Rail guard sacked for standing up to yob
Daily Mirror: 21/08/2007
By Aidan McGurran
The wife of have-a-go rail guard Paul Yarwood told of her despair last night as he faces ruin for standing up to Britain's yob menace.

'One' train
Sacked Paul, 44, is set to lose his home as he cannot pay the mortgage and will be hauled before a court this week charged with threatening behaviour. Yet the boozy thug who rampaged through his station got off with a paltry £80 fine - despite admitting he was entirely to blame.
The fiasco has incensed law-abiding Brits fed up with being cowed by marauding louts.
Many have even backed train strikes held to demand justice for the public-spirited railman.
His wife Maria, 41, of Brightlingsea, Essex, fumed: "Our lives have been ruined by this.
"Paul was doing his job and helping to protect passengers. It's a farce. He didn't attack the man."
The selfless dad of three, who spent 14 years in the Army, refused to stand idly by as the hooligan intimidated commuters and staff in Colchester, Essex.
The fare-dodger vaulted a ticket barrier, abused employees and further brazenly defied the law by smoking on a waiting train.
When a supervisor tried to get him to leave, he violently grabbed him, threatened to batter other staff with a broom and sneeringly told a commuter he would thump him.
Paul led passengers to safety and challenged the yob but was knocked to the ground, with the man looming over him. As Paul got up, their heads collided.
Despite Paul's bravery, bigwigs at train firm One axed him after claiming CCTV showed he headbutted the man. Police quizzed and charged him - while the hooligan merely got an £80 smoking fine.
The RMT union has held two strikes over the incident in June, supported by the public. Derek Monnery, of the Essex Rail Users' Federation passenger group, said: "Managers have to ask why the strikes were so strongly backed."
One passenger said: "It's a shabby way to treat someone doing his duty." The RMT added: "We've had many messages of support.
"One commuter said he'd never supported the union in his life but was 100 per cent behind us now."
Even the thug admitted he was at fault and backed the guard. An RMT insider said: "He returned to the station, made clear he was to blame and did not feel action should be taken against Paul."
But bosses at One defended the sacking and claimed they had addressed the union's concerns.
See also:
Rail guard bravely defends commuters from a violent yob - and gets sacked for it
Daily Mail: 21st August 2007

Sacked: Rail guard Paul Yarwood has been forced to put his house up for sale after being sacked for tackling a violent fare dodger
A rail guard has been fired for defending commuters from a violent fare dodger.
Paul Yarwood, 44, came to the rescue after a drunken passenger abused travellers and threatened staff with a broom at Colchester station.
But bosses at rail company One Railway sacked him for gross misconduct, claiming CCTV showed him headbutting the man.
His dismissal comes despite an admission by the fare dodger that he was entirely to blame.
The father-of-three, who has not worked since the incident, will appear before a court on Thursday accused of threatening behaviour.
Today his wife, Maria, 41, said the family have been forced to put their house up for sale after being unable to pay the mortgage.
She told the Daily Mirror: "Our lives have been ruined by this and it has been hanging over our heads for months. Paul was just doing his job and helping to protect his passengers.
"It's a farce. He's shattered by this. He didn't attack this man, even though he could have claimed it was self-defence.
"The company say he should have kept his cool, but he did. It's not they who have to deal face-to-face with situations like this and put up with what staff have to."
Mrs Yarwood said her husband - a former soldier who had notched up seven years of exemplary service with One Railway - had refused to stand by when a drunken passenger threatened members of the public at the Essex station.
The man had jumped over a ticket barrier, abused station staff and illegally lit up a cigarette on a waiting train.
When a supervisor tried to persuade him to leave, he grabbed him, threatened to hit another member of staff with a broom and told a fellow traveller he would punch him. After escorting passengers to safety, Mr Yarwood confronted the man, who lunged at him and knocked him to the ground.
Onlookers described how his attacker "loomed" over Mr Yarwood as he tried to get up and how their heads had briefly touched.
One Railway sacked Mr Yarwood after claiming that six seconds of CCTV showed him headbutting the man.
Police later questioned and charged Mr Yarwood while the man was fined £80 for smoking.
Mrs Yarwood said: "They're basing their case on six seconds of CCTV while there are plenty of witnesses to tell them what did happen."
The RMT union has held two local strikes over the incident, with the support of members of the public.
Derek Monnery, head of the Essex Rail Users' Federation passenger group, said: "Managers have to ask why this strike was so strongly backed. They should have taken into account the support given to Mr Yarwood by co-workers when they took the decision to sack him."
According to a union insider, the fare dodger returned to the station shortly after the incident and admitted he was at fault.
The source said: "He gave a taped interview to the station manager in which he admitted being abusive and threatening. He made it clear he felt he was to blame for the entire incident and did not feel any action should be taken against the guard."
Bosses at One Railway have defended the sacking, claiming they have "comprehensively" addressed the RMT union's concerns.
