategy published today have been welcomed by Scotland’s specialist transport union.

RMT welcomed the high-level aims of the strategy, but warned they could ultimately only be achieved by public investment in truly public transport.

"RMT members will always welcome commitment to investment in transport infratructure, and it is pleasing to see a high-speed north-south link as a strategic goal for Scotland's railway network," RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

"There is no doubt that public investment in truly public transport at all levels is the key to achieving the modal shift from cars to rail, tram and bus that we need to see if we are to meet the climate challenge facing us.

"It is essential that road-pricing revenue is ring-fenced for investment in the massive increase in public transport capacity we need.

"Private-sector involvement remains a barrier to achieving the integrated, high-quality and affordable transport that Scotland needs, and that is a problem that must be addressed if these aims are to be achieved.

"We need an end to the confusion over the future of Scotland's lifeline ferry services caused by the wholly unnecessary, destabilising and wasteful tendering of CalMac services.

"It is disappointing also that trade unions are not identified as one of the key partners, particularly on the eve of a parliamentary debate which will commend co-operation between the Scottish executive and the unions," Bob Crow said.

December 05, 2006

South Eastern job cuts will not be tolerated, says RMT

RMT: December 5 2006

PLANS BY South Eastern Trains to cut jobs, de-staff stations and increase unsafe lone-working under cover of a ‘re-rostering’ exercise will not be tolerated, Britain’s biggest rail union said today.

RMT said that it will resist the planned axing of dozens of posts and the replacement of full-time posts with part-time positions, with industrial action if necessary. The union also said it would resist any attempt to revisit the booking-office cuts beaten off in 2005.

"It is only a year since South Eastern Trains was re-privatised and this is their third attempt to cut staffing levels," RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

"It is only seven months since the company stepped back from cuts to platform staff and agreed to honour a pledge to keep high-risk gatelines staffed after our members voted overwhelmingly to strike.

"The simple fact is that there are already too few staff on stations and trains, and passengers and rail workers alike want to see more uniformed staff, not fewer.

"The RMT executive has made it clear that the union will support its members on SET in their campaign to defend their jobs, and will back industrial action if necessary," Bob Crow said.

Rail chief admits new timetable is a problem

Bath Chronicle: 30 November 2006

Train bosses have admitted that a new timetable affecting services in the Bath area will cause problems for passengers.

From next month a new timetable, which will lead to two-hour service gaps at Oldfield Park and Keynsham stations and inconvenient re-timings of services at Bath Spa, will come into effect. The number of carriages on some local trains will also be cut, adding to overcrowding.

Yesterday, the regional manager of the private train company responsible for implementing the changes admitted it could cause difficulties.

Andrew Griffiths, regional manager for First Great Western, said the new timetable represented the company's first effort at integrating local and inter-city services since taking over the new Greater Western franchise in April.

He said the idea had been to reduce the number of times people had to stop at Bristol to change trains.

"That's the theory," he said, "and it's a fine theory, but in practice, because of the proposed high speed train patterns, the local services have had to be superimposed on that and made to fit, and that's caused problems."

One problem is that trains in the Bath and Bristol area will no longer be evenly spread through the hour. Another is that cuts to the number of seats on some services will be compensated for by inter-city trains, which will not necessarily be at convenient times for commuters.

While First runs the trains, it does so according to strict instructions laid down by the Government's Department for Transport (DfT) and it was the DfT which had the final say on the shape of the new timetable.

Further consultation is due to be carried out on the company's proposed timetable for December 2007 and Mr Griffiths believes that some of the problems could be solved by then.

He was speaking at a meeting of the West of England Partnership's planning, transport and environment group.

The soaring cost of copper thefts

BBC News: 4 December 2006
By John Moylan, Business reporter

Thefts of copper are costing UK firms millions of pounds. The soaring copper price this year has seen a doubling of related thefts on the railways, causing severe delays for passengers. Other industries are being targeted too.
london_victoria.jpg
Thieves target copper cables on railway lines

Charles Bull recently woke to the overwhelming smell of gas in his house. It was a neighbour who noticed that the copper pipes that supplied the house with gas had been removed.

