" /> National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers (RMT): April 2010 Archives

« March 2010 | Main | May 2010 »

April 27, 2010

Brunel's Royal Albert Bridge to get £10m makeover

BBC: 26th April 2010

_45726314_royal_albert226.jpg
The Royal Albert Bridge is a Grade I listed structure

The Royal Albert Bridge, joining Cornwall to Plymouth, is to be refurbished at a cost of £10m.

Victorian engineer Isambard Kingdom Brunel's bridge across the River Tamar was 150 years old in 2009.

Corroded parts of the railway bridge will be repaired and the structure will be painted in goose grey. Its original colour was off-white.

Network Rail hopes the work, which will take about three years, will start by the end of the year.

The Grade I listed bridge has carried an estimated billion tonnes of rail traffic since it opened in 1859.

High-speed rail called boost to Central Conn.

The Bristol Press: April 26, 2010 By Steve Collins

HARTFORD — Central Connecticut could get a big economic boost if plans to create high speed rail between New Haven and Springfield, Mass. by 2016 come to fruition, officials said Monday.


Creating the high speed corridor would lead to more investments in the region that are bound to lead to more jobs and growth, said state Sen. Donald DeFronzo, the New Britain Democrat who is co-chair of the Senate transportation committee.

DeFronzo said it would mean a lot to the area if residents could get on a train and be in New York City in a couple of hours for a reasonable fee.

State leaders, including DeFronzo, met behind closed doors Monday morning with U.S. Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood to discuss the prospects for obtaining federal money to boost the high speed rail line that would run through Berlin and Newington.

“This is one issue that we are all together on,” said U.S. Sen. Chris Dodd, a Democrat who’s retiring this year.

Dodd said that if the state meets the required timetables for studies and other work along the way, construction could begin in 2014 and the entire project could be finished in 2016.

“The economic benefits are immeasurable,” Dodd said as he urged officials to stay on track.

LaHood said that a high speed rail line that would tie the state in to other rail systems in New England and beyond would prove “an economic engine” along its entire route.

“The people will benefit from this. The people are the winners in this,” LaHood said.

Connecticut, which received $40 million in federal funding for the line last year, “has its act together” to get the project done, he said.

DeFronzo said the secretary told state leaders behind closed doors that “your preparedness will be rewarded.”

Another round of funding is coming up this year that should attract more than a dozen competing applications for $2.5 billion in federal cash. Other contenders include California, a group of Midwestern states and Florida.

Gov. Jodi Rell said that keeping the project on track requires Connecticut to meet an aggressive timetable, but she thinks it can be done.

Rell said Connecticut will be the first in the nation to get high speed rail operating.

Joseph Marie, the state transportation commissioner, said he is “very confident” that the deadline will be met.

Initially, he said, the state will aim for “low-hanging fruit” in order to do such projects as double tracking the line.

Marie said the agreements needed to move forward include getting Amtrak and Massachusetts on board. Amtrak has some trains that use the route now.

In addition to high speed trains, the revamped rail corridor would also provide regional and commuter trains. It would tie in to other transportation options, too, including buses, officials said.

It isn’t clear how much it would cost to create the proposed 62-mile high speed rail line or how much of it would be funded by the state. At least 20 percent of the cost will fall on state shoulders, Marie said.

DeFronzo said there would also be ongoing state subsidies to keep the trains affordable.

He said, though, that legislative leaders are ready to come up with the funds.

“We’re willing to financially participate” over the long haul, DeFronzo said.

Mike Nicastro, president of the Central Connecticut Chambers of Commerce, said his organization is “very supportive of the efforts by our congressional leaders to explore the potential for investing in high-speed rail through the central corridor of the state.”

Nicastro said “an inland high speed connection to the north and to Boston would form a strategic alignment that has a high potential for economic growth” when tied to the commuter rail line he’d like see between Waterbury and Hartford.

He said, though, that he is concerned the proposed busway from New Britain to Hartford estimated to cost $545 million to $573 million “will use up the necessary federal funds” for the rail projects in order to create “just another HOV lane with little or no strategic value.”

Busway backers, however, say the new roadway is a perfect example of the intermodal transportation that federal officials hope will be in place to tie in with high speed rail ventures.

LaHood, Rell, Dodd and other officials, including U.S. Rep. John Larson, an East Hartford Democrat, rode a train to Hartford early Monday before holding a closed-door talk in the governor’s office. They held a press conference afterwards.

“We had a wonder train ride this morning,” Rell said as she thanked LaHood for coming. She said she hopes the ride gave him “a new perspective for some of the things that we have planned.”

Rail workers in Luxembourg rally for public services and secure jobs

ITF: 21 April 2010
Luxembourg.jpg
Luxembourg rally against liberalisation

European transport workers expressed their anger over the liberalisation of the railways and its impact on public services and jobs at a rally in Luxembourg last week.


Some 375 unionists representing transport unions in Belgium, France, Germany and Luxembourg joined forces under the banner of the European Transport Workers’ Federation (ETF), the European arm of the ITF. The rally - part of the ETF’s European railway workers’ action day, a key campaign running under the auspices of the ITF global railway action day on 13 April - was calling for an end to liberalisation. This, the unionists said, was responsible for deteriorating public services and a lack of job security. Earlier that day, Luxembourg union representatives distributed some 3000 flyers on the issue at the central railway station. A delegation of union leaders also met with the minister of development and infrastructure, Claude Wiseler, to send home the anti-liberalisation message.

Other activities taking place as part of ITF railway action day included: a seminar organised by an Indian railway union focusing on safety on the Indian railways, attended by more than 400 delegates and discussions on health and safety with railway commuters and the distribution of pamphlets to passengers by a Zimbabwean union. Meanwhile, in Brazil, unionists wearing yellow ITF vests marked the action day by handing out campaign material in the station in Rio de Janeiro and in New Zealand, activists took to the streets of Wellington and a small town in the Taranaki region to gather signatures for a petition to save a railway line facing closure or mothballing.

Mac Urata, ITF inland transport section secretary, commented: “During this action day railway workers - men and women, young and old working in passenger and freight - delivered the message that strong unions play an important role in fighting privatisation, liberalisation and restructuring and in promoting the railways as a safe, sustainable and important mode of transport."

Extra train to help ease rush hour pressure

BEP: April 16, 2010

An extra rush-hour train service between Bristol and Gloucester will run from May in a bid to ease overcrowding on the busy route.

Commuters using trains which stop at Yate have complained about packed trains and passenger groups have welcomed the move.

But there is still concern because the new service will only run in the morning and lack of rolling stock means there will be no extra evening services.

There have been a large number of complaints during peak periods about train passengers being unable to find seats.

Pressure group TravelWatch South West has led the calls for more coaches on services operated by First Great Western – a move backed by business leaders and passengers. The campaign has also been backed by Northavon MP Steve Webb and Friends of Yate Station.

TravelWatch SouthWest said there is still a demand for extra carriages on evening services.

Frank Chambers, from the organisation, said: "There is a major problem of overcrowding in the morning going down from Gloucester to Bristol, especially around Yate, and it is the same problem in the late afternoon coming back."

Julian Crow, First Great Western's general manager in the South West, said: "The trouble is there is not any spare rolling stock in the country at the moment.

"There is competition for what comes available, so we are working actively with the West of England partnership, the local authorities and Department for Transport on the case for allocating more coaches."

April 25, 2010

Britain's assets are slowly being nationalised, unfortunately not by us

The Observer: 25 April 2010 Ruth Sunderland

Deutsche Bahn's takeover of bus and rail operator Arriva is another example of foreign state-owned influence in UK businesses.


It is not necessary to be a raving protectionist to feel a sense of absurdity at the takeover of bus and train operator Arriva by German state-owned train company Deutsche Bahn. The UK's mania for privatisation of industries such as rail, nuclear and utilities has led to important British assets being nationalised by a foreign government. EDF, a French state company, owns nuclear power group British Energy, along with several local electricity franchises; the Dutch state railway owns chunks of our network, German state telecoms company Deutsche Telekom bought T-Mobile in the UK and Deutsche Post has a licence to deliver letters here. Then there are the sovereign wealth funds controlled by foreign governments, which bought chunks of Barclays Bank, P&O's ports and Manchester City football club.

This may not be a terrible thing. It may even be a good thing – the French government will probably do a better job of running nuclear power than ours. But these takeovers are too important to be waved through - and the situation is asymmetric. We did not use our North Sea oil revenues to create a sovereign wealth fund of our own; state-owned British firms are not on shopping sprees, and our open door policy towards bids is not replicated in Paris, Berlin, or even Washington DC.

