" /> National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers (RMT): July 2008 Archives

« June 2008 | Main | August 2008 »

July 30, 2008

Austria gives green light for joint venture with Deutsche Bahn

ÖBB: 30.07.2008

The Supervisory Board of Austrian State Railways (ÖBB) have opened the way for a new joint venture with Deutsche Bahn called 'Rail Select'.

Rail Select is a 50-50 joint venture with the German Railion and has a common production platform for the handling of freight traffic between Germany and Austria. The Austrian partner is Rail Cargo Austria (RCA).

The joint venture is a new sign of efficiency in cross-border freight transport for the benefit of freight customers, according to ÖBB.

The railways are expecting to make cost savings and to strengthen their position against private railway company competitors, which are bringing massive competition to all the major state-owned railways.

July 29, 2008

Grand Central told to improve safety systems

Sunderland Echo: 29 July 2008

RAIL operator Grand Central has been ordered to improve its safety management systems by industry regulators.

The order was made by Office of Rail Regulation (ORR), although the railway company insisted its trains and operations were safe.

The news comes after the Sunderland to London service was hit by a series of problems.

An ORR spokesman said Grand Central had until September 1 to comply with the notice or other measures could be taken.

A Grand Central spokesman said the company took the improvement notice very seriously and had already instituted measures to address the concerns raised.

He added: "However, this does not mean that the ORR believes our services or trains to be unsafe. Had they thought this to be the case a number of other options were open to them.

"The improvement notice requires Grand Central to address specific issues relating to our safety management system by September 1.

"We are working closely with our suppliers and expect to be fully compliant by that date."

The proposal for the Sunderland to London service came in 2005 and the service was expected to start running in December of that year.

But plans ran into fierce opposition from the then East Coast operator GNER before the ORR finally gave the go-ahead.

The first Grand Central finally ran on the route in December last year, but the service had to be suspended just days later when its only train broke down.

July 28, 2008

Station staff at Charing Cross, Lambeth North and Elephant and Castle strike over unfair sacking

RMT: July 27 2008

AROUND 100 RMT Tube station staff at Elephant and Castle, Charing Cross and Lambeth North and are to strike for 24 hours from 19:00 tonight to demand the re-instatement of a colleague dismissed after defending himself against a violent assault on New Year’s Eve.

Station assistant Jerome Bowes was sacked for defending himself against the assault from a member of the public who had already been involved in a fight on Elephant and Castle station, even though neither the Metropolitan Police nor the British Transport Police deemed that there was anything to arrest him for.

RMT members at the three Bakerloo Line stations, who voted by a margin of nine to one to strike to demand Jerome's re-instatement, will not book on for shifts that commence after 19:00 tonight.

"Jerome Bowes was sacked for defending himself against an attack from behind from someone who had already been involved in a fight on the most volatile night of the year, and that is unacceptable," RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

"Neither the Met nor the BTP found any cause to arrest Jerome, who was walking away towards a place of safety when he was assaulted, and it beggars belief that LUL has seen fit to dismiss him.

"The message London Underground seems to be sending out is that defending yourself against violent assault is to be regarded as a disciplinary offence, and it is no wonder that our members are angry and disgusted.

"Rather than train up inexperienced office staff in an attempt to undermine our members' strike, LUL should be asking itself why they voted so overwhelmingly to take action and re-instate Jerome Bowes," Bob Crow said.

Jordan plans regional railway, oil link with Iraq

AFP: 27 July 2008
Maliki Abdullah.jpg
AMMAN — Jordan is seeking six billion dollars from international donors to build a railway link with its neighbours and plans to import Iraqi crude oil by rail, the transport ministry said on Sunday.

The railway would link Jordan's Red Sea port of Aqaba in the south with the Syrian border, through Amman and then the industrial city of Zarqa, the ministry said in a report carried by the official Petra news agency.

View Larger Map

Covering more than 1,000 kilometres (600 miles), the railway would also link the Saudi and Iraqi borders with Jordan's northern city of Irbid as well as the northeastern towns of Mafraq and Azraq.

The report recommended that Iraqi crude oil be carried via rail, scrapping plans to build a 260-million-dollar pipeline between the two countries.

"Lack of funds is the only problem facing the project, which should be completed by 2013, and any delay would increase the costs," Petra quoted the report as saying.

Amman and Baghdad agreed last year to study the possibility of building an oil pipeline from Iraq's Haditha pumping station to Aqaba.

At the end of 2004, Jordan said it would conduct a feasibility study into building a pipeline between Haditha and Jordan's sole refinery in the industrial city of Zarqa, northeast of Amman.

The kingdom was entirely dependent on Iraq for its oil before the 2003 toppling of Saddam Hussein, importing 5.5 million tonnes a year by road, half of it free of charge and the rest at preferential rates.

In June, Iraq agreed to renew a 2006 deal to provide Jordan, which imports 95 percent of its energy needs, with between 10 and 30 percent of its daily oil requirements of around 100,000 barrels at a preferential price.


See also:


Jordan seeks $6.1 bln for railway project

Chinaview: 2008-07-27

AMMAN, July 27 (Xinhua) -- Jordan is in urgent need of 4.3 billion Jordanian dinars (about 6.1 billion U.S. dollars) to finance a railway project linking its major cities and economic centers with neighboring countries, local daily Jordan Times reported on Sunday.

Around 4 billion dollars are needed for infrastructure while another 2 billion dollars are needed for rail fleet, according to a study released by the Jordan's Transport Ministry.

The proposed railway project consists of two lines, the north-south line from the Syrian border to Aqaba passing through Mafraq, Zarqa, Amman and Maan, and the east-west line extending from the Iraqi to Saudi borders passing through Mafraq, Irbid and Azraq, said the study.

The speed of cargo trains is designed to reach 120 km per hour and that for passenger trains 160 km per hour, it added.

Scheduled to be finished by 2013, the railway might also be an alternative to a pipeline project between Jordan and Iraq that designed to transport Iraqi oil.

Jordan's Minister of Transport Alaa Batayneh said his ministry has started expropriating land for the railway track which stretches 1,080 km.

Jordan was among 13 Arab countries that approved a railway linkage agreement during meetings of the Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia, which requested those countries to implement their internal railway network in a period of 10 to 15 years. (1 dollar= 0.708 dinar)

July 27, 2008

Network Rail braced for governance inquiry

Sunday Times: July 27, 2008
Dominic O'Connell

Network Rail’s corporate governance will come under scrutiny again this week with the publication of a report by the consultancy KPMG.

The rail regulator commissioned KPMG to examine Network Rail’s management structure as part of a wider review of its licence to operate.

Rail-industry insiders expect KPMG to question how the company’s board is held to account and incentivised, and will propose more transparency on how management bonuses are calculated.

The Office of Rail Regulation declined to comment ahead of publication.

Network Rail, led by chairman Sir Ian McAllister and chief executive Iain Coucher, owns and operates nearly all Britain’s rail track and signalling, and most big stations.

It is a company limited by guarantee, meaning it has no shareholders. Instead the board reports to 118 “members”, some of whom represent railway- industry interests, and others who are members of the public.

The structure has been called into question several times, normally over the payment of bonuses to senior staff.

The pressure intensified earlier this year when over-running engineering works disrupted the travel plans of thousands over Christmas and the New Year.

At the group’s recent annual meeting members voted in favour of setting up their own inquiry into governance. It is understood that members will select a steering committee to run the inquiry, which will take on professional advisers. Network Rail will pay for the work. A report is expected by Christmas.

The renewed spotlight on how Network Rail is run comes as the company is in the final throes of negotiating with the regulator how much it will earn over the next five years.

Network Rail has asked for around £2.6 billion more than the regulator wants to give it, and says the watchdog’s efficiency targets are too tough.

Part of the settlement will be a change to Network Rail’s fundraising activities. To date it has borrowed using a government guarantee of repayment.

It is envisaged that from next April it will borrow on its own account.

July 26, 2008

Railway workers ready for strike

BBC News: 26 July 2008

Thousands of rail maintenance workers will start an 18-hour strike over pay and conditions from midday.
rail-maintenance.jpg
The dispute centres on a single set of terms and conditions for workers

The RMT union said the walkout would involve about 12,000 staff, although the Unite union which is also involved in the dispute will not be striking.

The RMT claims bosses at Network Rail have "scuppered" negotiations on harmonisation of pay and conditions.

Network Rail has released a letter by Unite which said negotiations were "clearly still ongoing".

The RMT said 100% of its members walked out when a 30-hour strike over the same issue was called last month.

The two sides are in disagreement over the creation a single set of terms and conditions after rail maintenance work was taken back in-house from private companies four years ago.


See also:


Urgent Communciation

Jul 25 2008

Dear All,

I am writing to draw your attention to a letter that ‘Unite the Union’ have sent out to their members which contains criticism of the RMT for taking action this weekend. The letter has been used by Network Rail to try and undermine the RMT.

Network Rail’s Director of Infrastructure Maintenance has emailed a copy of the letter to all his managers with an instruction to place it on all notice boards.

The company are even encouraging workers to visit the Unite website.

‘Unite The Union’ have written directly to their members so displaying it on notice boards can have only one intention.

The union purports not to understand why we are taking action but if its full time officers attended more of the meetings they would be in a better position to understand.

‘Unite The Union’ only have a small amount of members affected by harmonisation. The union has joint recognition with the RMT for workers in the Workshop grades. The RMT has the majority of the members in that grade. Whilst ‘Unite the Union’ may have its nose put out by its lack of influence and RMT’s success, it is not acceptable for a sister trade union to try and undermine our action.

We are writing to the joint General Secretary’s of ‘Unite the Union’ to relay our concerns.

Mick Cash
Senior Assistant General Secretary, RMT

RMT calls for urgent investigation into fears of ‘reckless’ Network Rail strike plans

RMT: July 25 2008

AN URGENT probe into Network Rail’s contingency plans for this weekend’s strike by 12,000 maintenance staff is being sought by RMT, which fears that the company intends to leave unmarked vans loaded with explosive and highly combustible materials parked on public roads.

RMT last night asked the Department of Transport to undertake an urgent investigation into the company’s plans, and to block practices that would pose unnecessary risk to the public.

RMT understands that at least ten vans containing a highly explosive combination of compressed gasses including acetylene, oxygen and commercial Calor gas, and quantities of petrol, oil and railway detonators will be left on public roads, possibly in the Peterborough and Huntingdon areas.

The vehicles, which are also believed to have been stripped of the key safety notices that tell the emergency services and other road users about the nature of their contents, would normally be parked in secure compounds which will be picketed during the weekend’s strike.

“If what we have heard is confirmed these are breathtakingly reckless plans that could put people’s lives in danger, and last night I asked the Transport Department to investigate as a matter of urgency,” RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

“We have obtained the registration numbers of the vehicles we believe the company intends to leave on public highways in the Peterborough and Huntingdon areas, but our fear is that it intends to repeat this highly dangerous practice across Britain.

“It is bad enough contemplating leaving such a dangerous combination of materials parked in public places, but it is irresponsible almost beyond words to remove the safety notices that the emergency services would rely on should the worst happen.

“Instead of making dangerous plans in a futile attempt to beat our members’ industrial action, Network Rail should give its talks team the authority to negotiate a just settlement to the harmonisation dispute,” Bob Crow said.

Fire Brigades Union general secretary Matt Wrack said: “If clearly dangerous material is to be left in unmarked vans then it is a major concern to firefighters and the public. Some of this material can and does explode with deadly effect if involved in a fire.

“Vans containing this type of material must be clearly marked because of the dangers posed to emergency services and the public. It would be utterly reckless of Network Rail to leave the emergency response services in the dark about the storage of potentially lethal materials.”

ends

Note to editors: RMT yesterday revealed that Network Rail had vetoed progress made during talks on harmonisation of terms and conditions on Tuesday that could have led to the suspension of this weekend’s action.

RMT members will not book on for shifts that commence between midday on Saturday July 26 and 17:59 on Sunday July 27. Members will also not undertake any overtime or ‘on-call’ work between 06:00 on Saturday July 26 and 06:00 on Monday July 28. Weekend maintenance work was brought to a virtual standstill during the first stoppage in the dispute, over the weekend June 14 and 15.

July 25, 2008

Funding for rail service removed

BBC News: 25 July 2008

A rail link between two West Midlands stations could be axed after the government said it is ending its funding.
londonmidland.jpg
The Wolverhampton to Walsall service is "quick and reliable"

The Department for Transport has said the 15-minute long Walsall to Wolverhampton link is "lightly used".

West Midlands transport bosses are urging the government to reconsider, saying the number of passengers using the line has grown to 60,000 per year.

A spokesman said commuters would have a 40-minute bus journey instead.

Gary Clarke, chairman of passenger authority Centro, said he would be writing to rail minister Tom Harris.

'Vital link'

He said he will be writing a letter to Mr Harris to express his disappointment at the decision.

He said: "The Walsall-to-Wolverhampton rail service is a vital link for many Walsall and Wolverhampton residents by providing a quick and reliable connection between the two boroughs and giving much needed access to connecting rail services.

"Existing bus services take over 40 minutes to cover the 15-minute rail journey.

"Thanks to the increase in reliability and punctuality on the Walsall-to-Wolverhampton line, confidence has grown and we have seen the number of people taking advantage of this service rise significantly."

The government has said it is focussing on providing extra capacity on the busiest routes in the region as part of a franchise agreement.

"The Walsall-to-Wolverhampton rail service was not included in the franchise agreement as the route is lightly used," a statement said.

July 24, 2008

Rail maintenance strike to go ahead after talks progress is scuppered by Network Rail bosses

RMT: July 24 2008

A SECOND strike by 12,000 Network Rail maintenance workers in Britain’s biggest rail union is set to go ahead this weekend after progress made in last-ditch talks with Network Rail was vetoed by the company’s own head office.

RMT’s talks team believed it had made sufficient progress on a number of key issues arising out of the long-running harmonisation dispute to be able to recommend a suspension of this weekend’s action.

However, a letter subsequently received from Network Rail head office failed to reflect the understandings reached in a number of crucial respects.

“It is reasonable to expect that the people you are sitting round the table with have the authority to negotiate, but the progress we thought we had made in talks at Network Rail on Tuesday has simply been vetoed from on high,” RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

“On a range of issues, including pay protection, we believed we had made enough progress to enable the union to call off the weekend’s strike, but when we received a letter that was supposed to confirm the progress made, some of the key items were simply not there.

“The only possible conclusion is that someone at a senior level in Network Rail would rather undermine their own negotiating team and see the weekend’s strike go ahead than allow the understandings we had reached to stand.

“That is shabby and underhanded and it undermines the faith the union should have in the talks process Network Rail is telling the world it is committed to.

“I have written urgently to Iain Coucher, the NR Chief Executive, urging him to re-instate the understandings we negotiated with his management team, but under the circumstances the union’s executive had no choice but to confirm that the weekend’s action will go ahead,” Bob Crow said.

ends

Note to editors: RMT members will not book on for shifts that commence between midday on Saturday July 26 and 17:59 on Sunday July 27. Members will also not undertake any overtime or ‘on-call’ work between 06:00 on Saturday July 26 and 06:00 on Monday July 28. Weekend maintenance work was brought to a virtual standstill during the first stoppage in the dispute, over the weekend June 14 and 15.

See also:


Harmonisation Update No 4

Below is the text of a letter sent today (July 24) to Network Rail Chief Executive Iain Coucher

Dear Mr Coucher

HARMONISATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE TERMS & CONDITIONS – NETWORK RAIL

As you will be well aware, my union has been in discussions with your company through a joint working party on harmonisation of infrastructure employees’ terms and conditions for over two years now.

These discussions entered a new phase recently and a deadline on coming up with a set of proposals which would have been acceptable to both parties was set for July 31st. These discussions, which have included your company’s Maintenance Director Steve Featherstone, have seen a lot of work being done by both parties. However, there has been a major concern that not enough issues have been ticked off and that, by 31st July, they just would not have been resolved as items were “subject to further negotiation.”

My negotiating team reported these matters to our representatives who expressed concerns that yet another delay to the timetable was about to occur even though the timetable was set exactly in order to avoid this. It was for this reason – i.e. no progress being made and no progress expected by 31st July – that my union reluctantly called further industrial action.

However, I can state quite clearly that my union remains committed to the harmonisation process and to further negotiations and that is why my representatives entered into further negotiations on 22nd July 2008. After four hours of exhaustive talks with your team, my representatives came away believing that a clear agreement had been reached on a number of areas which could have allowed my union to suspend this weekend’s industrial action and moved us toward a final and satisfactory outcome on harmonisation.

I was utterly dismayed and angered however that, two hours after leaving the meeting, I found out that what had been agreed was vetoed by your Maintenance Director’s superiors. It begs the question as to why your company agreed to further talks in the first place and why you would appoint people to carry out the negotiations if they cannot take the decisions. My union had received an assurance from your Human Resources Director and Maintenance Director earlier this year that whoever was involved in negotiations with my union on harmonisation would have the authority to take the decisions.

I urge you to intervene directly in this dispute and urge you to do this immediately. If what we agreed with your Maintenance Director on Tuesday afternoon was endorsed by your company, then this could result in my union calling off this weekend’s industrial action.

As a further point, my union needs an absolute undertaking that, in future, you are prepared to support your management team who are present in the negotiation room with my union as I am sure they are as disappointed as I am at the lack of support they have been given by your company until now.

I look forward to hearing from you on what concrete steps you are taking on resolving this dispute as soon as possible.

Yours sincerely

Bob Crow
General Secretary

Nationalisation: the policy that dare not speak its name

Citywire: 24 July 2008
By Tony Bonsignore

Margaret Thatcher’s body may be weak these days, but her influence remains as strong as ever. Some 18 years on from her prime ministerial demise, and after 11 years of a Labour government, our national political discourse remains confined within the narrow parameters she first set out more than a quarter of century ago.

Her starting point was as simple as it was dogmatic: in short, private competition good, public monopoly bad. Working from this starting point, Thatcher’s three governments (and Major’s two subsequent ones for that matter) progressively moved to privatise virtually all of our key industries, from coal and cars, gas and telecoms, through to the national rail and airline networks.

Retrospectively, the privatisation fad of the 80s and 90s can be seen as one of the most ambitious national economic experiments in recent history, one which has done much to shape the nation we now live in. It can also be seen as part of a broader global political shift to the right over the past quarter century, with the accompanying enthusiastic embrace of neoliberal economic policies.

It is incredible to think now, but even as recently as 1987 Labour was promising to re-nationalise the ‘family silver’ if elected. Since then, of course, New Labour has embraced the private sector ever more enthusiastically, starting in earnest with its historic abandonment of Clause IV in 1995, and culminating in the tragic farce that is the private finance initiative (PFI).

If anything, New Labour has taken the Thatcherite love affair with private industry to places where even the Iron Lady might have feared to tread. As a result nationalisation has become the policy that dare not speak its name - except when private banks lend themselves into an almighty mess, of course.

Over the past year or two, however, other nations – many of them more politically progressive than our own - have finally started to question the wisdom of allowing private ownership of key national industries. And it is a debate to be strongly welcomed.

In New Zealand, for example, the government has recently re-nationalised the rail industry nearly two decades after taking into private hands, calling the experience of privatisation a ‘painful lesson’. The Argentine government, meanwhile, has announced the re-nationalisation of the state airline, Aerolineas Argentinas, thereby rescuing the company from years of under-investment, as well as the imminent prospect of bankruptcy.

In both cases the government reckoned that national ownership was in the best national interest, and that private industry had failed to provide the best deal for the nation as a whole. Around the world more and more policymakers are engaging in similar debates, particularly in light of the problems afflicting the global economy, problems which will inevitably force many corporate entities out of existence.

Surely now then, with Labour painfully free of any real political ideas, is the time to reopen the debate in this country about the relative merits and demerits of public ownership.

For some industries - particularly some of the key monopolies – are surely totally ill-suited to private competition. Take for example our own rail network, a sorry tale of privatisation gone horribly wrong. Since privatisation in 1993 the rail network has gone from adequate to poor to appalling, where it still resolutely resides, in the process wasting tens of billions of pounds of public money.

Only the remorselessly optimistic would deny that our trains are dangerously overcrowded and prohibitively expensive – that is if they run at all, of course. So poor has the network become as a result of decades of under-investment (including in public ownership under Thatcher), that booking a train at the weekend is now equivalent to a straight toss-up between rail and bus.

Except for some lucky shareholders and a few ludicrously overpaid executives, privatisation of the railways has been a spectacular failure. That is especially obvious to those who have travelled to the continent in recent years - try using the Italian or German rail system to inspire wistful thoughts of ‘how it might have been’.

And the real comedy, of course, is that we taxpayers still subsidise the ‘privatised’ network, to the tune of £6.3 billion in 2007 alone.

The truth that the government refuses to even acknowledge is that some industries might well be better suited to public ownership; natural monopolies, for example - those industries where any meaningful competition is impossible, or industries too important to the national interest to be allowed to be run into the ground in the profitable interests of a minority, or even sold off altogether into foreign hands.

Rail, water and mail are three examples of such industries. After, do you have any choice of what train to take, tap water to drink or stamps to use? But we need all three to be affordable and of the highest quality to enable to live our lives properly.

One can only hope that there are some in government that understand the folly of this dogmatic belief in the power of unfettered markets. Most likely they have been kept quiet by the Labour executive amid their paranoia about being branded ‘Old Labour’. Now, however, is the time for them to speak out, to spark a real public debate about what we want our key industries to look like in a generation’s time.

Turkey, Georgia, Azerbaijan launch joint rail link

Reuters: July 24
By Hatice Aydogdu

KARS, Turkey - Leaders of Turkey, Georgia and Azerbaijan launched a railway project between the three countries on Thursday, building on links forged by gas and oil pipelines.

At a railway station in the eastern Turkish border town of Kars the presidents of the three countries held a ground breaking ceremony for the 290 million lira ($241.06 million) Turkish section of the railway.

The three are linked by the BP-led (BP.L: Quote, Profile, Research) Baku-Ceyhan oil pipeline and the Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum gas line but trade links between Turkey and the Caucasus region are limited.

Turkish President Abdullah Gul, Georgia's Mikheil Saakashvili and Azerbaijan's Ilham Aliyev placed three sections of railway track on a large map of the region in a symbolic launch of the project as confetti showered down.

"With this project the historic Silk Road is being reinvigorated," Gul said in a speech.

"The project is open to all countries in the region who want to contribute to good neighbourly relations, peace and prosperity," he said.

Ozgun Yapi-Celikler joint venture won the tender last September for construction of the 76-km (47-mile) Turkish stretch of the railway with a bid of 289.8 million lira, the lowest of 14 bids.

The project involves new track construction and renewal of existing track, and is expected to be completed in 2011. Work on the 29-km (18 miles) stretch in Georgia was launched last year.

The 160-km (99-mile) section of rail in Azerbaijan will be renewed.

"Thanks to this project we will not just be a part of Europe, we will become a solid bridge between Europe and Asia," Saakashvili said.

Turkish Transport Minister Binali Yildirim said the railway links from the region will extend into Europe with completion of an ongoing rail tunnel project linking the European and Asian sides of Turkey's biggest city, Istanbul.

In its first year of operation the Baku-Kars railway will carry one million passengers and 6.5 million tonnes of freight, Yildirim said.

The medium term annual target was three million passengers and 18 million tonnes of freight.

See also:


Caucasus closer to launching Iron Silk Road

Zaman: Jul 27, 2008
georgia_b.jpg
From right to left, Presidents Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan, Abdullah Gül of Turkey and Mikhail Saakashvili of Georgia applaud during a ceremony for the construction of the Turkish stretch of a railway linking Azerbaijani capital Baku with the eastern Turkish city of Kars via the Georgian capital, Tbilisi.

Turkish, Azerbaijani and Georgian leaders gathered in the far eastern province of Kars on Thursday to launch the construction of the Turkey section of a railway that will link the three countries and revive the historic Silk Road trade route that once connected Asia with Europe.

President Abdullah Gül and his Azerbaijani and Georgian counterparts, Ilham Aliyev and Mikheil Saakashvili, held a groundbreaking ceremony for the $241 million Turkish leg of the railway in Kars. The three presidents placed three sections of railway track on a large map of the region in a symbolic launch of the project amid confetti. "A new economic cooperation zone which is yet to be defined as such has emerged in our region," Gül said in an address at the ceremony, referring to expanding cooperation between Turkey, Azerbaijan and Georgia in the energy, trade and transportation fields.

The three countries are linked by the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) oil pipeline, which carries crude oil from Azerbaijan's Shah Deniz oil fields to world markets through Turkey's Mediterranean port of Ceyhan, and the Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum (BTE) gas line, but trade links between Turkey and the Caucasus region are limited.