Thieves had cut them off and stolen them. His was one of several homes targeted on the same road in Bedford.

"My first feeling was anger, that someone had come and nicked something from me," said Mr Bull.

"But when that subsided it was the realisation of what could have happened. It only would have taken a naked light and everything would have gone up."

Copper thefts are nothing new. The doubling of copper prices on global markets in the past two years has seen an increase in robberies.

Gas pipes, copper or bronze statues, even church lightning conductors have been ripped out for the sake of the scrap value.

Now for the first time the costs to businesses of such thefts are becoming clear.

British Transport Police have told the BBC there have been close to 1,000 copper-related incidents on the railways so far this year. That is a 50% rise year on year.

Network Rail, which owns and operates the railway infrastructure, says each incident can lead to delays for tens of thousands of passengers.

Those delays and the related repair costs have resulted in a £3m bill in the past 12 months.

Thieves have targeted high-voltage copper cables which power signalling systems and sets of points.

Organised crime

The rise in thefts mirrors what is happening on the continent. In Italy, the rail industry has also been targeted. There the finger of blame has been pointed at organised crime.

Here sources in the electricity industry talk of criminals who are organised. The sector has also been reeling from a rise in break-ins and thefts from sub-stations.

It was the theft of a copper earthing cable from a sub-station in the Black Country which recently left more than 16,000 homes and the Merry Hill shopping centre in Dudley without power.


"It is dangerous and you are putting your lives at risk" - Det Ch Insp Danny Snee, British Transport Police

Signal cable thefts cost £3m

The Energy Networks Association, which represents the companies that deliver electricity to our homes, claims the thefts have cost the industry £5m this year.

Of more concern is the fact that break-ins have been associated with two deaths and several serious injuries.

Incidents are occurring nationwide. But the hotspots are centred around the Midlands and the North East.

It has led British Transport Police to launch a nationwide clampdown called Operation Drum.

Police are working closely with other agencies in an effort to secure convictions.

Action plan

Scrap metal yards are where some stolen copper can end up. So in key areas the police are making frequent visits to yards and working with the industry to ensure dealers recognise stolen material.

For its part the industry is launching an action plan on stolen metals to advise on best practice.

Dealers such as Chris Wilkinson from Doncaster warn that despite their best efforts it can be difficult to identify stolen material.

"For me and the staff who work here our problem is deciding who is legitimately entitled to weigh in material and who is not," he said.

"Despite our best efforts we are finding it nearly impossible to establish the truth of the situation."

Police hope this clampdown will stem the rising tide of thefts.

Det Ch Insp Danny Snee of the British Transport Police has a warning for those involved in theft from the railways.

"The first thing I would say to these people is stay away," he said. "It is dangerous and you are putting your lives at risk.

"Secondly if you don't stay away you will be arrested, we will arrest you."

Free train travel for over-60s on community rail lines

Transport Briefing: 05/12/06

Wales is to offer free rail passes for the elderly in an effort to increase the viability of rural railways by boosting passenger numbers.

The Welsh Assembly Government’s statutory bus pass scheme has issued over 530,000 bus passes to people over the age of 60 or eligible on grounds of disability since it was introduced, but ministers believe that in some rural areas the railway represents a more viable and effective means of local travel than commercial bus services.

Plans have therefore been unveiled to pilot proposals for community rail designation on the rural stretches of the Heart of Wales Line and the Conwy Valley Line. Designation on these two lines could take place from early 2007. "If these pilots are successful the Assembly Government would look to extend them next to the Cambrian Coast, Borderlands (Wrexham-Bidston) and Shrewsbury-Chester lines," said Andrew Davies, Minister for Enterprise, Innovation and Networks.

The announcement follows discussions with the Department for Transport’s Community Rail Team, Network Rail, Arriva Trains Wales and local community rail partnerships - initially, the Heart of Wales Line Forum and the Conwy Valley Rail Partnership.