I have been arguing for several years that there needs to be a public debate on foreign takeovers – a lonely view until US company Kraft's takeover of British chocolate-maker Cadbury brought the issue centre stage.

Support is gathering for a tightening of takeover rules. The Tories are quiet on the subject but Labour and the Liberal Democrats want to lock short-term investors out of the voting, so firms cannot be bought and sold at the behest of hedge funds. The Lib Dems want to subject takeovers to a public interest test on whether a deal would serve the UK economy. Even bosses' club the Institute of Directors has joined in, backing Labour's manifesto proposal to introduce a "Cadbury rule" so hostile takeovers can only go through on a "super-majority" of two thirds of shareholders in the target. The captains of industry actually go further, and say the higher threshold should apply to the bidder as well.

A major motivator for takeovers is the rewards they decant into boardrooms, legal firms, investment banks and PR advisers. The incentives in the top ranks of a target company are stacked towards succumbing to a hostile bidder, after racking up the price. In the case of Kraft, "winner" Irene Rosenfeld had a 40% pay rise to £17m last year, but "loser" Todd Stitzer, the former Cadbury chief executive, walked away with £40m in cash, shares and pension. The hedge funds just want a quick return and even "long-term" shareholders often prefer to cash out at a profit to boost their quarterly performance figures.

It is not an environment conducive to the welfare of employees or pension fund members, or to the long-term interests of the UK.

'This bridge is gateway to the city – and it's a mess'

BEP: April 23, 2010

imagesCA3XNQQ8.jpg

NETWORK Rail has been accused of allowing a bridge on one of the main roads into Bristol city centre to become an eyesore.


Simon Davis, a resident of St Andrews, believes The Arches railway bridge over Cheltenham Road is not being properly maintained.

He says it has become unsightly in recent years because plants have grown out of the brickwork and the structure has been covered in graffiti.

IT consultant Mr Davis believes the state of the landmark Victorian bridge creates a bad impression for visitors travelling into the city centre along the A38.

He says he has been complaining about the condition of the bridge to Network Rail, the owner and operator of the British rail infrastructure, since 2006 but nothing has been done to tidy it up.

Mr Davis, 42, said the bridge has been left to deteriorate since it was last sandblasted several years ago.

He said: "Nothing appears to have been done to remove the graffiti over the last few years and it looks like Network Rail have not kept up regular maintenance of the stonework in terms of removing the plant growth.

"It will get to the stage where it becomes unsafe. I have tried to contact them but each time they have passed the buck.

"The bridge is on a gateway into Bristol and it is looking to become a host city for the World Cup. The first thing a lot of people coming into the city for the first time will see is a bridge which hasn't been looked after. Surely, the city council has the powers to enforce a clean-up."

Mr Davis added: "I know there is a finite amount of cash but Network Rail should at least tell us when they are planning to tidy up the bridge so people's expectations can be managed."

Mavis Choong, spokeswoman for Network Rail, said the bridge – which is at the junction of Cheltenham Road, North Road and Cotham Brow – would only receive a clean-up when it was next strengthened. She said: "Unfortunately, rail infrastructure is a prime target for graffiti vandals. Vandalism is not only a crime, it also costs the rail industry millions every year.

"As we are not funded by the Government to carry out cosmetic work, we would aim to spruce up the bridge whenever we are funded to strengthen the bridge, and/or work with external partners to explore other avenues."

April 22, 2010

Deutsche Bahn buys Arriva for £1.59bn

Rail News: 22 Apr 2010

Arriva_trains-200x132.jpg

Deutsche Bahn is to buy UK train and bus operator Arriva for £1.59bn in a deal that will create one of Europe’s largest transport groups.


The move comes as part of the German group’s plans to expand beyond its domestic market, as well as a shift towards consolidation within European transport.

Deutsche Bahn operates Germany’s national rail services, as well as Chiltern Railways and freight rail services in the UK. Arriva runs rail and bus services in 12 European countries.

Chief executive Rudiger Grube said he expected the would help Deutsche Bahn expand beyond Germany and tap into Europe’s “increasingly liberalised and fast-growing transport markets”.

He expected the newly merged group to eventually be one of the few leading transport companies operating in Europe.

Arriva’s chairman Sir Richard Broadbent said the £1.59bn deal “fully reflects the value of the business”. However shareholders must now give their approval for the deal to be proceed.

D.Bahn says must sell Arriva German rail activities

Reuters: Apr 22, 2010 by Sarah Marsh

Germany's national rail operator Deutsche Bahn must sell the German rail activities of Britain's Arriva (ARI.L) due to EU competition rules, Bahn's chief executive said while unveiling a proposed takeover.

Speaking at a news conference, Bahn CEO Ruediger Grube said on Thursday his comments came after talks with the European Union's anti-trust agency.

"We said at the beginning we do not see it as a deal breaker if rail activities need to be sold," Grube said.

"With bus activities it is open, we are naturally trying to keep bus business in Germany but if EU cartel authorities say it is not possible we would give it up," he added.

Deutsche Bahn's [DBN.UL] supervisory board approved a 1.5 billion pound ($2.31 billion) bid for Britain's Arriva (ARI.L) on Wednesday.

At the news conference, Arriva Chief Executive David Martin said his board had agreed to accept Bahn's offer and will recommend it to shareholders, adding that he expected the transaction to be completed in mid-August.

CN underreported blocked rail crossings

Southtown Star: April 22, 2010 BY MAURA POSSLEY

The U.S. Surface Transportation Board on Wednesday summoned Canadian National Railway officials to a hearing next week to explain what it called dramatic underreporting of blocked crossings in the Chicago area during the last two months of 2009.


It's holding the April 28 hearing based on the findings of an independent audit that showed more than 1,400 instances of crossings being blocked 10 minutes or more because of stopped or slowly moving trains.

That dwarfs the total of 14 blockages in November and December, caused only by stopped trains, that were reported by CN, the board said.

As part of the deal to take over the EJ&E Railroad in 2008, CN is required to report to the board every crossing blockage of 10 minutes or more.

CN, in an e-mailed statement issued Wednesday, said the audit included a broader range of reporting - all instances of blocked crossings - than the railway was required to report as part of the EJ&E deal. For instance, the audit includes slow-moving freights that resulted in gates being down for 10 minutes or more, CN said.

"CN has made clear in each of its reports for over a year that it was reporting only blockages resulting from trains stopped 10 or more minutes," the railroad said in the statement.

CN said data it automatically collects at some road crossings when gates are lowered for 10 minutes or more showed the number of such blockages dropped 12 percent in November and December 2009 compared with those same months in 2008, before its takeover of EJ&E.

"Although the report recommends clarifications by the (board) and improved communication between communities and CN in some areas, CN believes the report validates its overall compliance efforts and notes that nothing in the report questions whether CN has made a strong and good faith effort to comply with the dozens of conditions imposed by the (board)," the company said in the statement.

The majority of Southland towns with CN tracks running through them have negotiated agreements via the EJ&E takeover to quiet train noise with various improvements such as landscaped buffers and quiet zones.

Still in the legal fight, however, are Will County, New Lenox and seven other communities in the Chicago area.

New Lenox Mayor Tim Baldermann said Wednesday the audit's report made him "very leery of entering into any agreement" with CN.

"It seems like they have a black cloud over them ever since they took over the EJ&E," the mayor said, citing the audit report and the crossing signals that apparently malfunctioned last week as 26-year-old Katie Lunn drove across a University Park track and was killed.

"Canadian National is, in my understanding, not necessarily wanting to live up to the deal with other communities," Baldermann said. "I am in no hurry to sign on with any negotiations if they're not worth the paper they're written on."

U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and U.S. Rep. Melissa Bean (D-8th) issued a joint statement, calling the blocked crossings dangerous for emergency personnel in the communities CN tracks run through.

"Community officials and first responders need accurate, complete information to properly plan and implement mitigation efforts," the statement read. "Failure to report these blocked crossings could literally endanger people's lives."

Likewise, U.S. Rep. Judy Biggert (R-13th), of Hinsdale, said the audit's findings backed residents' claims in the EJ&E takeover - that CN was underreporting the impact it would have in communities.

April 21, 2010

Riches, rail and revolt

BBC: 20th April 2010

As a fight erupts over plans for a new £30bn high-speed rail link through some of the most scenic parts of southern England, Nick Serpell discovers that a similar battle was fought almost 180 years ago.


Lord Rothschild is not a happy man. The route for the proposed high-speed rail link between London and Birmingham - the biggest rail project in Britain for more than 100 years - is planned to cross his 5,000 acre estate in the Chilterns.