Comments
I like many others am incensed by the way the guard Paul Yarwood has been treated over his actions to protect the public from a yob. To have lost his job, his income, the possibilty of losing his home and now prosecution whereby he may end up with a criminal record is disgusting. I fully support the RMT in order to get him reinstated, One Railway should support him and give him his job back. Has the RMT thought of the possibility of setting up a fund that people can contribute to to help this man. I for one would be only to pleased to donate as would be many other people I am sure.
Posted by: Bob Bradley | August 23, 2007 01:57 PM
I wept when I saw Paul Yarwood on TV this evening. What have we reduced ourselves to as a nation? My husband is due to travel to Colchester station tomorrow (24th Aug) but would applaud strike action in support. With very best wishes to Mr Yarwood from a fellow human being (and member of the Conservative Party!)
Posted by: Pauline Currie | August 23, 2007 10:58 PM
How can I send Paul Yarwood some money, or do you have a support fund for him? I would like to do something about all violent yobs but this pathetic government is letting them get away with it all the time.
Posted by: Richard Bates | August 24, 2007 10:50 PM
These 'rail bosses' are morons who are probably on 'mega bucks' for doing very little and obviously never travel on public transport where these yobs cause trouble. Well done Paul.
Posted by: alan herron | August 25, 2007 01:39 PM
I am disappointed and greatly disturbed to see that the guard involved in the Colchester 'incident' has been sacked. I have met Paul many times when he worked on the Sudbury-Marks Tey branch line.
Paul is always courteous and helpful and has the passengers welfare foremost. I, and my travelling companions, all regulars on this line, have enjoyed his company, his cheerfulness and his unswerving devotion to duty. He has always been most polite and gets on with everyone. A pleasure to travel with.
The lout that has caused this fine chap to lose his job should be the one being penalised. I am totally appalled that a member of 'ONE' staff can be sacked for looking after, and indeed, protecting passengers on one of their trains.
What message does this send to the rest of 'ONE' staff? A passenger is assaulted, verbally or otherwise, and they will all stand back because the know they will lose their job if they intervene and help the passenger! The yobbo gets the message its ok to attack other passengers because nothing will be done.
This is totally ghastly.
I cannot imagine what hardships Paul is going through, mentally and financially because his employer has so dismally failed to support him when he was being a credit to them.
I only wish I was not limited to 'ONE' service for my daily travel regime, because I would surely use others after this.
It is equally galling to find that a driver on 'ONE' was fined £80 for a similar incident two weeks earlier. So no equality at 'ONE' either!
Good Luck to you Paul. We three on the Marks Tey- Sudbury line are rooting for you.
Posted by: Sheila Dudley | August 29, 2007 12:28 PM
If anyone would like to contribute towards the collection for Paul, they can pay it into the supervisors office at Colchester - Thank you for your support and kind words. I am a good friend and colleague of Paul and i know that your support will mean a lot to him.
Posted by: Colin Martin | August 30, 2007 09:59 PM
Well Sheila above has said it all really. Paul deserves a medal for his actions not the sack. Its nice to know your company are behind you all the way 'NOT.' It's a very bad state of affairs if your own company don't back you when all you do is put the public safety first.
As per Sheila I've meet Paul several times and you really could not meet a nicer person and whilst he was on the train you always felt safe and had a laugh.
Thinking of you and your family Paul.
Posted by: Jacqui Royal | August 31, 2007 08:01 AM
I think this case is disgusting, and tells us what's wrong with managers and police.
This guy shouldn't have been given the axe.
He should have been given a raise, and AN axe. So he could continue doing his job in such a great way.
Paul, an example to us all, sickening to see how the higher ups treat you.
Posted by: Jakey | September 2, 2007 10:09 PM
I'm afraid I am not surprised that this has happened. The company I work for makes it clear we are on our own if we use force - even in defending ourselves.
A guards job is by definition 'confrontational', to do this job well means you are an expert in diplomacy and have the patience of a saint.
I have been in this position and used force myself - The other man was seriously hurt. I nearly lost my job, I can sympathise exactly with this poor man. I'M SO GLAD YOU STOOD UP TO HIM AND I WOULDN'T HESITATE IN SUPPORTING YOU IN ANY WAY I COULD.
What if we all turned a blind eye and these thugs kill someone or themselves? What if your wife, sister, father were assaulted by a drunken yob.. - I couldn't live with my inaction. Could you? - This sacking is ludicrous and unwarranted. The message it sends out is on the side of the anti social - making this guard a victim twofold..
I wonder if the managers have worked front line themselves? - Clearly out of touch with the realities of working with the public on our railways.
Posted by: Andy | September 10, 2007 03:53 PM
Great News Paul! I only hope the settlement is enough to cover the unnecessary stress caused to you and your family.
Good luck and best wishes to you all for the future.
Posted by: Sheila Dudley | September 14, 2007 07:53 AM