Cllr Trevor Roberts, Chair of TAITH - the north Wales consortium of local authorities, said: "This is really exciting news for the people in our rural areas, for many of whom rail travel is a better option than local bus services. Thanks to the hard work of all the partners involved, those with a bus pass in the rural areas served by the railway will benefit greatly, particularly along the Conwy Valley line between Blaenau Ffestiniog and the coast which I am delighted to say will be one of the first in Wales to benefit."

"ACORP has argued that concessionary travel should be available to pensioners and the disabled using not only buses but also community rail services, which can often be the sole public transport facility in an area," added Neil Buxton, general manager, Association of Community Rail Partnerships. "We are delighted that the Welsh Assembly Government is proposing to support concessionary fares on both road and selected community rail lines. We hope that this will set a precedent for the rest of the UK."

One of the main benefits from Community Rail service designation is the relaxation of the strict regulatory and franchise requirements that can apply to main line services. This can allow the introduction of more responsive timetables; flexible fares and simpler contractual requirements and aims to improve net revenue by increasing patronage and/or ticket income. It can also deliver lower costs and increase community participation.

Community Rail designation is an initiative across England and Wales, led by the Department for Transport’s Community Rail Team, and established in 2004.

'The Drain' reopens after dust blinds drivers

ThisisLondon: 5 December 2006
By Peter Law

THOUSANDS of commuters were left stranded this morning when the Waterloo and City line was again suspended because of dust.

The line - known as The Drain - was suspended for most of yesterday and this morning because drivers complained they were having problems seeing properly.

The line was closed at 7.50am this morning and reopened at 11.12am.

The dust was a result of weekend rail grinding works by the controversial Tube maintenance firm Metronet.

LU managing director Tim O'Toole said Metronet had not done enough dust suppression, leaving a "terrible mess".

The busy line only reopened in September after five months of upgrade works which commuters were promised would make it more reliable.

Mayor Ken Livingstone said Metronet's contract may be scrapped if the firm's work did not improve next year.

Metronet today apologised to LU and passengers for the suspension of service.

A Metronet statement said: "As part of its planned operations, Metronet last weekend undertook work to grind the rails in the two tunnels of the Waterloo & City line.

"This work is prudent and responsible and is typically undertaken after completion of a major upgrade. It follows best practice and is designed to ensure that the life of the rail is preserved well into the future.

"As a result of this exercise a lot of dust was created and this has taken some time to remove. We had a team of 30 cleaners on site who used industrial vacuum cleaners and magnetic wands to eliminate the dust."

December 04, 2006

Spend Trident cash on transport and services, says RMT

RMT: December 4, 2006

THE TENS of billions of public pounds the government intends to spend on new weapons of mass destruction should be spent on public services, Britain’s specialist transport trade union says today. Massive protests are needed to show MPs they are out of step
trident.jpg

As the government was due to publish its White Paper on Trident replacement, RMT called for the cash earmarked for it to be ploughed instead into helping Britain meet its climate challenge.

“We need to spend money on saving the planet, not on weapons that can help destroy it,” RMT General Secretary Bob Crow said today.

“The £25 billion the government wants to spend on replacing Trident – and it could be three times that – could go a long way to helping Britain reduce carbon emissions, build some of the transport infrastructure we desperately need and to help bolster our public services.

“Blair took us into an illegal war over weapons of mass destruction that didn’t even exist, and now he wants to tear up the nuclear non-proliferation treaty to build some new ones of his own – there is only one word for that, and it is hypocrisy.

“While there is starvation, poverty, homelessness, illiteracy and a grave environmental threat hanging over our planet it would be nothing short of obscene to go ahead with replacing Trident, whether it’s with 200 warheads, 100 or just one.

“The brave MPs who have come out against Trident are to be congratulated, but there are far too many, across the parties, are totally out of step with what people in the real world want.