The noble lord has already briefed planning experts to fight the scheme and campaigners are enlisting the support of many wealthy celebrities who have made their homes in this area of outstanding natural beauty, which stretches through Oxfordshire, Buckinghamshire, Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire. These include musician Ozzy Osbourne and the model-turned-author Sophie Dahl.

None of this would come as any surprise to the entrepreneurs who built the original London-to-Birmingham railway through the Chilterns back in the 1830s. The opposition then was, if anything, more entrenched than it is today.

The railway writer Christian Wolmar says there are distinct parallels between difficulties faced by the original railway and the proposed new high-speed line.

"There have always been Nimbys," he says. "In both cases something being constructed in the national interest faced intense local opposition. Nothing has changed."

Railways were viewed by many people in the mid 19th Century with a great deal of suspicion. Folk in small rural communities feared the massive social changes that would result from a mode of transport that was many times faster than the horse.

Jack Simmons, in his 1991 book The Victorian Railway, quotes a parish clerk's reaction on seeing a railway engine for the first time.

"That was a sight to have seen; but one I never care to see again! How much longer shall knowledge be allowed to go on increasing?"

Operators of stage coaches and owners of canals feared the railway would destroy their livelihoods by carrying people and goods more quickly and cheaply. However, the bulk of the opposition came from those landowners who occupied estates in the path of the proposed lines.

Many believed a clanking smoke-belching train would frighten the cattle, stop their hens laying and ruin their fox hunting, as well as spoiling the view from their front windows.

Surveyors mapping out the route often worked at night to avoid being physically attacked by gangs recruited by wealthy landowners, eager to keep the rails off their property.

The London and Birmingham Railway Company had recruited the famous engineers George and Robert Stephenson to oversee construction of the line, but an Act of Parliament had to be obtained before construction could start.

The first attempt failed when, in 1832, the House of Lords threw out the proposal because "the directors had not made out a case which would warrant the forcing of the proposed railway through the lands and properties of distinguished landowners".

Those distinguished landowners were very vocal in their opposition. Sir Astley Cooper, surgeon to George IV, who owned land at Berkhamsted in Hertfordshire, was in no doubt as to the detrimental effect of the "fire horse."

"You are proposing to cut up our estates in all directions for the purpose of making an unnecessary road," he told Robert Stephenson. "If this sort of thing be permitted to go on, you will in a very few years destroy the nobility."

There was only one way to deal with this opposition - and that was by the use of the cheque book. It is estimated the London and Birmingham ended up paying £320 per acre for the thin strips of land necessary for the track, the equivalent of around £16,000 per acre in today's money.

The London and Birmingham spent a fifth of its entire share capital paying off landowners, says Mr Wolmar in his book Fire and Steam, a study of the social impact of the railways.

"It was just a form of bribery," he adds.

In many cases the land was completely unsuitable for agriculture and worth nothing like the sum the railway company had to pay.

Where land could not be bought, expensive diversions were built. A mile long tunnel had to be constructed near Watford so that the new railway avoided the estates of Lords Essex and Clarendon.

In the end the London and Birmingham's spending paid off and a second bill to allow the construction of the railway went through Parliament with little opposition.

The new line was finally opened on 17 September, 1838, just six years after the proposal had first been put to Parliament.

Given the complexities of today's planning process, and the strength of opposition, that is a time scale that supporters of the high speed link can only dream of.

The moment a trucker ignores warning lights and drives lorry into level crossing barriers

Daily Mail: 20th April 2010

article-1267244-0931FD11000005DC-565_634x427.jpg
Ignoring a level crossing's flashing red warning lights, this is the shocking moment a lorry driver ploughs his long vehicle into the closing barriers.

John McDonald, 38, accelerated his 44-tonne sewage lorry in an attempt to cross the King's Cross to Cambridge main-line at Foxton, Cambridgeshire.

With a train fast approaching, the automatic barriers crashed down on top of the articulated lorry, smashing the gates apart as stunned motorists looked on in horror.
'Extremely reckless': John McDonald accelerates his lorry towards a level crossing in Foxton, Cambridgeshire, as its barriers come down

Luckily the train managed to come to a screeching halt before hitting the line blockage, but commuters and motorists faced chaos while the line and A10 were closed for two hours as wreckage was cleared.
Faced with the footage of the December 12 incident during a hearing at Cambridge Magistrates' Court, McDonald admitted driving through the red light but escaped a driving ban.
Pc Tony Orton, of British Transport Police, said: 'McDonald's actions were extremely reckless.
'Had a train been closer to the crossing we would have been looking at far worse consequences.
'Drivers must realise that they are not simply risking their own lives when they ignore the warning lights - they are also risking the lives of those who are travelling on the trains.'
McDonald, of Denton Burn, Newcastle, was fined £170 and ordered to pay £45 costs. He also had three penalty points added to his licence.

The smash was the second close call at the Foxton level-crossing in recent months.
Charles Shaw, 40, told the same court on February 12 he made a 'split-second decision' to drive across the line at Foxton as the barriers descended.
CCTV caught his silver Volkswagen Golf speeding beneath the red and white barrier across the railway tracks moments before an express train was due.
Shaw, from Sutton, Cambridgeshire, was fined £600, ordered to pay £50 costs, and given three penalty points on his licence, after admitting failing to comply with a traffic signal.
Local councillor Deborah Roberts said she had seen motorists racing the lights herself.

She said: 'People are really being foolish - they are risking their own lives and those of the passengers on the train.

'They are only saving a few minutes, is it really worth the risk?'

Rail staff rescue bid 'jeopardised'

The Press Association: 20th April 2010
Jarvis Tamper.jpg

Unions have claimed that a rescue plan for 1,200 workers who lost their jobs when a maintenance firm went out of business was now being "jeopardised".


The Rail Maritime and Transport (RMT) union and the Transport Salaried Staffs Association (TSSA) said they had been given personal assurances last week by Transport Secretary Lord Adonis that the 1,200 Jarvis workers would be given jobs with Babcock Rail, another maintenance contractor, within days.

The unions claimed that Babcock Rail had now said it was only being re-allocated work that would save 300 jobs at most on the London North East renewals contract sometime next month.

RMT general secretary Bob Crow said: "I have asked the Secretary of State for an urgent re-convened meeting to take all necessary steps to ensure that justice is done and all Jarvis workers are immediately transferred to directly employed contracts under their old terms and conditions.

"Anything less is a betrayal of these workers who have had their wages and pension stolen from them."

TSSA leader Gerry Doherty said: "Network Rail has a moral obligation to 1,200 Jarvis workers to tell them quickly where this work is going and how many of them can look forward to being re-employed on their old terms and conditions.

"It was their decision to cut back on maintenance work by one third which effectively drove Jarvis out of business in the first place. They are also threatening to cut 1,500 maintenance jobs in-house.

"It is beyond my understanding how a taxpayer funded firm can put 2,500 key workers on the dole during the worst recession in our lifetime."

A Network Rail spokesman said: "Network Rail continues to work closely with the administrators to keep our investment programme moving forward and have put contingency plans in place in relation to any work that can't be taken forward by Jarvis in the weeks ahead.

"The allocation of contracts to our suppliers follows strict guidance in order to deliver best value for money. Each bidder is treated equally. There is no compromise on safety."

April 19, 2010

German bid for Arriva in closing stages

The Guardian: Tim Webb 18 April 2010

Deutsche Bahn group could seal £1.6bn deal this week


The takeover of one of Britain's largest public transport groups by Deutsche Bahn could be agreed by the end of the month, according to reports this weekend.

Analysts say that the £1.6bn deal to buy Arriva, if completed, is likely to be the first of many similar deals across Europe as legislation opens up the market to competition.

Due diligence is understood to be well advanced and the board of the German state-owned firm will meet this week to approve a formal bid for Arriva. Arriva declined to comment today.

The Sunderland-based group operates most of London's red buses, as well as most rail services in Wales and the CrossCountry rail franchise. It also operates services in 11 other countries in Europe.

Deutsche Bahn, which made an approach for Arriva last month, is thought to be in exclusive talks with the company. French group SNCF had been interested in mounting a rival bid but has dropped out after failing to secure support from the French government, it was reported.

If the deal is completed, Arriva would become the first large British transport group to be taken over. National Express came closest to a change of control last year after Spain's Cosmen family, which owns almost 20% of the group, teamed up with private equity outfit CVC but decided not to go ahead with a bid.

Europe's largest transport groups are jockeying for position as they seek scale to take advantage of both the liberalisation of the market over the next decade and cash-strapped local authorities looking to attract private investment into their bus and rail networks. Deutsche Bahn, which has been earmarked for partial privatisation, has already made inroads into Britain, acquiring Laing Rail, the owner of Chiltern Railways and operator of services between London and Birmingham.