The construction of the railway is planned to be completed by 2011. The Turkish section of the railway is 76 kilometers long. In Azerbaijan, a new track will be constructed to be linked to a renewed existing track. Work on the 29-kilometer stretch in Georgia between the Turkish border and Akhalkalaki (Ahılkelek) was launched last year. "This project contributes to the peace and stability in the Caucasus," Gül also said. Visibly absent from the project is Armenia, which has territorial and other disputes with both Turkey and Azerbaijan.

Gül said the project was open to all countries, provided that they also contribute to the peace and stability in the Caucasus and are willing to maintain good neighborly relations with other countries in the region. Turkey closed its border and severed its ties with neighboring Armenia in protest of Armenian occupation of the Azerbaijani territory of Nagorno-Karabakh early in the last decade. The landlocked country is also excluded from regional oil and natural gas transportation projects through the BTC and BTE pipelines.

The construction of the railway between Turkey, Azerbaijan and Georgia has long been hampered by Armenian lobbying against the project in the United States and Russia. Armenian experts have argued in the past that the project will not be economically viable, and the Armenian lobby pushed for a bill in the US Congress that blocked US banks from providing loans to Georgia to be used in the construction of the railway's Georgian section. The obstacles were eventually overcome by Azerbaijan offering a $220 million loan to Georgia.

Armenian leaders say the plan deliberately ignores the old rail link between Armenia and Turkey, which has been idle since the two countries cut off diplomatic ties in 1993. In March, Armenian President Serzh Sarksyan said the project did not target Armenia because many Armenian nationals were already traveling to Turkey via Georgia. The construction of the railway, he said, will further facilitate Armenians' travel to Turkey.

Gül said there was strong political will behind the project and that it will not be weakened because it will benefit the peoples of the region. Mitat Çelikpala of the private Turkish Union of Chambers and Commodity Exchanges (TOBB) Economy and Technology University said the project had been delayed for three to four years due to Armenian objections and that construction would never have started if Turkey had not pressed for it so enthusiastically, as the project had no backing from the West. According to Çelikpala, the railway will boost Turkish influence in the Caucasus and Central Asia. "The realization of this project means we will be more influential in the Caucasus, Central Asia and the Caspian region," he told the Anatolia news agency. "Turkey has become a sort of center of attraction for the entire Caucasus," he added.

The railway will also deepen ties between Georgia and Turkey, Çelikpala said, describing Turkey as the main bridge for the former Soviet Union country to economically integrate with the West.

"Some had called it a dream. It was once shelved. But meetings took place between the three countries and political will materialized to build the railway. The three countries also received support from Kazakhstan and China," Gül said at the ceremony. "Today, we are taking another step to make the historic Silk Road that people used to cross on the backs of animals a reality. This link not only connects the three countries, it also links China with London."

Transportation Minister Binali Yıldırım said the railway links from the region will extend into Europe with the completion of an ongoing rail tunnel project linking the European and Asian sides of Turkey's biggest city, İstanbul. The rail tunnel project, called Marmaray, is planned to be completed in 2013. "Thanks to this project, we will not just be a part of Europe, we will become a solid bridge between Europe and Asia," Saakashvili said.

Aliyev: Cooperation deepens

Azerbaijani President Aliyev said his country had excellent relations with both Turkey and Georgia. "The people are also getting closer as their countries launch joint projects," he said at the ceremony. He called the BTC oil pipeline a "dream come true" and added that the cooperation will be further strengthened when the railway becomes operational.

Some 1.5 million people and 6.5 million tons of cargo are expected to be transported by the railway in the first year following its launch.

railway.jpg

Railway project in figures

The Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railway project is built on links forged by natural gas and oil pipelines between Turkey, Azerbaijan and Georgia. The Turkish stretch will consist of a 76-kilometer railway. The Özgün Yapı-Çelikler joint venture won the tender last September for construction of the Turkish leg with a bid of YTL 289.8 million ($241 million), the lowest among 14 bids. In Azerbaijan, the project involves the laying of new track and the renewal of existing rails. Work on the 29-kilometer stretch in Georgia between the Turkish border and Akhalkalaki (Ahılkelek) began last year. The project is expected to be launched in 2011, with an initial capacity to carry 1.5 million people and 6.5 million tons of cargo annually. Its capacity is projected to grow to 3 million people and 17 million tons of cargo by 2034. The project's cost is estimated at $450 million.

Time for Armenia to take action to avoid isolation, says expert

A project to launch a railway between Turkey, Azerbaijan and Georgia is a strong message to Armenia that it has to take action to avoid isolation in the region, an expert has said.

"Armenia is about to be pushed into permanent isolation," said Hasan Kanbolat, an expert at the Ankara-based Center for Eurasian Strategic Studies (ASAM). He said Turkey was the main outlet for the landlocked Armenia to reach the West and that Yerevan must take concrete steps to normalize its relations with Ankara.

Turkey closed its border and severed its diplomatic ties with Armenia in the '90s in protest of Armenia's occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh in Azerbaijan. Ankara says normalization of ties depends on Armenian withdrawal from Nagorno-Karabakh, a change of policy in Yerevan on its claims of "genocide" against Armenians by Ottomans during World War I and formal recognition of the Turkish-Armenian border by Armenia.

Armenia has recently stepped up calls for normalization of ties with Turkey. Armenian President Serzh Sarksyan said earlier this month that he had invited his Turkish counterpart, Abdullah Gül, to visit Yerevan and watch a football match in September.

Kanbolat, however, said the invitation was not enough and that more substantial steps were needed for any serious progress in the direction of normalization to take place. "Armenia should keep its promises regarding gradual withdrawal from Azerbaijani territory," he told Today's Zaman. Turkish and Armenian officials had secret talks on July 8 in Switzerland, but the Turkish Foreign Ministry said this does not indicate a change of a policy.

Ambitious Crossrail plan finally leaves sidings

Financial Times: July 24 2008
By Amanda Vermeulen

The patience of business has been sorely tested during its elephantine gestation period.

But Crossrail, the £15.9bn rail project to link Heathrow directly with London's financial centre, finally reached the end of a tortuous 20-year journey to secure royal assent yesterday - holding out the promise of a transformation in the corporate travel experience within a decade.

The rail link, which will be 118.5km long and carry 200m passengers a year, is designed to lop at least a third off the journey time between Heathrow and Canary Wharf.

Work will begin in spring or summer next year to clear the way for construction to start in 2010. The new link is expected to start operating in 2017 and the entire route would be open within 12 months, said Crossrail.

The ambitious rail plan has been in the making since the late 1980s but was shelved in the early 1990s when a recession forced the government to rein in public spending.

But lessons have been learnt from what is now seen as the premature decision to abandon it when times got tough. With polls suggesting the Conservatives may win power before the scheme is completed, a cross-party consensus ensures it will survive whatever the government's stripe. Crossrail said all parties shared the view that, in spite of the economic slump,the long-term benefits and the scheme's wider contribution to the economy must override short-term concerns about the health of the public finances.

Crossrail, which becomes a wholly owned subsidiary of Transport for London from today, will recruit a chief executive to take over from Douglas Oakervee, the current executive chairman. Four non-executive directors were yesterday appointed to the board. They are Michael Cassidy, Patrick Crawford, Sir Joe Dwyer and Heather Rabbatts. Mr Cassidy is an independent non-executive director at UBS. Mr Crawford is chief executive of the Export Credits Guarantee Department in London, Sir Joe is the former president of the Chartered Institute of Building and the Institution of Civil Engineers. Ms Rabbatts is a former governor of the London School of -Economics.

The scheme, expected to cost £15.9bn, will be financed by a £5.1bn grant from the Department for Transport; £8.2bn from the City of London; and £500m from the City of London and BAA, the airports company that owns Heathrow. The rest will come from a variety of sources, including the London Planning charge, a controversial levy that will be paid by London businesses.

The direct gains fromEurope's largest infrastructure project, in-clude up to 30,000 new jobs, with 14,000 people employed full-time at the peak of construction in 2013-14; commercial, retail and residential property developments; and greater access to the City for people who live in the south-east.

The City of London Corporation believes Crosslink will play a critical role in helping London maintain its status as the nucleus of the world's financial industry. Stuart Fraser, policy chairman told the FT good transport infrastructure was essential, with competition intensifying to seduce the world's biggest players away from London to European capitals, such as Paris, and emerging financial hubs in the east, such as Shanghai.

"We don't have a choice. There is a temptation when government budgets become strained to take a short-term view and push major projects into the long grass until times improve. Thank goodness the Victorians didn't take a short-term view, otherwise we would never have had the Underground," he said.

Mr Fraser said, however, that Crossrail would only be as strong as its weakest link, which made it crucial that other aspects of London's transport infrastructure were up to the same standard.

How travelling will become easier:

*State-of-the-art trains will have extra-wide doors to help passengers with luggage

*Wheelchair access at seven new stations

*The 600 carriages will have air-conditioning, and potentially additional features such as wi-fi and mobile phone reception

*Travellers will journey directly from Heathrow to Abbey Wood in 56 minutes. The trip currently involves at least two train changes and takes about 90 minutes

*Adding four trains an hour on the line between Heathrow and Paddington used by the Heathrow Express services, which also runs four times an hour, will ease congestion on the route

*Crossrail will be fully integrated with Transport for London, which means commuters will be able to use their Oyster payment cards - no supplementary fare will be required

*The fare will be significantly cheaper than the Heathrow Express, which costs up to £23.50 one way

*A dedicated Crossrail station will be built at Heathrow by BAA, the airports authority

*Canary Wharf Group will build its own facility


See also:


Crossrail should be a public project in every sense, says RMT

RMT: July 23 2008

BRITAIN’S BIGGEST rail union today welcomed the news that the Crossrail project has been given the go-ahead by parliament.

RMT general secretary Bob Crow today said:

“Crossrail makes sense from every angle. It will help ease overcrowding on other routes, get more people off the roads and onto public transport and give the capital a massive economic boost.

“But we need to learn the lessons from the failures of privatisation and ensure that Crossrail is a public project in every sense, publicly run and publicly accountable, and with rolling stock built in Britain to help rescue our skilled train-making industry

“A modern, high-capacity and affordable rail network is not a luxury, it is essential for the economy and the environment, and we hope the government will use the momentum to work quickly towards a new high-speed north-south link as well.

“Businesses stand to benefit massively from Crossrail and it is only right that they pay their share towards its cost, but its benefit will be lost if it becomes a premium railway for use only by those who can afford high fares.”

July 23, 2008

Foulkes calls for railway renationalisation after bonuses row

The Herald: July 22 2008
MICHAEL SETTLE

Lord Foulkes, the former Scotland Office minister, last night called for the partial renationalisation of the railways after the bonuses of Network Rail (NR) bosses were branded "obscene".

After a damning report from MPs in which the bonuses of NR bosses were described as extraordinary, given passengers had been "humiliated and inconvenienced" by engineering overruns, the issue of NR's future was raised in the second chamber.

Lord Foulkes told peers that the targets and governance of NR could not be right when executives received such huge pay top-ups while passengers suffered "so much misery and inconvenience".

NR's top three directors are to get annual bonuses in excess of £200,000 each with Iain Coucher, its chief executive, receiving £305,000. Thousands of rail passengers have been delayed by the engineering overruns at Glasgow Shields junction, Rugby on the West Coast Main Line and at Liverpool Street station in London.

During Lords Questions, Lord Foulkes highlighted the Co-operative Party blueprint for a "people's rail", that NR members themselves had called for a review of how the company was run, and the report by MPs calling for better governance and scrutiny.

He added: "Surely, it's time that the government joined the growing groundswell to give the British people real power over Network Rail."

Lord Bassam of Brighton for the UK Government insisted there was going to be a review of NR governance and pointed out that the Office of Rail Regulation was looking at how the company's licence worked.

On the issue of executive pay, he simply noted that Lord Foulkes had made some "interesting and useful points".

During brief exchanges, it was pointed out from the Conservative front bench that NR, while a private company, had no shareholders, but simply had members and that this was a situation that could be looked at.

Lord Bassam replied that it was a previous Tory government which left "us with the mess of rail privatisation all those years ago and we are still paying the price for that".

He noted that the "people's railway" publication was a useful contribution to the broadening debate.

It was pointed out from the Labour benches that Britain was one of the few countries in the world that did not have state ownership of its railways.

Lord Bassam argued that the UK Government's role was to ensure the right level of investment was going in to improve services and that Britain was now "reaping the benefit", with the numbers travelling by rail up substantially on two years ago.

Lord Snape, the Labour peer and a former railway signalman, said it was "bizarre" to suggest that the governance of NR was somehow nothing to do with the public given that millions of pounds of taxpayers' money was spent on it.

He added: "There is something wrong with the governance of Network Rail when despite the dislocation, particularly to the west coast mainline every weekend and right through the forthcoming holiday season, NR's chief executive and several of their directors are paid bonuses that many of us would feel are obscene."

However, Lord Bassam said there was a difference between government and governance and that for ministers to seek to micromanage things would be a "profound mistake".

Outside the chamber, Lord Foulkes told The Herald that a fundamental review of NR was needed and the Co-operative Party proposal should be considered. "Since the people own the road network, I don't see why we can't own the rail network. The pressure is growing."

In response to the MPs' critical report, Mr Coucher insisted that it did not reflect the pivotal role NR had played in turning round the railway from the mess inherited from Railtrack.

"The railway is now performing at the highest levels of punctuality ever recorded and it is passengers and freight users who are benefiting from this turnaround," he said.

July 22, 2008

Germany checks axles of ICE 3 fleet after train accident

TopNews: July 11th, 2008
by Mohit Joshi

Dusseldorf - The German railway company Deutsche Bahn was conducting urgent tests Friday on the axles of all its ICE 3 bullet trains, two days after one snapped as a train left a station.
DB ICE.jpg
Germany checks axles of ICE 3 fleet after train accident

Bahn said it cancelled 60 trips on its national express network on Friday. Slow trains took over many routes. More cancellations would be necessary over the weekend.

The mark-3 version of Germany's inter-city express (ICE) electric trains cruises at more than 200 kilometres per hour and can accelerate to 300 on suitable sections of specially reinforced track. It also operates between Frankfurt and the French capital Paris.

A broken wheel derailed an earlier ICE version on June 3, 1998, killing 101 people in one of Germany's worst rail disasters.

The axle defect was discovered Wednesday after a passenger on an ICE from Frankfurt to Cologne complained to a conductor of strange noises, and said he was told, "Don't worry. That doesn't mean anything."

Deutsche Bahn said Friday a conductor activated the emergency brake as the train left Cologne. At slow speed, part of the train derailed. Nobody was hurt. Bahn said it was not clear if the axle break happened before or after the derailment.

After passengers laid a complaint with police, public prosecutors launched an inquiry Friday to see if anyone had committed the crime of endangering public transport.

Bahn's chief passenger services officer, Karl-Friedrich Rausch, said the passenger's concern had been acted on, since it prompted the conductor to halt the train. He described the accident as "highly unusual."

July 21, 2008

Kiwis approve of rail buyback

TVNZ: Jul 21, 2008
kiwirail_logo_c.jpg
Buying back the rail and ferry network will cost taxpayers well over a billion dollars, but a ONE News Colmar Brunton poll shows most New Zealanders believe it is money well spent.

The government bought back 180 trains, over 4000 wagons and one interisland ferry from Australian company Toll Holdings after National sold them in 1993.

But was buying back the nation's train set more about politics than public transport?

"It is not red it is an orangey colour for those of you who think there is some kind of branding exercise," Michael Cullen said on July 1, referring to the new colour scheme of the trains.

One thousand voters were polled, and asked that given the final price tag will go well over the billion dollar mark would they support the buying back of rail and ferry services?

The results:

* Yes - 68%
* No - 24%
* Don't know - 8%

On Tuesday, the government will announce that it will spend $80 million upgrading the Auckland and Wellington metro services.

National opposed the buyback, but the poll found 56% of their voters actually support the rail deal.

And National is promising that, if elected it will not sell off state assets in its first term.

"We'll work hard to try and deliver top class rail services but I don't think we should underestimate just what a large challenge that will be," says National leader John Key.

Labour wants to make state asset ownership a key election issue and it is clear why given the public sentiment with rail.

Network Rail chiefs condemned by MPs

Daily Telegraph: 21/07/2008
By Richard Edwards

Network Rail chiefs took "quite extraordinary" bonuses despite an "entire catalogue of management failings" which caused misery for passengers, according to a scathing parliamentary report.


Engineers work on the West Coast Main line at Rugby
PA
Thousands were hit by rail disruption over the the New Year after engineering work scheduled for the Christmas period overran

The heads of the infrastructure company were condemned for their "widespread complacency" and for sharing more than £700,000 in bonuses that added "insult to injury" for "long-suffering passengers who had to struggle with the consequences of the company's failings".

It comes after a fiasco over the New Year when over-running engineering works at Rugby, Liverpool Street and Glasgow Shields Junction disrupted more than 60,000 passengers a day.

The House of Commons Transport Committee said the overruns were "simply unacceptable" and had "laid bare an entire catalogue of management failings for all to see".
Article continues
advertisement

"Chaos ensued", said the report, which left passengers "humiliated and inconvenienced".

The company was fined a record £14 million by the regulator for the delays.

Despite that, Iain Coucher, the chief executive, pocketed a £305,581 annual bonus on top of his £539,000 salary and a long-term incentive payment of £205,000, taking his total pay last year to more than £1 million.

Three executive directors received annual bonuses in excess of £200,000 each – just 14 per cent less than the maximum they could have received.

The report published today (mon) called for changes to "prevent generous bonuses being handed out for good performance in some areas against a background of catastrophic failure in others."

It was also critical of the Government for failing to act earlier on Network Rail's failings. The Committee called for a review of the way the company is run, criticising the lack of clear procedures, consistency, communication and management controls.

The MPs were also critical of Network Rail chairman Sir Ian McAllister.

"We fear that the lack of a sense of urgency manifested by the chairman over the new year period, as well as when he appeared before us, is symptomatic of widespread complacency within Network Rail," the report said.

MPs said communication within the company and between it and the train companies was "seriously deficient" and this had serious consequences for passengers.

The committee also said it was "deeply concerned that the rapid shift away from taxpayer contributions and towards passengers paying a significantly larger share of the cost of running the railways will be detrimental to passengers and future of the railways alike".

On the future of railways, the report said that it was "deeply disappointing" that the Government had "dodged the decision" on building new high-speed rail lines in a recent White Paper.

It said ministers should consider them seriously and added that more electrification should take place. A promised 1,300 new train carriages was welcome but was unlikely to relieve overcrowding significantly due to the growth in passenger numbers, it said.

Labour MP Louise Ellman, who chaired the committee, said: "The railways are increasingly popular and the (Government's) 30-year strategy has the potential to provide a tremendous sense of purpose and direction. However, the White Paper lacks vision and represents a missed opportunity."

Liberal Democrat transport spokesman Norman Baker said yesterday: "The Government's abject failure to plan for a high-speed rail network has condemned passengers to years more misery and overcrowding.

"Delays, slow trains, endless replacement bus services and out-dated working practices have created cattle-truck Britain while other countries have created modern, efficient railways.

"Travellers should be encouraged to choose public transport, but they are being given little reason to ditch their polluting cars. Momentum is clearly gathering for a high-speed rail network, but yet again the Government is being left behind on the platform."

The report came as rail passengers were bracing themselves for a month of delays in August as vital engineering work is carried out on one of Britain's busiest routes.

Services on the West Coast main line will be hit by work in the West Midlands and North West as track upgrading work is carried out. Work is also being done on Central Trains' routes in the East Midlands and East Anglia.

Travellers face delays and buses replacing trains on services to and through towns and cities including Birmingham, Manchester, Coventry, and Stoke-on-Trent, plus connections from the North to Stansted Airport.

July 19, 2008

12,000 rail maintenance staff to strike next weekend over harmonisation

RMT: July 18 2008

SOME 12,000 Network Rail maintenance workers in Britain’s biggest rail union are to strike again next weekend after talks on the long-running dispute over harmonisation of terms and conditions failed to make sufficient progress.

RMT members will not book on for shifts that commence between midday on Saturday July 26 and 17:59 on Sunday July 27. Members will also not undertake any overtime or ‘on-call’ work between 06:00 on Saturday July 26 and 06:00 on Monday July 28.

Weekend maintenance work was brought to a virtual standstill during the first stoppage in the dispute, over the weekend June 14 and 15.

“We had hoped that fresh talks after our first strike would make some progress, but it is clear that the company is still trying to use what should be talks about harmonisation as a cost-cutting attack on jobs and conditions,” RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

“Our reps met today and to say they are angry at the lack of progress would be an understatement, and the RMT executive has agreed to call the second weekend’s stoppage our reps have demanded.

“Our first strike was a solid demonstration by our members that they expect talks about harmonisation to produce proposals about harmonisation, not ever-longer lists of the conditions the company wants to destroy.

“We remain available for talks, but if Network Rail wants to settle this dispute it should get around the table and negotiate a harmonisation package that is acceptable to our members,” Bob Crow said.

Pay all Tube cleaners living wage now, says RMT

RMT: July 17 2008

Leaving Tubelines and ITS cleaners on poverty pay ‘not tenable’, says union

ALL TUBE cleaners should be paid the London living wage, the Underground's biggest union said today after the mayor of London appeared to backtrack on his pledge yesterday that all cleaners on Metronet contracts would be paid at least £7.45 an hour by next month.

At yesterday's question time the mayor said that cleaners on Metronet contracts, which he now controls, would be paid the London living wage "by August at the latest", but a statement today said that it would apply only to those contracts up for renewal next month.

That would leave cleaners on Metronet's ITS contract, which is not due for renewal until next year, being paid nearly £2 an hour less than colleagues doing identical work, while the mayor's position also raised the prospect of cleaners on Tubelines contracts having to endure poverty pay for up to four more years.

"If poverty pay is unacceptable on some Metronet cleaning contracts it is unacceptable on all Tube cleaning contracts, including Tubelines," RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

"Yesterday the mayor said that Metronet staff would get the £7.45 minimum by August at the latest, but today his office is saying that it will apply only to the three contracts up for renewal next month.

"That would leave cleaners on Metronet's ITS contract being paid £2 less an hour than colleagues doing identical work until next year, and potentially leaves cleaners on Tubelines' contracts facing poverty wages for another four years.

"Frankly that is untenable and the only solution is for the mayor to go the final mile and ensure that all Tube cleaners get the London living wage and get it now.

"Our members cannot afford to wait for jam tomorrow, they want a living wage today," Bob Crow said.


ends

Note to editors:
Some 700 RMT cleaners working for cleaning subcontractors ISS, ITS, ICS and GBM have taken strike action twice in their campaign for a living wage: a 48-hour strike between July 1 and 3, and an earlier 24-hour stoppage on June 25 and 26.

The cleaners' demands also include 28 days' holiday, sick pay, decent pensions and travel facilities, and an end to the barbaric practice of 'third-party sackings' in which cleaners can be dismissed, with no disciplinary hearing or right of appeal, at the behest parties other than the employer - a device used to get rid of union activists.

Early Day Motion 1872: Tabled by John McDonnell and signed by 50 MPs to July 15

CONDITIONS FOR CLEANERS EMPLOYED ON LONDON UNDERGROUND

"That this House fully supports the 700 cleaners on London Underground who are members of the RMT union, who have voted by a margin of 125-to-one to take strike action for the London living wage and improved working conditions, including decent sick pay, pensions, holiday entitlement and travel facilities; notes that the action also seeks to end the disgraceful practice of third-party sackings in which cleaners can be dismissed, with no disciplinary hearing or right of appeal, at the behest of parties other than the employer; is appalled that these vulnerable workers who do such an essential job for London must get by on rates of pay of little more than £5.50 an hour; believes that such exploitation brings shame on London as it prepares for the 2012 Olympics; further notes that the cleaners are employed by contractors ISS, ITS, ICS and GBM who are subcontracted to Metronet and Tube Lines to undertake cleaning for London Underground; therefore believes that Transport for London (TfL) has a clear responsibility to assist in resolving this dispute; calls on the Mayor of London to honour the pledge of the previous Mayor that cleaners on Metronet contracts would receive the London living wage as soon as they passed under TfL control, and to bring pressure on Tube Lines also to pay the living wage; condemns the intimidation of cleaners by employers in this dispute; and urges cleaning bosses instead to direct their energies to reaching a just, negotiated statement."

Uproot line and expel Rift Valley Railway team

Sunday Nation: 7/19/2008
Story by DONALD B. KIPKORIR

“No enterprise is so seductive as a railroad for the influence it exerts, the power it gives, and the hope of gain it offers.” - Poor’s Manual of Railroads, 1900 Edition.