“MPs are supposed to be there to represent the people, but it seems that we are going to need to take to the street again in huge numbers to make it clear that we want our money spent on peaceful construction, not on bloody destruction,” Bob Crow said.

New rail station planned for paradise

Glasgow Evening Times: 04/12/06
parkhead.jpg PLANS to create a new train station beside Celtic Park have taken a major step forward.

CELTIC supporters and Parkhead Forge shoppers could soon be able to get rail access with the planned new station

spt_alistair_watson.jpg
ALISTAIR WATSON says new station is of critical importance for the East End

Proposals to create a station near Parkhead Forge are now at an "advanced stage" and rail bosses will hold talks about the long-awaited project next week.

Transport bosses believe the development will help cut congestion around the ground on match days and serve the new National Indoor Arena.

Hundreds of Celtic fans currently travel by train to Bridgeton or Bellgrove, the nearest stations to Celtic Park, and walk to the stadium.

Strathclyde Partnership for Transport commissioned a feasibility study earlier this year into adding Parkhead station to the Helensburgh to Airdrie/Drumgelloch line.

The findings, along with the outline design of the station for Craigmore Street, off Duke Street, will be presented to Transport Scotland and Network Rail on December 12.

The Celtic Park station has been in the pipeline for more than 10 years and Railtrack paid for a feasibility study in the mid-1990s but the project stalled.

However, with the Commonwealth Games 2014 bid and the multi-million regeneration of the East End, the proposals look likely to be finally given the go-ahead.

In February, Celtic fans backed a petition calling for better public transport to the club's ground. Councillors also support the idea

Alistair Watson, chairman of SPT, said: "Parkhead has been one of our top-three priorities for more than 10 years.

"There have been extensive talks over an extended period of time with Network Rail and their predecessors."

He added: "Parkhead is of critical importance to the East End regeneration."

Five other proposed railway stations for the West of Scotland will also be discussed at next week's meeting.

As well as the Parkhead plan, outline studies have been carried out into creating a new station at Jordanhill, which would serve the West End district and Scotstoun Leisure Centre.

Officials have also looked into siting new stations at Millerston, on the Cumbernauld line, Flemington, near Motherwell, and Healthfield, between Prestwick and Ayr.

RMT cleaners perform Cleaners’ Christmas Carol for scrooge rail bosses

RMT: December 4 2006

RAIL AND Tube cleaners fed up with poverty pay from scrooge bosses will be taking their campaign for fair pay to rail company offices this Monday morning (December 4).

They will be joined by RMT general secretary Bob Crow and other activists from Britain's biggest rail union in special performances of the Cleaners' Christmas Carol at the offices of Network Rail, the Association of Train Operating Companies and Metronet. (timetable below).

"Father Christmas will be making his regular delivery of millions of pounds of taxpayers' and passengers' money to the rail companies - in fact every day is Christmas day for them," RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today

"But for the cleaners who work on the contracts these companies are responsible for, it will be the usual pittance of poverty pay.

"Many of the jobs they do are dangerous and require special safety certificates, and without them London's Tube and railway system would disappear under a mountain of rubbish, food scraps and frequently vomit, blood, urine and excrement.

"After a suicide or accidental death it is our cleaner members who have to remove body parts stuck to the train or lying on the track or platform.

"They get no special training or pay for this and no counselling and have to do it all for £5.35 an hour, and this disgrace has to stop.

"Last week Network Rail announced that it had made £747 million in profits, yet they seem happy for their own contractors to pay poverty wages to railway cleaners.