April 15, 2010

Rail dispute talks resume between RMT and Network Rail

BBC: 13/04/2010

Negotiations to resolve disputes between rail maintenance workers and Network Rail will resume later. A legal injunction prevented last week's strikes being held.


The Rail Maritime and Transport (RMT) union and Network Rail will meet at the conciliation service Acas.

Four days of strikes were called off last week after a legal challenge to the union's ballots by Network Rail.

Meanwhile, Scottish rail workers on First ScotRail have begun a three-day walkout in a dispute over increased use of ticket inspectors instead of guards.

ScotRail said it would operate 95% of services during the strike, which the RMT says is over the safety implications of extended use of driver-only trains.

At Acas on Monday, the RMT and Network Rail will discuss the maintenance workers dispute about plans to axe 1,500 maintenance jobs and change rosters to allow more work in the evenings and at weekends.

A separate dispute over signal workers will be discussed at a later date, Acas said.

Network Rail's legal challenge concerned only the ballot of signallers, and did not relate to the RMT's ballot of maintenance workers and the Transport Salaried Staffs' Association (TSSA) ballot of supervisors.

But after the ruling, RMT and TSSA announced the two other strikes would be suspended and fresh ballots would be held, the timetable for which has yet to be announced.

Crossrail 'could be scrapped', admits Tory spokeswoman

The Guardian: Hélène Mulholland, 15 April 2010

Shadow minister Justine Greening says Conservatives support Crossrail in principle but cannot guarantee the future of the cross-London rail link.


Labour today accused the Conservatives of breaking a manifesto pledge only two days after launching their election proposals after a shadow minister admitted that a key rail project could be scrapped under a Tory government on the grounds of cost.

The Labour party seized on the comments made by Justine Greening, the shadow London minister, who told London's LBC radio that she "cannot guarantee" that the building of the £16bn Crossrail scheme – an east-to-west rail link across the capital – would continue under the Conservatives.

The Tories' opponents said Greening's comments contradicted a commitment in the Conservative manifesto, published earlier this week, which says: "We support Crossrail and the electrification of the Great Western line to south Wales."

Greening told LBC earlier today that she was unable to give "a line-by-line budget on projects across government, including Crossrail. Everything's up for review but we think it's important," she said.

Pressed on whether this meant that a Tory government would allow the Crossrail development to continue, Greening replied: "I can't give a guarantee that it will continue."

Asked if this meant it could be scrapped altogether, Greening said: "It's possible, but at the end of the day we've always said that we think it's an important project and actually the reason this is important is we want to be responsible, so we can't pretend that we can write an entire budget outside of government. We've said we'll do one within 50 days of getting into government if we get elected and we will then provide some clarity and certainty."

Greening's comments are likely to alarm Boris Johnson, the Tory mayor of London, who has repeatedly hailed Crossrail as a scheme which will create thousands of jobs and boost the capital's economy.

Lord Adonis, the transport secretary, accused the Conservatives of "weasel words".

"The Tories' supposed commitment to Crossrail lasted just two days. Now Justine Greening has exposed the weasel words in the Tory manifesto for what they are," he said.

"This sends an alarming message to business in and around the capital, to Londoners, and also calls into question the extent of their commitment to all other infrastructure projects, including high-speed rail."

Johnson stood shoulder to shoulder with Adonis and Gordon Brown last year to mark the formal start of the construction the major railway project.

At the time, he said: "The years of hesitation, irresolution and vacillation are over, the shovels have tasted earth and the construction of a railway that is crucial to the economic prosperity of this great city has begun.

"This amazing project will create and support thousands of jobs, relieve congestion and provide a high-speed link between east and west of London. When the first of Crossrail's chariots glide smoothly along its lines in 2017 it will change the face of transport in London and the south east forever."

Kulveer Ranger, Johnson's transport adviser, said today: "The mayor's passion and support for Crossrail is unquenched and his view is it is not a want but a must for the capital. Every inch of London will benefit from the jobs, increase in capacity and easing of congestion that Crossrail will bring."

The Conservative party, which has been keen to call attention to Johnson's administration during the election campaign, insisted its position on Crossrail was "very clear".

A spokeswoman said Crossrail would be part of a Tory government's spending review alongside everything apart from health and international development, whose funding has been ring-fenced.

"Our position is consistent and claims to the contrary are disingenuous," she said.

The party issued a quote David Cameron made last November, in which he said: "I back Crossrail. I want Crossrail to go ahead. Obviously everything has to pass the value-for-money test and all the rest, but we want it to go ahead."

Rail improvement work due on North Cotswold line

BBC: 15/04/2010

Up to £70m will be spent on improving the North Cotswold line in the next two years, Network Rail has announced.


Track and stations between Ascott-under-Wychwood, Oxfordshire; Moreton-in-Marsh, Gloucestershire; and Evesham, Worcestershire, will be revamped.

Network Rail said new level crossings, barriers and signals would be installed and the work should provide extra capacity for hourly services by 2011.

It said it would carry out most of the work overnight to reduce disruption.

Track renewal work at Ascott-under-Wychwood and Evesham is due to start in June followed by work to redouble 21 miles (31km) of track starting in autumn.

Network Rail said it would tender contracts for track, signalling, stations, telecoms and plant installation work in the summer.

It said the North Cotswolds line was a particularly congested part of the railway, which meant even small delays had a big impact on rail services in the area.

It said improvement work would increase rail service reliability along the line.

Rail unions rally to defend safety rules

Morning Star: John Millington in Lille, France. 13 April 2010
Rail-unions-rally-to-defend-safety-rules_large.jpg
RMT members rally outside the European Railway Agency headquarters in Lille, France pic: Guy Smallman

Transport unions from across Europe have held a mass rally of thousands of railway workers in Lille, France, to protest against the EU-driven privatisation of the industry.


The huge mobilisation brought together 20 unions from across Europe and was supported by the World Federation of Trade Unions.

Basking in the warm spring sunshine, railway workers began the day by blocking roads, lighting red flares and blowing horns as a podium was erected outside the European Railway Agency (ERA) headquarters.

The workers were in Lille to deliver a letter calling on the ERA to give a "clear commitment to rail safety" and assurances that jobs will not be lost "in the interests of competition and profit."

Unions have expressed widespread concern that increased liberalisation and marketisation of rail services under the auspices of the "undemocratic" Lisbon Treaty will lead to more accidents on networks throughout Europe.

Union representatives were present from Britain, Ireland, France, Spain, Portugal, Belgium, Germany, Switzerland, Italy, Greek, Cyprus and the Basque country.

A special mention of solidarity was given to the Hungarian trade unionists who had made the arduous trip to Lille from Budapest.

Scandinavian countries also sent messages of support as did Britain's firefighters' union the FBU.

General secretary of RMT Bob Crow, who headed the largest delegation, said that Britain had been used as "a guinea pig" for rail privatisation.

"To me 'liberalisation' means 'free' - but the only people who can afford to run the railways are big business," he said.

Mr Crow sparked deafening applause and shouts of support when he added: "Today should not be the end of the rally, brothers and sisters. We should be organising industrial action across the length and breadth of Europe."

Sister transport union TSSA assistant general secretary Manuel Cortes warned that accidents in Britain such as those in Potters Bar and Hatfield would happen elsewhere through "the pursuit of profiteering instead of safety.

"Profit and safety don't mix," said Mr Cortes.

"We have to fight a common enemy with a common voice."

Portuguese railway workers trade union CGTP-IN national co-ordinator Manuel Alexandre Cruz hailed the day's action, pointing to the Lisbon Treaty as part of Europe's "anti-social policies."

And he insisted that "trade union organisations from different countries must join efforts to fight neoliberalism."

Mr Cruz said that rail travel was an important social service and that the highest safety standards must be implemented.

"In this moment, in Portugal, the offensive against the public railway and railway workers is getting worse." he said.

"In Portugal, we are struggling, as you are struggling here today in this European mobilisation, to affirm that the struggle continues."

Spokesman for German railway rank-and-file group Bahn von Unten (Railways from Below) Hans-Gerd Oefinger declared that the only way to ensure safety was "workers' and democratic ownership of the entire railway system."

Trains get screens to show TV and films

The Mirror: By Mark Ellis 15/04/2010

train-seats-pic-dm-912961337.jpg

The world's first seat-back TV screens have been installed in passenger trains - in Britain.


Travellers on board First Great Western high-speed trains can watch TV programmes, films or sports channels for a flat fee of £3.95 for a single journey.