From the night of July 18, 64 AD and for the next five days and nights, 11 out of 14 districts of the City of Rome burnt whilst Emperor Nero was watching from his palace balcony and playing his fiddle to the tunes of the epic and ancient Greek poem Illiou Persis.

roys_puffet.jpg
Rift Valley Railways managing director Roys Puffet. Photo/FILE

Nero, who was a tragic leader, may have caused the fire to blame it on the Christians as their massacre followed thereafter. The citizens of Rome could not stand up to Nero and neither were his courtiers.

The tragedy of Romans in the time of Nero has afflicted nations to date. We fear to stand up and let the fire rage, yet the fire will ultimately reach us.

Fires are raging in our country in various forms: the ghosts of Goldenberg and Anglo-Leasing, the dodgy presidential results announced by the Electoral Commission, the post-election violence, still-born constitutional reforms, the suspect sale of Grand Regency and of course the concessioning agreement of Kenya-Uganda Railways.

Written speeches

Amidst all these, President Kibaki never uttered a word except to issue written speeches or form commissions. Maybe he is not seeing the fires burning.

Kenya-Uganda Railways stands as a monument of both historical and economic significance and also for the shame it represents.

Between May 30, 1896 and December 19 1901, Indian expatriates under supervision of the British masters, braved the elements, diseases and wild animals to build the railway line from Mombasa to Kisumu. Thereafter, a 10km railway line was built between Port Bell and Kampala in Uganda.

We call the railway, Kenya-Uganda yet Uganda initially got only 10km of it. Later the line was extended in both Kenya and Uganda to include some towns in the interiors. Since then, the railway line has neither been expanded nor modernised.

Our railway line still has the gauge system built in India in the 19th Century and is not compatible with the rail systems of our neighbours or rest of Africa.

By series of agreements, the governments of Kenya and Uganda agreed to surrender the management of Kenya-Uganda Railways to RVR Investments (Pty) Limited through its respective local affiliates, Rift Valley Railways (Kenya) Limited and Rift Valley Railways (Uganda) Limited (the said company and affiliates hereinafter called RVR).

In the agreements, RVR was granted the authority to use the railway lines for both passenger and freight transport for an exclusive period of five and 25 years respectively.

The agreements they seem, locked respective governments into a non-divorce relationship till the expiry of the contract period.

In fact, if there is any dispute, the parties can only go to arbitration for resolution. There is no termination clause. And if still the two Governments are not pleased with the services of RVR, the agreements say that they are free to set up alternative lines. What a mischievous clause!

By mistake

My proposition is that the governments of Kenya and Uganda not only terminate the contract, but also set up new lines. The two can be done at the same time.

On the issue of termination, RVR as the concessionaire undertook that it shall offer the said rail services with clearly set-out bench-marks of “… reliability, safety, environmental protection, economy and expedition…”.

In the entire period RVR has been running the railways, has it achieved or even attempted to achieve these bench-marks?

The law of contract is clear that contracts are never cast in stone. Parties may enter into contracts without termination or revocable clauses, but the law is wiser.

Contracts can be set aside if either side to the contract can show that the contract was entered by mistake, fraudulent representations, absence of consideration, frustration or non-performance of the contract.

If the two governments want a reason to terminate the contract, they can get 1,000 reasons. RVR should therefore be issued immediately with termination letters by Nairobi and Kampala.

For developing economies like those of Kenya and Uganda that are based on export of raw and bulk goods, the railways is a lifeline. Kenya, Uganda and Rwanda are their own biggest trading partners and an inefficient or collapsed railway system has a catastrophic impact.

No modern economy has developed without a developed rail system. Railways have always generated and spawned direct and indirect employment, growth of towns and populations along the routes.

Further, railways have played a catalyst role in providing platforms and opportunity to advance engineering technology, business management and trade unionism; all essential factors in economic development.

While we are still operating a railway system that hasn’t changed for over 100 years, railway systems of other countries have moved on. Germany, France, China and Japan have moved to the next level and are now operating magnetic levitating (Maglev) ones.

In developing new technology for their rail systems, these advanced countries develop technology that benefits other sectors. Technology is not exclusive to one area.

That the Kenya-Uganda Railways having remained stuck in history is not benefiting either country or its people.

We cannot aspire to want to be a middle-income economy in a generation when we still operate outmoded and out-dated non-technology rail system.

As it is, RVR has not introduced new technology or an innovative management style. Instead, the media treats us to broken-down wagons, uprooted rail-lines and staff forever on strike.

Kenya-Uganda railways is a study in how not to run a company.

Kenya, Uganda and Rwanda have to make a strategic decision and now, to lay new and modern railway line stretching from Mombasa or Lamu to Rwanda’s border with DRC Congo.

The benefits that shall accrue to the three countries cannot be gainsaid.

Financing the line need not be 100 per cent government-funded. Public-Private Participation ought to be used. England, the mother of modern railways has spanned off the management and running of its rail system to local players.

The rail-system though continuous is actually owned in sections through franchising the way McDonalds is run. Germany has also done the same but allowing private companies to actually own the lines and services.

The economies of Eastern Africa cannot grow even if we wish it unless our transportation sector is working.

A study in contrasts proves this correct. DRC Congo sits on the world’s richest minerals yet its economy is in dark ages because its political leadership from Belgium (its colonial rulers) to Joseph Kabila now has never seen it fit to develop the transport system.

America laid the foundation of its modern economy in the development of its rail system in the first part of 19th Century. East Africa has to choose on the choices taken by either DRC Congo or America.

Our Vision 2030 gives us clear road-map on the way forward. The vision will be that, a vision, if we cannot fix our railways. Until our economies become non-transport based, we do not have alternatives.

Transporting our coffee, tea, soda ash, cement and passengers demand efficient, reliable and working rails. Our roads are dilapidated to withstand extra burdens imposed by a broke rail system.

Citizens demand visionary leadership from those they have chosen to lead them. The lead story of the current TIME magazine is on the secrets of Mandela’s leadership and why he remains an icon and a living saint.

Richard Stengel, its managing editor, who wrote the article, says that in Mandela, “courage is not the absence of fear - it is inspiring others to move beyond it.”

Mwai Kibaki, Yoweri Museveni and Paul Kagame have an obligation to the people they govern to lead us to material prosperity and happiness. Constructing a new railway line will be a fundamental and primary step.

Meanwhile, RVR ought to receive their termination notices and the boys of Kibera allowed to legitimately pull out the railway line to give way to a modern one.

See also:


RVR strike called off

KBC NEWS: Jul 21, 2008
Rose Kamau

Striking workers at the Kenya-Uganda railways concessionaire Rift Valley Railways (RVR) have called off their strike and formally accepted to return to work.

The workers led by six of their representatives on Tuesday called off the ten day strike following a consultative meeting between them and RVR's top management team.

In a statement RVR Managing Director Roy Puffett confirmed that the strike had been called off after the workers reached an amicable and unconditional return to work formula with the managers.

Puffet said RVR has also undertaken to as a matter of urgency consider and address the workers grievances.

Subsequently, RVR has confirmed that all normal services including the urban commuter service on the Ruiru, Kahawa, Embakasi and Kikuyu routes will resume normal operations Wednesday morning. Upcountry passenger services to Mombasa will also resume Wednesday evening.

"I am happy to confirm that we have broken the standoff and the illegal strike has been called off following a meeting with the workers representatives," Puffett said.

He added: "subsequently, all normal railway service including commuter trains and cargo services will resume tomorrow morning."

Prior to the calling of the strike, RVR had moved to procedurally resolve the standoff precipitated by a delay in June salaries through formal dialogue with the workers representatives.

By Monday afternoon, and buoyed by assurances that the management would not victimize the staff, normal operations had begun to resume progressively.

Save for commuter services, cargo freight operations on the mainline have already resumed with efforts to unclog the system already in high steam.

The RVR boss reiterated that the firm is committed to sound and good industrial relations with staff and shall continue to foster dialogue with the staffers.

See also:


Uganda-Kenya rail cargo falls to 8%

The New Vision: 17th July, 2008
By Mikaili Sseppuya

SINCE Rift Valley Railways (RVR) took over management of the Kenya-Uganda railways, freight cargo has reduced to 8% from 16%, an official of the Kenya Ports Authority (KPA) has said.

“The committee noted that the rail market share had declined from 16% to 8.7% over the last two years. This has led to a major shift of cargo from the railway to roads, which has increased road accidents, road maintenance and freight costs,” Alex Kabuga, the KPA Inland Container Depot manager and chairman of the Seamless Transport Committee, said. The committee met from July 14 to 15 at Crested Towers in Kampala.

It comprises government and private sector stakeholders from Kenya, Uganda and Rwanda, officials from the roads and transport ministries, revenue authorities, clearing and forwarding associations, RVR, Police and truckers’ associations.

“The meeting noted challenges facing transportation of cargo by RVR. It was concerned that the concession had not lived up to expectations,” Kabuga said.
He said the committee had recommended the two governments address RVR’s ‘serious shortcomings.’

Kabuga said the railways needed investments in locomotives, rolling stock and infrastructure to improve capacity.

“Railway transport is the desirable option for bulk cargo as one locomotive can carry the equivalent of 50 trucks, with attendant savings in costs, wear and tear on the roads as well as reduced accidents.”

He said the committee had called on Kenya, Uganda and Rwanda revenue authorities to implement 24-hour, seven-day customs clearance at their border posts by December 31.

Kabuga said the committee was working towards implementation of a seamless transportation system where trucks would complete the Mombasa-Kigali route in four days from the current seven to nine day.

July 18, 2008

Plan for £30bn high-speed rail link

Press Association: 18 July 2008

A plan for a new north-south £30 billion high-speed rail line which will link to Europe will be unveiled next week by councils opposed to Heathrow airport expansion.

Running initially along the line of the M1, the route would make it easier for people in Scotland and northern England to get to Heathrow, reducing the need for internal connecting flights.

European links via the Channel Tunnel would mean travellers could get from Sheffield to Paris in three hours, Manchester to Amsterdam in four hours and Leeds to Frankfurt in five-and-a-half hours.

July 17, 2008

European Commission launches two new probes into state subsidies

Trading Markets: July 17, 2008

A sizeable proportion of the European transport market has long been closely aligned with the state sector and despite several decades of liberalisation and deregulation, that situation shows few signs of changing.

In fact in recent years, the state-controlled element of the market has actually increased, with aggressive moves by companies such as Deutsche Bahn and French railways (SNCF). DHL, Schenker, Geodis, DPD and GLS, as well as numerous airlines, are partly or wholly nationalised.

Ownership by state organisations carries with it a risk, or at the very least the perception of risk, that public money can be used to create an unfair advantage over companies in the private sector. For example, Deutsche Post has fought a long battle with the European Commission (EC), the organisation tasked with overseeing free and fair competition in the European Union, over allegations that the company improperly funded part of its operations from its mail monopoly.

The suspicion of endemic state-funded meddling in the dynamics of the transport market was reinforced yesterday (July 16) by announcements that the European Commission had just launched two more investigations.

The first involves an investigation into aid granted by the French government to Sernam, the former road and rail transport services operator of SNCF. It will focus on the implementation by France of a decision taken by the Commission in 2004 authorising aid of EUR503m to Sernam but requiring the repayment of EUR41m which the company had already received. Several complaints have been made alleging that the company has not reimbursed this sum.

The complaints also allege that Sernam was not sold in accordance with the conditions imposed by the Commission. It is claimed that before Sernam was sold off, it had received an additional injection of capital from SNCF, a transaction which could constitute a new instance of state aid.

The second investigation involves a probe into the subsidy provided to Polish haulage company C. Hartwig Katowice. The Polish authorities will have to demonstrate to the Commission that the restructuring measures which have been implemented in return for aid will restore the long term viability of the company. It has also decided to scrutinise the terms of its acquisition by PKP Cargo, the Polish state-controlled rail freight operator and the price paid for its takeover.

The Commission commented that it does not yet have information which demonstrates that the takeover of C. Hartwig Katowice by PKP Cargo will be completed under "normal market conditions" and in a manner which does not involve any undue advantage in favour of PKP Cargo.

As the transport market in Europe gets even more competitive due to spiralling fuel costs, the issue of state subsidies will become increasingly controversial. Governments may feel under political pressure to bail out the largest transport providers should jobs become threatened. However, this will discriminate against the small and medium sized private operators which are already feeling real hardship and which account for the vast proportion of the industry.

A private high-speed train will run in Italy by 2011

LE MONDE: 17.07.08
Salvatore AloÏse

The choice of color was not difficult: trains of the new privately owned railway company Nuovo Trasporto Viaggiatori (NTV) chaired by Luca Cordero di Montezemolo - the boss of Ferrari - will be ... red.
AGV_alstom.jpg
REUTERS / REGIS DUVIGNAU - Alstom will provide 25 convoys of 11 cars each - AGV-type (high-speed railcar) to the new privately owned railway company Nuovo Trasporto Viaggiatori (NTV).

In summer 2011, the company will gamble on railways - up to now a monopoly sector. The liberalisation of rail transport will be effective from 1 January 2010. Alstom will provide 25 11-car sets of its AGV-type (high-speed railcar).

Mr. Montezemolo, Diego Della Valle - the inventor of Tod's shoes - and Gianni Punzo, a contractor are already in the rail sector, jointly holding 54.50% of the shares of NTV. They are counting on the contribution of the Intesa-Sanpaolo bank (21.40% stake) and Generali Insurance (16.10%).

The company wants to offer a quality service on the 1,250 kilometre "Alta velocità", the Italian high-speed network in which the State has invested 40 billion euros. This network should be completed by 2013 and grow along the Italian Peninsula, from Milan to Naples and, transversely from Turin to Venice. On Tuesday, July 15, Mr. Montezemolo stressed the importance for the country of the birth of an entirely Italian company, "without any public euros, that places competition at the centre of its activities. There will be competition and users will be free to choose."

COMPETE WITH THE AIRLINES

On board, all passengers can access the latest technologies and NTV ensure that "travelling time is not lost time." It is true that at a speed, which in Italy, will be 300 km per hour, the train will enter into direct competition with aircraft. On the Milan-Rome route - without stopping - three trains will make the trip daily in three hours. To Naples will add just 1 hour and 10 minutes.

In total, NTV plans 54 trains per day. By 2015, the company is counting on taking a 20% share of this market, carrying 30,000 people per day, 10 million per year. The investment is €900 millions, €650 millions of which are for the purchase of trains and maintenance to be provided by the manufacturer. On the jobs side, a thousand people will work directly for NTV, which aims to achieve profitability by 2013.

July 16, 2008

Globaltrans to establish Ukrainian subsidiary

Railway Gazette International: 16 Jul 2008

UKRAINE: On July 15 the board of Russian private freight operator Globaltrans approved the creation of a Ukrainian subsidiary.
Globaltrans.jpg
Globaltrans is the second biggest freight operator in Russia.

'In line with the growth strategy we presented during our recent IPO, we believe that Ukraine provides significant current and future opportunities', said Globaltrans CEO Sergey Maltsev. 'We intend to focus on the gondola car segment and to provide competitive and customer-focused transportation services, primarily to large companies operating in the steel, iron ore and coking coal sectors.'

Two arrests for copper cable theft

Neath Guardian: Jul 17 2008
by Anthony O'Connell,

TWO men have been arrested in connection with the theft of copper signal cable from a Neath railway depot.

After a significant rise in railway cable theft, British Transport Police (BTP) staged two national days of action during which it visited scrap yards and swooped on the pair.

In their 20s, the men became the fourth and fifth to be arrested in connection with the same incident.

They were bailed pending further police enquiries.

BTP’s Mark Cleland, said: “On the rail system, theft of cable is a particular problem and is extremely dangerous to those involved.

“It can cause significant delays and inconvenience to the thousands of passengers who rely on the rail network, and those who steal cable are not just risking a prison sentence, they are risking their lives.

“Theft of copper signalling cable from the railway has increased significantly in the last four years as the price of copper and other metals has increased.

“We are working very closely with Network Rail to reduce opportunities for cable theft and these national days of action were about joining forces to send a clear message to metal thieves that we are not going to tolerate their criminality.”

BTP was joined by South Wales Police, the Environment Agency, HM Revenue and Customs, and the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency during its operations.

Nationally, metal thefts cost UK industry £360million annually and, since January 1, BTP has recorded 1,169 thefts and 235 arrests for this offence.

Privatising Kenya Railways was an experiment gone bad

The East African:16/07/2008
By Managing Editor, Jaindi Kisero

By now it should be clear to everyone that privatisation of the Kenya Railways is a total failure.

In less than a year, the Rift Valley Railways (RVR) has retrenched 600 employees and dismissed over 200 casual workers.

On Tuesday, managing director Roy Puffet announced that the company will shortly be sending more workers to the streets.

In the last few years, and as the corporation was being prepared for privatisation, it was forced to reduce its workforce by almost 50 per cent – from 7,000 to 3,400.

Thus, an institution that used to be among the biggest employers in the country, with a powerful workers union and owning colossal assets – mainly buildings and land in Nairobi, Kisumu, Mombasa and Nakuru – has been made to shrink almost into nothingness.

And it is not only the workforce that is shrinking. Operations have also shrunk, according to a recent brief prepared by the agency that monitors its operations on behalf of the Government, namely, the residual Kenya Railways Corporation.

RVR is transporting less freight than the Kenya Railway was transporting when it was still in the hands of the Government, while the quality and quantity of passenger services have declined .

In terms of maintenance and safety, the company has implemented a 100 per cent speed restriction on the main line from Mombasa to Malaba, a clear indication of a decline in safety standards.

It is noteworthy that by the time the Government was handing over the railway line and its assets to RVR, only 34 per cent of the line had speed restriction. The number of wagons in operation has also dropped considerably. Where did we go wrong?

Privatisation, per se, is not a bad thing. Implemented well, it is a way to remove control and management of key public utilities such as railways from the paralysing grip of public control.

When you privatise a parastatal, you insulate it from being used as an instrument for rewarding political allies through appointment to boards, and awards of lucrative tenders.

Admittedly, the defunct Kenya Railways Corporation was grossly inefficient. By the time it was being concessioned to RVR, it had become a bottomless pit into which hundreds of millions of shillings were being poured so that it could pay salaries.

However, privatisation – whether the method is a concession, outsourcing or an outright sale of State-owned shares to private parties – does not have to necessarily lead to loss of jobs at such a massive scale.

At its peak, the defunct Kenya Posts and Telecommunications Corporation (KPTC) was among the biggest employers in Kenya with a total workforce of nearly 22,000.

As the parastatal was being privatised, more than 50 per cent of its employees had to be sent home.

But contrary to what has happened in the Kenya Railways privatisation, these jobs were replaced by more productive jobs in companies such as Safaricom, Celtel, Econet Wireless, Communications Commission of Kenya, Flashcom, Jambonet and all the tens of Internet servicen providers which mushroomed in the wake KPTC’s demise.

The Kenya Power and Lighting Company also went through a privatisation of sorts when two separate companies were established.

New jobs were created at KenGen, the Electricity Regulatory Commission, the Rural Electrification Authority and nearly half a dozen independent power producers operating in the country.

Clearly, we went into a railway concession without properly interrogating the likely benefits to the country.

In my view, the predicament we are faced with has come about because the objectives of the concessionaire are not aligned with the country’s national interests.

RVR is in a hurry to make money for its shareholders. That is why it has sent too many people to the streets in such a short time. It has drastically reduced the scope of operations because it wants to run a lean, profitable operation.

The priority for this country is, however, different. What we want is massive infusion of capital in the purchase of new wagons and in rehabilitating operational assets such as the track, maintenance workshops, and signalling equipment.

We don’t need expatriates from South Africa to come and teach us how to run and manage railways.

We have said it in this column before. One of Kenya’s most prized national assets is its geographical location as the hub of economic activity in the region. It is an asset we have not exploited fully.

If we do not pour huge resources into the port of Mombasa, the rail network and on the road linking Mombasa to Busia or Malaba roads, Vision 2030 will not happen.

We have started doing the right thing with roads. For instance, the gross development budget for roads was increased from Sh17.7 billion in the financial year 2005/2006 to Sh32 billion in the 2006/2007 financial year – an increase of more than 85 per cent within one fiscal year.
This is the level of capital expenditure needed to modernise and rehabilitate the railway. The concession was a bad experiment.


See also:


KPA hit by cargo pile-up as rail staff strike over pay

Business Daily: 16 July 2008 NAIROBI
Written by Githua Kihara
Mombasa_Port-Container.jpg
Photo by: Laban Walloga - Loaders at the port of Mombasa. If RVR workers continue with the strike, it will aggravate the congestion problem already being experienced at the port.

The recent strike by the Rift Valley Railway (RVR) workers is now being felt at the Kenya Ports Authority.

There are over 15,000 containers lying at the port of Mombasa, which exceeds the port’s capacity of 14,000. Congestion at the port of Mombasa has been worsened by the slow pace of automation of the port operations which started early this month and expected to take about two to three months before it starts running smoothly.

Mr Twalib said there are seven ships waiting to dock, adding that if RVR workers continue with the strike, it will aggravate the problem already being experienced at the port.

See also:


Pressure mounts on RVRC to shape up or leave

Business Daily Africa: 16 July 2008
Written by Millicent Kamau
RVR-Railways.jpg
An RVR train

NAIROBI -- Pressure is mounting on the Kenya Uganda railway operator to deliver on its performance benchmarks or be shown the door.

Nairobi Metropolitan minister Mutula Kilonzo yesterday said the Rift Valley Railways Consortium (RVRC) should surrender back the rail infrastructure and services to the Government following its admitted failure to perform to expectations.

The company took over the management of Railway under a 25- year concession in 2006, but has since failed to impress the business community in terms of service delivery and infrastructural improvements. The consortium is led by Sheltam Rail Corporation of South Africa.

“RVRC promised to improve the rail network system and cushion the transportation system in the country- but so far nothing tangible has been done,” said Mr Kilonzo. The company is also under sharp criticism in Uganda where President Yoweri Museveni has indicated the ownership of the rail and operations should revert to the State.

Until yesterday evening, railway operations had been brought to a halt as workers went on strike on claims that they had not been paid salaries for last month.

“Any company that fails to pay their workers is an indication that the company is doing badly — the failure of RVRC is causing a national crisis,” he said.

Since the workers went on strike bulk cargo movement had reverted to the roads, causing heavy traffic along major highways.“Heavy tracks competing with small vehicles poses high risks in terms of accidents and damages roads”.Mr Kilonzo was speaking during the official launch of a new parking lot at Belle Vue Cinema drive -in cinema.

He said the Sate loses Sh29 billion in fuel consumption, air pollution and the destruction of roads annually as a result of traffic jams in the city.

Traffic jams
“We are currently working with the private sector to reduce the traffic menace that has been haunting the city for a long time,” he said.

The new parking lot is being managed by Kool Travels Limited, a company that deals with air travel services. It has the capacity to hold 1,000 vehicles.

Motorist will require to pay Sh100 a day for full day parking and Sh70 a day for half day parking.Kool Travels Limited has rented the space from Uni-Drive-Inn Theaters, the owners and partnered with City Hoppa to offer shuttle services to and from the Central Business District (CBD).

According to Mr Gilbert Maina, the managing director of Kool Travels Limited, the project cost Sh3 million and will create 30 new jobs.

July 15, 2008

Italy's railways set to launch €1 bn high-speed train tender

Thomson Financial News: 07.15.08
stephen.jewkes@thomsonreuters.com

MILAN - Ferrovie dello Stato (FS), the state-owned company that runs Italy's railway system, is set to launch a tender offer worth over 1 billion euros for trains to run on its high-speed rail network, FS CEO Mauro Moretti said.

'The tender for about 50 trains will be launched in July or September,' Moretti said, speaking to foreign correspondents in Milan.

Moretti said the tender could be interesting for groups like Finmeccanica SpA unit AnsaldoBreda and Siemens.

The high-speed train link between Milan and Bologna will open on December 14 this year while the Milan-Rome link will be ready in December 2009, he said.

'When the Milan-Rome link is ready we intend to run trains every 15 minutes,' Moretti said.

Analysts said the existence of a high-speed train link between Rome and Milan could alleviate concerns that a possible merger of Alitalia SpA and AirOne could create antitrust problems on the Milan-Rome route.

Since 1995, around 50 billion euros have been invested in building Italy's high-speed train network, Moretti said.

The CEO said FS intends to compete for routes in Europe when international passenger services are fully liberalised in 2010.

'We have to internationalise the group,' he said.

To help generate cash, the state-owned FS intends to take steps to extract full value from its real estate portfolio, Moretti said.

He confirmed the group is currently reviewing its high-speed passenger business with a view to creating a unit that can be listed on the stock market.

'We'll have to bring on board an equity partner to help lighten the contribution we'll have to make,' he said but gave no timeframe for any listing.

Asked about operating results, Moretti said FS could break-even this year, 18 months ahead of schedule.

He said the group currently spends around 300 million euros in interest payments on the group's 9 billion euro debt.