"We are campaigning for an immediate rise to the London living wage - that's £7.05 an hour - as the minimum starting wage for all railway industry cleaners, and the rail companies that employ these contractors have a moral duty to make sure it happens," Bob Crow said.

ends

The Cleaners' Christmas Carol

Performances on Monday December 4

09:00 to 10:00 Network Rail Headquarters (outside Euston Station)

10:30 to11:30 ATOC Headquarters 40 Bernard Street WC1N 1BY (next to Russell Square Tube)

12:30 to13:30 Metronet Headquarters Templar House 81 - 87 High Holborn WC1V 6NU (near Holborn Tube)

Israel's NICE gets order from Network Rail

Reuters: Dec 4

- NICE Systems today announced that it has received a 7-digit order for its advanced solutions for the reconstruction, analysis and distribution of voice communications from Network Rail, which owns and operates Britain's rail infrastructure. Initial roll-out entails implementation at 270 signal boxes.

Network Rail is responsible for the operation, maintenance and development of Britain's tracks, signaling system, rail bridges, tunnels, level crossings, viaducts and 17 key stations.

As part of its National Voice Recorder Project, NICE will fulfill phase one of the project that will ensure all interactions between signal operators and train drivers are captured and stored in compliance with strict corporate policy.

Network Rail will also benefit from Scenario Replay(TM), NICE's event reconstruction solution that facilitates faster compilation of evidence and information sharing in the event of a post-incident inquiry.

By utilizing NICE's powerful applications for scenario reconstruction, Network Rail will be able to make a thorough and effective review of events to confirm what happened, where and when it happened, and who was involved.

This profoundly reduces the time and resources required to search, analyze, and distribute records, and improves the accuracy of event reconstruction to help transit officials better serve the public.

"We needed a complete network-based solution to help us meet our very strict requirements," said David Lovell, Overall Project Manager of the Network Rail National Voice Recording Project. "With NICE's powerful applications for scenario reconstruction we are confident that we will be able to fully and accurately understand any situation where signal failure, accident or negligence may have occurred, and to ensure that we can correct or even prevent such occurrences in the future for better public service."

"We are very pleased to have been selected to support the critica communications infrastructure of Britain's Network Rail," said Tamir Ginat, President of NICE EMEA. "This win is further evidence that NICE is the premier solution for transit systems all over the world, in their efforts to ensure the security of the public."

Draft corporate killing law would have made no difference to rail disasters, top law firm tells RMT

RMT: December 4 2006

DRAFT CORPORATE-killing legislation to be debated in parliament today would have made no practical difference to the four major railway disasters since 1997 had it already been in place, a study for RMT by Britain’s biggest trade-union law firm reveals today.

The 'corporate manslaughter' label is the only achievement the government can claim if the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill passes unamended, according to Thompsons Solicitors, which adds that the bill marks a "significant retreat" from the government's policy on the issue.

For the Southall, Ladbroke Grove, Hatfield and Potters Bar crashes, which killed a total of 49 and injured approaching 700 people, the draft law would have made no practical difference in sanctions or establishing individual accountability, the law firm says.

Rather, the bill expressly prevents individuals being held to account, provides a "glaring loophole" for companies to establish complex corporate structures to avoid liability and would encourage companies to shift responsibility for health and safety to more junior managers.

RMT general secretary Bob Crow has forwarded the report to Labour MPs, urging them to support amendments that would prevent the bill becoming a wasted opportunity.

"We have waited patiently for nearly a decade for the government to keep its promise of a proper corporate-killing law," Bob Crow said today.

"To have any effect such a law would expect employers to take workers' health and safety far more seriously, and would put those whose negligence caused unnecessary deaths in the dock and potentially behind bars.

"If this bill is passed as it stands it will achieve neither.

"If the law is to achieve any real purpose it is essential that company directors have specific health and safety responsibilities and stand to be held accountable if their failure to observe them results in death," Bob Crow said.

ends

Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill: Impact on major rail disaster cases

Thompsons solicitors
November 2006

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill is currently proceeding through Parliament. The Bill, as currently drafted, abolishes the common law offence of Corporate Manslaughter and replaces it with a statutory offence. Sanctions are unlimited fines and remedial orders. There is no individual liability for directors or senior managers under the Bill such that no person will be imprisoned under this legislation.

This paper considers what practical differences the Bill will make with particular reference to how the Bill would have applied to the major railway disasters of recent years.