Fgw, which operates out of London paddington to South Wales, the West Country and southern England, plans to fit screens in all of its 54 high-speed trains by the end of next year.

So far 16 carriages have been fitted with the Volo screens, which also feature the latest news and a real-time journey tracker.

Passengers can bring their own headphones or buy a pair for £2.50 from the buffet car. FGW's Neil Micklethwaite said: "This exciting scheme has seen a lot of positive feedback from customers so far.''

And Volo TV boss Marcus Noble said: "It's just great to see a world first in rail in the UK.

"The quality of viewing is better than that available to air travellers in business class.''

Meanwhile, train punctuality improved last month - apart from on a line that was nationalised last year. Network Rail said yesterday that 93.5% of Britain's rail services were on time in the period from March 7 to March 31 this year, compared to 92.7% in the same period of 2009.

But punctuality on the Londonto-Scotland East Coast Main Line, previously operated by National Express and now run by a company set up by the Department for Transport, dipped 4.9 percentage points to 87.0%. It was the worst performance of any of the passenger train companies.

A TRAINSPOTTER'S VIEW

The Mirror's train bore JON MOORHEAD writes: If you watch video on trains you use a laptop, handheld or DVD viewer.

Handhelds are too small for my liking and it's tricky balancing bigger screens on those little pull-down tables. So this seems like a good idea.

But what will they be showing for £ 3.95?

If it's all dodgy repeats I'll stick to my iPod or read. Also, won't the seating be more cramped?

Escaped monkey stops rail services

The Telegraph: By David Millward. 14 Apr 2010

An escaped monkey has been held responsible for stopping train services in northern England.


Network Rail was asked to suspend operations on the line at Askam, Cumbria after a police marksman was sent to tackle a small monkey which had escaped from a nearby wildlife park.

Cumbria police intervened after the 20-inch tall capuchin was seen hanging from the trees over the railway track.

However by the time the police gunman arrived, the monkey had disappeared..

A spokesman for Network Rail,said: "It is our duty to put passengers first and ensure the smooth running of the railway."

However the small animal was caught the following day, said Karen Brewer, the marketing manager at the South Lakes Wild Animal Park at Dalton in Furness.

"It was spotted by the railway track, we staff and cornered it in a graveyard and caught it in a dustbin."

The monkey has since been returned to its former home

April 9, 2010

Strikes: Now militant rail unions threaten national walkout on polling day

Daily Mail: 7th April 2010

Militant rail unions are threatening to bring the country to a standstill in the run-up to the General Election - or even polling day itself.


The timing of a possible strike by the hardline Rail Maritime and Transport Union would be humiliating for the Prime Minister, and annoying for him and his rivals.
All three major political parties have pledged to use Britain's rail network as extensively as possible during their election campaigns.
And a strike - the first national rail strike for 16 years - would exasperate millions of voters who may decide to lay the blame with the Government, and take out their anger in the polling booth.
But the RMT's executive committee said it will meet to decide the timetable for another ballot of its members.
Union sources said last night that it is 'perfectly possible' that a strike would be held 'before, on or after polling day.'
It comes amid an air of growing militancy in Britain, with a public sector bracing itself for massive cuts in a bid to tackle the crippling £167billion deficit.
At the National Union of Teachers' annual conference on Monday, dozens of activists raised their fists and chanted the Marxist-inspired mantra 'The workers, united, will never be defeated!'
Union members unanimously backed a resolution demanding 'a campaign of action, up to and including strike action where needed, to oppose job cuts, pay freezes, threats to pensions and cuts in services'.
The spontaneous chanting followed a speech by Mark Serwotka, general secretary of the Public and Commercial Services Union, who urged public sector workers to 'stand together to defend every job and every service'.

They should take 'united industrial action' if needed to defend jobs, pay and pensions, he said, and condemned the Labour government as the 'worst in the history of this country'.
The RMT union had originally planned to strike after Easter, but it hit the buffers after a High Court judge granted an injunction blocking the walkout following allegations of an illegal ballot.
Network Rail - which operates the country's rail infrastructure and brought the case against the union - highlighted 'scores of inaccuracies and deficiencies' in the controversial ballot.
Ballot papers had been sent to up to 300 'phantom' signallers at signal boxes which no longer existed.
At the time, RMT general secretary Bob Crow warned that it was just 'a temporary halt to the hostilities.'
He added: 'Round one is over, now on to round two. The matter ain't going away.' The RMT was expelled from the Labour party in 2004.
It is planning to ballot its 12,000 maintenance workers and 6,000 signallers at the earliest possible opportunity.
A ballot usually takes 14 days and they are legally required to give seven days' notice to Network Rail before holding the first day of strike action.
A strike could last for days and is likely to target the most controversial dates. The first strike was due to be a four-day walkout designed to hit the Easter school holiday.
Yesterday a Network Rail spokesman said: 'We continue to talk with the RMT and hope that the outstanding disputes will be solved by negotiations.'
A 'yes' vote is not guaranteed. Only 54 per cent of signallers had voted in favour of the first strike in a row over rotas involving just 50 staff earning up to £70,000 a year for a three-day week plus overtime.
Among the 12,000 maintenance staff, the 'yes' vote was higher at 77 per cent, but Network Rail says a strike by maintenance workers would not cripple the network.
The Transport Salaried Staffs' Association, which represents 1,600 supervisors which were also involved in the first strike, is also planning to re-ballot its members.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1264076/General-Election-2010-Railmen-threaten-strike-bring-country-standstill-polling-day.html?ITO=1490#ixzz0kYQvqmUV

Snow clearing on Snowdon railway

BBC: 7 May 2010

_47601200_snowdonsnow2226.jpg

Diggers are being used to clear snow drifts from the railway track up Snowdon in a bid to reopen the summit visitor centre and cafe in May.

There are thousands of tonnes of snow to be cleared before the train can reach the summit

The building, Hafod Eryri, is always shut over the harsh winter months but this time workers admit the clear-up is even harder than usual.

After the digger shifts the snow, a blower is used to remove the last icy traces.

The new improved £8.4m Hafod Eryri building opened in June last year.

Doug Blair, the senior engineering manager with the Snowdon Railway, said the clear-up this year was "a challenge".

Ice and snow

"It is work which has to be done very carefully along the edge of the Clogwyn cliff face," he said.

"Once we use the excavator to clear the snow we then have to blow the snow out of the rack and if any bad weather reappears, and there's more snow, it ruins everything we've done," he said.

The object was to open Hafod Eryri in "one swoop", he added.

"Then if the building is cut off it can survive on its own for a bit," he said.

The snow is first cleared by the digger then a blower finishes the job
Apart from the snow the track can also be damaged by ice and frost, he added.

"I sometimes look at people who run railways on the flat and think they have it easy", he said.

The target is to reopen Hafod Eryri by early May, according to Jonathan Tyler the railway company's marketing manager.

"Many people have been inquiring about going to the summit and hopefully the weather will be okay," he said.

John Ifor Jones has worked for the railway for 30 years, and he said conditions had been "pretty bad" this year.

"We come prepared, with plenty of clothing, and you get used to working here," he said.

"Drifts can get up to 15 feet deep. We need plenty of sunshine, and also rain and mist which eats away at the snow," he added.

April 7, 2010

Lib Dems ducking the issue on railways

The Guardian: Christian Wolmar 6 April 2010

Plans to reopen rail lines are small fry compared to current investments, and ignore the need to reform the system itself


The Liberal Democrats are back in woolly-hat territory. You can't really go wrong if you propose reopening railway lines and reversing Beeching cuts. Indeed, mere mention of the B bogey figure is guaranteed to attract the support of thousands of rail supporters across the country.

So Norman Baker's proposal to open swathes of the railway shut down by Beeching hit all the right buttons and received a surprising amount of coverage, which was largely favourable except, of course, from the roads lobby because he proposes to shift most of the spending on roads to rail.

While he should be commended for daring to support rail rather than road investment, there is an element of fantasy around his figures. Spending an extra £3bn on the railways will get, at best, a hundred or so miles of track reopened, not thousands of miles, and that is not necessarily the priority for the railways – although his constituents in Lewes would love the Lewes to Uckfield line to be reopened, creating a direct service to London and relieving pressure on the Brighton mainline.

The initial task for whoever sits at the head of the Department of Transport after 6 May – and it is not inconceivable that it might be Baker himself – is ensuring that existing commitments on the railways are adhered to. Baker is being rather churlish in criticising his friend Lord Adonis, the current transport secretary, for concentrating solely on high-speed rail, as we are in the middle of the biggest rail investment boom since the 1950s with Crossrail, Thameslink, the electrification of the Great Western line, major station redevelopments at Reading and Birmingham, and countless smaller enhancements by Network Rail.