SNCF offers high-speed venture to Air France

Reuters: Jul 15, 2008

PARIS -- Airline Air France KLM is in preliminary talks with state railways company SNCF about high-speed train cooperation even before the liberalisation of rail travel by 2010, Liberation newspaper said on Tuesday.

The French paper said SNCF has offered to Air France to set up a special joint unit for the rail link between airport hubs.

Air France last week confirmed its interest in high-speed train travel and said it was in talks with Veolia Transport, which does not currently have a high-speed train service.

Air France and SNCF had no immediate comment on the report.

High-speed rail links have already taken traffic from short distance air links. With existing or upcoming high-speed rail links between Paris, Amsterdam or Frankfurt, airlines could transport long-distance air travellers to their hubs -- boosting the load factor and cutting costs.


See also:


Air France deal possible with SNCF train services

Bloomberg News: July 15, 2008

PARIS -- France's state-owned SNCF rail operator offered to set up a passenger-train partnership with Air France-KLM Group, seeking to head off a proposed venture between Europe's largest airline and Veolia Environnement.

Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer Français wants to discuss a joint venture with Air France focused on transporting passengers to and from its flights, spokesman Remy François said during a telephone interview.

The SNCF initiative comes just days after Air France confirmed it was in talks with Veolia's transportation unit over a passenger rail service that could replace some short-haul air services when Europe opens cross-border passenger trains to competition on Jan. 1, 2010.

There has so far been no contact with Air France on the proposal, François said Tuesday. The plan was first disclosed by the SNCF Europe Director Frank Bernard in an interview published today by the French daily newspaper Liberation. An Air France spokesman said the company had no comment.

Air France abandoned Paris-Brussels flights in 2001 and negotiated a code-sharing agreement allowing it to book passengers onto Thalys trains linking Paris Charles de Gaulle airport with the Belgian capital.

July 14, 2008

Track worker killed on mainline

BBC News: 14 July 2008

A rail worker has been killed while working on the West Coast Mainline.

The 41-year-old man, from Stockport, Greater Manchester, died near Rugby train station on Saturday morning, British Transport Police (BTP) said.

He was employed by contractor Leda Rail. Details of the accident have not been released but Network Rail said it was investigating.

Network Rail is carrying out massive engineering works at Rugby in a bid to upgrade the West Coast Mainline.

A statement released by Network Rail said: "A rail worker employed by Leda Rail was fatally injured early on Saturday 12 July just south of Rugby Station while carrying out track works.

"A full investigation has been launched into the incident.

"Network Rail's thoughts are with the family of the deceased."

In February, Network Rail was given a £14m fine relating mainly to work at Rugby in late December and January, which over-ran by four days.


See also:


Rail worker in horror accident

Coventry Telegraph: Jul 15 2008
By Warren Manger

A RAIL worker has been killed while carrying out track improvements near a Warwickshire station.

The 41-year-old man was fatally injured while working on the West Coast Mainline south of Rugby Station on Saturday at 7.30am.

No details about the accident have been released but police said it did not involve a train.

Ambulance crews, medics and the County Air Ambulance from Cosford went to the site.

A West Midlands Ambulance Service spokesman said: "On arrival crews found a man with numerous serious injuries.

"Despite the best efforts of crews, nothing could be done to save him and he was confirmed dead at the scene."

The worker was a Stockport man employed by Leeds-based contractor Leda Rail.

It is understood he was working on the massive engineering upgrades being made to the West Coast Mainline in Warwickshire this summer.

Network Rail is closing Rugby Station every Saturday until September to complete the work.

Warwickshire Police and British Transport Police were also called to the scene after the accident.

British Transport Police said the man's family were "understandably extremely upset and traumatised".

A statement released by Network Rail said: "A rail worker employed by Leda Rail was fatally injured early on Saturday just south of Rugby Station while carrying out track works.

"Network Rail's thoughts are with the family of the deceased."

British Transport Police are now investigating what caused the accident with the help of HM Railway Inspectorate and The Railway Accident Investigation Branch.

Say NO to SWT ticket office cuts, rail unions urge passengers

RMT: July 14 2008

Campaigners to target Waterloo tomorrow (Tuesday):
BRITAIN’S TWO biggest rail unions have joined forces to urge South West Trains passengers to reject plans to cut ticket-office opening times at 114 stations.

As SWT began a compulsory consultation over its plans, RMT and TSSA started distributing postcards to commuters with which they can object to Passenger Focus, the watchdog which has the power to challenge the plans.

Campaigners from the two unions will tomorrow morning (Tuesday) distribute postcards to commuters coming in to London’s Waterloo station from 08:00 to 0930. RMT assistant general secretary Pat Sikorski and TSSA assistant general secretary Manuel Cortes will be available for interview.

Southampton Test MP Alan Whitehead has already tabled a commons motion against the plans (text and signatories below), which will leave dozens of stations without ticket-office facilities all weekend, and dozens more with curtailed opening hours. The result will also mean more stations completely unstaffed – often late at night.

“SWT’s plans amount to an attack on the service to passengers and up to 140 jobs, and they undermine safety for everyone,” RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

“Passenger numbers on SWT are up by nearly six per cent and it is only a couple of weeks since SWT’s owners, Stagecoach, announced a massive jump in their rail profits to nearly £60 million on the back of year-on-year ahead of inflation fare increases.

“Rail workers and passengers alike want to see more staff on stations, not fewer, and I hope that passengers will join us in telling SWT that these cuts are unacceptable,” Bob Crow said.

TSSA assistant general secretary Manuel Cortes said: “These cuts will directly hit passengers, making stations unsafe and tickets more expensive.

“Unmanned stations will be less safe for travellers, particularly at the weekends and in the evenings. Tickets will be more expensive because you cannot ask a machine for the cheapest available journey.”

ends

Early Day Motion 1969

South West Trains ticket offices

Tabled by Alan Whitehead and signed by 16 others by July 14, 2008

"That this House notes with extreme concern plans by South West Trains to close ticket offices and cut ticket office opening hours at 114 stations; believes that such cuts cannot be justified when these stations have seen a combined increase in passengers of nearly 27 per cent. in the last year; is further concerned that the cuts will dramatically increase the number of stations that will lose their ticket offices entirely during weekends and will leave stations unstaffed at weekends and in the evening making railway stations and passengers who use them feel less secure; believes that replacing staff with ticket machines will also reduce the quality and range of services available to passengers; and calls on South West Trains immediately to withdraw its plans."

Signatures( 17)

Alan Whitehead, MP
Kate Hoey, MP
John [R] McDonnell, MP
Peter Bottomley, MP
David Drew, MP
Graham Stringer, MP
Lynne Jones, MP
Dr William McCrea, MP
Martin Caton, MP
Ann Cryer, MP
Mike Hancock, MP
Robert Key, MP
David Laws, MP
Annette Brooke, MP
Ronnie Campbell, MP
Jeremy Corbyn, MP
Janet Dean, MP

Doubling Cotswold rail line could cost double

Oxford Mail: 13th July 2008
By William Crossley

The projected cost of reinstating double track on parts of the Cotswold Line rail route could hit £105m - double Network Rail's estimate - according to consultants working for the rail industry regulator.

In a report on Network Rail's spending plans, engineering experts Arup said they had "serious concerns" over the gap between their calculation of the cost of the work on the Oxford-Worcester line and the rail firm's figures.

Earlier this year, in its Strategic Business Plan, Network Rail put the bill at £51m, although Arup said in late April the infrastructure firm put the cost at almost £74m - a figure Network Rail also gave to the Oxford Mail when publicly unveiling its proposals that month.

The Office of Rail Regulation, which commissioned the Arup report, put a price of £48m on the work in its official response to the business plan last month.

Network Rail wants to reinstate 20 miles of double track, including a 4.5-mile section running from Ascott-under-Wychwood to just east of Charlbury, and provide extra platforms at Charlbury and Ascott's stations.

Commenting on a series of increases in the projected bill since last October, Arup said: "This escalation supports our view that costs on this scheme are underestimated and the scope is ill-defined. While not as severe as before, we still have serious concerns."

They added: "Network Rail's continuous cost increases seem to be converging on the correct answer, but there still appears to be some way to go."

A spokesman for the ORR said: "Our role is to take Network Rail's plans and scrutinise them to make sure they add up. We think they can do the work for £48m.

"Where there is a disparity, we subject plans to benchmarking against costs on European and international networks."

Official approval from the ORR for Network Rail's 2009-14 spending plans is due in October. If final costings for the Cotswold Line scheme are signed off, work could start early next year, with completion expected in 2010.

In the late 1990s, redoubling of the Chiltern Line between Bicester and Princes Risborough cost about £1m a mile, but more complicated work in 2002 to double track the section from Bicester to Aynho junction, south of Banbury, cost £8m per mile.

A current project in south-west Scotland has cost about £4.5m per mile.

EWS appeals freight charges on fast rail line

Financial Times: July 14 2008
By Robert Wright, Transport Correspondent

The start of a new rail freight service bringing more efficient mainland European wagons into the UK is being held up by unreasonable fee demands from the owner of the track, according to Britain's largest rail freight operator.

EWS, owned by Germany's Deutsche Bahn railway group, believes there is demand for Continental-sized freight wagons to run through the Channel tunnel and then along High Speed 1, the fast line to London.

Such wagons are barred from almost all the UK's railways because bridges and tunnels are too low.

But High Speed 1, whose last section opened in November, was built to accommodate Continental-sized freight trains. Nevertheless, no European or UK-style freight train has used it since the first section was opened five years ago. The line is owned by London & Continental Railways.

Graham Smith, EWS's planning director, said larger wagons would offer customers considerable efficiency advantages. They could carry pallet-loads of goods stacked three-high, rather than two-high on normal, British-sized wagons.

"It would be good for manufactured goods, vehicle components and fresh produce and would enhance the rail freight offering through the Channel tunnel."

Spain's Transfesa, also part of the DB Group, was interested in using the new service to take goods to Ford Motor Company's Dagenham plant on the edge of London, Mr Smith said. However, EWS fears the likely charges to use High Speed 1 could make the service uneconomic, and has appealed to the Office of Rail Regulation to force LCR to change how it calculates the fee.

Most UK goods trains are charged only for wear and tear on the track, energy consumption and other marginal costs of running the train. Mr Smith said LCR wanted to charge freight trains a marginal cost almost twice that on the normal network, an extra mark-up to produce a profit and a charge to cover some of the track's building costs. LCR declined to comment.

The ORR can handle appeals against decisions by LCR over issues such as pricing, but does not regulate it as tightly as Network Rail, owner of the rest of the mainline rail network.

The office has ruled that mark-ups can be charged only on traffic that can bear the extra cost, defined as coal going to power stations and trains carrying nuclear waste. The ORR has received an appeal from EWS.

Militancy brings Australian rail workers pay and conditions victory

Green Left Weekly: 12 July 2008
John Coleman

Rail workers’ militancy against Morris Iemma’s New South Wales Labor government has won some important concessions and forced the government onto the back foot.

An enterprise bargaining agreement (EBA) with NSW Rail Corporation (Railcorp) had been in dispute for months. After some 40 meetings, the deadlock was only resolved when an industrial court-approved ballot resulted in 95% of union members voting for industrial action.

The Rail, Tram and Bus Union announced it would take industrial action on July 17, during the pope’s visit. Predictably, the Sydney Daily Telegraph went on the attack against the union, running a front-page caricature of RBTU secretary Nick Lewocki, complete with horns and a pitchfork under the headline “Devil’s work”.

However, on its website, Telegraph readers’ emails were overwhelmingly in support of the rail workers. There is broad public sympathy for government sector workers, who have been told by the Iemma-Costa leadership that a 2.5% pay rise would be the limit.

The Iemma government is hugely unpopular, a result of its attacks on public sector workers, its determination to sell off electricity and its failure to invest in public transport. A June Newspoll revealed its primary vote has sunk to 28%. The poll also revealed that Liberal opposition leader Barry O’Farrell had overtaken Iemma as preferred premier by 39% to Iemma’s 32%.

Railcorp had wanted to reduce sick leave, scrap public holiday and annual leave accruals and eliminate meal allowances. It was prepared to offer a wage rise of 4-8% over one or two years, but only if the union accepted further losses in conditions.

Following the union’s threat to take strike action during World Youth Day — when thousands of pilgrims are expected to be in Sydney for the pope’s visit — the government was forced to drop its threat to use emergency powers to force the RBTU back to work; scrap its plan to cut 400 jobs; make a pay offer (the detail of which is still to be negotiated but the union want 5% per year) and concede back pay (which had been held up during the EBA negotiations). The union states in a July 11 bulletin that it “will not agree to any final position until it has been voted on by members”.

While the RBTU has managed to negotiate an agreement with real gains for workers, more needs to be done to maintain and extend the fight against the government’s deliberate run-down of the rail system, with more than 1000 other jobs threatened by the government-appointed Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal.

The travelling public has us to thank for protecting 400 jobs. Our solid support for action indicates the way forward in thwarting further attacks on rail workers’ pay and conditions.

[John Coleman is an RTBU workplace representative at Sydney Central Station.]

Fortescue opens the world's heaviest haul railway in Australia

Railway Gazette International: 14 Jul 2008
John Kirk

AUSTRALIA -- A remarkable iron ore railway has been built across the Pilbara region in record time. John Kirk of Railway Gazette International reports.

The Fortescue River is the only permanent watercourse in the Chichester Range of the remote Pilbara region in northwestern Australia. The area is famous for its mineral deposits, and in 2003 the Fortescue name was adopted by a mining company with ambitions to compete in the booming market for iron ore.

The market is being driven by insatiable demand from China, and Fortescue Metals Group arrived on the scene to compete against established giants BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto. Defying the odds, the weather and the critics, FMG shipped its first iron ore to China in mid-May. Exploratory test drilling had begun just 42 months earlier - in that period FMG managed to plan, design and build a mine with ore processing facilities, plus a 260 km heavy haul railway and a port for Cape-size ships with ship loader and train unloading plant.

FMG has holdings or tenements spread over 40 000 km2 - about the same size as Switzerland. This far exceeds the combined tenement areas of both Rio Tinto (11 000 km2) and BHP Billiton (7 000 km2).

The Fortescue story is as much about its CEO Andrew Forrest as it is about iron ore, the Pilbara, open access infrastructure and China. Forrest is passionate about the Pilbara and about Australia's role in the global economy. When he first announced his dream to become a significant iron ore producer in the Pilbara, the experts laughed, but the jokes have since stopped. Forrest has proved his detractors wrong, and in the process he has built the world's heaviest haul railway.

Originally, Fortescue had no intention of building its own line. The company made numerous attempts to secure access for its trains on the existing Pilbara iron ore railways owned by BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto. Despite winning several legal battles, they eventually lost the war through political intervention and had to invest an estimated A$2·5bn to build their own 260 km railway linking their mine at Cloud Break with their new Herb Elliott Port near Port Hedland.

The market

The original plan was to produce 45 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) of iron ore, but this was subsequently lifted to 55 mtpa. Remarkably, this first-phase production has sold out, and agreements have been signed for an additional 50 mtpa. A long-term agreement was signed in March 2007 with Baosteel, China's biggest steel producer, for up to 20 mtpa, as well as a joint venture to mine magnetite.

Since then, more than 35 sales agreements have been signed, and the top 10 Chinese steel mills have all agreed supply contracts. In a clear indication of the importance of its Chinese customers, Fortescue has opened its first offshore office in the Pudong business district of Shanghai.

In March this year FMG announced that it was going to ramp up production to meet increased demand from the Chinese steel mills with the expectation that once the project was fully completed and commissioned, it would be looking to produce over 100 mtpa.

In an expression of confidence in the future, Forrest predicted that once new deposits in the Solomon region were developed, annual production could increase to around 200 mtpa. This compares with BHP's current output of about 135 mtpa and Rio Tinto's estimated 115 mtpa.

First shipment

On May 15 2008, the conveyors at Herb Elliott Port completed loading 180 000 tonnes of high quality 'Rocket' iron ore on to the Cape-size vessel MV Heng Shan, which translates as Everlasting Mountain. This marked the culmination of an extraordinary achievement by around 12 000 people who have worked on the project. Celebrated as the 'First Ore On Ship', it was the first official shipment to China, quickly following a trial consignment of 70 000 tonnes that had been dispatched as part of the port's commissioning process.

FMG had celebrated another landmark moment on April 5 2008 when it carried its first load of Cloud Break ore to Port Hedland. The train, named the Alannah MacTiernan Express after Western Australia's transport minister, carried the first ore 185 km from Hunter Siding to the port.

On the next day, a manual team and the Plasser & Theurer SUM2000 tracklayer placed the last sleepers and connected the final piece of rail linking Cloud Break to the mine. In a letter to the Australian Stock Exchange dated April 8 2008, FMG reported 'as of 02.30 this morning its railway is fully connected between Cloud Break and Port Hedland. The last of the rail sleepers and rail line have been laid along the main line between Fortescue's Herb Elliott Port through to the ore preparation facility at Cloud Break, some 260 km to the south.'

Rail infrastructure

The railway is built for 40 tonne axleloads, making it the heaviest haul railway in the world. For comparison, the other Pilbara railways operate with axleloads of 35 tonnes and 37·5 tonnes, while the trans-Australian main line was recently upgraded to operate at just 21 tonnes.

Unlike the other Pilbara railways, FMG's line was built for open access. Through its wholly-owned subsidiary and railway owner, The Pilbara Infrastructure Pty Ltd (TPI), FMG will negotiate access to the line with other Pilbara-based mining companies. This reflects the company's philosophy of providing infrastructure to develop its assets for the benefit of the Pilbara, Western Australia and Australia.

The key design objectives and philosophy of the railway were to limit its impact on the environment, to make the line as short as possible, to minimise adverse gradients and to ensure efficient maintenance to the highest standards.

Construction began in November 2006 with infrastructure specialist Laing O'Rourke's rail team in charge. The completion deadlines were tough - the entire railway had to be built from scratch and operational in less than 18 months.

Cyclone threats, wet weather, finding skilled people and maintaining machine availability in a remote area of Australia all provided challenges to the construction team.

Two manual tracklaying crews at each end of the line complemented the SUM tracklayer, and productivity of the machine was improved during construction to enable it to lay up to 3 km of track a day.

Cyclones in March 2007 cost the company considerable construction time and caused the death of two workers. The delay prompted FMG to accelerate the work programme to get the railway back on schedule. Work forged ahead at more than six sites, and Fortescue's own mine team provided 40 people and 18 pieces of equipment to help complete earthworks and capping.

The 1 435 mm gauge line used 38 000 tonnes of continuously welded 68 kg/m rail supplied by China's Panang Steel; 420 000 concrete sleepers made by Austrac in Port Hedland; countless Pandrol clips; eight bridges and 360 culverts. There are four short 250 m long sidings, three 3 km passing loops, and one balloon loop at the port, plus a siding at the Cloud Break mine with a 3 km spur on the south end.

From Cloud Break the line heads northwest to the Chichester Range, running parallel to BHP's Mount Newman Railway for around 100 km and crossing it using a flyover. It then runs directly towards the coast. The unloader is located just south of BHP Billiton's Boodarie yard, and a conveyor takes the ore over the Finucane Island road and the Goldsworthy Railway to the ship loaders.

Laing O'Rourke's Rail Regional Manager (West) Graeme Spragg summed up the kind of hurdles the team had overcome to meet the deadline. 'A radiator on the SUM tracklaying machine blew, so the team came up with an innovative stop-gap measure, plumbing up a series of 200 litre drums and filling them with water and ice until a replacement arrived. This saved several days' lost production and typified the determination of the whole project team in meeting the target milestone dates.'

Spragg said the decision to operate two independent materials trains instead of one also helped increase productivity. 'Within two days of using the two materials trains we set what we believe to be a new Australian tracklaying record of 3 292 m in a single day', he said. In all, 285 km of track was laid and eight bridges were built.

Locomotives and rolling stock

The initial order of 816 ore wagons was manufactured in China by CSR in Zhuzhou Rolling Stock Works and shipped from the port of Zhangjiaga. The wagons are in permanently coupled pairs and are fitted with rotary couplers for tippler unloading. After arrival, the wagons were deployed over completed sections of track as part of the company's dry commissioning process. It is understood that another 160 wagons are on order.

In full operation, FMG will run 2·5 km long trains of up to 240 wagons hauled by two GE Dash 9-4400CW diesel locomotives - a design that is already proven in the harsh Pilbara environment. Setting a new benchmark in heavy haul railways, the wagons have a tare weight of 23 tonnes and can carry up to 137 tonnes of ore. Each trainload will consist of about 30 000 tonnes of ore.

The fleet of 15 locomotives was supplied by United Group in partnership with GE Transportation. The locomotives and wagons are equipped with electronically-controlled air brakes from New York Air Brake. According to NYAB, their EP-60 technology improves braking performance, allowing long and heavy trains to operate at higher speeds with improved safety and fuel economy. Stopping distances are shorter and in-train forces are considerably reduced.

Four former Robe River and Hamersley Iron C-636R Alco units were rebuilt by GTSA Engineering in Perth and used to haul tracklaying and construction trains. Owned by Coote Industrial, the locomotives were leased to Australian Rain Mining Services, a subsidiary of South Spur Rail Services. All four were fitted with 'Pilbara cabs', painted in FMG's colours and given individual names.

Operations and unloading

Simplicity and efficiency are the keys to FMG's railway operation. When the line is fully operational, two banker locomotives will assist the two train engines to haul the loaded ore train to the top of the Chichester Range grade and will then return to the mine. The bankers will in turn be replaced by the locomotives off the next empty train arriving from Port Hedland, ensuring that motive power with adequate fuel is always available. Currently, trains are operating with three Dash 9 locos hauling up to 240 wagons.

No signals are operational as yet, so train orders called Proceed Authorities are issued to the driver of each train for safe working. The PAs are issued over a UHF radio network via 10 repeaters sited along the line. Each locomotive is equipped with two radios and a satellite phone.

Track Access Authorities are issued for trackwork and maintenance by train control currently located in Port Hedland, but with a planned move to Perth once the operation is up and running. Like the other Pilbara rail operators, FMG will use single person crews.

The twin-cell rotary dumper at Anderson Point was supplied by Metso Minerals and was manufactured and assembled at the AGC workshop in Kwinana, south of Perth. The cells incorporate a fixed beam and onboard hydraulic clamping. The wagons are positioned using an indexer, two wagons at a time. The system then rotates the two tippler cells through 160° to ensure a fast dump. Metso Minerals designed the system to accommodate a throughput of 80 wagons/h, with a cycle time of 90 sec.

The infrastructure at Anderson Point is designed to handle the first phase of FMG's 55 mtpa output, and it is expected that later expansion will include a second and third train unloading system.
Community development

FMG is committed to building strong local communities in this remote part of Australia. In August 2007 Forrest announced an important housing programme, promising to build 250 high-quality, environmentally-friendly homes in Port and South Hedland in his 'battle against fly-in fly-out, socially de-stabilising work practices'.

The housing 'directly swings the tide back against fly-in fly-out which exacts such a heavy toll against sustainable local communities and the families of all involved', he said, adding that 'the Pilbara is not a short term quarry. It will sustain major wealth generation for Australians for hundreds of years. The Pilbara therefore can and must host long-term, fully-sustainable and high-quality living Pilbara communities.'

Construction is now underway, and the first homes are expected to be ready by mid-2008, defying the shortage of builders in many WA mining towns.

The open access battle

FMG has taken a strong stand in support of open access infrastructure in the Pilbara, believing that access will open up a number of isolated iron ore deposits in the region.

The company is practising what it preaches. After signing an infrastructure agreement with the Western Australian State Government in December 2004, Fortescue set about designing and constructing rail and port facilities that would meet its own requirements as well as support the development and sale of the Pilbara's stranded iron ore bodies.

The company website proclaims that 'Fortescue's open access infrastructure will increase the throughput capacity of Port Hedland and remove a fundamental barrier to entry for junior mining companies. As a result, increased production, competition and efficiencies will result for the bulk mineral exports in the Pilbara region.'

Looking at its own future, Fortescue is facing considerable investment to expand its existing rail infrastructure to link new mines with its port.

Through TPI, FMG has made three applications to the National Competition Council to open up lines owned by Rio Tinto and BHP Billiton under Part IIIA of the Trade Practices Act 1974. The company wants access to BHP Billiton's Mount Newman line for its proposed Mindy Mindy project, which it owns in a joint venture with Consolidated Minerals. The other applications were to open Rio's Hamersley Iron rail network and the BHP Billiton Goldsworthy rail network. Both BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto have argued, so far unsuccessfully, that the rail line was part of the production process and therefore proprietary.

In an application to the National Competition Council in January this year to open up Rio Tinto's Robe River Railway, Fortescue Executive Director Graeme Rowley said 'Fortescue is seeking to open the tremendous transport logistic synergies available in the Pilbara to all Australian mining companies. There are sufficient stranded iron ore deposits in the Pilbara, which alone many not be of sufficient scale to support their own infrastructure, yet could become viable with access to existing infrastructure such as the Robe River railway.'