We conclude:

* The Government has stepped back from its position in 2000 which was the most progressive it has been on this issue. The present Bill represents a significant retreat from that position in a number of respects.
* The Government has performed a complete U-turn on two key issues. The Bill does not apply to unincorporated bodies such as partnerships, whatever their size. On individual liability, Clause 16 expressly prevents this so that there is no personal liability for directors or senior managers under the Bill. Therefore, no person will be imprisoned under this legislation.
* There is a glaring loophole in the Bill in that companies can establish complex corporate structures using subsidiary companies to avoid any liability on the parent.
* The "senior management" test will continue to cause difficulties and has already resulted in many companies pushing down health and safety matters to more junior managers to avoid liability under the Bill.
* Ultimately, the corporate manslaughter label is the only achievement the Government can claim. No new sanctions will apply to the new offence and it will be far harder to secure a conviction for corporate manslaughter than for the existing health and safety offences. The only real difference will be the label.
* On sanctions, it is clear that whilst prosecutions would now arise for corporate manslaughter, the sanctions would be no greater and indeed are more restricted than under health and safety legislation. In addition, with the senior management test, precisely the sort of companies who do not have an adequate safety culture are already taking steps to avoid possible prosecution by pushing health and safety down to more junior managers. This is having the opposite effect of the Government's stated intention that board's should take greater responsibility for health and safety matters
* In respect of the railway disasters which are the subject of this paper, from Southall in 1997 to Potters Bar in 2002, the Bill as currently drafted would make no difference in terms of sanctions. Bereaved families and injury victims are unlikely to consider it adequate that the only positive outcome of the Bill would be the ability to secure a manslaughter conviction and attach that label to companies guilty of gross corporate negligence.

INTRODUCTION

The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill is currently proceeding through Parliament. The Bill passed second reading on 10th October 2006 and the Standing Committee debates concluded on 31st October 2006.

The Bill, as currently drafted, abolishes the common law offence of Corporate Manslaughter and replaces it with a statutory offence. Sanctions are unlimited fines and remedial orders. There is no individual liability for directors or senior managers under the Bill such that no person will be imprisoned under this legislation. Prosecution of offences will be the responsibility of the Crown Prosecution Service.

This paper considers how the Bill would have applied to the major railway disasters of recent years if it had been in operation when they occurred, to ascertain whether the Bill will make any practical difference in the prevention of such incidents and the prosecution of those responsible.

MAJOR RAILWAY INCIDENTS 1997 - 2006

Southall Rail Accident

This occurred at Southall East Junction on 19th September 1997 when a high speed train from Swansea to London Paddington operated by Great Western Trains collided with a freight train operated by English Welsh and Scottish Railways which was crossing to Southall yard. 7 died and there were 139 injuries.

The underlying causes of the accident were the failure of Great Western Trains' maintenance systems to identify and repair an automatic warning system fault on the high speed train, the failure of Railtrack to put in place rules to prevent normal running of a train with the automatic warning system isolated and the failure of Great Western Trains to manage the automatic train protection pilot scheme.

The corporate manslaughter prosecution against Great Western Trains failed. They were fined £1.5 million for an offence under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.

Ladbroke Grove

On 5th October 1999 a commuter passenger train operated by Thames Trains passed a red signal at Ladbroke Grove and collided with a high speed passenger train operated by Great Western Trains. There were 31 fatalities and over 400 persons injured.

The underlying causes of the accident were deficiencies in the route training of the driver, poor sighting of a signal and a failure by Railtrack to respond to numerous previous SPAD's (signals passed at danger).

The Ladbroke Grove Public Inquiry under Lord Cullen took place during 2000 and the two reports published in 2001 made 163 recommendations. Railtrack were blamed for 'institutional paralysis' and failures which were 'serious and persistent' and 'lamentable' leading to the disaster.

The report of a separate Public Inquiry into train protection systems was published in 2000 and included 39 recommendations.