This is big-bucks stuff, with perhaps £40bn being committed to these schemes if they all see the light of day and rather more important than reopening a few branch lines, welcome though that would be. Therefore Baker's suggestion that rail investment has been neglected in recent years under Labour is misleading. Sure, there are not many reopenings being promoted by the current government but while there is a good case for a few, most of the easy ones have been done: since Beeching, 200 miles of track and 350 stations have been reopened. The pace has slowed greatly since privatisation because of the cost and the complexity since train operators have to agree to changes in their contracts if a new station is opened or section of track is reinstated, and the bureaucratic nature of Network Rail has pushed up costs enormously.

Baker, too, ducks the issue that the whole system needs radical reform. Ditching the failed franchising system should, therefore, be the first priority as the current structure makes rail investment far too expensive. Decision-making needs to be devolved. The real issue is not only ensuring that the current huge programme of rail investment is maintained, but also working out a way of drawing in money for smaller schemes like those proposed by Baker.

The clue is to be found in where current investment is going: London, Scotland, Wales, even Northern Ireland – all places to which considerable power over transport matters has been devolved. Wherever power is given to local people over transport decisions, rail schemes are favoured over road projects. This is why there are far more coherent local transport policies in Europe than in Britain. To bring about Baker's dream of new and reopened lines, transport spending needs to be devolved to regional government rather than being centrally controlled from Whitehall.

East African railway project to be launched soon

Sudan Tribune: By Tesfa Alem tekle 7 April 2010

The construction of a Massive railway line project connecting various countries in the east African region is reportedly to start next May.

The Feasibility studies for the railway project linking south Sudan’s Juba, with Kenya, Uganda, Ethiopia, and northern Sudan will be started next month soon member states file in their evaluation to the study. East African Community officials said.

The $900 billion Railway project will build 15 new railway lines connecting at least seven countries.

Ethiopia and Kenya would have two railway branches connecting them with Sudan.

The railway first line will connect Addis Ababa with the Kenyan northern border town of Garissa while the other will connect another Kenyan coastal town Lamu to Juba through Garissa.

According to Kostelo Garang, adviser to the President of the Government of southern Sudan and the Director General of the project, construction of the project will open job opportunities to more than five thousand people in south Sudan.

The whole project will activate economic, social, and political development in the African continent with further huge potential to spur trade across the vast region.

Slow train to a lost Britain: discovering a magical world barely changed since the golden age of rail

Daily Mail: By Michael Williams 2nd April 2010

Can there be a better image to summon up the spirit of the British landscape than a country branch line?

article-1263193-08F70AB1000005DC-531_468x286.jpg

A little tank engine chuffs along a single track, a few wisps of steam drifting across the fields, the sun glinting off its copper-capped chimney.

There might be a couple of elderly carriages and perhaps a milk tank or a cattle truck in tow. There’s a friendly wave from the signalman as the train clanks by, but nobody much comes or goes on the immaculately tended platforms.

Somehow here, it always seems to be summer. At least, that’s how we like to think of it.

Of course, Britain’s railways haven’t really been like this since Dr Richard Beeching, one of the great bogeymen of modern times, came along with his axe in 1963 and shut down more than 4,000 miles of track.

Back then, the comedy songwriting duo Michael Flanders and Donald Swann caught the mood of the nation in their song Slow Train, mourning the closure of ‘all those marvellous old local railway stations with their wonderful evocative names all due to be axed and done away with one by one’.

‘No churns, no porter, no cat on a seat / At Chorlton-cum-Hardy or Chester-le-Street,’ they sang. ‘No one departs, no one arrives / From Selby to Goole, from St Erth to St Ives. / They’ve all passed out of our lives …’

Flanders and Swann’s song was an elegy for the passing of a less hurried way of life. But luckily, many of the lines the dastardly doctor wanted to close are still flourishing, thanks to dogged ordinary folk in local communities who fought for their survival — and the satiric genius of this odd couple of middle-aged singers. (Who can’t still hum a few lines of ‘Mud, mud, glorious mud’?)

Although we always tend to think of our railways as unreliable, overcrowded and strikebound — despite this week’s High Court injunction blocking an Easter walkout by the rail unions — travelling by train in this country can still be one of life’s great pleasures.

You have to forget about the InterCity routes, banish from your mind any talk of Government plans for a new 250mph line from London to the north. It’s the branch lines and slow trains that truly offer some of the most glorious journeys in Britain — and, indeed, the world.

It’s now almost half a century since the Beeching era, and I have spent the past year travelling the length and breadth of Britain on the slowest of slow trains — not on preserved ‘heritage’ railways, but on ordinary Network Rail lines using tickets bought from normal ticket offices.

I wasn’t trying to seek out the shortcomings of the modern railway, but to celebrate the endurance of one of this nation’s greatest achievements, our Victorian rail system.

Has there ever been a better way to view the landscape than through the prism of a railway carriage window?

Is it still true that ‘the railway train has a place in British society unparalleled anywhere else in the world’, as a historian once observed?

The wizened stationmasters with their fob watches and braid may have gone, but the answer is emphatically yes.

The greatest railway journeys in Britain today are often the slowest — a single railcar dawdling along a Cornish branch line, a stopping train making its leisurely way through the remote heart of Wales, a vintage steam engine at the head of a brace of Art Deco Pullman carriages on a secondary line, its passengers enjoying a proper meal with silver service in the style of the traditional dining cars of old.

Is it still true that the railway train has a place in British society unparalleled anywhere else in the world? The answer is emphatically yes There is the unsurpassable pleasure of waking to breakfast on the West Highlands sleeper from Euston as it passes across the wilds of Rannoch Moor, under the watchful gaze of curious stags.

Or alighting at Berney Arms in Norfolk, the loneliest station in Britain, where there are no houses and the nearest road is three miles away. With just the birds and brilliant East Anglian skies for company, there is no finer spot in Britain to get away from it all.

Or take possibly the slowest train in the land — the four-hour trip from Preston to Carlisle along the remote Cumbrian coastline from Barrow-in-Furness to Carlisle.

The train picks its way along the shore where the waves crash over the track, but the views across the Irish Sea to the distant Scottish hills are among the most sensational Europe.

By the time it reaches its destination, through stations with names such as St Bees, Foxfield and Maryport, you could have been up to London and back on the main line.

The Settle and Carlisle railway through the Pennines, over the ‘roof of England’, reprieved after an almighty decade-long fight with British Rail, may have only six through passenger trains a day, but people come from all over the world to ride across its greatest monument — the mighty Ribblehead Viaduct.

Not for nothing is it known as the Gotterdammerung of railway lines. There are intimate insights, too, that can be experienced only from a train.

Such as the tantalising glimpse of the final overs of a village cricket match, the whites of the players turned to gold in the last embers of the setting sun. What the result will be, we will never know, since the train has already passed by.

How often have we peered from a local train trundling over urban rooftops into back gardens and windows, catching momentary and mysterious flashes of other people’s lives? A couple share a brief embrace, a mother prepares tea for her children, freshly home from school.

The Britain perceived from the window of a slow train is quite different from the one seen from a Eurostar racing in a blur through the countryside at 180mph, or from a motorway, where the walls on the viaducts are built deliberately high to stop drivers becoming transfixed by the scenery.

Slow trains on local lines offer an unrivalled way to travel around Britain in a hurried age — and they have always been more than just a way of getting from A to B.

As the historian David St John Thomas observed, for at least two full generations in villages all over the land, all important comings and goings were on the local train.

‘The pair of rails disappearing over the horizon stood for progress, disaster, the major changes in life — the way one’s fiancé paid his first visit to one’s
parents, one’s children returned for deathbed leavetaking, the way summer visitors came.’

But the local railway has always provided more than transport, he points out. It was always part of the district it served, with its own natural history, legends and folklore, a staff who were at the heart of village affairs, its stations and adjoining pubs, places for exchange of gossip, news and advice.

Many things, of course, have changed for the worse since then. The ticket offices nowadays are often closed and shuttered, and the local goods sidings ripped up, replaced by juggernaut trucks that roar through the country lanes.

On the Isle of Wight I stayed in a monastery where one of the monks prays for the wellbeing of the local train service Platform staff in many areas are extinct. Modern trains bear garish corporate liveries designed by focus groups, which clash hideously with the gentle pastels of the landscape.

The fares system is mostly impenetrable to passengers, confused by bureaucratic jargon and time restrictions, and deliberately designed to penalise those who simply want to buy a ticket and walk on.