Although FMG has won the major legal battles to gain access to BHP Billiton's Mount Newman rail lines, the success has been undermined by federal government intervention, particularly former treasurer Peter Costello's decision not to support the National Competition Council decision in 2006 that Fortescue be given access. 'Three decisions, one by the National Competition Council and two by the Federal Court, have now ruled in favour of Fortescue's attempts to gain access to a railway our planning forefathers always intended would be open to third-party access', Rowley said.

Nor is there much support from the new Labor government. BHP scored a small victory when federal resources minister Martin Ferguson indicated that he would review the Trade Practices Act legislation that governed third party rail access, particularly in relation to the public interest provisions. 'We've got to work out a framework which guarantees further investment by BHP ... and further investment by Fortescue, but not on terms which destroy what is the best mining logistics chain in the world', Ferguson was quoted as saying.

FMG has vowed to press on with its attempts to gain access to the other Pilbara railway lines and has in the meantime signed up a three-part Pilbara port handling, ship loading and rail haulage memorandum of understanding with Atlas Iron. The one-year deal starting in March 2009 will see TPI rail 3 mtpa of ore from Atlas's Abydos project. Product from the company's Pardoo mine will be transported by road to Port Hedland and shipped out through Fortescue's port facilities. 'While Atlas is planning to haul Pardoo iron ore to Port Hedland by road, we believe that rail is the safest and most commercially viable means to haul iron ore', said Atlas Managing Director David Flanagan. 'Wherever we can work with infrastructure owners to achieve a workable rail solution, we will.'

It is too early to predict the future for FMG. Forrest is certainly upbeat about expansion plans to meet the growing demand for Pilbara iron ore, and the share price at the time of writing reflects this optimism - FMG shares were trading at A$10·71, up from A$5·66 in November 2007.

The ore and the mine

Commercial mining of high-grade Marra Mamba haematite ore commenced at Cloud Break in late 2007. Marra Mamba ore was originally rejected by early miners as 'fool's gold' because they didn't believe it was possible to make steel from the crumbly yellow cakey-looking ore - it didn't look like the hard, blue-grey haematite ores. However, Marra Mamba ore is relatively high grade with around 62% iron content, has lower impurities than some Australian iron ore, and its low silica content makes it particularly attractive in iron making processes.

FMG is using a mix of traditional mining methods and a few innovations of its own. It is the first iron ore mine in the world to use surface mining rather than the traditional drill, blast and crush, deep open-cut method. Surface mining has a number of advantages, including reduced downtime due to blasting; cleaner pit floors resulting in less damage to vehicles and tyres; and environmental restoration can be undertaken almost immediately after mining has occurred.

Mining commenced during December 2007 with four Wirtgen surface miners operating on a single shift in the first two of Fortescue's four start-up pits, Daydream and Hayman. Both pits produced about 650 000 tonnes of ore in the first three months, and by the end of this year the Green and Hook pits should also be in operation. At full production 14 Wirtgen surface miners will be running 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year.

Milestones in the Fortescue story

Early 2003 The Metal Group Pty Ltd acquires Allied Mining & Processing and changes name to Fortescue Metals Group.

May 2003 Fortescue acquires first tenements at Cloud Break and Christmas Creek.

Oct 2004 Iron ore sales agreement with Hebei Wenfeng and Ping Xiang Iron & Steel.

Dec 2004 Infrastructure WA State Agreement signed.

Jan 2005 FMG raises A$70m through convertible note issue.

Feb 2005 FMG discovers significant iron ore mineralisation in the Cloud Break area.

Oct 2005 FMG signs sales agreements for 38% of initial planned production of ? 45 mpta and begins trial mining at Cloud Break.

Dec 2005 Mining State Agreement signed.

Feb 2006 Commencement of earthworks at Anderson Point, site of the port.

Apr 2006 Feasibility study for Cloud Break and Christmas Creek completed.

Jul 2006 Federal Environmental Approval granted.

FMG signs a Subscription Agreement with Leucadia National Corp of the USA; dredging commences at port.

Aug 2006 FMG settles A$3·2bn capital raising and A$2·7bn debt underwriting.

Nov 2006 Railway construction commences with earthworks and the marshalling yard.

Dec 2006 Detailed Proposals for Mining Approval agreed.

Mar 2007 Iron ore sales agreement with Baosteel, taking sales of initial 45 mpta output to 100%.

May 2007 Iron ore sales agreement with Tangshan and agreement with Fengli.

Jul 2007 Institutional equity placement A$504m raised; tracklaying commences.

Aug 2007 Fortescue joins S&P/ASX 100 index.

Oct 2007 China Office Opened in Shanghai; commercial mining starts at Cloud Break.

Nov 2007 FMG announces substantial estimates of Inferred Resource for the ? Solomon East Project area.

Feb 2008 Railway bridges completed.

Mar 2008 Railway earthworks completed and train unloader commissioned.

Apr 5 2008 Construction of railway completed and first load of ore moved by train; wet commissioning of Herb Elliott Port with trial ore shipment.

May 15 2008 First shipment of ore loaded at Herb Elliott Port, Anderson Point.

Govt may assemble Kiwirail locomotives in NZ

NZPA: 13 July 2008
kiwirail_logo_c.jpg
The Government will consider assembling new KiwiRail locomotives in New Zealand instead of overseas, State Owned Enterprises (SOE) Minister Trevor Mallard said.

But the National Party says the plan is "an idea from the 1950s" and would waste taxpayer money.

The Government bought rail operator Toll this month for $690 million. The purchase also included $140 million in debt.

Finance Minister Michael Cullen has said an $80 million injection will be needed over the next five years to keep rail running. He has also signalled a "reinvestment package" of about $380 million which will include new locomotives.

Mr Mallard today said although the components of those locomotives would be bought overseas the Government was investigating the possibility of assembling them in New Zealand.

"There is no doubt there is a possibility of assembling locomotives in New Zealand," he said on TVNZ's Agenda programme.

"It's probably a very logical thing to do from a currency perspective, from a value for money perspective."

Mr Mallard said expertise would have to be developed if the plan was to go ahead, but the work could be done at remaining rail workshops in Woburn, Lower Hutt.

He did not know how much investment would be needed to enable the trains to be assembled locally.

He said Cabinet was currently deciding whether to approve a scoping study.

But National's SOE spokesman Gerry Brownlee said the plan was "daft".

"New Zealand's economic well-being will not be served by returning to the glory days of NZ Railways, which everyone knew was a huge waste of taxpayer resources," he said.

"New Zealanders still don't know what the final bill for the railways buy-up is, let alone the cost of something like this."

He said the fact the locomotives would be assembled in Mr Mallard's Lower Hutt electorate suggested it was little more than a "save-my-seat campaign".

See also:


Local rail input attacked

New Zealand Herald: July 14, 2008
By Mathew Dearnaley

A Government suggestion that new locomotives may be assembled locally for its new KiwiRail concern has been panned by National but backed by the political head of Auckland's rail upgrade.

State-Owned Enterprises Minister Trevor Mallard told Television One's Agenda programme yesterday that a local assembly operation was "probably a very logical thing to do from a currency perspective" and that the Cabinet was being asked to approve a scoping study.

He said the location for such an operation was likely to be KiwiRail's Woburn workshops in his Hutt South electorate, a point not lost on National's SOE spokesman, Gerry Brownlee.

"This smacks of pork-barrel politics," Mr Brownlee said.

"New Zealand's economic well-being will not be served by returning to the glory days of NZ Railways, which everyone knew was a huge waste of taxpayer resources."

But Auckland Regional Council chairman Mike Lee said last night that rocketing fuel prices were forcing an acceleration of the "renaissance" of rail, and he appealed for political consensus on ways to equip New Zealand and its workers to meet that challenge.

He said his council had led the way by sponsoring the rebuild of a fleet of rolling stock at KiwiRail's Hillside workshops in Dunedin.

"It's already happening, it shouldn't be controversial," Mr Lee said. "As we tackle our traffic congestion and transport problems in Auckland, we've been providing jobs in Otago and rebuilding industrial capacity - and what's wrong with that?"

See also:


Local loco assembly is "madness"

TVNZ: Jul 14, 2008

Opponents of the government's rail buy-back scheme are rubbishing a proposal to have locomotives built in New Zealand.

As the new owner of KiwiRail the government wants to revive an old industry.

"There is a possibility of assembling locomotives in New Zealand. It is probably a very logical thing to do from a currency perspective, from a value for money perspective," said Trevor Mallard, State Owned Enterprises Minister on TV One's Agenda programme.

"Well at the moment we take locomotives apart and put them back together at the Woburn workshops in Wellington and that's a good place to do it."

Labour says assembling locos will create jobs and business opportunities.

However, opponents say it is back to the bad old days.

Critics say with KiwiRail expected to run at a loss for the first few years, it will mean even more unjustified and wasteful spending.

"When New Zealand had those sort of protections which saw us basically reassemble products that were manufactured overseas, every New Zealander paid the price," says Gerry Brownlee, National State Owned Enterprises spokesman.

"Its madness and it will really just exacerbate the extraordinary price we've already paid."

The government confirmed on Sunday that KiwiRail will be run at a loss for first few years, although it could be helped by funding changes.

Hungarian rail union calls for indefinite strike

Reuters: 07.13.08

BUDAPEST - One of Hungary's largest railway unions called for an indefinite strike from Monday in protest against the government's rejection of its pay demands.

Trade union VDSZSZ, one of six rail unions, said on Sunday it wanted a fresh 10 percent wage increase on top of the 6.9 percent already awarded for 2008, as well as a one-off 250,000 forint ($1,525) payout to each of Hungary's 35,000 railway workers from the privatisation of the company's cargo unit.

State-owned railway firm MAV is Hungary's largest employer and has tens of billions of forint in losses every year, forcing the government to bail out the company regularly.

The union already held several strikes earlier this year, but suspended them in March as it negotiated with the government, which has repeatedly said it will not meet any of the union's demands.

The former communist country's trade unions have lost most of their power over the past decade and the rail unions are among the few left with any significant following.

(Reporting by Balazs Koranyi) ($1=163.96 Forint)

See also:


Indefinite rail strike on from Monday midnight

MTI: July 14

Budapest -- An open-ended rail strike in Hungary, repeatedly called and then suspended by railway workers union VDSZSZ, began again after midnight on Monday, the union and the railways MAV reported.

Budapest's major railway stations, the Keleti (Eastern) and the Nyugati (Western) stations were running services, but the Southern (Déli) station services had stopped, MAV spokesman Imre Kavalecz said.

Trains running normally to the Deli station from the western areas were halted or rerouted to the nearby Kelenfold station, he added. Train Services from the largest cities and towns to Budapest in the north and the east were suspended because many of the rail workers did not appear for work. However, services from the larger cities in the south and the west were running, Kavalecz said. He warned of expected delays, cancellations and route shortenings that might also affect international services during the strike.

VDSZSZ executive Laszlo Gelencser told MTI early on Monday that services in the Nyugati and Keleti stations were not running normally as many workers did not take up work there. The strike is strongly supported by workers in many of the cities and towns across the country, he added.

VDSZSZ, representing about 25 percent of Hungary's some 35,00 rail workers, first called an open-ended strike on February 7, which it had suspended several times since then, most recently on April 7. It called for Monday strike after negotiation with MAV had failed on Sunday evening.

The union is demanding 250,000 forints (about 1,000 euros) per worker for about 35,000 workers from the sale of Hungarian railway MAV's cargo enterprise, a 10 percent wage hike in addition to the 6.9 percent agreed on, for some 15,000 workers outsourced when MAV subsidiaries became independent, and agreement by MAV that it will not close down 38 spur lines as planned.

MAV described the demands unrealistic and impossible to meet.

However, negotiations between the union and MAV will resume on Monday.


See also:


National strike at railway company over pay

EIROnline: February 2008

The Free Trade Union of Railway Workers launched a nationwide strike after several rounds of wage negotiations failed with the Hungarian Railway Company (MÁV). The trade union is demanding a 10% pay increase for employees of MÁV’s outsourced companies, in addition to a bonus of HUF 250,000 to be paid to all railway workers after last year’s privatisation of MÁV Cargo.

Following the failure of several rounds of negotiations with the Hungarian Railway Company (Magyar Államvasutak, MÁV), the Free Trade Union of Railway Workers (Vasúti Dolgozók Szabad Szakszervezete, VDSZSZ) launched a nationwide strike. Officials of VDSZSZ, which represents 10,000 out of 36,000 employees of MÁV, insisted that they would continue to strike until agreement is reached.

Cause of dispute

VDSZSZ is demanding a 10% pay increase for employees of the companies to which MÁV has outsourced work. In addition, it is calling for a bonus of HUF 250,000 (about €956 as at 11 March 2008) to be paid to all railway workers following the privatisation of MÁV Cargo – the freight transport arm of MÁV. This bonus would be paid by a consortium of Rail Cargo Austria (RCA) and Győr-Sopron-Ebenfurt Railway (Raaberbahn AG, GYSEV), which paid €400 million for 100% of the company’s shares.

According to VDSZSZ, when MÁV outsourced MÁV Cargo in 2006, employees received a 10% wage increase, which established a precedent; it argues, therefore, that the same wage increase should be given to all employees of the outsourced companies. With respect to the bonus of HUF 250,000, the President of VDSZSZ, István Gaskó, referred to the alleged promise of the former Minister of Economy and Transport, János Kóka, to pay a proportion of the privatisation revenue to all of MÁV’s employees in the event of a successful privatisation. The privatisation contract also stipulates that employees of MÁV Cargo should receive 5% of the company’s shares.

Negotiations fail

However, MÁV is contesting the legal grounds of having to pay either the bonus or pay increase, claiming that the demands of VDSZSZ would cost about HUF 30 billion (€115 million), on top of the costs incurred by the strike, which amount to HUF 720 million (€2.75 million) daily.

After several sessions of failed negotiations, the parties requested the help of the Labour Mediation and Arbitration Service (Munkaügyi Közvetítő és Döntőbirói Szolgálat, MKDSZ). The appointed mediator, László Herczog, State Secretary of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Labour (Szociális és Munkaügyi Minisztérium, SZMM), made recommendations during the negotiations, but so far has not managed to resolve the dispute.

Consequences of strike

During the strike, the majority of passenger and freight trains stopped running and passengers received limited information about the suspended services. The three main railway stations in Hungary’s capital city of Budapest were paralysed as most of the ticket and train inspectors, as well as traffic controllers, were on strike. On the first day of the strike, MÁV brought the matter before the court. The Budapest Labour Court (Fővárosi Munkaügyi Bíróság, FMB) declared that VDSZSZ’s claim for a 10% pay increase was unlawful; however, it also ruled that the strike demand for a bonus after the successful privatisation of MÁV Cargo was in fact legal.

Hungary’s Minister of Economy and Transport, Csaba Kákosy, claims that the trade union has been playing a political game in the run-up to the referendum against privatisation of the healthcare system, which was due to take place on 9 March 2008. Minister Kákosy warned that if the rail strike drags on, funds will be transferred to bus companies so that they can take on some of the public transport services.

Position of other social partners

Although other railway trade unions did not join the strike, both the Trade Union of Hungarian Railwaymen (Vasutasok Szakszervezete, VSZ) and the Trade Union of Engine Drivers (Mozdonyvezetők Szakszervezete, MOSZ) expressed their support for the employees, albeit not for the officials of VDSZSZ. The President of VSZ, Dezső Simon, stated that the strike would jeopardise jobs and make negotiations more difficult with the government over the closure of secondary lines.

The National Association of Entrepreneurs and Employers (Vállalkozók és Munkáltatók Országos Szövetsége, VOSZ) published a statement in which it pointed out that the VDSZSZ President, Mr Gaskó, as President of the Democratic League of Independent Trade Unions (Független Szakszervezetek Demokratikus Ligája, LIGA), had co-signed the agreement in the National Interest Reconciliation Council (Országos Érdekegyeztető Tanács, OÉT) for wage increases of between 5% and 7.5% for 2008.

Meanwhile, the International Transport Workers’ Federation (ITF) sent a letter to Minister Kákosy requesting that the demands of VDSZSZ be met.

Commentary

The recent railway strikes have highlighted the inefficiency of both Hungarian strike law and national wage agreements. In relation to strike law, plans are being made to amend regulations on essential services and on how much notice trade unions need to give in advance of strike action. In terms of wage agreements, the OÉT only makes recommendations for wages, which by definition cannot be enforced; moreover, even signatories may ignore such recommendations in their lower-level actions.

Máté Komiljovics and László Neumann, Institute for Political Science, Hungarian Academy of Sciences


See also:


Railway services back to normal throughout Hungary

MTI: 15 July 2008

Budapest - All railway services returned to normal on Tuesday morning, including the international services, following a Monday strike that disrupted rail traffic throughout Hungary, railway company MAV spokesman Imre Kavalecz said.

"The complete timetable is back to normal by the start of services on early Tuesday morning. Delays may be expected on international services during the day but all scheduled services will leave Budapest and arrive in Hungary in time," Kavalecz said in a statement.

The strike started at midnight on Monday and lasted 11 hours, he said. Budapest suburban rail services were the first to resume on Monday, followed by intercity trains and international services.

Coordination talks between rail workers' union VDSZSZ and MAV's management will continue on Tuesday.

After the trade union suspended Monday's strike, the chairman of the union Istvan Gasko said the union maintained its demand for 250,000 forints (about 1,000 euros) per worker from the sale of Hungarian railway MAV's cargo enterprise plus a 10 percent wage hike in addition to the 6.9 percent already agreed on by the railway.

MAV's management also insisted that the trade union's demands were unrealistic and the company was unable to fulfill them.

July 13, 2008

German railways - Mixed signals

The Economist: Jul 10th 2008

BERLIN -- Deutsche Bahn is under attack from all sides. Privatisation will not help much

NAPOLEON would have made a great railway boss, claimed Hartmut Mehdorn, the chief executive of Deutsche Bahn (DB), in a recent interview. “The fact that he was short and fat like me is incidental,” he added. Mr Mehdorn has been notching up victories in his own quest for global domination—getting the go-ahead for a part-privatisation for instance—but there are continuous battles at local level.

VRR, a body responsible for local railway services in North-Rhine Westphalia last month tore up a contract with DB Regio, a DB subsidiary, complaining that it ran dirty trains, failed to provide agreed security guards and charged too much, thanks to a sweetheart deal arranged by politicians that is tantamount to a state subsidy. DB is still running the trains, pending mediation: tendering for a new operator is a long process. Next week a court in Lower Saxony will deliberate on the cancellation of another DB Regio contract, to run trains around Bremen.

The European Commission has its own suspicions about a contract in Berlin and Brandenburg, and opened formal investigations last October. There is a slight risk, played up by DB’s competitors, that a string of other local contracts which were negotiated, rather than publicly tendered, could be called into question too.

These are the hazards of being a state-owned incumbent that not only runs the mainline network, but also competes with hundreds of firms to provide local train services—which is by far the most profitable part of DB’s business, if a shrinking one. Veolia, a private train-operator, pulled out of bidding for a contract in Stuttgart in February, complaining that DB, which was also in the running, would not provide the information needed to prepare its bid.

Two railway watchdogs, the Eisenbahnbundesamt (EBA) and the Bundesnetzagentur (BNetzA), try to keep DB on the rails, by checking how it manages such conflicts of interest as it allocates routes, sets timetables and schedules repairs. How much does DB Netz, its network subsidiary, favour DB’s freight, local and long-distance subsidiaries? But the BNetzA, which started overseeing railways only in 2006, is understaffed and dogged by political interference, says Michael Holzhey of KCW, a consultancy.

A fight also looms with the European Commission over the separation of DB’s network and train services: the commission wants the computer systems to be separate too. Last month the Commission wrote to 24 of the European Union’s 27 member states, spelling out how each is infringing European railway directives and threatening proceedings. “The German list was much shorter than the ones for France or Italy,” sniffs a DB spokesman.

On balance that is right: Germany comes out well on railway liberalisation when compared with other European countries. Despite criticism of DB’s dominance, local German rail services are operated by 350 different companies. DB actually has a bigger share of freight traffic in Britain—through its subsidiary EWS—than it does in Germany. And the cost to the state is far lower than for France or Britain.

Will part-privatisation of DB, planned for November, make much difference? Only 24.9% of an operating subsidiary, DB Mobility & Logistics (DB ML), is being sold to investors, with proceeds estimated at €4.5 billion-6 billion. A third of that is expected to go to DB ML, a third to the state budget, and another third to improving infrastructure. But DB managers see it as a vital step away from political interference, even if the proceeds are puny. It will also enable DB ML to invest in foreign expansion—it is the fifth-biggest logistics operator worldwide, but with less than half the turnover of Deutsche Post and its subsidiaries DHL and Exel. SNCF, the French railway, has similar ambitions in logistics.

DB AG will remain 100% state-owned, as will its subsidiary DB Netz. In theory, the presence of private shareholders in DB ML should reduce its ability to win special treatment from DB Netz, though Mr Mehdorn will, bizarrely, continue to head both DB and DB ML. The privatisation represents a step towards the British model, in which private firms run trains on a state-owned network. This requires the regulator to maintain the balance between profit-seeking and provision of a public service. DB managers reckon that Britain’s regulator favours shareholders over passengers.

It is not clear who, if anyone, will be interested in buying shares in DB ML. Given the poor performance of shares in other privatised firms, such as Deutsche Post and Deutsche Telekom, the German public may stay away. Mr Mehdorn seems likely to end up contending with institutional investors and hedge funds that want to shake things up. The last Napoleonic German boss in that situation, Werner Seifert at Deutsche Börse, ignored their demands and was forced out. Mr Mehdorn should be careful what he wishes for.

See also:


German railway boss insists share listing does not threaten service

AFP: July 11 2008

FRANKFURT — A stock market listing of Deutsche Bahn shares does not mean unprofitable regional rail service will be cut, railway boss Hartmut Mehdorn said in an interview Thursday.
DB AG Potsdamer Platz.jpg
People walk past a Germany's national railway Deutsche Bahn (DB) logo at the company's headquarters in Berlin

"You think investors will have a list of all the lines with their respective profitablility? What matters is that the network functions as a whole," Mehdorn told the daily Die Welt.

"Of course some lines are more interesting than others," he acknowledged, "but no shareholder will provoke me by asking why we have maintained line X or Y."

Deutsche Bahn is to be partially privatised at the end of 2008 following years of discussions and setbacks.

Critics claim a subsequent search for profit will lead to the closure of some regional lines and small stations.

"What counts is the overall performance," insisted Mehdorn, who strongly supports the plan to list Deutche Bahn shares publicly, and would like to eventually see more than 24.9 percent of the company in private hands.

"We will prove that it works," he added. "Germany will still need money in the future" that could come from subsequent listings.

The German airline Lufthansa, Mehdorn noted, was also also a former state-owned monopoly that began its privatisation with the sale of 25 percent of its capital.

See also:

D.Bahn IPO in late 2008 "not at any price" - CEO

Reuters: July 10

BERLIN - The head of Germany's Deutsche Bahn will not sell shares in the rail operator at any price, he told a newspaper on Thursday, suggesting he would be prepared to delay the flotation if market conditions are poor.

Germany plans to sell 24.9 percent of Deutsche Bahn [DBN.UL] in November in what is expected to be Germany's biggest flotation since 2000. The government expects the sale to raise between 5 billion ($7.86 billion) and 8 billion euros.

In an interview in Germany's Die Welt, Hartmut Mehdorn said officials and bankers were working on the basis that the initial public offering (IPO) would take place by the end of the year.

"At some point the price of the shares will be determined according to demand. But you can be sure of one thing: We are not going to give anything away," Mehdorn told the paper.

"I am a business man. If I don't get an appropriate price, then it's not happening," he added.

Germany has seen no major initial public offerings this year due partly to turmoil on financial markets linked to the U.S. subprime crisis.

In April, German Transport Minister Wolfgang Tiefensee said the partial privatisation, which Germany's political parties have wrangled over for years, could be delayed until next year due to the turbulent markets.

However, Mehdorn also said there was plenty of money available, despite the difficult situation on global markets.

"Several hundreds of billions of dollars and euros are sloshing around the world which need a safe haven," he said.

Under the plan, 24.9 percent of Bahn's passenger transport, logisitics and services businesses will be sold to private investors. The rail tracks, stations and energy supply unit will remain the property of the state.

Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservatives have said the sale will be a first step in the process of privatising the operation but her Social Democrat coalition partners oppose the sale of further stakes.