Thames Trains were prosecuted for offences under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 concerning failures in respect of driver training. They were fined £2m.

Railtrack's successor Network Rail, was also prosecuted under the 1974 Act. On 31st October 2006 Network Rail pleaded guilty to charges which included an obscured signal and failures in respect of signal visibility. The charges also alleged a failure to ensure a signals sighting committee met after 6 signals passed at danger between 1996 and 1998 and a failure to conduct any adequate risk assessment or investigations following the SPAD's. The matter has been adjourned for a further hearing on 18th December 2006 at Blackfriars Crown Court when Network Rail will confirm in writing the full basis of its guilty plea.

Hatfield

On 17th October 2000 a high speed train from Kings Cross to Leeds operated by Great North Eastern Railways de-railed on passing over a section of broken rail south of Hatfield station in Hertfordshire. There were 4 fatalities and 70 persons injured.

The immediate cause of the accident was the fracture and subsequent fragmentation of the rail due to the presence of multiple and pre-existing fatigue cracks. The underlying causes were the failure by Balfour Beatty Rail Maintenance Limited to effectively manage the inspection and maintenance of the rail and Railtrack's failure to manage effectively the work of Balfour Beatty and to implement an effective rail renewal operation at the scene of the accident.

Manslaughter charges were brought against Network Rail as successors to Railtrack, Balfour Beatty and 6 managers from both companies. Those 6 managers and a further 6 were charged with breaches of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 as were Balfour Beatty and Network Rail.

The manslaughter charges were dismissed. Balfour Beatty had pleaded guilty to a health and safety charge relating to the derailment. They were fined £10m but this was subsequently reduced on appeal to £7.5m. Network Rail was found guilty of health and safety charges and was fined £3.5m. 5 individual Defendants facing health and safety charges were found not guilty.

Potters Bar

On 10th May 2002 a Kings Cross to Kings Lynn train operated by West Anglia Great Northern de-railed on passing over points on the approach to Potters Bar station. There were 7 fatalities and over 70 injured.

The immediate cause of the accident was the failure of the points causing them to move whilst the train was passing over them. An underlying cause was that the points were poorly maintained and out of adjustment. Whilst it has not yet been clearly established for certain how they came to be in this condition, the maintenance staff employed by Jarvis had received no specific training in the installation and maintenance of adjustable stretchers bars which was a key feature of these type of points. The reason for the lack of any training programme was a failure to produce a procedure for the installation of such equipment despite a stated intention by British Rail to do so back in 1993.

The Crown Prosecution Service have announced that there is insufficient evidence to pursue manslaughter charges against any individual company. However, charges under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 are still being considered and a decision will be taken after the Coroner's Inquest to be held in 2007 as an enhanced Inquest with a High Court Judge sitting as Coroner.

THE PROPOSED LEGISLATION

Discussion of a Corporate Manslaughter Bill goes back many years and in1994 the Law Commission published a consultation paper proposing a new regime of corporate liability for manslaughter. This process concluded in 1996 with Law Commission recommendations. In 1997, at the first party conference of the New Labour Government the then Home Secretary Jack Straw announced that the Government would enact the recommendations for the new offence of Corporate Killing.

A Working Group was then set up but it was not until 2000 that there was any progress and this was simply a further consultation paper. Nevertheless, the Government's position in 2000 was the most progressive it has been on this issue and the present Bill represents a significant retreat from that position in a number of respects. In particular the Government rejected the Law Commission's suggestion that only incorporated bodies should be liable and put forward their preferred alternative that the new offence be applied to "undertakings" as used in the 1974 Act. This would therefore include unincorporated bodies such as partnerships, small businesses etc.

In addition on the crucial issue of individual liability in "Reforming the law on involuntary manslaughter: The Government's proposals: Home Office May 2000", the Government stated:

The Government considers that there is no good reason why an individual should not be convicted for aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring an offence of corporate killing.

The Government also proposed that any individual who could be shown to have some influence on, or responsibility for the circumstances in which a management failure falling f