Some of the trains deployed on rural branches, such as the ‘Pacers’, built in the Eighties from parts of old Leyland buses, are fit only to run in the Third World. (Which, indeed, some of them do, since the only other country apart from Britain that operates Pacer trains is Iran.)

There are interminable announcements about ‘station stops’ (what’s wrong with good old ‘stations’) and ‘keeping your luggage with you at all times’, as well as dire warnings about having the wrong ticket.

And beware the ‘jobsworths’. I was evicted from the platform of the historic station in the genteel Lancashire resort of Grange-over-Sands for taking a photograph of the view over Morecambe Bay — on the grounds that ‘I could be a terrorist’.

And yet the friendliness and sense of community that mostly infuses local branch lines all over Britain is hardly changed from those halcyon days. In the thousands of miles I travelled, writing my book The Slow Train, I met innumerable people passionate about their local railway.

In the waiting room at Appleby station in Westmoreland, I shared a pot of tea with Anne Ridley the ‘stationmistress’ who looks after the passengers along with herd of cattle in the fields outside. The place was so spick and span that you could have eaten your tea off the floor, as Alan Bennett, the playwright, might have put it.

During a long lull between trains at Yeovil Pen Mill, Catherine Phillips, the local rail officer, offered to drive a couple to their destination in her own car rather than let them wait two hours after they had missed their train.
There was similar passion almost everywhere I went. At Stalybridge in Cheshire, I dined on home-cooked mushy peas with black pudding the size of a policeman’s truncheon in what is indisputably the finest platform buffet in England, so perfectly in period that no one would have blinked if L. S. Lowry had walked through the door.

On a train in the Yorkshire Dales I ate cakes from the trolley, lovingly baked by local farmers’ wives, and on the Isle of Wight I stayed in a monastery where one of the monks prays for the wellbeing of the local train service.

At Chester-le-Street, in Durham, the local stationmaster had rescued the station from closure and transformed the ticket office into one of the busiest in England by hiring staff who could explain the complexities of the fares system in simple language.

There is no longer any talk of shutting Dreamingham-on-the-Marsh or Sleepytown-in-the-Wold — indeed, there has been a steady stream of lines that have reopened since Beeching. Mansfield and Corby, once the biggest towns in Britain without a station, has got its trains back at last.
Only last month, the first turf was cut for the re-opening of the ‘Waverley line’ through the Scottish borders, once the route of the legendary Thames-Clyde Express, and one of the great scenic journeys of the world until Beeching choked it to death.
That’s not to say that Beeching was wrong about everything. He did a necessary job in trimming the bloated bottom line of an inefficient nationalised industry.

But how crazy was it to close the Great Central route from London to the north, the newest and best engineered line in Britain, that could have been a key freight route today? Or exterminating almost every branch line in Devon and Cornwall, leading to the trafficchoked roads we have now.

Even though we hear a lot about high-speed rail lines expanding all over the world, the pleasures and delights of relaxed rail travel on secondary lines have never been more appreciated.

In almost every way, the slow train journey is more pleasurable than a fast one. Think of Edward Thomas’s poem Adlestrop, in which his express train stopped
‘unwontedly’ one June afternoon at an Oxfordshire country station.

What he saw and heard was nothing special: the hiss of steam, an empty platform, a man clearing his throat. Yet suddenly a blackbird sang, summoning up for Thomas a profound sense of the timelessness of the English countryside.

Or perhaps the most evocative slow train journey of all, Philip Larkin’s Whitsun Weddings, written on the afternoon train from Hull:

‘Not till about / One-twenty on the sunlit Saturday / Did my threequarters- empty train pull out / All windows down, all cushions hot, all sense / Of being in a hurry gone.’

Both poets were foreshadowing the now-fashionable concept of ‘slow’; there is even a ‘Manifesto For Slow Travel’, which declares that it is ‘about eceleration rather than speed.

The journey becomes a moment to relax, rather than a stressful interlude imposed between home and destination. Slow travel re-engineers time, transforming it into a commodity of abundance rather than scarcity’.

Be honest. Would you be enticed by a list of Great Motorway Journeys, or Great Domestic Air Services? Michael Portillo has just presented a BBC TV series of great train journeys which has been so popular that a new one has been commissioned.

Thanks to the genius of Brunel and Stephenson and the other great Victorian engineers, slowtrain passengers get a close-up and intimate view of our green and pleasant land that motorists cannot see, nor ever will be likely to.

What better idea, then, as warmer days begin to emerge from this bleakest of winters, to get into the heart of Britain on its country railways?

The buds are bursting in the hedgerows, the fields are filling with newborn lambs. The coltsfoot, the classic wild flower of railway embankments, is already unfolding its sun-like petals. Climb aboard.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1263193/Britains-railways-seen-slow-train-shows-magical-world-barely-changed-golden-age-rail.html#ixzz0kPU2CUDZ

National Railway Museum gives Sam Pointon the honorary title of Director Of Fun

York Press: 7th April 2010

flag_jpg_display.jpg

THIS seven-year-old boy is determined to ensure the National Railway Museum in York keeps the fun factor.


Sam Pointon made headlines last year after he applied for the position of museum director when Andrew Scott retired, and was subsequently given the honorary title of Director Of Fun.

Sam returned to the museum yesterday to inspect the range of Easter activities on offer this year.

On his return, he met new director Steve Davies and tried out some of the activities, including riding on board the footplate of the class N7 locomotive and watching the NRM’s new Energy show and a theatre performance by Platform 4 actors in the Great Hall.

He said: “The best thing about Easter is the steam train.

“I loved being next to the driver when it was moving.”

But wasn’t all play for the fun chief. Sam helped staff give out free Thomas The Tank Engine badges and was advising the museum on making his next visit even better, as well as taking suggestions from the public through his page on the NRM’s website www.nrm.org.uk/getinvolved/directoroffun.

Sam said: “Next time I come, I hope that it’s sunny and there are lots of fun things to do outside. It would be fun to have a sand pit and I would like to go on another steam train.”

When applying for the museum director’s job, Sam said he would be perfect for the position as he had been on lots of trains and owned an electric train track, on which he could control two trains at once.

New director Mr Davies thinks he has potential.

He said: “My passion began at his age too, so who knows where his career might go.”

April 4, 2010

Blocking RMT strike solves nothing

The Guardian: 2 April 2010 Gregor Gall

Making trade unions jump through hoops with their balloting only leads to more bitter and drawn-out disputes


The striking down of the RMT union's proposed action against Network Rail next week continues a very worrying trend in industrial relations in Britain. Given the injunction against Unite in the British Airways dispute last December and many other recent examples, it seems the right to hold effective strikes no longer exists.

In Britain there is an ability to strike, subject to the requirements of onerous laws that date from the 1980s Conservative governments and that have been kept in place by New Labour. This is based on properly conducted ballots in trade disputes providing unions with "immunity in tort" – that is, unions cannot be sued by an employer for loss of business incurred as a result of a strike.

If this was not so, no union would hold a strike as they could be bankrupted by employers suing. This "legal privilege" goes all the way back to the Taff Vale judgment of 1901 and the Trades Disputes Act 1906.

But that does not make the ability to strike an effective one. Far from it. In the last five years, of the last 36 injunctions applied for (and nearly all granted) all but seven have concerned public transport (bus, rail, air), the prison service or the Royal Mail, where strikes have an immediate impact on an employer's operations and revenue.

The law as it currently stands obliges a union to furnish the employer with a huge array of detail about the members being balloted and the members going on strike so that the employer has the time and ability to prepare to counter the impact of the strike. That is the completely unbalanced nature of the law.

Interestingly, no employer is compelled to go through so many hoops when they take their form of industrial action against workers such as closing factories or making mass redundancies.

Equally noteworthy is the fact that there is no legal obligation on the employer to help provide the union with up-to-date data about where workers are working. In the case of the RMT, with thousands of signal boxes (defined as individual workplaces) and workers compelled to move between these when the employer wants, it is always going to be nigh on impossible to approach 100% accuracy.

What this all means is there is a huge incentive for employers to seek injunctions to stop effective strikes and pretty much ignore ineffective or less effective strikes. Indeed, this was highlighted by Network Rail itself. It targeted the signal workers' ballot and not the maintenance workers' ballot because the latter would not have created any immediate disruption.

To put it in a nutshell, if you are a strong union, you'll targeted and if you're not, you'll probably be left alone. The sum of this is to keep all unions down under the thumb.

Even if you're not a union member who believes that workers should have the right and ability to act collectively to defend their interests, many others – including those from the legal profession – have come to the conclusion that the effective right to take effective strike is an inalienable human right.

But if all that fails to stir your conscience and your sense of fairness, just consider the fact that injunctions do not end industrial disputes.