(Reporting by Madeline Chambers; Editing by David Cowell)

July 11, 2008

Prosecutors Open Investigation into Derailed German High-Speed Train

Spiegel Online: 07/11/2008
By Barbara Schmid and Frank Dohmen

Public prosecutors have opened an investigation into Deutsche Bahn following the derailing of a high-speed passenger train in Cologne on Wednesday. According to information obtained by SPIEGEL, evidence exists that wheels or axles may have been damaged earlier.
ICE-3.jpg
Police and employees of Deutsche Bahn investigate a derailed high-speed train in Cologne.

SPIEGEL has learned that on Friday morning, the Cologne Public Prosecutor's Office opened an investigation into German national railway Deutsche Bahn because it may have known about problems with a high-speed train before it derailed on Wednesday, thus endangering passengers and the national rail network.

The high-speed train, part of German rail's fleet of ultra-modern, third-generation ICE trains, derailed shortly after leaving Cologne's central station en route to Düsseldorf on Wednesday afternoon, bringing train travel between the heavily-trafficked stations to a standstill for hours. The national railway, Deutsche Bahn, was forced to cancel 90 train connections and recall all its newest ICEs to maintenance sites for inspection.

Public prosecutors now have evidence that the train's wheels or axels may have been damaged earlier -- possibly when it departed from a station at the Frankfurt International Airport. Passengers allegedly repeatedly complained to train crew of hearing suspicious noises.

Prosecutors suspect that the train travelled with a defect wheel or axel along the high-speed line between Frankfurt and Cologne, with speeds of up to 300 kilometers per hour (186 mph). The line, which is Germany's fastest, is considered a national prestige project and a crucial link in the European Union's high-speed rail network.

Deutsche Bahn declined to answer questions from a SPIEGEL reporter about the incident early Friday. However, the chairman of Deutsche Bahn's board, Karl-Friedrich Rausch, said the safety of its passengers was the company's "highest priority" and that the railway had recalled all the trains in the ICE third-generation series in order to conduct multiple safety inspections. "We're not taking any chances," he said.

Experts from Germany's railway regulatory authority and police have been dispatched to investigate the exact cause of the incident. And the Cologne Public Prosecutor's Office has also appointed a expert to probe the accident.

None of the train's 250 passengers were injured in the accident in Cologne. The train had only travelled a few meters and passengers were able to evacuate via a normal platform.

An earlier generation of ICE trains was involved in the world's worst-ever high-speed rail disaster in 1998. An ICE train traveling from Munich to Hamburg derailed near the city of Eschede, killing 101 people and injuring 88. A broken wheel rim caused the deadly train crash.

See also:


MOLASSES-SPEED RAIL

Why Trains Go a Lot Faster in France than in Germany

Spiegel Online: 06/11/2007
By Christian Wüst

Germany's ICE high-speed rail network now includes a connection to Paris. But the critically acclaimed German train, which has become an export succcess, is only able to travel at high speeds once it crosses the border into France.

This train is amazing: It travels faster than any Porsche, and does so without producing any emissions whatsoever. It races through the Westerwald, a large forest in western Germany, at a speed of 300 kilometers an hour (186 mph), and it travels at 350 kilometers an hour (218 mph) in Spain. It understands the rail signal codes of six countries -- now including that of France.

On Sunday, Germany's high-speed train, the InterCityExpress (ICE), went into service between Frankfurt and Paris. Getting approval took 12 years and cost €28 million ($37 million) -- about the price of an entire ICE train. The additional signaling equipment now fills a sizeable wall unit in one of the first-class cars. Six passenger seats had to be forsaken in order to accommodate the control unit.

Paris ICE.jpg
A German ICE train arrives at Gare de l'Est: Travel times from Paris to Frankfurt are slowed by mandatory stops in Germany in provincial cities like Saarbrücken, Kaiserslautern and Mannheim.

The reward for such outlays is a respectable reduction in travel time. The rail journey from the French capital to the German banking city will now take a good four hours. It used to take five-and-a-half and involved changing trains. The French high speed TGV also takes about four hours from Paris to Stuttgart -- a second route that was inaugurated simultaneously with the one to Frankfurt this weekend.

Knut Rothmann, who is responsible for the international long-distance services of Germany's national railway, Deutsche Bahn, the company that owns and administers the ICE network, says the "magical limit" has been undercut with the new rail line. On the new route, the ICE has finally become "more attractive than the plane," he claims.

It's a nice thought, no doubt. Unfortunately, though, it's not true. Peter Mnich, one of Germany's leading rail experts and a professor at Berlin's Technical University, places his trust in a different formula: "In order to beat the plane, the train has to reach its destination within three hours," he explains. "With such a travel time, the train can achieve a market share of up to 80 percent."

"More Attractive than the Plane"

That's precisely what France's experience with high-speed rail shows. There, the TGV has displaced the plane on many domestic routes. The TGV even covers the distance of 750 kilometers (466 miles) separating Paris and Marseille in just three hours.

Deutsche Bahn, by contrast, accounts for only seven percent of total passenger traffic in Germany. The rail provider has only shown strong results on a few short-distance, high-speed routes like Frankfurt-Cologne or Berlin-Hamburg. But the medium-distance routes -- such as those between Hamburg and Cologne or Frankfurt, stretches that take about four hours -- reveal just how unpopular a travel time of four hours is. Lufthansa offers as many as 14 direct flights along those routes daily. Those in a hurry will continue to choose the plane.

What's going wrong on Germany's rail tracks?

Basically everything. And nothing illustrates the misery of Germany's railway infrastructure as exemplarily as the new route from Frankfurt to Paris. It's only in France that the route is really new. The French invested €5.2 billion ($6.9 billion) in the newest high-speed line running from Paris to Strasbourg in the east. The new route closes the last major gap in the French high-speed rail network and ends a short distance from the German border.

And that's where the dilly-dallying begins. Only about one-tenth of the money invested in the new train route was invested by Germany. Among other things, the German money was spent on bringing the signaling equipment on an old and essentially unchanged track up to date. The result is that the ICE train will reach a speed of 320 kilometers per hour (199 miles per hour) only when traveling west of the French-German border. On German territory, the train barely reaches a maximum speed of 200 kilometers an hour (124 mph). The TGV traveling between Paris and Stuttgart suffers the same fate.

The difference reveals itself especially drastically to train passengers traveling from the city of Saarbrücken on Germany's western border. Paris is a good 400 kilometers (249 miles) away from Saarbrücken and can now be reached in an hour and 50 minutes. But the trip to Frankfurt, which is only 180 kilometers (112 miles) away, takes a full two hours.

Not forward-looking enough

The first Franco-German high-speed rail project invites study of mistakes in transport policy that reach back as far as the time when Helmut Kohl was chancellor of Germany (1982-1998). Half a dozen transport ministers have "not been forward-looking enough" since, Mnich complains. They notoriously gave priority to the car. "But in France, there was no parallel expansion of highways along the TGV routes, for example," Mnich explains.

The results of the failed policy are evident today: France disposes of about 2,000 kilometers (1,243 miles) of high-speed tracks, whereas the figure for Germany is only about half that.

But Deutsche Bahn's Rothmann blames an even higher authority than himself for this state of affairs: "The Lord was involved in that too," the graduate physicist says. Deutsche Bahn isn't faced with man-made obstacles, in his view, but by mountains.

Germany has far more low mountain ranges running through it than its western neighbor. The mountains force the railway builders to construct expensive tunnels, since high-speed routes have to be as straight as possible. Rothmann has a formula to sum up the problem: "Every minute of travel time saved by building new train tracks costs us €100 million ($134 million)." In France, the necessary outlays are "many times lower," he adds.

Blame the Mountains

But Germany's railway planners have wallowed in this disadvantage whenever they could. Almost all high-speed tracks built to date drill their way, subway-like, through mountainous terrain. The railway network's gaps are to be found, of all places, on completely level stretches of land -- areas where not a single tunnel would need to be built. They include the areas between Hamburg and Hanover and Hamburg and the populous Ruhr Valley, as well as one track section between Frankfurt and Mannheim that is part of the route to France where the ICE train is now wasting precious time.

And so Germany's railway industry -- technologically one of the most advanced in the world -- becomes a tragic hero. The third-generation ICE train, built by Siemens and Bombardier, is recognized as a top product, and its manufacturers are receiving export orders from places as far away as China.

Paris Frankfurt HS1.jpg
Map: The new high-speed rail connections between France and Germany

From December onward, the high-speed trains made in Germany will travel at a speed of 350 kilometers an hour (218 mph) between Madrid and Barcelona, a world record in scheduled passenger train traffic. It's only in its home country that the ICE rattles about like a commuter train on a majority of its routes. The home-produced super train is forced to travel at snail-like speeds in Germany, of all places, where the absence of speed limits for cars is considered an irrevocable dogma.

A different slowdown factor Germany's train services struggle with is political: "Unfortunately the trains have to stop for every mayor," Mnich explains. Non-stop trips between major cities -- one of the keys to the French high-speed network's success -- hardly exist in federalist Germany. The ruling politicians of Germany's states and cities are too powerful.

An 'Incomprehensible Mistake'

Deutsche Bahn explains the many stops by arguing that Germany is far more densely populated than France. But does this justify the fact that almost every ICE train traveling between the north and the south of the country has to stop in the town of Göttingen (population 129,000)? Mnich considers this an "incomprehensible mistake." The French generally build around cities of such size. The TGV even races past Lyon, France's second biggest city, in order to complete the journey from Paris to Marseille on the Mediterranean in just three hours.

In Germany, by contrast, just about any lord of the manor has a good chance of being able to spoil the trip for high-speed trains. The two Westerwald towns of Limburg and Montabaur (populations 34,000 and 12,518 respectively) have become the running joke on this section of railway tracks -- two cumbersome stops have been placed on the speedy ICE line between Frankfurt and Cologne just to appease officials in the states of Rhineland-Palatinate and Hesse.

The train journey on the new route to Paris is slowed down by three "system stops" or train stations where every ICE is being forced to stop. All three are located on German territory: Saarbrücken, Kaiserslautern and Mannheim.

In Rothmann's view, such compulsory stops don't just reflect the power of the local town councils. They also embody a valuable tradition: "That's a directive that goes back to the time of the Bundesbahn (the state-owned German rail provider that became Deutsche Bahn in 1994), according to which it has to be possible to use every train like a streetcar, meaning it has to stop as often as possible."

The Stop at Every Station Principle

Since the French do what they can to negate the commuter train principle, the option of a separate train track was initially considered. On May 22, 1992 the transportation ministers of Germany and France signed the agreement on the high-speed train connection between the two countries in La Rochelle. In Article Five of the agreement, they reached a consensus on "provisions for the later creation of a new high-speed route north of Strasbourg."

This slightly longer route would allow the ICE train to travel almost exclusively on high-speed tracks, instead of trundling through Germany's hilly Saarland region. The train could speed from Frankfurt to Paris in about three hours, without any intermediate stops. The train option would win out over that of taking the plane.

But it looks like that will never happen. Karl-Friedrich Rausch, who heads Deutsche Bahn's passenger transport division, has already issued a written response to the project. In it, the top train service director explains: "The necessity of a direct route past Strasbourg arises only when the volume of traffic between the locations in question rises so strongly that additional sprinter connections such as Paris-Frankfurt are operating at full capacity."

The idea follows the logic of the old state-owned railway exactly: It's only when a poor product is in unusual demand that Deutsche Bahn rewards its customers with a better one.

In the meantime, Frankfurt-Paris will remain a flight route for many people.

European Commission criticises Belgian railways

Le Vif.be: 11/07/2008
sncbb300.jpg
Europe has formally found that Belgium is in breach of EU directives. The way in which Belgium has organised the structure of SNCB is inconsistent with EU rules. The Secretary of State, Etienne Schouppe is announcing changes, the press reported on Friday.

The European Commission last year opened an investigation into how the Belgian railways are organized. Under rail liberalisation, management of the railway network is required to be separated from that of the train operating company.

SCNB was split in 2004 between a holding company (SNCB Holding) overseeing an infrastructure manager (Infrabel) and a railway company (SNCB).

The European Commission sent a list of questions to Belgium in May 2007. Belgium replied twice but these answers were obviously unsatisfactory because on June 26 the Commission sent a formal warning.

The Commission argues that Infrabel and SNCB should not have staff in common and that it should not be possible to be a member of the Board of Infrabel and SNCB Holding at the same time.

Belgium now has two months to respond. If these answers are unsatisfactory, the Commission may initiate proceedings before the European Court of Justice.

See also:


SNCB in Europe's sights

LeVif.be: 11/07/2008

The European Commission is accusing SNCB of organisation in breach of EU rules on rail liberalisation. The Infrastructure manager (Infrabel) is too close to the train operating company (SNCB).

Europe does not agree with the method of SNCB organisation. Under rail liberalisation, management of the rail network should be separate from that of the train operating company. SCNB was split in 2004 between a holding company (SNCB Holdings), which oversees an infrastructure manager (Infrabel) and a railway company (SNCB). But they are still too close, according to the investigation initiated last year by the European Commission on how the Belgian railways are organised.

Infrabel and SNCB has the same staff, which is not in line with European requirements. In May 2007 the Commission sent a list of questions to Belgium. The latter responded in July 2007 and February 2008. The answers have not satisfied the Commission, which sent a warning on June 26. Infrabel and SNCB may not have staff in common, and it is not possible to be a member of the Board of Infrabel and the SNCB Holding at the same time.

Belgium now has two months to respond. If his answers are not satisfactory, the Commission may initiate proceedings before the European Court of Justice. Note that in 2004 the State Council had already indicated that the division of the Belgian State Railways, as planned, did not correspond to European directives.

The SNCB promises improved services

The case comes as the SNCB promises to improve its passenger service in years to come with the announcement of new trains and 15,000 additional seats. The trains will be better maintained and the capacity of freight transport will also be increased.

In case of delay, passengers will be informed by SMS, and will receive greater compensation. A delay of one hour will entitled them to compensation of 100% of ticket prices. For ten delays of more than 30 minutes in six months, half the train ticket will be refunded. The compensation rules will also be simplified.

Marc Descheemaecker, managing director of the SNCB, announced to the Flemish daily newspaper "Punctuality is a problem even if during the first half of this year it increased by 1.5% to 2%." The target is a punctuality rate of 92% to 93% by the end of 2008 against 90% in 2007.

Removal of Catering Facilities - First Great Western

Personal letter to all FGW Traincrew and On-Train Catering members; 11th July 2008

Dear Colleagues,
Following the closure of the above ballot for strike action, I am pleased to inform you of the successful result:

Are you prepared to take strike action?

Number of votes cast 292
Number found to be spoilt 1
Number voting ‘YES’ 188
Number voting ‘NO’ 103

I would like to congratulate members for returning this positive mandate for strike action and on their courageous stance against considerable misinformation from FGW management.

Many of you will have seen the announcement in the ‘staff bulletin’ dated 7th July 2008 which states that FGW’s internal review makes “a clear recommendation to retain buffet facilities on all our HST services”. Basically, this is a complete U-turn by FGW who previously refused to give this union such an undertaking. Kevin Gale said in the past “there would be no commitment not to remove buffet cars”. FGW could have easily resolved this dispute months ago by giving us the guarantee above.

You will have also received a letter from Andrew Haines dated 25th June 2008. Andrew says that the RMT treats not voting in a ballot as voting yes, but once again I will say that all our ballots are carried out by an independent scrutineer and the only votes that are counted are the ones actually cast. This procedure is uniform across the board, including General and Local Elections and other unions’ ballots. FGW did refuse to meet RMT at national level before changing their mind, allowing the meeting of 12th May to take place. FGW may guarantee no job losses but they are still using agency staff to do members’ jobs at Paddington and Bristol.

Some of you may have children and be familiar with the method of arguing Andrew is employing here.

Finally, I will advise you of a letter sent from TSSA to FGW that complains about FGW bullying their managers to undertake our Guard members’ duties and requesting a meeting to discuss the issues. FGW have not granted this meeting and TSSA will ballot their members also if they do not receive a meeting date by 16th July. I would like to thank the TSSA for their support and also remind you that FGW’s treatment of their own managers is why all FGW workers need to be in a trade union.

The fact is that FGW have now released a statement reversing their policy because of the principled stand taken by yourselves and the successful campaign organised by RMT involving thousands of rail users, trade unionists and politicians calling on FGW to reverse their previous policy of withdrawing buffet cars from HSTs.

Do not be fooled by Andrew’s form of words in ‘Connect’. THIS DISPUTE IS STILL VERY MUCH ONGOING. There are still questions that need answering in relation to FGW’s new policy, particularly regarding the smaller buffet on 30% of services. This meeting will take place next week and then the matter will be considered by the General Grades Committee.

Yours sincerely,

Bob Crow
General Secretary

European Parliament opens up rolling stock market

European Parliament: 09-07-2008

The European Parliament has approved an agreement reached with the European Council on the EU-wide approval of different types of railway rolling stock. Under the new legislation, any rolling stock already approved for use in one Member State will have to be accepted in the other states.

This will cut safety requirements and should boost the development of privatisation of rail transport in Europe. Heritage, museum and tourist railways are exempted from the directive.

The agreement on which the EU's rubber-stamp parliament will be voting - at second reading under the co-decision procedure - relates to two pieces of legislation. The first updates the existing Railway Safety Directive; the second amends the current European Railway Agency regulation.

Cross-border acceptance of rolling stock crucial to free movement

Under current rules, locomotives and other vehicles that can operate in one Member State are not necessarily allowed to operate in another State. Sometimes national safety rules conflict. For example, in Italy fire extinguishers on trains must contain CO2 powder and no foam, while Austria requires fire-extinguishers to be filled with foam and CO2 is not allowed.

Furthermore, rail companies wishing to operate international services have to undergo repeat approval procedures for their rolling stock in each Member State. This often requires the provision of evidence that is not mutually recognised between States and can cause delays and costs. Certification can take up to three years to complete.

The solution proposed by the European Commission - and now on the verge of being endorsed by Parliament and Council - is to introduce the principle of "cross-acceptance through mutual recognition". This means that a railway vehicle that has been approved for use in one Member State must be authorised in the other States.

Safety to be undermined

Efficiency must not come at the expense of safety claimed the Parliament, and the Commission proposed from the outset that Member States' authorities be allowed to impose additional national safety requirements in some cases, for example to take account of "local system specifications".

However, MEPs were keen to ensure that safety issues were not used as an excuse to hinder the approval of rolling stock and the creation of new railway undertakings. They therefore proposed a clearer definition of “national safety rules”, which has been taken on board by the Council.

The Commission and Council wanted a voluntary certification system to guarantee that trains are properly maintained but MEPs argued for it to be mandatory, thus creating a level-playing field in the EU. Following pressure from MEPs, this system will apply to all vehicles: for freight wagons two years after the directive enters into force and for all other vehicles no later then ten years after entry into force.

Lastly, heritage, museum and tourist railways are exempted from the directive, as the result of another demand by Parliament.

Speaking in the debate in Strasbourg on 8 July, Brian Simpson (PES, UK, Labour North West) said: "Finally, I must thank our rapporteur and all the Members for their support of my amendments exempting heritage and tourist railways from this directive. Had they been forced to comply, the cost burden would have been crippling, putting at risk the preservation of that rich industrial heritage that these railways undoubtedly provide. "

European Railway Agency

For the Rail Safety Directive to work, centralised procedures and data will be needed. This is the task of the European Railway Agency. Under the amended regulation on the European Railway Agency, this body is mandated to develop a reference document with information on all the national rules on the placing in service of rolling stock. It will also play a coordinating role in efforts to streamline the number of national safety rules.

A key point was the introduction of a European Railway Traffic Management System, consisting of the most advanced rail safety technology. This system will be installed on the Trans-European Transport network but, at Parliament's insistence, it will be phased in gradually.

July 10, 2008

Activities of Associated Train Crew Union (ATCU)

RMT Circular No. NP/80/08/AG: July 10, 2008

Dear Colleague,
I wrote to all Branches and Regional Councils on 9th May, documenting the activities of breakaway ASLEF members forming an organisation calling itself the Associated Train Crew Union.

This organisation claims to represent Train Crew, yet has no negotiating rights. They play on the fears of working people and try to get them to join under the misapprehension that they will represent the best interests of this group of workers. Such activity is divisive, undermines RMT industrial campaigns and plays into the hands of management.

I have already written to members in Scotland warning of outside attempts to organise this Union's members and I will be meeting with the ASLEF General Secretary next week to determine a joint strategy.

In the meantime Branches and Regional Councils should continue to be vigilant and robustly rebuff any activity from other organisations purporting to be able to represent railway workers.

I will keep you advised of developments.

Yours sincerely,

Bob Crow
General Secretary

July 9, 2008

Message to Andrew...

... "You ain't fooling nobody but yourself" ...

Spice Girls - Denying In First Great Western's weekly staff bulletin ('Connect' 7 July 2008), Chief Operating Officer (!) Andrew Haines reports on a somewhat abrupt change of policy by the company. Reporting on the review of buffet services on trains he says that the recommendation is now: "to retain buffet facilities on all our HST services." Well hallelujah! Andrew denies however that this change of mind has any connection with RMT's campaign to retain buffet cars on HSTs. Read it in full below.

"Yesterday we received the results of our full review into how we provide buffet services on our trains. While we are a few weeks away from being able to make a final decision, the review makes a clear recommendation to retain buffet facilities on all our HST services.

"It would involve retaining existing buffet cars on around 70 per cent of HSTs and the development of a new, smaller buffet for the remaining 30 per cent of services, which will allow us to increase standard class seating capacity over the next few years.

"We would refresh a number of the existing buffet vehicles and develop the new smaller buffet to ensure we can still offer a comprehensive range of hot and cold food and drink on all services.

"There is still more work to do to finalise costings and feasibility but we should be able to make a definitive decision in the next four weeks.

"We have repeatedly told the RMT that we were undertaking this review and that is why I am so disappointed that they have insisted on twice balloting colleagues on this issue.

"You might think the company could have avoided this if we had made our position clear earlier on, but it is not the company who calls the ballots. The work we have been doing could not be rushed because it required detailed bids and prices from suppliers under European legislation, which the RMT knew about.

"The results of the second ballot are due out tomorrow - the outcome of which has the potential to severely damage what goodwill we have managed to earn from customers over recent months.

"Andrew"


See also:

To hear RMT Council of Executive member Nick Quirk welcoming Andrew Haines' U-turn on BBC Radio Somerset click on this link http://www.bbc.co.uk/somerset/local_radio/listen/

Then click on listen again.

Then click on Somerset's Drive.

When it starts playing skip it forward by 15 mins to about the 18th minute!

See also:


Spice Girls - Denying lyrics

Ooh yeah yeah come on
You think you're quick but I'd like to see you keep up with me
You think you're slick but I'd like to see you pull a trick on me
You think you're so cool Hey big man you're old school
You think you're smart but who the hell d'ya think you're talking to
Everyone can see who you are
Take a look at yourself tell me why keep on denying
everything you say denying everything you do
So be a fool to yourself forever more, trying,
Any kind of move, tell me, So what's it gonna prove,
You ain't fooling nobody, You ain't fooling nobody but yourself

I know you're sweet, But I know you don't wanna be seen that way
Admit defeat, win or lose, Who cares it's just a game you play
I know you need me, If you stay that way it's never gonna be
You got your style, but I know what you really want from me
Everyone can see who you are,
Take a look at yourself, tell me why keep on denying,
Everything you say, denying, everything you do,
So be a fool to yourself forever more, trying,
Any kind of move, tell me, So what's it gonna prove,
You ain't fooling nobody, You ain't fooling nobody but yourself

Ha, ha, check yourself
Check yourself, but don't forget yourself, 'cause you're denying
Ha ha, ha ha, check yourself, ha I don't forget yourself
Check yourself, but don't forget yourself, 'cause you're denying
You're getting everything you are and even everything you need, That's life, come on,
ha ha, check yourself,

Everyone can see who you are,
Take a look at yourself, tell me why keep on denying,
Everything you say, denying, everything you do,
So be a fool to yourself forever more, trying,
Any kind of move, tell me, So what's it gonna prove,
You ain't fooling nobody,
You ain't fooling nobody, denying,
Everything you say, denying (Everything you say),
Everything you do (Everything you do),
So be a fool to yourself forever more (more), trying,
Any kind of move (Any kind of move), tell me,
So what's it gonna prove (What's it gonna prove),
You ain't fooling nobody, You ain't fooling nobody, denying (Woo),...

Europe's rail renaissance on track

Guardian: July 9, 2008
David Gow in Chamonix

The rail renaissance in Europe is racing ahead like a 320kph TGV yet Guillaume Pepy, head of SNCF, sees risks as well as opportunities as he celebrates the centenary of the reborn Mont Blanc Express aboard one of its six new electric traction trains.
Alps4.jpg
A train winds through the Alps. Photograph: Sandro Vannini/Corbis

Last weekend saw the start of the French summer holiday season and 1.3 million people thronged Paris's stations as they headed for the mountains and sea. The elongated twin-set TGVs pulling out of the Gare de Lyon virtually every five minutes are packed with up to 1,000 passengers. The concourse and platforms are so crammed with anxious families and international backpackers it's surprising they all get on board on time.

Even in the driving rain sweeping through the French Alps, accompanied by thunder and lightning, drenched walkers and climbers rush to join the "express" linking St Gervais with Vallorcine on the Franco-Swiss border and offering stunning views of the Mer de Glace.

Pepy, SNCF chairman and chief executive (PDG) since February, says that, unlike his predecessors who had to manage a railway recession, he is presiding over an accelerating boom. The state-owned SNCF delivered a net €1.1bn (£875m) profit last year and first-half figures, due next week, are said to be sparkling. Pepy envisages up to 80m extra passenger trips this year or an increase of around 8%.

"This change will speed up because we are facing a twin energy and environment crisis," he says, pointing to surging fuel costs and growing personal worries about carbon footprints. "People want sustainable mobility and, in France, more trains and more SNCF."

Carlos Ghosn, head of Renault-Nissan, he adds, has spoken of the demise of the petrol-driven car and drivers are shifting to trains which are four times more energy-efficient than cars – and six times more than planes. "People are looking for new answers," Pepy says. "They are waiting for SNCF solutions."

But, first, he adds, the state-owned group has to complete what he calls its "internal transformation". This, he quickly points out, has nothing to do with an injection of private capital – unlike La Poste which is preparing for a possible float ahead of EU liberalisation of postal services. What he means is a change of mentality: gearing the workforce to boom rather than bust.

Streamlining the business, he hastily adds, is not about improving productivity by firing staff among the SNCF's 220,000-strong workforce but creating greater flexibility both in working practices and operations. "My personal challenge as the new chairman is how we are going to meet these new expectations among the public. There's a risk we cannot provide the proper answers."

The French media are full of reports about long delays caused by maintenance problems on the tracks and Pepy reels off a list of problems to be addressed: punctuality, lack of "slots" on the network, the length of time taken to introduce new rolling stock and locos. The SNCF, which will tender for up to 30 new very high-speed trains next year, wants to double the size of its TGV network by 2015 – and capture the shift from road and air to rail.

This, he insists, will require a huge investment from RFF – the equivalent of Network Rail – and radical changes in maintenance practices. It also means a big expansion of SNCF's freight business which, even with the full acquisition of logistics company Geodis, ranks only fourth in Europe – well behind market-leader Deutsche Bahn, Pepy's yardstick for profitability.

Beyond that, the new SNCF chairman sees rail stations, mainly in the regions, becoming new transport (and commercial) hubs not just for trains but for buses and trams – "all those places where people don't want to bring their cars."

SNCF executives believe rail can take market leadership from air and road on journeys up to four hours long and point to the success of Eurostar (part owned by the group) in increasing traffic so far this year by around a fifth on the back of shorter journey times between London and Brussels/Paris. You can even get to Marseille from Paris in little more than three hours.

Pepy is, therefore, unfazed by the recent move by Air France-KLM to join forces with French freight operator Veolia and launch its own TGV services to, say, Charles de Gaulle airport. "SNCF is not going to be an airline-style operator as we need to operate regional and local services as well."

He believes he can count on two key supporters to drive his vision forward. One is local/regional authorities such as that of the Rhone-Alpes which helped rescue the Mont Blanc Express by putting up two-thirds of the recent €50m investment in new trains. The other is the workforce – despite the traditionally militant stance of the cheminots and their unions.

"Thirty-five thousand of our workforce was hired less than six years ago and the growth project is extremely exciting for them. As the older guys leave the future of the company will be theirs and they are very sensitive to that," he says.

Throughout mainland Europe – in Spain, Italy, Germany as well as France – train operators are investing in new high-speed services to meet growing popular demand. As we travel back to Paris from Lyon in less than two hours, we debate whether Britain can ever follow their lead and build its own TGVs on dedicated new track – apart from in Kent. Sadly, the consensus is overwhelmingly negative.

£8m package to double train service frequency on Cornish Maritime line

Transport Briefing: 09/07/08
truro-falmouth.jpg
Services on the Maritime branch line between Truro, Penryn and Falmouth are to double in frequency after Cornwall County Council signed agreements with Network Rail and train operator First Great Western to deliver the Truro–Falmouth branch line passing loop scheme.

The £7.8m project will be funded by £4.67m from the European Union’s Convergence investment pot, £2.5m provided by Cornwall County Council and Network Rail contributing £600,000.

Detailed design work on the enhanced rail service has already begun and work is expected to start on site by the last quarter of this year with a new timetable commencing in May 2009.

EU Convergence investment will allow the project to form a key part of the overall transport strategy identified for the Truro area in order to achieve its wider economic, social and environmental objectives to 2016 and beyond.

The project, one of a number across Cornwall to be delivered throughout the lifetime of the Convergence programme, will provide a passing loop adjacent to Penryn station to allow two way movement of trains, increase the current level of service to a regular two per hour service during the working day, and increase patronage to provide a commercially self sustaining service. This will be supported by a new bus based park and ride service which will open this summer on the A390 at Langarth Park, Threemilestone.

Cornwall County Council executive member for strategic planning and transport Matt McTaggart said: “This is a great scheme that by increasing the capacity for rail passengers will remove car users from the congested road between Truro and Falmouth and reduce environmental pollution.”

The council’s executive member for the economy Andrew Mitchell added: “As a ‘Community Rail’ designated link, the Truro to Falmouth rail improvement scheme presents an opportunity to demonstrate sustainable transport which can support economic development initiatives, improve access to key services and ensure that environmental objectives are met in addition to wider social and economic aims.”

Diana Mompoloki, head of convergence for the South West of England Regional Development Agency – which is the managing agent for the ERDF Convergence Programme in Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly, said: “This is the first investment to be approved under Convergence and evidence that the programme is already starting to deliver for Cornwall. This improved rail link will have a significant economic impact, helping to boost productivity by reducing travel times, reinforcing the links to the Combined Universities in Cornwall and helping to underpin environmentally sustainable growth in Truro, Penryn and Falmouth.”

In 1997 156,000 journeys were made on the Falmouth to Truro Maritime line. Ten years later passenger numbers had increased 67.3% to 261,000.

July 8, 2008

Train operators told to improve - FGW worst satisfaction rating again

Financial Times: July 8 2008
By Robert Wright

Five long-distance train operators have been told to improve their performance following a fall in passenger satisfaction ratings.

Cross Country, East Midlands, First TransPennine Express, National Express East Coast and Virgin Trains should take the fall in long-distance passengers' satisfaction "as a red alert", said Anthony Smith, chief executive of Passenger Focus, the official rail passenger watchdog, which conducted the survey.

The number of passengers overall saying they were very or fairly satisfied with the train journey they had just taken rose 2 percentage points on the year before to 80 per cent in the survey conducted this spring. First Great Western, which has one of the worst punctuality records, continued to have the lowest satisfaction rating - 73 per cent.


See also:

FirstGroup's First Great Western criticised for poor service

Thomson Financial: 07.07.08

LONDON - Controversial rail operator First Great Western (FGW) has come under renewed fire from passengers for poor service on its trains from London to Wales.

Travellers criticised the company, run by FirstGroup, for its connections with other public transport, its handling of delays, the standard of its train toilets and information provided during journeys, according to a national survey of more than 25,000 passengers by watchdog Passenger Focus.

FGW has previously faced a barrage of criticism for poor punctuality on its long-distance services and overcrowding on trains in the south west. The UK government has threatened to terminate its franchise unless it improves.

Other companies running trains in Wales, including Virgin CrossCountry -- part-owned by Stagecoach Group -- and Arriva Trains Wales (ATW), exceeded the national average passenger satisfaction score of 80 percent, achieving 85 percent and 83 percent respectively. First Great Western achieved a score of 79 percent.

Passenger Focus said all three companies continued to rate poorly on value for money.

Simon Pickering, passenger manager for Wales, said: 'All three operators must respond to this clear sign that passengers are not happy with the price of their train tickets.'

Passenger Focus said although ATW managed to improve performance in five aspects of its service, the survey highlighted shortcomings including facilities and services at stations and the company's handling of delays.

July 7, 2008

Italy's transport workers on strike

Press Association: 7 July 2008

Transport workers in Italy are on strike, forcing the cancellation of thousands of bus, tram and subway lines and snarling traffic across the country. Railway workers have been on a 24-hour strike since Sunday evening.

The railway company says some commuter trains will be operating.

Labour unions say services will be guaranteed during the morning and evening rush hours.

The unions called the strikes to put pressure on upcoming contract renewal talks.


See also:


Support for train-bus strike over 80% according to unions

Reuters: July 7, 2008

MILAN - Trains, buses and metros are on strike on a black day for public transport, which the unions say is 80% firmly behind the strike.

According to the first figures from Filt Cgil, which together with Fit Cisl, Uiltrasporti, Orsa transport, Ugl, Faisa and Fast organised the protest in support of their dispute for a new national contract, the stoppage had the support of about 82% among trains, metro, buses and trams throughout the country.

The MTA, which manages public transport in Milan, said this morning, outside protected areas, the metro remained closed, while around 55% of the suburban fleet has remained stuck in depots.

Even ATAC, the public transport holding company in Rome, confirmed that the underground Capitoline remained closed throughout the morning. The figures for the surface services, however, are not yet available.

The group Ferrovie dello Stato admitted the cancellation and suspension of many regional and long-distance trains and is inviting rail users to call the stations before travelling on a toll-free number 800-892021, which will remain active until 21.00 tonight .

As for local transport, in Milan the MTA know the service will be guaranteed from the start of the morning rush hour until 8.45 and from 15.00 to 18.00. In Rome, Atac announced that the services will be guaranteed from the beginning of service until 8.29 and from 17.01 - when the fleet leave depots - to 19.59.

Solidarity with Israeli and Palestinian Workers

RMT: July 2008

RMT's 2008 Annual General Meeting adopted the following policy on 'Solidarity with Israeli and Palestinian Workers'.

That this Annual General Meeting reaffirms our union's support for:

1. the right to self-determination of the Palestinian people as expressed in numerous United Nations resolutions;
2. the right of return in accordance with Article 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as applied to the Palestinian people in UN General Assembly Resolution 3236 (1974) and 52/62 (1997);
3. the immediate and unconditional withdrawal of Israeli troops to the 1967 borders of the state of Israel as expressed in UNs Security Council resolutions 242 (1967) and 338 (1973) and the right of Israel to exist in peace alongside an independent and sustainable Palestinian state.

This AGM condemns the indiscriminate targeting of civilians, including Israeli military air strikes and the economic blockade of Gaza, as well as the arbitrary murders of Israeli citizens in so-called 'martyrdom operations' by suicide bombers and 'Kassem' rocket attacks launched by terrorist forces allied to Hamas in Gaza and Hizbollah in southern Lebanon. We mourn the eight railway workers in the Israeli city of Haifa killed in July 2006 when rockets fired from Lebanon hit the train depot where they were working. We note both the Israeli and Palestinian victims of the conflict are usually working class people, targeted by political and military forces that seek to de-humanise Arab and Jewish workers using anti-semitism, Jew-hatred and anti-Arab racism. We note that the Hamas Charter is a virulently anti-semitic document that exhorts the killing of Jews and subordinates all social and human rights to Islam.

AGM congratulates the General Secretary and Council of Executives for hosting a visit from the Israeli Workers' Advice Centre (Ma'an in Arabic), which organises Israeli Arab and Jewish workers in Israel and supports Israeli Arab workers' cooperatives such as Sindyanna of Galilee. AGM notes that the International Transport Workers' Federation, the transport union of the Histadrut and the Palestinian General Transport Workers’ Union met in Tel Aviv on 6-7 Feb regarding a helpline project for Palestinian transport workers to improve the passage of professional drivers at checkpoints and road blocks in the West Bank. The ITF and the two unions agreed this is a vital project of benefit to both Israeli and Palestinian transport workers.

This AGM:
1. supports the links that RMT and ITF have established with Palestinian and Israeli trade unions and the Workers’ Advice Centre and recognises the importance of increasing our links with labour, peace movement and progressive socialist and trade union organisations in Israel and Palestine;
2. wishes to promote unity between Arab and Jewish workers and to oppose both anti-semitism and anti-Arab racism;
3. resolves to set up a solidarity appeal to raise money and material aid for an appropriate workers’ advice centre or other trade union initiative;
4. supports and will promote protest actions in this country in line with this policy.

Air France-KLM, Veolia Discuss Creating High-Speed Rail Operator

Bloomberg: July 4
By Laurence Frost

Air France-KLM Group, the largest European airline, is in talks with Veolia Environnement SA's transportation unit about setting up a passenger rail service.

"Air France and Veolia Transport are looking at the possibility of concluding a strategic partnership that would lead to the emergence of a new player in European high-speed rail,'' Air France spokeswoman Brigitte Barrand said today in a telephone interview. She declined to comment further.

The services may replace some of Air France's short-haul flights, the Financial Times reported today, without saying where it got the information. After abandoning Paris-Brussels flights in 2001, Air France negotiated a code-sharing agreement allowing it to book passengers onto Thalys trains linking Paris Charles de Gaulle airport with the Belgian capital.

Veolia, Europe's No.1 private rail-freight operator, said discussions with Air France are still at an exploratory stage. "It's too early to say what routes they would serve'' or what brand the venture would use, spokesman Jerome Simon said.

Veolia, which like Air France is based in Paris, is also the world's biggest water company. Veolia Environnement operates utility and public transportation businesses. The Company supplies drinking water, provides waste management services, manages and maintains heating and air conditioning systems, and operates rail and road passenger transportation systems.


See also:

Air France talks to Veolia about rail venture

Financial Times: July 3 2008
By Robert Wright in London

High-speed trains could take a chunk of European short-haul airline business

Air France is holding talks about a joint venture that could see some of its short-haul flights switched to rail and increase competition for continental Europe’s mainly state-owned high-speed train operators.

The move could mark the beginning of a decline in short-haul air travel on routes such as Paris-Frankfurt, which now enjoy good high-speed rail links. High-speed rail has already nearly eliminated air travel on some European routes, such as Paris-Brussels.

The French flag carrier, part of Air France-KLM, is holding discussions with Paris-based Veolia Transport, part of the Veolia Environnement group.

Veolia is continental Europe’s largest private rail freight operator and runs passenger trains in several countries. It previously operated public transport services worldwide under the now-defunct Connex brand and in 2005 became the first private company since 1938 to run a freight train in France.

Veolia could run trains under the Air France brand from the airline’s hub at Paris’s Charles de Gaulle airport to destinations across Europe. The services are likely to be solely international because European legislation is set to liberalise only the international rail passenger market. Private operators will be able to compete on such services from January 2010.

Such services’ potential is increasing as Europe’s network of dedicated high-speed rail lines becomes more international. Last year saw France’s LGV Est open between Paris and near Strasbourg, on the German border. A line linking Antwerp and Amsterdam should open in the next year.

Although Air France and Germany’s Lufthansa have previously bought seats on existing high-speed train operators’ services, the venture would mark the first time an airline has commissioned its own high-speed trains.

Airlines are struggling to cope with fuel costs that eat up 30-40 per cent of most carriers’ total costs, against about 15 per cent earlier this decade.

Air France on Thursday confirmed a report in French magazine La Vie du Rail International, which said the airline had been exploring for four years the possibility of using rail to complement its air services, or where air services were unprofitable. It was looking at its own services because it had been unhappy with the quality of connections when it had bought space on existing operators’ trains.

Veolia confirmed it was in talks with Air France.

20 years after Piper Alpha, safety still the major offshore issue

RMT: July 5 2008

TWO DECADES after 167 offshore workers died in the Piper Alpha disaster, an industry in which billions are made still pays far too little heed to safety, and workers can still effectively be fired for raising concerns, maritime union RMT says today.

Effective organisation of the offshore workforce remains the key to improving safety, says the union, whose recently merged OILC section was formed as a direct result of the July 6, 1988 disaster.

Despite significant efforts to improve safety and industry-specific regulations imposed after the tragedy and the subsequent inquiry, RMT says that workers are still under the threat of being told they are 'Not Required Back' (NRB) if they raise safety issues.

Enforcement is lax, not least because the number of inspectors has fallen by 40 per cent since 1994, and there is a feeling among parts of the workforce that the Health and Safety Executive's Offshore Division has been 'captured' by the industry, the union says.

"This is an industry in which millions in profits are made by the hour, but also one in which the threat of NRB still hangs over workers who dare to challenge their employers on safety issues," RMT general secretary Bob Crow said today.

"The Offshore Division of the HSE responsible for enforcing safety standards has dragged its feet on taking formal enforcement action to the extent that many offshore workers see it more as a poodle than a watchdog.

"In more than half the 83 offshore visits they made between 2004 and 2007 the installations were considered to be in a poor physical state, but where is the formal enforcement action?" Bob Crow said.

"In the run-up to Piper hundreds of workers said that it was only a matter of time before a major accident would happen, and the inquiry found that management controls amounted to little more than a 'paper chase'," said RMT offshore organiser Jake Molloy

"Yet several incidents since Piper have avoided major fatalities only through good luck, and in many cases concerns raised by the workforce were ignored or dismissed.

"The industry still needs to learn to engage with and listen to its own workforce, and that dissent is not a threat but a priceless insurance against disaster," Jake Molloy said.

ends

Notes to editors:

Safety on Offshore Installations

The Health and Safety Executive has an Offshore Division (OSD) responsible for the offshore industry. There are clear concerns over the lack of formal enforcement action that has been brought forward by OSD to tackle shortcomings in safety amongst certain operators within the offshore industry.

The Work and Pension Select Committee recently published a report on the role of the Health and Safety Commission and the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) in regulating workplace health and safety, (third report of session 2007/08). The Select Committee, with specific reference to the Offshore Industry, highlighted a report that had been published by HSE in 2007, Key Programme 3: Asset Integrity Programme, which exposed the poor physical condition of safety critical offshore plant.

The programme comprised of 83 visits to offshore installations from 2004 to 2007. In more than half of the installations inspected the physical state of the plant was considered poor. This follows a number of complaints that have been made by OILC/RMT and other industry critics regarding poor maintenance of offshore plant since the late 1990s.

The problems of both under investment, together with the decision to extend the life of many rigs, has left a potentially dangerous work environment for many employed in the sector.

Lack of enforcement action by Offshore Safety Division

The perception amongst much of the workforce is that the Offshore Safety Division (OSD) is a captured regulator.

Whilst OSD have ensured that adequate safety cases are set out by operators there has been a lack of inspection and enforcement activity to ensure that risks in the actual workplace are controlled.

New safety cases containing the same arrangements for control of risks have been accepted from operators who have previously failed to control these risks, and BERR have also awarded new offshore production licences to companies that have failed to honour previous assurances of improvement.

OILC have seen unsafe practices continue for many years. Despite the availability of a range of enforcement measures ranging from formal notices to require that breaches of regulations are remedied and ultimately prosecution, too often inspectors have only followed up with written advice when more rigorous action has clearly been required.

Safety representatives

These are elected by the workforce as opposed to being appointed by trade unions. There are statutory requirements to consult with safety representatives but again the reality on the ground is different.

There are too few properly trained representatives to enable meaningful consultation to take place and often workforce concerns are ignored. The Offshore Safety Directorate of the HSC appear reluctant to take any enforcement action regarding the need to ensure the appointment, training, consultation or victimisation of safety representatives:

In his report following the Piper Alpha tragedy, Lord Cullen stated:

"The representation of the workforce in regard to safety matters is important not merely for what it achieves on installations but also for the effect which it has on the morale of the workforce - in showing that their views are taken into account and that they are making a worthwhile contribution to their own safety."

Unfortunately the Offshore Safety Division of the HSE often hold meetings with oil company and contractor senior management without any workforce involvement.

Number of Inspectors

The Work and Pensions Select Comm also called for the HSE to take urgent steps to reverse a loss of specialist inspectors from its offshore division. The number of OSD Inspectors has fallen from 200 in 1994 to fewer than 120 at the time of the report, (2007/08)


See also:

Rig risks: warnings 'ignored'

Sunday Mirror: 6/07/2008

The oil and gas industry still does not pay enough attention to offshore safety - 20 years after the Piper Alpha disaster killed 167 workers, a union claims.

The RMT says safety enforcement is lax and the number of inspectors has fallen by almost 40 per cent since 1994.

Rmt offshore organiser Jake Molloy said: "Several incidents since Piper have avoided major fatalities only through good luck. In many cases concerns raised were ignored."

Survivors and relatives of people killed when the Piper Alpha oil platform blew up attend a service in Aberdeen today to mark the tragedy's anniversary.

An oil and gas industry spokesman defended the industry's safety record, saying lessons had been learned from the tragedy.

July 5, 2008

Feminism and the Tube Cleaners strike

New Statesman: 04 July 2008
Alex Iossifidis

So, why is the tube cleaner’s plight a feminist issue? Well, for a start most tube cleaners are women and Feminist Fightback feel that cleaning has been underpaid and devalued as a ‘women’s industry’, reports Alex Iossifidis
cleaners demo window.jpg
Cleaners and Feminist Fightback: Here one of the cleaner's rights activists is protest-cleaning the window of the TfL headquarters while below in the reflection through the glass commuters can be seen buzzing around the tube gates at St James Park. Taken on 28th June 2008 on the morning of the Tube cleaners' strike. The direct action asked TfL to "Clean up your act" and the protesters set to work cleaning the lobby while calling out the demands of the tube cleaners strike.

Most readers inside London will have heard of the tube cleaners strike. Some will have been inconvenienced and annoyed. A few will have picked up the rubbish on order of the intercom. Others, however, will have actively littered in solidarity with the cleaners. These others count Feminist Fightback among their ranks; a diverse group of feminists dedicated to women’s liberation and a democratic, classless society. They are a fairly new group, with a founding conference in 2006, and are news to a feminist scene which has lacked presence in the workplace in recent years. A tube worker and group member explained that “lots of activism hasn’t really been concerned with working class women’s issues” but now Feminist Fightback are “filling the gap”.

So, why is the tube cleaners' plight a feminist issue? Well, for a start most tube cleaners are women and Feminist Fightback feel that cleaning has been “underpaid and devalued as a ‘women’s industry’”. At £5.50 an hour, tube cleaners are certainly underpaid and undervalued. The 700-800 RMT members have a list of demands that brings shame to Transport for London (TfL) and its cleaning sub-contractors. They want a living wage, sick pay, 28 days holiday, final salary pension, free travel and an end to third party sackings. As well as the expected level of unpleasantness involved in the work, tube cleaners claim to face grim conditions: on-the-spot sackings, having to clean faeces with their bare hands, using unsafe cleaning chemicals and cleaning eight stations at a time on their own. On top of this, many workers face intimidation over immigration status. Despite Transport for London’s insistence that the strike was “completely unnecessary” it is about much more than the simple pay dispute TfL claims to be fixing.

Feminist Fightback certainly see it that way. One tube worker in the group believes that this kind of industrial action “shows the way forward for other women”. Many women in underpaid “pink-collar” jobs are made to feel powerless by managers and given no practical help from mainstream feminist organisations. By organising in day-to-day struggles, in the workplace or community, women (and men for that matter) can make improvements and gain a sense of empowerment. This is a basic part of Feminist Fightback’s activities, that women’s liberation isn’t merely a statistic or piece of legislation, but an experience.

With solidarity from groups like Feminist Fightback, women battling poor pay and working conditions can get support where it has been denied by anti-union laws. To this end the group have been attending pickets and staging protests. On the first day of the strike a dozen members cleaned up the London underground offices whilst handing out leaflets to staff and the public. In the recent 48 hour strike, the group dumped rubbish outside the offices, chanting “Transport for London – clean up your act”. Clara Osagiede, RMT cleaner’s grade secretary, says the demos and picket support have been “very useful” and are much appreciated by the workers.

Although their activities are fairly small scale for the moment, these activists are optimistic, one member explaining that “this kind of action gives us a boost and a model to build on”. With the 80th anniversary of universal female suffrage this week, it seems an appropriate time for feminist groups and activists to be getting back to direct action.

July 3, 2008

New Zealand is in tune with the times - Britain's lagging

The Guardian: July 3, 2008
Comment is free: Seumas Milne

The privatisation tide is turning, from Wellington to Caracas, but public intervention has to be at the cutting edge as well.

New Zealand has long had a record of being ahead of the political game. It was the first country in the world to accept women's right to vote, in 1893. In the 1930s, it emerged as a pioneer of the modern welfare state. Fifty years later, in the 1980s, it was the first state to declare itself nuclear-free. Less creditably, during the same decade, New Zealand became host to the first social democratic government to embrace a free-market programme of wholesale privatisation, liberalisation and deregulation.