Whether in the case of the RMT or BA, they are lengthened, they fester and they become more embittered because the union will immediately move to re-ballot its members. Therefore, resolving the disputes become even more difficult. For the public, the pain is delayed not done away with.

In this situation, the government, mainstream political parties and the employers shout from the rooftops that the unions should come back to the negotiating table and all these disagreements can be dealt with amicably, sensibly and productively.

This is pie-in-the-sky nonsense. It is the very fact that negotiations have not been amicable or sensible or productive that explains why strikes have been called. No union wants to call a strike, because members lose pay, but they feel they have no other option in order to get their voice heard.

The irony is that if there was an effective positive legal right to take effective strike action, this would be the best way to expedite negotiations and produce fair and balanced settlements. This is because employers would know that they have to engage in genuine give-and-take because they cannot run off to the courts to gain injunctions to stop strikes.

It's up to the unions and fair-minded voters to put this as high up the political agenda in the forthcoming election as possible. This is the best way attain the industrial peace that so many members of the public are after.

Undermining the right to strike

The Guardian Letters: 3 April 2010

The media treatment of RMT and Bob Crow over the last 48 hours over the Network Rail strike ballot has been the worst example of a concerted campaign of media bias against a trade union that we have seen since the 1980s miners' strike.

John Humphrys's interview of Bob Crow, with his references to ballot-rigging, and the BBC's subsequent headline of "RMT's Bob Crow denies ballot rigging", was that disgusting classic of the old hack lawyer's tactic of asking the defendant: "When did you stop beating your wife?"

Even the Guardian's editorial (2 March) ignorantly weighed in with "No union that conducts its ballots properly according to the reasonable requirements of the law … would be in danger of being injuncted." This reference to "reasonable requirements of the law" is patent rubbish. To hold a ballot the union must construct and supply the employer with a detailed and complex matrix of information setting out which members it is balloting, their job titles, grades, departments and work locations. The employer is under no obligation to co-operate with the union to ensure this is accurate. If there is the slightest inaccuracy, even where it did not affect the result, the ballot is open to being challenged by the employer and quashed by the courts.

There can be no question of the union ballot-rigging or interfering in the balloting process because it is undertaken by an independent scrutineer, usually the Electoral Reform Society, and all ballot papers are sent by post to the homes of the members being balloted, and returned to the ERS for counting. The union at no time handles the ballot papers.

On at least four occasions in the last three years I have tried in parliament on behalf of RMT and other TUC-affiliated unions to amend employment law to require employers to co-operate with unions in the balloting process so these problems can be overcome. Employers' organisations, the Conservatives and the government have all opposed this reform.

The result is not fewer strikes but a deteriorating industrial relations climate as people become increasingly angry that their democratic wishes are frustrated by one-sided anti-trade-union laws.

John McDonnell MP

Lab, Hayes and Harlington


• The injunction granted against the RMT after the application by Network Rail continues a worrying trend. Of the 36 applications for injunctions in the past five years – of which the vast majority were granted – all but seven concerned strikes in transport, prisons or Royal Mail. This is because strikes in these organisations have an immediate impact on the employer's operations. So, it can be concluded, there is now very little right to hold an effective strike in Britain.

Unions must do their utmost to put the positive right to strike as high up the election agenda as possible.

Professor Gregor Gall

University of Hertfordshire

April 2, 2010

A message from Bob Crow

RMT: April 1, 2010

NETWORK RAIL INDUSTRIAL ACTION CALLED OFF FOR BOTH SIGNALLING STAFF AND ENGINEERING MEMBERS

As you are no doubt aware Network Rail, instead of negotiating with the union, decided to seek an injunction to stop next week's industrial action by signalling and other operations staff going ahead. I am sorry to say the High Court today granted that injunction.

The matter has been considered by an emergency meeting of your full Council of Executives and they have made the following decision:-

"That we note the Court injunction granted against us today in regard to the signal workers action due to start on 6th April 2010.

We instruct the General Secretary to inform our members and Network Rail that the action is called off.

In regard to the infrastructure ballot and the action due to take place on 6th April 2010, as a result of today's injunction we note that this ballot may also be unsafe in legal terms. The General Secretary is, therefore, instructed to call off all industrial action and inform our members and Network Rail.

This Council of Executives is of the view that this is a highly political judgement based on a further development of over two decades of vicious anti-trade union laws in the U.K.

We are concerned that Network Rail may have provided the High Court with false information today in their efforts to convince the Court of their case

RMT has acted on the latest legal advice and acts to protect its members, their jobs and terms and conditions.

Accordingly, the General Secretary is instructed to re-ballot all of our Operations and Infrastructure members as soon as practically possible. The General Grades Committee is to be reconvened on 7th April 2010 to lay down a timetable on this re-ballot and also to receive the full legal judgement from today's Court decision.

The General Secretary is to ensure that our members are advised of this decision. We are still in dispute and are determined to fight on in defence of jobs, terms and conditions and for a safe railway.

The General Secretary is to inform Network Rail that we remain available to negotiate a settlement to both disputes; all union member and officers to be informed."

I will write to you again shortly.

Yours sincerely,

Bob Crow
General Secretary

Rail strike called off as judge rules union ballot was flawed

The Guardian: Dan Milmo, transport correspondent. 1 April 2010

Judge-blocks-National-Rai-001.jpg
Bob Crow (centre), general secretary of the RMT union, outside the high court in London after a judge granted an injunction preventing a crippling national strike Photograph: Anthony Devlin/PA

Millions of commuters have been spared the chaos of a national rail strike next week, and Gordon Brown has avoided further political embarrassment, after the high court blocked a walkout.

Network Rail argued that a signallers' ballot was riddled with irregularities and should be ruled unlawful. Mrs Justice Sharp granted an injunction against the Rail Maritime and Transport union today, stopping a crippling four-day strike by 5,800 staff starting next Tuesday – the day the prime minister could call the general election.

The RMT said the court decision was "an attack on the whole trade union movement", coming three months after British Airways secured an injunction against a 12-day cabin crew walkout by exploiting the same legal loopholes. Bob Crow, general secretary of the RMT, said: "This judgment … twists the anti-union laws even further in favour of the bosses."

The RMT will try to restage the ballot but Network Rail said that would take months. Robin Gisby, Network Rail's head of operations, said there would be a normal service next week. A strike planned by maintenance workers to coincide with the signallers' walkout has been called off.

"Train services next week will run as normal," said Gisby. "This is good news for the millions of passengers who rely on us every day."

The Transport Salaried Staffs' Association, which was also due to strike next week, cancelled its walkout and said it would hold a new ballot.

Network Rail believes it can withstand a maintenance strike but had warned that industrial action by signal workers would see just one out of five trains running next week, with services in and out of London, where the majority of trains operate, badly affected. Around three and a half million passengers a day would have been hit, with motorists' organisations warning that the first national walkout in 16 years would have caused widespread gridlock.

The government-backed company added that it was considering a legal challenge against the maintenance strike after warning the RMT that the ballot also contained serious discrepancies.

Today's ruling confirms the potency of a loophole in the 1992 Trade Union Act that, until a few years ago, had not been widely used but has now become a favoured tool. The act requires unions to give companies accurate voting information, including the number of employees who voted and details of their respective departments.

BA's cabin crew union was defeated in the high court last December after it emerged that it had polled hundreds of flight attendants who had taken voluntary redundancy. The injunction was granted even though the irregularities made no dent in a sizeable majority vote in favour of strike action.

However, the RMT vote was much closer, and Network Rail argued that 112 of 4,556 signallers balloted could have changed the result. The company presented a string of irregularities including 11 "phantom" signal boxes that should not have featured in the poll. Over the past two years dozens of businesses have threatened or secured injunctions using the same loophole, according to industrial relations experts.

The transport secretary, Lord Adonis, urged both sides to resume negotiations. "This will be a huge relief to all those who are planning on travelling on the railways next week. It is now vital that the two sides in this dispute get back round the table as soon as possible to negotiate a settlement and I call on them to do so," he said.

Before it brought the injunction, Network Rail believed it was close to solving the signallers' dispute over changes to working practices, including a promise to subject changes to work rosters to local consultation. The RMT claims the changes, along with the axing of 1,500 maintenance posts, threaten safety.

Passenger Focus, the rail user watchdog, said the ruling had come too late for passengers who had cancelled or rearranged trips on the strike dates. "Three and a half million passengers have been living in limbo and now at least know where they stand after days of uncertainty."

Theresa Villiers, the shadow transport secretary, said the Conservatives deserved credit for the court decision, which was based on legislation passed by John Major's government.