Named after New Zealand Labour's then finance minister, "Rogernomics" was all the rage on the global new right for a time - and laid the ground for neoliberal social democratic governments like Tony Blair's - until it finally imploded amidst a litany of social and economic failures: stagnation, unemployment, bankruptcies, crime and rampant inequality. Two decades on, another New Zealand government, this time a more progressive Labour coalition headed by Helen Clark, is again at the forefront of political change - leading the revival of public ownership.

On Tuesday, Clark's government renationalised the country's railways and ferry services, privatised in the early 90s and subsequently run down and asset-stripped by the Australian owners. Launching the new, publicly owned KiwiRail, finance minister Michael Cullen declared that privatisation had "been a painful lesson for New Zealand". Nor is this the first renationalisation by the Clark government, which took over Air New Zealand after it nearly collapsed in 2001 and has also built up a successful state-owned retail bank - named Kiwibank, needless to say.

And unlike Gordon Brown's government, which strained every nerve to avoid nationalising Northern Rock to avoid seeming "old Labour", Clark has championed the takeover of rail as exactly what is needed to build a modern, environmentally sustainable transport network. Against a background of global warming and rising fuel prices, she argues, rail is a "central part of 21st-century economic infrastructure".

Given Britain's similarly disastrous experience with rail privatisation, you might think that taking a leaf out New Zealand's book would be just the kind of popular policy to help dig Brown's government out of its hole. Despite the modest improvements achieved by putting the lethal Railtrack out of its misery, Britain's railway system remains a byword for bewildering fragmentation, unreliability, overcrowding, delays and exorbitant cost - which has only now completed a high-speed link to the Channel tunnel, 15 years after its state-owned French counterpart.

Fleeced by the private train companies and rolling stock contractors (some of them pocketing 30% rates of return), it is now the most expensive, opaque and inefficient rail system in Europe. As the Campaign for Better Transport reported yesterday, walk-on fares are on average nearly five times those booked in advance - and all ticket prices are set to spiral in the next few years. Meanwhile, renationalisation is strongly supported by the public and is in fact official Labour party policy.

But far from planning to end what has been a disastrous experiment, the rail minister, Tom Harris, last month insisted that if the Tories hadn't privatised the railways, New Labour would have sold them off when it came to power in 1997. In a surreal aside that will baffle most UK train passengers, he insisted that "the private railway has provided a level of investment, innovation, imagination that wouldn't have happened if BR had stayed as it was".

This is nonsense. Investment in the railways comes from farepayers and government subsidy, now around three times the level before privatisation (£2bn a year goes to the train operating companies alone), while the leakage of cash from the industry to private investors and lenders is estimated at £800m a year. The rise in passenger numbers is simply the product of economic growth, and the case for a reintegrated, publicly owned rail system - at the heart of a national investment programme to encourage more people to move off road and air travel on to rail - is overwhelming. It has the added advantage that most services can be taken back at no cost as franchises expire.

But the government is still in the grip of an ideology that sees privatisation as the only way to reform the health service, and nationalisation as a throwback to be avoided at all costs. As global economic conditions increasingly undermine the credibility of free-market economics, however, real life is pointing in another direction. The revival of public ownership in countries as diverse as New Zealand and Venezuela reflects a wider disillusionment with the neoliberal experience of the past decade.

As the writer and Work Foundation chief executive Will Hutton recently argued in a BBC programme on nationalisation, the takeover of Northern Rock, Railtrack and Metronet has begun to force a mainstream reappraisal of what had become a political taboo - just as academic research has been rehabilitating the productivity and costs record of Britain's postwar nationalised industries.

But it's also clear that, if there is going to be an effective new role for public enterprise and intervention, it will have to be about more than bailing out the failures of the private sector in traditional industries, and engage with the cutting edge of the economy. In Britain, the credit crisis has exposed the dangers of the reliance on finance, the rundown of manufacturing, and the chronically low rate of investment in the economy. The case for a national fibre-optic network, for example, giving universal fast broadband access to the home is a powerful one, both on economic and social grounds - countries such as South Korea are far ahead of Britain. But the private sector won't deliver the necessary multibillion pound long-term investment. A publicly owned network, on the other hand, could do - perhaps funded by service providers as part of a universal service obligation, as the Communication Workers Union argues.

What is certain is that the Brown government's kneejerk resistance to public intervention and ownership will have to end if it is to have a hope of riding out the crisis and dealing with the new economic reality. By making a stand for progressive common sense, New Zealand has at least helped break the spell that privatisation is somehow the natural order of things in the modern world.

See also:


Letter from: Alex Gordon

03/07/08 13:40

To: Guardian Letters Editor
Subject: Renationalising our railways means rejecting EU liberalisation directives
Status: Response

Renationalising our railways means rejecting EU liberalisation directives

Congratulations to Seumas Milne ('New Zealand is in tune with the times - Britain's lagging' Thursday July 3, 2008) for noticing that a progressive Labour coalition headed by Helen Clark, is leading the revival of public ownership by renationalising New Zealand's railways.

Unfortunately, emulating such a rational policy in the UK would face additional obstacles to those faced by Helen Clark. Britain's disastrous experiment with rail privatisation has been structurally and legislatively imposed by European Union directives that since 1991 have seriously damaged our rail system.

EU member states were ordered to split railways into separate companies under EU directive 91/440: to allow competitive market players to emerge in train operations while historic debt was transferred to infrastructure companies. This has led to a catastrophic deterioration in track maintenance and many deaths and injuries to staff and passengers. European member states have spent £5.5 billion on infrastructure since 2004 and paid £11.5 billion a year to maintain so-called 'unprofitable routes'. The Commission is now warning member states to clamp down on 'state aid'.

The New Zealand government is showing the way out of the funding crisis created by privatisation by re-nationalising rail. To emulate New Zealand's refreshing approach the UK and other EU member states would have to reject the EU's various rail diktats and its mania for rail privatisation. If the renamed EU constitution, the Lisbon Treaty, comes into force it would be even harder for member states to regain democratic control of their railways as transport is one of the areas where national vetoes would be abolished. This would mean any member state wishing to renationalise railways as New Zealand is doing could be outvoted by the other member states.

Alex Gordon,

RMT Council of Executives
c/o Unity House,
39 Chalton St,
London NW1 1JD

Tel': 0207 378 4771
Mob': 077141 05036
AGordon2@rmt.org.uk

July 2, 2008

NZ government reveals ‘Plan B’ on rail

Scoop: 2 July 2008, 2:24 pm
Press Release: New Zealand Government
Hon Dr Michael Cullen,
Minister of Finance

The Labour-led government has today revealed that its buyback of New Zealand’s rail system was influenced by plans to close regional rail services throughout the country, Finance Minister Michael Cullen said today.

Dr Cullen has released a list of services that was the centrepiece of Toll’s ‘Plan B’ which hung over negotiations with the government over the subsidy for the Australian firm’s operation.

The Labour-led government bought back the rail operation and launched KiwiRail yesterday.

“A modern rail system is vital for New Zealand’s economic future,” Dr Cullen said. “With the rising cost of petrol and the threat of global climate change, New Zealanders know we have to use more efficient transport methods.

“This is especially true for regional economies. The communities who have already lost their rail services know the pain that closures can cause.

“John Key says we should have left Toll in charge and refused to pay for any infrastructure investment. I invite him to travel to the regions that could have had their services axed and to explain his stance.”

The services that could have been closed under ‘Plan B’ are:

• The Overlander passenger service
• The Central North Island section of the Main Trunk Line (Te Kuiti to Palmerston North)
• Northland Line
• Taranaki Line
• Hawke’s Bay Line
• Napier to Gisborne Line
• Wairarapa Line north of Masterton
• Picton to Christchurch (freight + passenger services)
• Greymouth to Hokitika Line
• Invercargill to Bluff Line
• Invercargill to Wairio Line


ENDS


See also:


Toll wanted to close regional rail says govt as mud flies

NZPA: July 2 2008

Toll threatened to close down much of New Zealand's regional rail service during its negotiations with the Government, Finance Minister Michael Cullen said today.

As details over the renationalisation of the rail service began to emerge, Prime Minister Helen Clark said under parliamentary privilege that National Leader John Key had personally profited during the rail network's chequered financial history.

The attack came as Finance Minister Michael Cullen defended the $690 million deal saying it was influenced by plans to close regional rail services throughout New Zealand.

These included the central North Island section of the main trunk line, the Picton to Christchurch line as well as lines in Northland, Taranaki, Hawkes Bay, Wairarapa and Invercargill.

Dr Cullen said the closure threat hung over negotiations with Toll concerning the subsidy for the Australian firm's operation.

In the end the Government decided it would be better to purchase the assets and make the investment themselves.

In Parliament, National MPs accused the Government of being "suckered" and Mr Key said ministers seemed to have little idea of how much investment was needed or what it was getting itself into.

Miss Clark attacked Mr Key saying during the original privatisation of New Zealand Rail he was a director of Bankers Trust, which had advised over the sale.

"That sale was worth $400 million to the New Zealand Government... in 1993," Miss Clark said.

"That same year, the Bankers Trust, of which Mr Key was director, pocketed $39 million in profit... who benefited from the sale? Mr Key and his friends."

Mr Key later said it was a fact that he was a director with the Bankers Trust, but was involved in a different division.

His performance bonuses were based on his division's work.

Miss Clark also accused Mr Key's family trust of holding $30,000 worth of share in TranzRail in 2002.

"As associate transport spokesman for the National Party in 2003, Mr Key commented on whether we should be buying back the (rail) track and we can find no record of Mr Key disclosing his financial interest."

Mr Key later said the trust had sold the shares before he made those comments and Miss Clark's spokesman said she accepted his word on that.

During heated debate, Labour MPs accused National of wanting to sell off KiwiRail.

Mr Key said Labour was using smear tactics because it was behind in the polls.

Rail services Toll threatened to close down according to the Government:

*The Overlander passenger service;

*The Central North Island section of the Main Trunk Line (Te Kuiti to Palmerston North);

*Northland Line;

*Taranaki Line;

*Hawke's Bay Line;

*Napier to Gisborne Line;

*Wairarapa Line north of Masterton;

*Picton to Christchurch (freight and passenger services);

*Greymouth to Hokitika Line;

*Invercargill to Bluff Line; and

*Invercargill to Wairio Line.


See also:

Prime Minister Helen Clark gave this speech at the launch of KiwiRail today

NZ Herald: July 01, 2008

Today, 1 July, is a proud day for the railway system in New Zealand.

Our country's rail and ferry services were today transferred into government ownership.

Shortly I will announce the name of the new rail company, and unveil its new logo and livery on the train beside us.

A century ago, on 7 August 1908, the first train left Wellington for Auckland via the main trunk line.

That line was built for strategic reasons, and it represented a great leap forward in passenger and freight transport.

A century later our government has bought back the rail business for strategic reasons.

In the 21st century, just as in 1908, our rail system needs major investment so that it can play a growing role in our transport system.

With growing worldwide awareness of climate change and the need for our country to be more sustainable, and with the price of a barrel of oil reaching an historic US$142, many nations are looking at rail as a central component of their economic infrastructure - and so must New Zealand.

A modern and well resourced rail system will lessen the carbon footprint of our transport network, and therefore of our whole economy.

The reasons are simple. Fuel efficiency for diesel-powered trains is four times better than using the road to carry the same load; and electric trains are ten times more fuel efficient.

One locomotive can pull the equivalent freight of 65 trucks.

The benefits of rail for moving passengers are equally compelling. A small move off road and onto rail reduces road congestion; allows business to move goods and services to the public more freely; reduces fuel consumption; and reduces the pressure to build more roads.

Our government has a vision for a transport system which is affordable, integrated, safe, responsive, and sustainable.

We need all transport modes working together effectively and efficiently.

With our rail system back in public ownership we can make the strategic decisions and investments necessary for rail to play its full part in building a more sustainable New Zealand.

By 2040 total freight transport movements in this country are expected to more than double. We are looking to rail - and to coastal shipping which is also fuel efficient - to carry a lot of that extra load.

It should be acknowledged that Toll Holdings has made good progress in our rail system in recent years. But it also has become clear that our rail system cannot survive without substantial government subsidies into the future.

That, together with the need to develop a more sustainable and integrated transport system for our country, makes the case for public ownership compelling in the 21st century.

This is a strategic investment in New Zealand's future.

A new establishment board will manage the services, pending determination of the final shape of the relationship between the new entity and OnTrack - the SOE which runs the railtrack.

The establishment board will be chaired by Rt Hon Jim Bolger. He will work with a board of experienced directors.

It is now my pleasure to reveal the name and the logo and livery of Zealand's new rail company: KiwiRail!


See also:

Full text: Michael Cullen's speech 'NZ rail back in NZ hands'

NZ Herald: July 01, 2008

Dr Cullen gave this speech at the launch of KiwiRail today

Good morning. I am very pleased to be here at Wellington Station on the first day of operation for KiwiRail - an important day for our nation's economy.

15 years ago New Zealand became the first country in the world to fully privatise its rail operation as a single entity. Our great experiment of privatisation was carried out under two governments - one Labour and one National - and there is no point today in revisiting the political debates of those years.

I think it is fair to say, however, that the failure to develop a strong, efficient rail system is for many New Zealanders the enduring symbol of what went wrong with privatisation.

For a decade after its sale, there were stories of financial scandal, of asset-stripping, and of neglect. In recent years, Toll Holdings has worked hard to turn this around, but in the end all have acknowledged that it is not possible to run an effective rail network in New Zealand without significant financial support from the New Zealand taxpayer.

Confronted with the urgent need for major investments in rail infrastructure, the government had two fundamental questions to address.

First, is it in New Zealand's interests to have a strong rail system? For the Labour-led government, the answer is an unequivocal 'yes.'

As the Prime Minister has outlined, rail's ability to make our transport sector more sustainable and more efficient is huge. We also know how important rail is to regional economies. And we know that moving freight off road and onto rail and also coastal shipping will make our highways safer and cheaper to maintain.

The truth is that New Zealand must have a strong, thriving rail network if we are going to live up to our full economic and environmental potential.

And having answered that question, the government was forced to confront another. If the government is going to have to pay for the investments in rail that we must have, are we willing to do so in a way that essentially subsidises the profits of a private overseas firm? This is not a short-term question Toll had a monopoly right to the operation of the rail system through to 2070. It is a question whose answer would impact several generations of taxpayers.

And for the Labour-led government, the answer had to be 'no.' We refused to accept that New Zealand taxpayers should indefinitely subsidise a private, foreign operation and then not make sure that the investment would deliver social and economic returns for New Zealand.

We knew that with a rail system owned by all New Zealanders, we would finally be in a position to make sure that rail system worked in the interest of all New Zealanders.

The government has been heartened by the enthusiastic response the buy-back of the rail system has received. New Zealanders especially those in provincial New Zealand know that rail has a vital role to play in our future and know that public ownership is the right way to go.

Some of this enthusiasm has been criticised as nostalgic, linked to some belief in the glory days of rail. But to me, the only nostalgic view in this debate is the one that sees State Owed Enterprises as unable to be highly successful economic forces. The truth is that our SOEs are performing very well and I have every confidence that whatever the final structure of the new rail system it will be a huge success.

And I am very pleased that the man who has in recent years played a major role in the SOE success story, former Prime Minister Jim Bolger, has agreed to guide our integrated rail system as chairman. Jim, we are very lucky to have someone with your skills and your dedication to New Zealand on board with us.

Thank you.

See also:


KiwiRail launch marks end of 'failed' privatisation

Railway Gazette International: 02 Jul 2008
kiwi_rail.jpg
KiwiRail locomotive livery

NEW ZEALAND: Prime Minister Helen Clark unveiled KiwiRail as the name for the rail and ferry operations which were transferred from Toll New Zealand into government ownership on July 1.

Services will initially be unchanged, with KiwiRail controlled by an establishment board chaired by former Prime Minister Jim Bolger; the other members are Brian Corban, Mark Franklin, Ross Wilson, Brian Jackson, Linda Constable and Ross Martin.

A Rail Development Group is due to present the government with recommendations for the future structure of the rail businesses in early August. One option is the formation of a single organisational structure with two divisions, KiwiRail and infrastructure manager Ontrack, which took over the 4 000 km network when it was bought back by the government for a nominal NZ$1 in 2003. Another option under consideration is the creation of a state-owned enterprise which would function commercially, and a separate Crown Entity.

'With our rail system back in public ownership, we can make the strategic decisions and investments necessary for rail to play its full part in building a more sustainable New Zealand', said Clark during launch of KiwiRail at Wellington station. 'Over time, we will be able to move more and more freight off our roads and onto rail. Rail will also play a bigger role in public transport in our major centres.'

Finance Minister Michael Cullen said the privatisation of Tranz Rail in the 1990s had clearly not worked. 'From asset-stripping to trading scandals, New Zealand's experiment with rail privatisation failed to produce much-needed investments in this critical part of New Zealand's transport infrastructure. Toll Holdings had made good progress in recent years, but it has become clear to all that the rail network could not be run without substantial government subsidies into the future.'

The government paid NZ$655m to acquire assets with a book value of NZ$430m. Toll retains the Tranzlink rail and road forwarding business, warehousing and logistics operations, and having rent-free use of premises for six years. Cullen described the deal as 'a long-term investment in New Zealand's future.'

July 1, 2008

RMT Tube cleaners to take 48-hour strike action tonight to demand a living wage

RMT: July 1, 2008

Cross-party support from MPs for Tube cleaners to be paid the London living wage

Over 700 RMT members working for four cleaning subcontractors on London Underground will begin their second round of strike action at 18:50 tonight until 18.49 Thursday to demand the London living wage.

After voting to strike by a landslide 125-one margin, RMT cleaners working for ISS, ITS, ICS and GBM also took 24-hour action on June 26.

Over 30 Tory, Lib Dem and Labour MPs, including two former transport ministers Glenda Jackson and Karen Buck, have so far signed signing a Commons motion supporting the cleaners, condemning the employers and urging the mayor to ensure that contract cleaners are paid the London living wage (text and list below).

RMT general secretary Bob Crow said that all contracts held by the failed Metronet consortium have now passed to Transport for London and demanded that TfL act now to halt the scandalous practice of paying cleaners just £5.50 per hour.

“London mayor Boris Johnson has stated that all temporary and contracted GLA staff should be paid at least the living wage as the contracts come up for renewal (see below) and Tubelines has indicated that it would be willing to enter negotiations on the issue.

“However, three cleaning companies with contracts with Metronet are currently in talks with TfL right now and paying the London living wage isn’t even on the agenda.

“Despite massive intimidation of our members’, RMT has pledged complete support for the Tube cleaners' campaign for a living wage, and the employers should now get around the table with us to negotiate a living wage, Bob Crow said.

Ends

For further information contact Brian Denny on 020 7529 8824

Notes to editors: The cleaners' demands also include 28 days' holiday, sick pay, decent pensions and travel facilities, and an end to the barbaric practice of 'third-party sackings' in which cleaners can be dismissed, with no disciplinary hearing or right of appeal, at the behest parties other than the employer - a device used to get rid of union activists.

From last week's Mayor's Question Time: London Living Wage

Question No: 1205 / 2008

John Biggs: Will you retain the commission and will you support the living wage, including the annual, independent, assessment of its appropriate value? If so, will you ensure all GLA staff are covered by it and will you press for its wider adoption in London?

Mayor: Yes. I will shortly be announcing the 2008 living wage rate. All direct employees of the GLA Group are paid at least the living wage and as contracts are renewed I will seek to ensure that our temporary and contracted staff are as well. All employers in London should be encouraged to pay at least the Living Wage and I will be encouraging them to do so.


CONDITIONS FOR CLEANERS EMPLOYED ON LONDON UNDERGROUND

Early Day Motion 1872 Tabled by John McDonnell and signed by 31 MPs so far

"That this House fully supports the 700 cleaners on London Underground who are members of the RMT union, who have voted by a margin of 125-to-one to take strike action for the London living wage and improved working conditions, including decent sick pay, pensions, holiday entitlement and travel facilities; notes that the action also seeks to end the disgraceful practice of third-party sackings in which cleaners can be dismissed, with no disciplinary hearing or right of appeal, at the behest of parties other than the employer; is appalled that these vulnerable workers who do such an essential job for London must get by on rates of pay of little more than £5.50 an hour; believes that such exploitation brings shame on London as it prepares for the 2012 Olympics; further notes that the cleaners are employed by contractors ISS, ITS, ICS and GBM who are subcontracted to Metronet and Tube Lines to undertake cleaning for London Underground; therefore believes that Transport for London (TfL) has a clear responsibility to assist in resolving this dispute; calls on the Mayor of London to honour the pledge of the previous Mayor that cleaners on Metronet contracts would receive the London living wage as soon as they passed under TfL control, and to bring pressure on Tube Lines also to pay the living wage; condemns the intimidation of cleaners by employers in this dispute; and urges cleaning bosses instead to direct their energies to reaching a just, negotiated statement."

See also:


Tube cleaners' strike under way

BBC News: 2 July 2008
ube-platform.jpg
Nine London MPs have backed the strike

A 48-hour strike is under way by cleaners on the London Underground in a row over pay and conditions.

More than 700 cleaners employed by four sub-contractors walked out at 1850 BST on Tuesday. The strike follows a 24-hour stoppage last week.

The members of the Rail Maritime and Transport (RMT) Union want hourly rates to be raised from £5.50 to £7.20 plus improved holidays and pensions.

Transport for London (TfL) called the strike action "completely unnecessary".

The union wants the cleaners' pay to be set at £7.20 an hour, which is the London living wage.

This figure is recommended by the Greater London Authority, and is a minimum hourly rate for a full-time employee to cover the basic costs of living in London.

'Solidly supported'

A TfL spokesman said: "Following the transfer of Metro net to TfL, we will be working with Metronet and its sub-contractors to ensure that they pay their employees who work on the Tube the London living wage.

"We have already reassured all interested parties, notably the trade unions, that we are taking this commitment forward."

But RMT leader Bob Crow said negotiations had hardly begun.

He said three cleaning companies with contracts with Metronet are currently in talks with TfL and "paying the London living wage isn't even on the agenda".

A RMT spokesman said: "We expect the strike to be solidly supported as the last one was."

Last month, 24 London MPs backed an early day motion tabled by Hayes and Harlington MP John McDonnell supporting the cleaners.

Portishead railway line back on track?

Weston & Somerset Mercury: 29 June 2008
Portishead.jpg
RAIL campaigners in Portishead believe there could be a light at the end of the tunnel after a study found a rail link to Bristol would be feasible.

The study was carried out for North Somerset Council by infrastructure development experts Halcrow and shows the railway could be viable with no show stoppers.

Frustrated commuters who sit in traffic for hours at peak times every day are among those who have been campaigning to re-open the old railway line in an attempt to alleviate some of the congestion problems experienced in a town described by Woodspring MP Liam Fox as 'the biggest cul-de-sac in the country'.

The study looked at several different options based on one train per hour between Portishead and Bristol Temple Meads.

It also evaluated the cost of building the necessary infrastructure including a new station for Portishead, west of Quays Avenue, and re-laying track between the town centre and the existing Portbury Dock spur.

Detailed calculations show that building the infrastructure is likely to cost £7.5-£15 million, while annual operating costs would be £1.6-£2.4million.

Identifying the funding for the infrastructure and an operating subsidy is now being investigated.

Cllr Elfan Ap Rees, North Somerset Council's deputy leader with responsibility for transport, said: "Investigating a Portishead rail link was one of the priorities the new Conservative administration set itself when we took over last year and I am delighted that this report shows that the idea is not only feasible but would positively contribute to reducing road traffic on the A369 through to the M5 junction 19 and have economic benefits, too for the town.

"We hope now that the Government will support the plan and help us find the funding needed to bring this to fruition, either through the Transport Innovation Fund process or, if that should prove unworkable for some reason, through alternative transport bids."

If the railway does not re-open, it is believed Portishead will be the largest town in the country without a rail link when the current house building programme is complete.

Rail Fare Hike Imminent In U.K.

AHN: June 30, 2008
Vittorio Hernandez

London, England - Barely six months after Britons were hit by a 15 percent rail fare increase at the start of the year, another round of train fare hike appears to be forthcoming.

Economists forecast a five percent increase by the end of the year to recover soaring cost of oil and energy bills. Using a government RPI plus one formula, it would translate to a 6 percent upward adjustment in ticket prices or at least $200 (100 pound) more for season ticket holders.

Britons who travel via the Southeastern route or rail passengers who reach London from Kent and East Sussex would likely have to shell out a higher 8 percent increase in train fares to recover the improvement in rail service in the region, particularly with the roll out of the high speed Javelin service into St. Pancras by 2009.

When train fares went up by almost 15 percent in January, British rail travelers were outraged because it came at a time when the service was marked by long delays, overcrowding and generally poor service. At that time train travelers rated the country's rail service with very low satisfaction ratings.